Free Trial

Reinsurance Group of America (RGA) Competitors

Reinsurance Group of America logo
$207.68 -2.50 (-1.19%)
Closing price 05/13/2026 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$208.18 +0.50 (+0.24%)
As of 06:14 AM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

RGA vs. BHF, AIG, CNO, L, and MET

Should you buy Reinsurance Group of America stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Reinsurance Group of America with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Reinsurance Group of America include Brighthouse Financial (BHF), American International Group (AIG), CNO Financial Group (CNO), Loews (L), and MetLife (MET). These companies are all part of the "finance" sector.

How does Reinsurance Group of America compare to Brighthouse Financial?

Brighthouse Financial (NASDAQ:BHF) and Reinsurance Group of America (NYSE:RGA) are both finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

In the previous week, Reinsurance Group of America had 16 more articles in the media than Brighthouse Financial. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Reinsurance Group of America and 3 mentions for Brighthouse Financial. Reinsurance Group of America's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Brighthouse Financial's score of -0.11 indicating that Reinsurance Group of America is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Brighthouse Financial
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Reinsurance Group of America
2 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
11 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

81.2% of Brighthouse Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.1% of Reinsurance Group of America shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.6% of Brighthouse Financial shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Reinsurance Group of America shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Reinsurance Group of America has higher revenue and earnings than Brighthouse Financial. Brighthouse Financial is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Reinsurance Group of America, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Brighthouse Financial$5.53B0.64$433M-$2.98N/A
Reinsurance Group of America$23.70B0.57$1.18B$18.4611.25

Reinsurance Group of America has a net margin of 4.92% compared to Brighthouse Financial's net margin of -1.10%. Brighthouse Financial's return on equity of 16.88% beat Reinsurance Group of America's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Brighthouse Financial-1.10% 16.88% 0.43%
Reinsurance Group of America 4.92%13.16%1.13%

Brighthouse Financial has a beta of 0.87, indicating that its stock price is 13% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Reinsurance Group of America has a beta of 0.5, indicating that its stock price is 50% less volatile than the broader market.

Brighthouse Financial currently has a consensus target price of $60.86, suggesting a potential downside of 0.71%. Reinsurance Group of America has a consensus target price of $249.00, suggesting a potential upside of 19.90%. Given Reinsurance Group of America's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Reinsurance Group of America is more favorable than Brighthouse Financial.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Brighthouse Financial
4 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.64
Reinsurance Group of America
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Summary

Reinsurance Group of America beats Brighthouse Financial on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Reinsurance Group of America compare to American International Group?

Reinsurance Group of America (NYSE:RGA) and American International Group (NYSE:AIG) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, valuation, earnings, risk and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Reinsurance Group of America had 8 more articles in the media than American International Group. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Reinsurance Group of America and 11 mentions for American International Group. American International Group's average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat Reinsurance Group of America's score of 0.67 indicating that American International Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Reinsurance Group of America
2 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
11 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
American International Group
6 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Reinsurance Group of America currently has a consensus target price of $249.00, suggesting a potential upside of 19.90%. American International Group has a consensus target price of $88.06, suggesting a potential upside of 16.24%. Given Reinsurance Group of America's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Reinsurance Group of America is more favorable than American International Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Reinsurance Group of America
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
American International Group
0 Sell rating(s)
12 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.45

American International Group has higher revenue and earnings than Reinsurance Group of America. Reinsurance Group of America is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than American International Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Reinsurance Group of America$23.70B0.57$1.18B$18.4611.25
American International Group$26.78B1.50$3.10B$5.6713.36

American International Group has a net margin of 11.86% compared to Reinsurance Group of America's net margin of 4.92%. Reinsurance Group of America's return on equity of 13.16% beat American International Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Reinsurance Group of America4.92% 13.16% 1.13%
American International Group 11.86%10.93%2.75%

Reinsurance Group of America has a beta of 0.5, meaning that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, American International Group has a beta of 0.53, meaning that its share price is 47% less volatile than the broader market.

95.1% of Reinsurance Group of America shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.6% of American International Group shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Reinsurance Group of America shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of American International Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Reinsurance Group of America pays an annual dividend of $3.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. American International Group pays an annual dividend of $1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Reinsurance Group of America pays out 20.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. American International Group pays out 31.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Reinsurance Group of America has increased its dividend for 16 consecutive years and American International Group has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

Summary

American International Group beats Reinsurance Group of America on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Reinsurance Group of America compare to CNO Financial Group?

CNO Financial Group (NYSE:CNO) and Reinsurance Group of America (NYSE:RGA) are both finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations and dividends.

In the previous week, Reinsurance Group of America had 17 more articles in the media than CNO Financial Group. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Reinsurance Group of America and 2 mentions for CNO Financial Group. CNO Financial Group's average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat Reinsurance Group of America's score of 0.67 indicating that CNO Financial Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
CNO Financial Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Reinsurance Group of America
2 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
11 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Reinsurance Group of America has higher revenue and earnings than CNO Financial Group. Reinsurance Group of America is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CNO Financial Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CNO Financial Group$4.49B0.96$229.30M$2.4918.50
Reinsurance Group of America$23.70B0.57$1.18B$18.4611.25

CNO Financial Group pays an annual dividend of $0.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Reinsurance Group of America pays an annual dividend of $3.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. CNO Financial Group pays out 27.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Reinsurance Group of America pays out 20.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. CNO Financial Group has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Reinsurance Group of America has increased its dividend for 16 consecutive years. Reinsurance Group of America is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

CNO Financial Group presently has a consensus target price of $47.50, suggesting a potential upside of 3.10%. Reinsurance Group of America has a consensus target price of $249.00, suggesting a potential upside of 19.90%. Given Reinsurance Group of America's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Reinsurance Group of America is more favorable than CNO Financial Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
CNO Financial Group
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40
Reinsurance Group of America
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

95.4% of CNO Financial Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.1% of Reinsurance Group of America shares are held by institutional investors. 3.4% of CNO Financial Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Reinsurance Group of America shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

CNO Financial Group has a beta of 0.82, indicating that its stock price is 18% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Reinsurance Group of America has a beta of 0.5, indicating that its stock price is 50% less volatile than the broader market.

CNO Financial Group has a net margin of 5.44% compared to Reinsurance Group of America's net margin of 4.92%. CNO Financial Group's return on equity of 17.65% beat Reinsurance Group of America's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CNO Financial Group5.44% 17.65% 1.18%
Reinsurance Group of America 4.92%13.16%1.13%

Summary

Reinsurance Group of America beats CNO Financial Group on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Reinsurance Group of America compare to Loews?

Loews (NYSE:L) and Reinsurance Group of America (NYSE:RGA) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, valuation, earnings, media sentiment, institutional ownership and profitability.

Loews has a net margin of 8.83% compared to Reinsurance Group of America's net margin of 4.92%. Reinsurance Group of America's return on equity of 13.16% beat Loews' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Loews8.83% 8.51% 1.91%
Reinsurance Group of America 4.92%13.16%1.13%

In the previous week, Reinsurance Group of America had 6 more articles in the media than Loews. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Reinsurance Group of America and 13 mentions for Loews. Loews' average media sentiment score of 0.73 beat Reinsurance Group of America's score of 0.67 indicating that Loews is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Loews
5 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Reinsurance Group of America
2 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
11 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Reinsurance Group of America has a consensus price target of $249.00, indicating a potential upside of 19.90%. Given Reinsurance Group of America's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Reinsurance Group of America is more favorable than Loews.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Loews
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
4.00
Reinsurance Group of America
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Loews has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Reinsurance Group of America. Reinsurance Group of America is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Loews, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Loews$18.45B1.16$1.67B$7.8713.22
Reinsurance Group of America$23.70B0.57$1.18B$18.4611.25

Loews pays an annual dividend of $0.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Reinsurance Group of America pays an annual dividend of $3.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Loews pays out 3.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Reinsurance Group of America pays out 20.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Reinsurance Group of America has increased its dividend for 16 consecutive years. Reinsurance Group of America is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

58.3% of Loews shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.1% of Reinsurance Group of America shares are held by institutional investors. 19.0% of Loews shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Reinsurance Group of America shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Loews has a beta of 0.56, indicating that its share price is 44% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Reinsurance Group of America has a beta of 0.5, indicating that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Loews beats Reinsurance Group of America on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Reinsurance Group of America compare to MetLife?

MetLife (NYSE:MET) and Reinsurance Group of America (NYSE:RGA) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, risk and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, MetLife had 11 more articles in the media than Reinsurance Group of America. MarketBeat recorded 30 mentions for MetLife and 19 mentions for Reinsurance Group of America. Reinsurance Group of America's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat MetLife's score of 0.40 indicating that Reinsurance Group of America is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
MetLife
10 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
13 Neutral mention(s)
5 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Reinsurance Group of America
2 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
11 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

MetLife has a beta of 0.78, indicating that its stock price is 22% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Reinsurance Group of America has a beta of 0.5, indicating that its stock price is 50% less volatile than the broader market.

95.0% of MetLife shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.1% of Reinsurance Group of America shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of MetLife shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Reinsurance Group of America shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

MetLife currently has a consensus price target of $95.15, indicating a potential upside of 21.91%. Reinsurance Group of America has a consensus price target of $249.00, indicating a potential upside of 19.90%. Given MetLife's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe MetLife is more favorable than Reinsurance Group of America.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
MetLife
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.93
Reinsurance Group of America
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

MetLife has higher revenue and earnings than Reinsurance Group of America. Reinsurance Group of America is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MetLife, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
MetLife$77.08B0.65$3.38B$5.1615.13
Reinsurance Group of America$23.70B0.57$1.18B$18.4611.25

MetLife pays an annual dividend of $2.37 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Reinsurance Group of America pays an annual dividend of $3.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. MetLife pays out 45.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Reinsurance Group of America pays out 20.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. MetLife has increased its dividend for 12 consecutive years and Reinsurance Group of America has increased its dividend for 16 consecutive years.

Reinsurance Group of America has a net margin of 4.92% compared to MetLife's net margin of 4.66%. MetLife's return on equity of 22.60% beat Reinsurance Group of America's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
MetLife4.66% 22.60% 0.88%
Reinsurance Group of America 4.92%13.16%1.13%

Summary

MetLife beats Reinsurance Group of America on 12 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Reinsurance Group of America News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for RGA and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding RGA and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

RGA vs. The Competition

MetricReinsurance Group of AmericaINS IndustryFinance SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$13.77B$16.52B$13.49B$22.97B
Dividend Yield1.77%3.42%5.81%4.07%
P/E Ratio11.258.9923.1328.29
Price / Sales0.571.38180.3824.58
Price / Cash9.819.1720.5025.11
Price / Book1.021.292.144.73
Net Income$1.18B$1.06B$1.11B$1.07B
7 Day Performance-2.52%-1.45%-1.14%-1.11%
1 Month Performance0.99%-0.62%0.14%1.36%
1 Year Performance1.59%10.03%10.81%24.41%

Reinsurance Group of America Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
RGA
Reinsurance Group of America
4.8797 of 5 stars
$207.68
-1.2%
$249.00
+19.9%
+0.5%$13.77B$23.70B11.254,300
BHF
Brighthouse Financial
0.9725 of 5 stars
$62.69
+0.1%
$60.86
-2.9%
+2.5%$3.60B$6.77B10.811,400
AIG
American International Group
4.9353 of 5 stars
$77.61
-1.5%
$87.71
+13.0%
-9.6%$42.29B$26.78B13.6922,100
CNO
CNO Financial Group
3.2218 of 5 stars
$45.64
+2.3%
$46.50
+1.9%
+19.2%$4.18B$4.49B18.333,300
L
Loews
0.9278 of 5 stars
$104.91
-6.1%
N/A+17.4%$22.98B$18.45B13.1513,100

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:RGA) was last updated on 5/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners