Go Pro

MetLife (MET) Competitors

MetLife logo
$93.58 +1.38 (+1.50%)
Closing price 07/16/2026 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$93.94 +0.35 (+0.38%)
As of 05:24 AM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

MET vs. PFG, AFL, AIZ, AMP, and CNO

Should you buy MetLife stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares MetLife with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with MetLife include Principal Financial Group (PFG), Aflac (AFL), Assurant (AIZ), Ameriprise Financial (AMP), and CNO Financial Group (CNO). These companies are all part of the "finance" sector.

How does MetLife compare to Principal Financial Group?

Principal Financial Group (NASDAQ:PFG) and MetLife (NYSE:MET) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, profitability, risk and analyst recommendations.

Principal Financial Group has a beta of 0.88, indicating that its share price is 12% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, MetLife has a beta of 0.78, indicating that its share price is 22% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, MetLife had 8 more articles in the media than Principal Financial Group. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for MetLife and 12 mentions for Principal Financial Group. Principal Financial Group's average media sentiment score of 1.20 beat MetLife's score of 0.54 indicating that Principal Financial Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Principal Financial Group
5 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
MetLife
5 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
10 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

75.1% of Principal Financial Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.0% of MetLife shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of Principal Financial Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of MetLife shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

MetLife has higher revenue and earnings than Principal Financial Group. Principal Financial Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MetLife, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Principal Financial Group$15.63B1.56$1.19B$6.9916.18
MetLife$77.08B0.78$3.38B$5.1618.14

Principal Financial Group pays an annual dividend of $3.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. MetLife pays an annual dividend of $2.37 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Principal Financial Group pays out 46.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. MetLife pays out 45.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Principal Financial Group has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years and MetLife has increased its dividend for 12 consecutive years.

Principal Financial Group has a net margin of 10.10% compared to MetLife's net margin of 4.66%. MetLife's return on equity of 22.60% beat Principal Financial Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Principal Financial Group10.10% 16.25% 0.57%
MetLife 4.66%22.60%0.88%

Principal Financial Group presently has a consensus target price of $104.83, indicating a potential downside of 7.33%. MetLife has a consensus target price of $98.57, indicating a potential upside of 5.33%. Given MetLife's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe MetLife is more favorable than Principal Financial Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Principal Financial Group
3 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
MetLife
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.93

Summary

MetLife beats Principal Financial Group on 13 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does MetLife compare to Aflac?

MetLife (NYSE:MET) and Aflac (NYSE:AFL) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends and risk.

MetLife presently has a consensus price target of $98.57, indicating a potential upside of 5.33%. Aflac has a consensus price target of $114.50, indicating a potential downside of 6.83%. Given MetLife's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe MetLife is more favorable than Aflac.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
MetLife
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.93
Aflac
2 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.23

Aflac has a net margin of 25.60% compared to MetLife's net margin of 4.66%. MetLife's return on equity of 22.60% beat Aflac's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
MetLife4.66% 22.60% 0.88%
Aflac 25.60%13.88%3.34%

MetLife pays an annual dividend of $2.37 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Aflac pays an annual dividend of $2.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. MetLife pays out 45.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Aflac pays out 27.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. MetLife has increased its dividend for 12 consecutive years and Aflac has increased its dividend for 44 consecutive years.

Aflac has lower revenue, but higher earnings than MetLife. Aflac is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MetLife, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
MetLife$77.08B0.78$3.38B$5.1618.14
Aflac$17.16B3.64$3.65B$8.8113.95

95.0% of MetLife shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 67.4% of Aflac shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of MetLife shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Aflac shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, MetLife had 2 more articles in the media than Aflac. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for MetLife and 18 mentions for Aflac. Aflac's average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat MetLife's score of 0.54 indicating that Aflac is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
MetLife
5 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
10 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Aflac
9 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

MetLife has a beta of 0.78, meaning that its share price is 22% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Aflac has a beta of 0.61, meaning that its share price is 39% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

MetLife beats Aflac on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does MetLife compare to Assurant?

MetLife (NYSE:MET) and Assurant (NYSE:AIZ) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability and dividends.

In the previous week, MetLife had 16 more articles in the media than Assurant. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for MetLife and 4 mentions for Assurant. Assurant's average media sentiment score of 1.10 beat MetLife's score of 0.54 indicating that Assurant is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
MetLife
5 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
10 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Assurant
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

MetLife has a beta of 0.78, suggesting that its share price is 22% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Assurant has a beta of 0.55, suggesting that its share price is 45% less volatile than the broader market.

95.0% of MetLife shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.7% of Assurant shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of MetLife shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Assurant shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

MetLife has higher revenue and earnings than Assurant. Assurant is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MetLife, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
MetLife$77.08B0.78$3.38B$5.1618.14
Assurant$12.81B1.06$872.70M$19.5514.06

Assurant has a net margin of 7.60% compared to MetLife's net margin of 4.66%. MetLife's return on equity of 22.60% beat Assurant's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
MetLife4.66% 22.60% 0.88%
Assurant 7.60%20.32%3.26%

MetLife currently has a consensus price target of $98.57, suggesting a potential upside of 5.33%. Assurant has a consensus price target of $291.43, suggesting a potential upside of 5.99%. Given Assurant's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Assurant is more favorable than MetLife.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
MetLife
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.93
Assurant
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.90

MetLife pays an annual dividend of $2.37 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Assurant pays an annual dividend of $3.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. MetLife pays out 45.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Assurant pays out 18.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. MetLife has increased its dividend for 12 consecutive years and Assurant has increased its dividend for 21 consecutive years.

Summary

MetLife beats Assurant on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does MetLife compare to Ameriprise Financial?

Ameriprise Financial (NYSE:AMP) and MetLife (NYSE:MET) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and risk.

In the previous week, Ameriprise Financial and Ameriprise Financial both had 20 articles in the media. Ameriprise Financial's average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat MetLife's score of 0.54 indicating that Ameriprise Financial is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Ameriprise Financial
10 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
MetLife
5 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
10 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

84.0% of Ameriprise Financial shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.0% of MetLife shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Ameriprise Financial shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of MetLife shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Ameriprise Financial has a net margin of 20.57% compared to MetLife's net margin of 4.66%. Ameriprise Financial's return on equity of 62.88% beat MetLife's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ameriprise Financial20.57% 62.88% 2.12%
MetLife 4.66%22.60%0.88%

Ameriprise Financial presently has a consensus price target of $553.67, indicating a potential upside of 4.10%. MetLife has a consensus price target of $98.57, indicating a potential upside of 5.33%. Given MetLife's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe MetLife is more favorable than Ameriprise Financial.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Ameriprise Financial
1 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.36
MetLife
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.93

Ameriprise Financial has higher earnings, but lower revenue than MetLife. Ameriprise Financial is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MetLife, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ameriprise Financial$18.48B2.59$3.56B$40.2113.23
MetLife$77.08B0.78$3.38B$5.1618.14

Ameriprise Financial pays an annual dividend of $6.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. MetLife pays an annual dividend of $2.37 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Ameriprise Financial pays out 16.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. MetLife pays out 45.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Ameriprise Financial has raised its dividend for 21 consecutive years and MetLife has raised its dividend for 12 consecutive years.

Ameriprise Financial has a beta of 1.16, indicating that its stock price is 16% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, MetLife has a beta of 0.78, indicating that its stock price is 22% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Ameriprise Financial beats MetLife on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does MetLife compare to CNO Financial Group?

CNO Financial Group (NYSE:CNO) and MetLife (NYSE:MET) are both finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings and dividends.

CNO Financial Group has a net margin of 5.44% compared to MetLife's net margin of 4.66%. MetLife's return on equity of 22.60% beat CNO Financial Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CNO Financial Group5.44% 17.65% 1.18%
MetLife 4.66%22.60%0.88%

CNO Financial Group presently has a consensus target price of $51.50, indicating a potential downside of 3.70%. MetLife has a consensus target price of $98.57, indicating a potential upside of 5.33%. Given MetLife's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe MetLife is more favorable than CNO Financial Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
CNO Financial Group
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40
MetLife
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.93

In the previous week, MetLife had 5 more articles in the media than CNO Financial Group. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for MetLife and 15 mentions for CNO Financial Group. MetLife's average media sentiment score of 0.54 beat CNO Financial Group's score of 0.16 indicating that MetLife is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
CNO Financial Group
4 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
MetLife
5 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
10 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

CNO Financial Group pays an annual dividend of $0.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. MetLife pays an annual dividend of $2.37 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. CNO Financial Group pays out 28.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. MetLife pays out 45.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. CNO Financial Group has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years and MetLife has raised its dividend for 12 consecutive years. MetLife is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

CNO Financial Group has a beta of 0.81, meaning that its stock price is 19% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, MetLife has a beta of 0.78, meaning that its stock price is 22% less volatile than the broader market.

95.4% of CNO Financial Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.0% of MetLife shares are held by institutional investors. 3.4% of CNO Financial Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of MetLife shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

MetLife has higher revenue and earnings than CNO Financial Group. MetLife is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CNO Financial Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CNO Financial Group$4.49B1.11$229.30M$2.4921.48
MetLife$77.08B0.78$3.38B$5.1618.14

Summary

MetLife beats CNO Financial Group on 12 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get MetLife News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for MET and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding MET and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

MET vs. The Competition

MetricMetLifeINS IndustryFinance SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$59.32B$22.02B$14.42B$23.43B
Dividend Yield2.57%3.26%5.68%4.19%
P/E Ratio18.1411.5720.7731.08
Price / Sales0.781.8244.3319.91
Price / Cash11.9013.1319.4433.10
Price / Book2.152.742.284.78
Net Income$3.38B$1.89B$1.14B$1.07B
7 Day Performance2.09%-0.30%0.77%0.53%
1 Month Performance8.87%5.40%2.51%2.19%
1 Year Performance20.94%5.83%14.01%17.07%

MetLife Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
MET
MetLife
4.8892 of 5 stars
$93.58
+1.5%
$98.57
+5.3%
+22.2%$59.32B$77.08B18.1446,000
PFG
Principal Financial Group
4.1882 of 5 stars
$113.61
+1.2%
$105.82
-6.9%
+41.7%$24.24B$15.63B13.1711,600
AFL
Aflac
4.2139 of 5 stars
$123.26
+1.1%
$114.50
-7.1%
+21.1%$62.05B$17.16B13.9912,716
AIZ
Assurant
4.6899 of 5 stars
$279.99
+0.4%
$291.43
+4.1%
+48.0%$13.82B$12.81B14.3214,800
AMP
Ameriprise Financial
4.9403 of 5 stars
$519.11
+2.4%
$553.67
+6.7%
+1.3%$45.56B$18.48B12.9113,600

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:MET) was last updated on 7/17/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners