Principal Financial Group Competitors

Principal Financial Group (NYSE:PFG) and MetLife (NYSE:MET) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation and risk.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

68.6% of Principal Financial Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 74.9% of MetLife shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.5% of Principal Financial Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of MetLife shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Dividends

Principal Financial Group pays an annual dividend of $2.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.8%. MetLife pays an annual dividend of $1.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.0%. MetLife pays out 30.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Principal Financial Group has increased its dividend for 8 consecutive years and MetLife has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Principal Financial Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Profitability

This table compares Principal Financial Group and MetLife's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Principal Financial Group and MetLife's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

MetLife has higher revenue and earnings than Principal Financial Group.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Principal Financial Group and MetLife, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Principal Financial Group currently has a consensus price target of $44.6667, suggesting a potential upside of 15.93%. MetLife has a consensus price target of $41.1667, suggesting a potential upside of 11.41%. Given Principal Financial Group's higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Principal Financial Group is more favorable than MetLife.

Summary

MetLife beats Principal Financial Group on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Principal Financial Group (NYSE:PFG) and Prudential Financial (NYSE:PRU) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

Dividends

Principal Financial Group pays an annual dividend of $2.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.8%. Prudential Financial pays an annual dividend of $4.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.1%. Prudential Financial pays out 37.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Principal Financial Group has raised its dividend for 8 consecutive years and Prudential Financial has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

68.6% of Principal Financial Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 57.1% of Prudential Financial shares are held by institutional investors. 1.5% of Principal Financial Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Prudential Financial shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and price targets for Principal Financial Group and Prudential Financial, as reported by MarketBeat.

Principal Financial Group currently has a consensus price target of $44.6667, suggesting a potential upside of 15.93%. Prudential Financial has a consensus price target of $75.10, suggesting a potential upside of 20.47%. Given Prudential Financial's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Prudential Financial is more favorable than Principal Financial Group.

Profitability

This table compares Principal Financial Group and Prudential Financial's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Principal Financial Group and Prudential Financial's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Prudential Financial has higher revenue and earnings than Principal Financial Group.

Summary

Principal Financial Group beats Prudential Financial on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Aflac (NYSE:AFL) and Principal Financial Group (NYSE:PFG) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, risk and analyst recommendations.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for Aflac and Principal Financial Group, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Aflac currently has a consensus target price of $44.1429, suggesting a potential upside of 28.62%. Principal Financial Group has a consensus target price of $44.6667, suggesting a potential upside of 15.93%. Given Aflac's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Aflac is more favorable than Principal Financial Group.

Dividends

Aflac pays an annual dividend of $1.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. Principal Financial Group pays an annual dividend of $2.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.8%. Aflac pays out 25.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Principal Financial Group has increased its dividend for 8 consecutive years. Principal Financial Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

66.4% of Aflac shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 68.6% of Principal Financial Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.4% of Aflac shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Principal Financial Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Aflac and Principal Financial Group's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Aflac has higher revenue and earnings than Principal Financial Group.

Profitability

This table compares Aflac and Principal Financial Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Aflac beats Principal Financial Group on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Principal Financial Group (NYSE:PFG) and Lincoln National (NYSE:LNC) are both finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation and risk.

Profitability

This table compares Principal Financial Group and Lincoln National's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

68.6% of Principal Financial Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.3% of Lincoln National shares are held by institutional investors. 1.5% of Principal Financial Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Lincoln National shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Dividends

Principal Financial Group pays an annual dividend of $2.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.8%. Lincoln National pays an annual dividend of $1.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.9%. Lincoln National pays out 18.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Principal Financial Group has increased its dividend for 8 consecutive years and Lincoln National has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Principal Financial Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Principal Financial Group and Lincoln National's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Lincoln National has higher revenue and earnings than Principal Financial Group.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for Principal Financial Group and Lincoln National, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Principal Financial Group presently has a consensus target price of $44.6667, indicating a potential upside of 15.93%. Lincoln National has a consensus target price of $38.3750, indicating a potential upside of 17.07%. Given Lincoln National's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Lincoln National is more favorable than Principal Financial Group.

Summary

Lincoln National beats Principal Financial Group on 7 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Primerica (NYSE:PRI) and Principal Financial Group (NYSE:PFG) are both finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

89.7% of Primerica shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 68.6% of Principal Financial Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.9% of Primerica shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Principal Financial Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Primerica and Principal Financial Group's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Primerica has higher revenue and earnings than Principal Financial Group.

Profitability

This table compares Primerica and Principal Financial Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for Primerica and Principal Financial Group, as provided by MarketBeat.

Primerica presently has a consensus target price of $148.6667, suggesting a potential upside of 35.86%. Principal Financial Group has a consensus target price of $44.6667, suggesting a potential upside of 15.93%. Given Primerica's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Primerica is more favorable than Principal Financial Group.

Dividends

Primerica pays an annual dividend of $1.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Principal Financial Group pays an annual dividend of $2.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.8%. Primerica pays out 19.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Primerica has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Principal Financial Group has raised its dividend for 8 consecutive years. Principal Financial Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Primerica beats Principal Financial Group on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Unum Group (NYSE:UNM) and Principal Financial Group (NYSE:PFG) are both finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, valuation and earnings.

Dividends

Unum Group pays an annual dividend of $1.14 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.9%. Principal Financial Group pays an annual dividend of $2.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.8%. Unum Group pays out 21.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Principal Financial Group has increased its dividend for 8 consecutive years.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Unum Group and Principal Financial Group's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Unum Group has higher revenue and earnings than Principal Financial Group.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

90.7% of Unum Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 68.6% of Principal Financial Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Unum Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Principal Financial Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Unum Group and Principal Financial Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for Unum Group and Principal Financial Group, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Unum Group presently has a consensus target price of $25.00, suggesting a potential upside of 51.79%. Principal Financial Group has a consensus target price of $44.6667, suggesting a potential upside of 15.93%. Given Unum Group's higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Unum Group is more favorable than Principal Financial Group.

Summary

Unum Group beats Principal Financial Group on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.