Lincoln National Competitors

Lincoln National (NYSE:LNC) and MetLife (NYSE:MET) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, risk, dividends, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

76.7% of Lincoln National shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 74.4% of MetLife shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.5% of Lincoln National shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of MetLife shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Dividends

Lincoln National pays an annual dividend of $1.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. MetLife pays an annual dividend of $1.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Lincoln National pays out 19.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. MetLife pays out 30.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Lincoln National has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and MetLife has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years. MetLife is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Risk & Volatility

Lincoln National has a beta of 2.26, meaning that its stock price is 126% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, MetLife has a beta of 1.35, meaning that its stock price is 35% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Lincoln National and MetLife's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Lincoln National and MetLife's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

MetLife has higher revenue and earnings than Lincoln National. Lincoln National is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MetLife, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings for Lincoln National and MetLife, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Lincoln National currently has a consensus target price of $58.3846, suggesting a potential downside of 11.90%. MetLife has a consensus target price of $60.2308, suggesting a potential downside of 8.18%. Given MetLife's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe MetLife is more favorable than Lincoln National.

Summary

MetLife beats Lincoln National on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Lincoln National (NYSE:LNC) and Prudential Financial (NYSE:PRU) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, valuation and institutional ownership.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Lincoln National and Prudential Financial's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Prudential Financial has higher revenue and earnings than Lincoln National. Lincoln National is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Prudential Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

76.7% of Lincoln National shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 54.5% of Prudential Financial shares are held by institutional investors. 1.5% of Lincoln National shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Prudential Financial shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Lincoln National and Prudential Financial's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk & Volatility

Lincoln National has a beta of 2.26, meaning that its share price is 126% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Prudential Financial has a beta of 1.72, meaning that its share price is 72% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations for Lincoln National and Prudential Financial, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Lincoln National currently has a consensus price target of $58.3846, suggesting a potential downside of 11.90%. Prudential Financial has a consensus price target of $91.3846, suggesting a potential downside of 12.34%. Given Lincoln National's higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Lincoln National is more favorable than Prudential Financial.

Dividends

Lincoln National pays an annual dividend of $1.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Prudential Financial pays an annual dividend of $4.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.4%. Lincoln National pays out 19.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Prudential Financial pays out 39.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Lincoln National has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Prudential Financial has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Summary

Lincoln National beats Prudential Financial on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Aflac (NYSE:AFL) and Lincoln National (NYSE:LNC) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, profitability and earnings.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for Aflac and Lincoln National, as provided by MarketBeat.

Aflac presently has a consensus target price of $50.4545, suggesting a potential downside of 8.80%. Lincoln National has a consensus target price of $58.3846, suggesting a potential downside of 11.90%. Given Aflac's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Aflac is more favorable than Lincoln National.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

66.0% of Aflac shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.7% of Lincoln National shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.4% of Aflac shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Lincoln National shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility and Risk

Aflac has a beta of 0.97, suggesting that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Lincoln National has a beta of 2.26, suggesting that its stock price is 126% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

Aflac pays an annual dividend of $1.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Lincoln National pays an annual dividend of $1.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Aflac pays out 29.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Lincoln National pays out 19.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Aflac has raised its dividend for 39 consecutive years and Lincoln National has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Lincoln National is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Profitability

This table compares Aflac and Lincoln National's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Aflac and Lincoln National's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Aflac has higher revenue and earnings than Lincoln National. Lincoln National is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Aflac, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Lincoln National beats Aflac on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Primerica (NYSE:PRI) and Lincoln National (NYSE:LNC) are both finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, dividends, valuation and analyst recommendations.

Dividends

Primerica pays an annual dividend of $1.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Lincoln National pays an annual dividend of $1.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Primerica pays out 22.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Lincoln National pays out 19.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Primerica has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Lincoln National has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Lincoln National is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for Primerica and Lincoln National, as reported by MarketBeat.

Primerica presently has a consensus price target of $164.1667, indicating a potential downside of 0.30%. Lincoln National has a consensus price target of $58.3846, indicating a potential downside of 11.90%. Given Primerica's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Primerica is more favorable than Lincoln National.

Volatility & Risk

Primerica has a beta of 1.44, meaning that its share price is 44% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Lincoln National has a beta of 2.26, meaning that its share price is 126% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Primerica and Lincoln National's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Primerica and Lincoln National's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Lincoln National has higher revenue and earnings than Primerica. Lincoln National is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Primerica, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

89.0% of Primerica shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.7% of Lincoln National shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.9% of Primerica shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Lincoln National shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Primerica beats Lincoln National on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Unum Group (NYSE:UNM) and Lincoln National (NYSE:LNC) are both finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, profitability, valuation, dividends and institutional ownership.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and target prices for Unum Group and Lincoln National, as provided by MarketBeat.

Unum Group presently has a consensus price target of $25.75, indicating a potential downside of 12.74%. Lincoln National has a consensus price target of $58.3846, indicating a potential downside of 11.90%. Given Lincoln National's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Lincoln National is more favorable than Unum Group.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Unum Group and Lincoln National's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Unum Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Lincoln National. Unum Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lincoln National, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Unum Group and Lincoln National's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility and Risk

Unum Group has a beta of 1.78, meaning that its share price is 78% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Lincoln National has a beta of 2.26, meaning that its share price is 126% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

85.0% of Unum Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.7% of Lincoln National shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Unum Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Lincoln National shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Dividends

Unum Group pays an annual dividend of $1.14 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. Lincoln National pays an annual dividend of $1.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Unum Group pays out 21.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Lincoln National pays out 19.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Unum Group has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Lincoln National has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Summary

Lincoln National beats Unum Group on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Lincoln National (NYSE:LNC) and CNO Financial Group (NYSE:CNO) are both finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, valuation, earnings, risk and analyst recommendations.

Profitability

This table compares Lincoln National and CNO Financial Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility & Risk

Lincoln National has a beta of 2.26, indicating that its share price is 126% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, CNO Financial Group has a beta of 1.41, indicating that its share price is 41% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

76.7% of Lincoln National shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.1% of CNO Financial Group shares are held by institutional investors. 1.5% of Lincoln National shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of CNO Financial Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Lincoln National and CNO Financial Group's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Lincoln National has higher revenue and earnings than CNO Financial Group. Lincoln National is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CNO Financial Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for Lincoln National and CNO Financial Group, as provided by MarketBeat.

Lincoln National currently has a consensus price target of $58.3846, suggesting a potential downside of 11.90%. CNO Financial Group has a consensus price target of $25.20, suggesting a potential downside of 3.67%. Given CNO Financial Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe CNO Financial Group is more favorable than Lincoln National.

Dividends

Lincoln National pays an annual dividend of $1.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. CNO Financial Group pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Lincoln National pays out 19.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CNO Financial Group pays out 26.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Lincoln National has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and CNO Financial Group has raised its dividend for 6 consecutive years. Lincoln National is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

CNO Financial Group beats Lincoln National on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.