Free Trial

Prudential Public (PUK) Competitors

Prudential Public logo
$30.25 +1.02 (+3.48%)
Closing price 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$30.24 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 04:10 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

PUK vs. CB, MRSH, MFC, SLF, and WTW

Should you be buying Prudential Public stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Prudential Public include Chubb (CB), Marsh (MRSH), Manulife Financial (MFC), Sun Life Financial (SLF), and Willis Towers Watson Public (WTW). These companies are all part of the "insurance" industry.

How does Prudential Public compare to Chubb?

Chubb (NYSE:CB) and Prudential Public (NYSE:PUK) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, risk and media sentiment.

Chubb pays an annual dividend of $3.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Prudential Public pays an annual dividend of $0.71 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Chubb pays out 13.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Chubb has increased its dividend for 31 consecutive years.

Chubb has a beta of 0.43, suggesting that its share price is 57% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Prudential Public has a beta of 0.74, suggesting that its share price is 26% less volatile than the S&P 500.

83.8% of Chubb shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.9% of Prudential Public shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Chubb shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Prudential Public shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Chubb has a net margin of 18.58% compared to Prudential Public's net margin of 0.00%. Chubb's return on equity of 14.30% beat Prudential Public's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Chubb18.58% 14.30% 4.13%
Prudential Public N/A N/A N/A

Chubb presently has a consensus price target of $349.33, suggesting a potential upside of 8.29%. Given Chubb's higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Chubb is more favorable than Prudential Public.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Chubb
1 Sell rating(s)
11 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Prudential Public
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57

In the previous week, Chubb had 20 more articles in the media than Prudential Public. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for Chubb and 2 mentions for Prudential Public. Prudential Public's average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat Chubb's score of 1.07 indicating that Prudential Public is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Chubb
18 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Prudential Public
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Chubb has higher revenue and earnings than Prudential Public.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Chubb$61.21B2.04$10.31B$28.3211.39
Prudential Public$27.39B1.40$3.98BN/AN/A

Summary

Chubb beats Prudential Public on 13 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Prudential Public compare to Marsh?

Marsh (NYSE:MRSH) and Prudential Public (NYSE:PUK) are both large-cap insurance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, earnings, dividends and media sentiment.

Marsh has a beta of 0.65, suggesting that its share price is 35% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Prudential Public has a beta of 0.74, suggesting that its share price is 26% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Marsh pays an annual dividend of $3.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Prudential Public pays an annual dividend of $0.71 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Marsh pays out 45.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Marsh has increased its dividend for 15 consecutive years.

Marsh has a net margin of 14.26% compared to Prudential Public's net margin of 0.00%. Marsh's return on equity of 31.87% beat Prudential Public's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Marsh14.26% 31.87% 8.35%
Prudential Public N/A N/A N/A

88.0% of Marsh shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.9% of Prudential Public shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Marsh shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Prudential Public shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Marsh had 33 more articles in the media than Prudential Public. MarketBeat recorded 35 mentions for Marsh and 2 mentions for Prudential Public. Prudential Public's average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat Marsh's score of 0.90 indicating that Prudential Public is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Marsh
17 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
7 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Prudential Public
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Marsh has higher revenue and earnings than Prudential Public.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Marsh$27.52B2.93$4.16B$8.0020.91
Prudential Public$27.39B1.40$3.98BN/AN/A

Marsh presently has a consensus price target of $205.33, suggesting a potential upside of 22.73%. Given Marsh's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Marsh is more favorable than Prudential Public.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Marsh
1 Sell rating(s)
10 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.35
Prudential Public
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57

Summary

Marsh beats Prudential Public on 13 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Prudential Public compare to Manulife Financial?

Prudential Public (NYSE:PUK) and Manulife Financial (NYSE:MFC) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings and media sentiment.

Manulife Financial has a net margin of 9.18% compared to Prudential Public's net margin of 0.00%. Manulife Financial's return on equity of 16.43% beat Prudential Public's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Prudential PublicN/A N/A N/A
Manulife Financial 9.18%16.43%0.75%

In the previous week, Manulife Financial had 10 more articles in the media than Prudential Public. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Manulife Financial and 2 mentions for Prudential Public. Prudential Public's average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat Manulife Financial's score of 1.00 indicating that Prudential Public is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Prudential Public
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Manulife Financial
7 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Manulife Financial has higher revenue and earnings than Prudential Public.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Prudential Public$27.39B1.40$3.98BN/AN/A
Manulife Financial$53.01B1.24$4.14B$2.2217.71

1.9% of Prudential Public shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 52.6% of Manulife Financial shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Prudential Public shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Manulife Financial shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Manulife Financial has a consensus price target of $51.50, suggesting a potential upside of 31.01%. Given Manulife Financial's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Manulife Financial is more favorable than Prudential Public.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Prudential Public
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57
Manulife Financial
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.17

Prudential Public has a beta of 0.74, meaning that its share price is 26% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Manulife Financial has a beta of 0.87, meaning that its share price is 13% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Prudential Public pays an annual dividend of $0.71 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Manulife Financial pays an annual dividend of $1.42 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Manulife Financial pays out 64.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Manulife Financial has raised its dividend for 12 consecutive years. Manulife Financial is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Manulife Financial beats Prudential Public on 14 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Prudential Public compare to Sun Life Financial?

Sun Life Financial (NYSE:SLF) and Prudential Public (NYSE:PUK) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends and valuation.

Sun Life Financial has a net margin of 8.48% compared to Prudential Public's net margin of 0.00%. Sun Life Financial's return on equity of 17.76% beat Prudential Public's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Sun Life Financial8.48% 17.76% 1.11%
Prudential Public N/A N/A N/A

Sun Life Financial has a beta of 0.91, indicating that its stock price is 9% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Prudential Public has a beta of 0.74, indicating that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Sun Life Financial pays an annual dividend of $2.70 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. Prudential Public pays an annual dividend of $0.71 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Sun Life Financial pays out 61.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Sun Life Financial has raised its dividend for 11 consecutive years. Sun Life Financial is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Sun Life Financial currently has a consensus price target of $86.50, suggesting a potential upside of 18.12%. Given Sun Life Financial's higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Sun Life Financial is more favorable than Prudential Public.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Sun Life Financial
1 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.55
Prudential Public
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57

Prudential Public has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Sun Life Financial.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sun Life Financial$38.45B1.06$2.68B$4.4016.64
Prudential Public$27.39B1.40$3.98BN/AN/A

52.3% of Sun Life Financial shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.9% of Prudential Public shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Prudential Public shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Sun Life Financial had 7 more articles in the media than Prudential Public. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Sun Life Financial and 2 mentions for Prudential Public. Prudential Public's average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat Sun Life Financial's score of 0.85 indicating that Prudential Public is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Sun Life Financial
4 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Prudential Public
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Sun Life Financial beats Prudential Public on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Prudential Public compare to Willis Towers Watson Public?

Willis Towers Watson Public (NASDAQ:WTW) and Prudential Public (NYSE:PUK) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability and dividends.

Prudential Public has higher revenue and earnings than Willis Towers Watson Public.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Willis Towers Watson Public$9.71B2.52$1.61B$17.1515.13
Prudential Public$27.39B1.40$3.98BN/AN/A

In the previous week, Willis Towers Watson Public had 30 more articles in the media than Prudential Public. MarketBeat recorded 32 mentions for Willis Towers Watson Public and 2 mentions for Prudential Public. Prudential Public's average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat Willis Towers Watson Public's score of 0.34 indicating that Prudential Public is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Willis Towers Watson Public
7 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
7 Neutral mention(s)
10 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Prudential Public
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Willis Towers Watson Public pays an annual dividend of $3.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Prudential Public pays an annual dividend of $0.71 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Willis Towers Watson Public pays out 22.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Willis Towers Watson Public has increased its dividend for 8 consecutive years.

Willis Towers Watson Public has a net margin of 16.84% compared to Prudential Public's net margin of 0.00%. Willis Towers Watson Public's return on equity of 21.52% beat Prudential Public's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Willis Towers Watson Public16.84% 21.52% 6.00%
Prudential Public N/A N/A N/A

93.1% of Willis Towers Watson Public shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.9% of Prudential Public shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Willis Towers Watson Public shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Prudential Public shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Willis Towers Watson Public has a beta of 0.45, indicating that its stock price is 55% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Prudential Public has a beta of 0.74, indicating that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Willis Towers Watson Public currently has a consensus price target of $352.00, suggesting a potential upside of 35.66%. Given Willis Towers Watson Public's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Willis Towers Watson Public is more favorable than Prudential Public.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Willis Towers Watson Public
0 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.71
Prudential Public
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57

Summary

Willis Towers Watson Public beats Prudential Public on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Prudential Public News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PUK and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PUK and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PUK vs. The Competition

MetricPrudential PublicINS IndustryFinance SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$38.23B$20.84B$13.39B$22.95B
Dividend Yield2.37%2.97%5.77%4.03%
P/E RatioN/A11.4123.3328.58
Price / Sales1.401.59177.8123.58
Price / Cash14.6811.3519.7219.03
Price / Book1.802.542.214.68
Net Income$3.98B$1.86B$1.11B$1.07B
7 Day Performance-0.78%-0.84%0.03%0.89%
1 Month Performance4.12%5.64%4.65%6.56%
1 Year Performance38.78%1.32%13.61%31.66%

Prudential Public Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PUK
Prudential Public
3.4397 of 5 stars
$30.25
+3.5%
N/AN/A$38.23B$27.39BN/A15,338
CB
Chubb
4.7026 of 5 stars
$332.31
+2.4%
$349.33
+5.1%
N/A$129.77B$59.40B11.7445,000
MRSH
Marsh
4.8323 of 5 stars
$170.50
-7.8%
$205.33
+20.4%
N/A$81.95B$26.98B21.2695,000
MFC
Manulife Financial
4.9433 of 5 stars
$38.82
+0.6%
$51.50
+32.7%
N/A$64.92B$43.63B17.4937,000
SLF
Sun Life Financial
4.8152 of 5 stars
$71.34
+0.9%
$86.50
+21.3%
N/A$39.53B$29.99B16.2132,151

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:PUK) was last updated on 5/5/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners