Manulife Financial (MFC) Competitors

Manulife Financial has a net margin of 9.99% compared to Principal Financial Group's net margin of 9.93%. Manulife Financial's return on equity of 16.68% beat Principal Financial Group's return on equity.

Manulife Financial pays an annual dividend of $1.38 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. Principal Financial Group pays an annual dividend of $3.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Manulife Financial pays out 51.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Principal Financial Group pays out 47.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Manulife Financial has raised its dividend for 12 consecutive years and Principal Financial Group has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Manulife Financial is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Manulife Financial had 3 more articles in the media than Principal Financial Group. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Manulife Financial and 3 mentions for Principal Financial Group. Principal Financial Group's average media sentiment score of 1.23 beat Manulife Financial's score of 0.60 indicating that Principal Financial Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

52.6% of Manulife Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 75.1% of Principal Financial Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of Manulife Financial shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Principal Financial Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Manulife Financial currently has a consensus target price of $59.00, suggesting a potential upside of 35.25%. Principal Financial Group has a consensus target price of $108.83, suggesting a potential downside of 4.47%. Given Manulife Financial's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Manulife Financial is more favorable than Principal Financial Group.

Manulife Financial has a beta of 0.83, meaning that its share price is 17% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Principal Financial Group has a beta of 0.86, meaning that its share price is 14% less volatile than the broader market.

Manulife Financial has higher revenue and earnings than Principal Financial Group. Principal Financial Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Manulife Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Manulife Financial pays an annual dividend of $1.38 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. Brookfield pays an annual dividend of $0.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Manulife Financial pays out 51.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Brookfield pays out 50.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Manulife Financial has increased its dividend for 12 consecutive years and Brookfield has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Manulife Financial is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Manulife Financial presently has a consensus target price of $59.00, suggesting a potential upside of 35.25%. Brookfield has a consensus target price of $57.40, suggesting a potential upside of 54.83%. Given Brookfield's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Brookfield is more favorable than Manulife Financial.

Manulife Financial has a beta of 0.83, suggesting that its share price is 17% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Brookfield has a beta of 1.53, suggesting that its share price is 53% more volatile than the broader market.

Manulife Financial has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Brookfield. Manulife Financial is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Brookfield, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Manulife Financial has a net margin of 9.99% compared to Brookfield's net margin of 1.85%. Manulife Financial's return on equity of 16.68% beat Brookfield's return on equity.

In the previous week, Brookfield had 8 more articles in the media than Manulife Financial. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Brookfield and 6 mentions for Manulife Financial. Brookfield's average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat Manulife Financial's score of 0.60 indicating that Brookfield is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

52.6% of Manulife Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 61.6% of Brookfield shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of Manulife Financial shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 11.0% of Brookfield shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Manulife Financial has a beta of 0.83, suggesting that its stock price is 17% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, MetLife has a beta of 0.77, suggesting that its stock price is 23% less volatile than the broader market.

52.6% of Manulife Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.0% of MetLife shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of Manulife Financial shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of MetLife shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Manulife Financial has higher earnings, but lower revenue than MetLife. Manulife Financial is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MetLife, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Manulife Financial presently has a consensus price target of $59.00, indicating a potential upside of 35.25%. MetLife has a consensus price target of $104.31, indicating a potential upside of 7.42%. Given Manulife Financial's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Manulife Financial is more favorable than MetLife.

Manulife Financial has a net margin of 9.99% compared to MetLife's net margin of 4.57%. MetLife's return on equity of 23.39% beat Manulife Financial's return on equity.

In the previous week, MetLife had 13 more articles in the media than Manulife Financial. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for MetLife and 6 mentions for Manulife Financial. Manulife Financial's average media sentiment score of 0.60 beat MetLife's score of 0.40 indicating that Manulife Financial is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Manulife Financial pays an annual dividend of $1.38 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. MetLife pays an annual dividend of $2.37 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Manulife Financial pays out 51.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. MetLife pays out 45.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Manulife Financial has raised its dividend for 12 consecutive years and MetLife has raised its dividend for 12 consecutive years.

Primerica has a beta of 0.86, indicating that its share price is 14% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Manulife Financial has a beta of 0.83, indicating that its share price is 17% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Manulife Financial had 4 more articles in the media than Primerica. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Manulife Financial and 2 mentions for Primerica. Primerica's average media sentiment score of 1.03 beat Manulife Financial's score of 0.60 indicating that Primerica is being referred to more favorably in the media.

90.9% of Primerica shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 52.6% of Manulife Financial shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Primerica shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Manulife Financial shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Primerica pays an annual dividend of $4.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Manulife Financial pays an annual dividend of $1.38 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. Primerica pays out 19.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Manulife Financial pays out 51.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Primerica has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Manulife Financial has increased its dividend for 12 consecutive years. Manulife Financial is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Primerica presently has a consensus target price of $315.17, indicating a potential upside of 14.68%. Manulife Financial has a consensus target price of $59.00, indicating a potential upside of 35.25%. Given Manulife Financial's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Manulife Financial is more favorable than Primerica.

Primerica has a net margin of 23.20% compared to Manulife Financial's net margin of 9.99%. Primerica's return on equity of 32.45% beat Manulife Financial's return on equity.

Manulife Financial has higher revenue and earnings than Primerica. Primerica is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Manulife Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.