Prudential Financial Competitors

MetLife (NYSE:MET) and Prudential Financial (NYSE:PRU) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, risk, dividends and earnings.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

74.9% of MetLife shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 57.1% of Prudential Financial shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of MetLife shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Prudential Financial shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk and Volatility

MetLife has a beta of 1.28, meaning that its stock price is 28% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Prudential Financial has a beta of 1.69, meaning that its stock price is 69% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares MetLife and Prudential Financial's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings for MetLife and Prudential Financial, as provided by MarketBeat.

MetLife presently has a consensus price target of $41.1667, suggesting a potential upside of 4.54%. Prudential Financial has a consensus price target of $75.10, suggesting a potential upside of 13.07%. Given Prudential Financial's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Prudential Financial is more favorable than MetLife.

Dividends

MetLife pays an annual dividend of $1.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.7%. Prudential Financial pays an annual dividend of $4.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.6%. MetLife pays out 30.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Prudential Financial pays out 37.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. MetLife has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Prudential Financial has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares MetLife and Prudential Financial's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

MetLife has higher revenue and earnings than Prudential Financial. Prudential Financial is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MetLife, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

MetLife beats Prudential Financial on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Prudential Financial (NYSE:PRU) and AFLAC (NYSE:AFL) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, institutional ownership and valuation.

Profitability

This table compares Prudential Financial and AFLAC's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk & Volatility

Prudential Financial has a beta of 1.69, meaning that its share price is 69% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, AFLAC has a beta of 0.82, meaning that its share price is 18% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Prudential Financial and AFLAC's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Prudential Financial has higher revenue and earnings than AFLAC. Prudential Financial is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than AFLAC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

Prudential Financial pays an annual dividend of $4.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.6%. AFLAC pays an annual dividend of $1.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Prudential Financial pays out 37.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. AFLAC pays out 25.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Prudential Financial has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Prudential Financial is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

57.1% of Prudential Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 66.4% of AFLAC shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Prudential Financial shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of AFLAC shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Prudential Financial and AFLAC, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Prudential Financial currently has a consensus target price of $75.10, indicating a potential upside of 13.07%. AFLAC has a consensus target price of $44.1429, indicating a potential upside of 20.05%. Given AFLAC's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe AFLAC is more favorable than Prudential Financial.

Summary

AFLAC beats Prudential Financial on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Principal Financial Group (NYSE:PFG) and Prudential Financial (NYSE:PRU) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings and risk.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

68.6% of Principal Financial Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 57.1% of Prudential Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.5% of Principal Financial Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Prudential Financial shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Principal Financial Group and Prudential Financial's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Dividends

Principal Financial Group pays an annual dividend of $2.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.3%. Prudential Financial pays an annual dividend of $4.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.6%. Prudential Financial pays out 37.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Principal Financial Group has raised its dividend for 8 consecutive years and Prudential Financial has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings for Principal Financial Group and Prudential Financial, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Principal Financial Group presently has a consensus price target of $44.8333, indicating a potential upside of 6.77%. Prudential Financial has a consensus price target of $75.10, indicating a potential upside of 13.07%. Given Prudential Financial's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Prudential Financial is more favorable than Principal Financial Group.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Principal Financial Group and Prudential Financial's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Prudential Financial has higher revenue and earnings than Principal Financial Group.

Summary

Principal Financial Group beats Prudential Financial on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Prudential Financial (NYSE:PRU) and Lincoln National (NYSE:LNC) are both finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation and risk.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

57.1% of Prudential Financial shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.3% of Lincoln National shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Prudential Financial shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Lincoln National shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Prudential Financial and Lincoln National's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Dividends

Prudential Financial pays an annual dividend of $4.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.6%. Lincoln National pays an annual dividend of $1.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.5%. Prudential Financial pays out 37.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Lincoln National pays out 18.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Prudential Financial has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Lincoln National has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Risk & Volatility

Prudential Financial has a beta of 1.69, indicating that its stock price is 69% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Lincoln National has a beta of 2.21, indicating that its stock price is 121% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and target prices for Prudential Financial and Lincoln National, as provided by MarketBeat.

Prudential Financial currently has a consensus target price of $75.10, indicating a potential upside of 13.07%. Lincoln National has a consensus target price of $38.3750, indicating a potential upside of 7.22%. Given Prudential Financial's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Prudential Financial is more favorable than Lincoln National.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Prudential Financial and Lincoln National's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Prudential Financial has higher revenue and earnings than Lincoln National. Lincoln National is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Prudential Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Lincoln National beats Prudential Financial on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Prudential Financial (NYSE:PRU) and Primerica (NYSE:PRI) are both finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation and risk.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and target prices for Prudential Financial and Primerica, as provided by MarketBeat.

Prudential Financial currently has a consensus target price of $75.10, indicating a potential upside of 13.07%. Primerica has a consensus target price of $148.6667, indicating a potential upside of 26.06%. Given Primerica's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Primerica is more favorable than Prudential Financial.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Prudential Financial and Primerica's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Prudential Financial has higher revenue and earnings than Primerica. Prudential Financial is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Primerica, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Prudential Financial and Primerica's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk & Volatility

Prudential Financial has a beta of 1.69, indicating that its stock price is 69% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Primerica has a beta of 1.39, indicating that its stock price is 39% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

57.1% of Prudential Financial shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.7% of Primerica shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Prudential Financial shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Primerica shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Dividends

Prudential Financial pays an annual dividend of $4.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.6%. Primerica pays an annual dividend of $1.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Prudential Financial pays out 37.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Primerica pays out 19.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Prudential Financial has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Primerica has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Summary

Primerica beats Prudential Financial on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Unum Group (NYSE:UNM) and Prudential Financial (NYSE:PRU) are both finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership and risk.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and price targets for Unum Group and Prudential Financial, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Unum Group currently has a consensus target price of $25.00, indicating a potential upside of 29.94%. Prudential Financial has a consensus target price of $75.10, indicating a potential upside of 13.07%. Given Unum Group's higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Unum Group is more favorable than Prudential Financial.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Unum Group and Prudential Financial's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Prudential Financial has higher revenue and earnings than Unum Group. Unum Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Prudential Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Unum Group and Prudential Financial's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk and Volatility

Unum Group has a beta of 1.73, meaning that its share price is 73% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Prudential Financial has a beta of 1.69, meaning that its share price is 69% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

90.7% of Unum Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 57.1% of Prudential Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Unum Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Prudential Financial shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Dividends

Unum Group pays an annual dividend of $1.14 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.9%. Prudential Financial pays an annual dividend of $4.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.6%. Unum Group pays out 21.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Prudential Financial pays out 37.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Prudential Financial has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Prudential Financial is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Unum Group beats Prudential Financial on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.