Regions Financial Competitors

Regions Financial (NYSE:RF) and Truist Financial (NYSE:TFC) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, risk, institutional ownership and earnings.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Regions Financial and Truist Financial, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Regions Financial currently has a consensus price target of $15.5714, indicating a potential downside of 14.21%. Truist Financial has a consensus price target of $48.6429, indicating a potential downside of 5.79%. Given Truist Financial's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Truist Financial is more favorable than Regions Financial.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

71.7% of Regions Financial shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.1% of Truist Financial shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Regions Financial shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Truist Financial shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Risk and Volatility

Regions Financial has a beta of 1.58, meaning that its stock price is 58% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Truist Financial has a beta of 1.36, meaning that its stock price is 36% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

Regions Financial pays an annual dividend of $0.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Truist Financial pays an annual dividend of $1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.5%. Regions Financial pays out 40.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Truist Financial pays out 41.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Regions Financial has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Truist Financial has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Profitability

This table compares Regions Financial and Truist Financial's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Regions Financial and Truist Financial's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Truist Financial has higher revenue and earnings than Regions Financial. Regions Financial is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Truist Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Truist Financial beats Regions Financial on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Regions Financial (NYSE:RF) and The PNC Financial Services Group (NYSE:PNC) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, risk, institutional ownership and earnings.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Regions Financial and The PNC Financial Services Group, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Regions Financial currently has a consensus price target of $15.5714, indicating a potential downside of 14.21%. The PNC Financial Services Group has a consensus price target of $147.4118, indicating a potential downside of 5.66%. Given The PNC Financial Services Group's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe The PNC Financial Services Group is more favorable than Regions Financial.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

71.7% of Regions Financial shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.6% of The PNC Financial Services Group shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Regions Financial shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of The PNC Financial Services Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Risk and Volatility

Regions Financial has a beta of 1.58, meaning that its stock price is 58% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, The PNC Financial Services Group has a beta of 1.38, meaning that its stock price is 38% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

Regions Financial pays an annual dividend of $0.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. The PNC Financial Services Group pays an annual dividend of $4.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Regions Financial pays out 40.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. The PNC Financial Services Group pays out 40.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Regions Financial has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and The PNC Financial Services Group has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Regions Financial is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Profitability

This table compares Regions Financial and The PNC Financial Services Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Regions Financial and The PNC Financial Services Group's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

The PNC Financial Services Group has higher revenue and earnings than Regions Financial. Regions Financial is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than The PNC Financial Services Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

The PNC Financial Services Group beats Regions Financial on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Regions Financial (NYSE:RF) and First Republic Bank (NYSE:FRC) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, risk, institutional ownership and earnings.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Regions Financial and First Republic Bank, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Regions Financial currently has a consensus price target of $15.5714, indicating a potential downside of 14.21%. First Republic Bank has a consensus price target of $133.9333, indicating a potential downside of 13.92%. Given First Republic Bank's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe First Republic Bank is more favorable than Regions Financial.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

71.7% of Regions Financial shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.5% of First Republic Bank shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Regions Financial shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Risk and Volatility

Regions Financial has a beta of 1.58, meaning that its stock price is 58% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, First Republic Bank has a beta of 1.06, meaning that its stock price is 6% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

Regions Financial pays an annual dividend of $0.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. First Republic Bank pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Regions Financial pays out 40.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. First Republic Bank pays out 13.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Regions Financial has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and First Republic Bank has raised its dividend for 6 consecutive years.

Profitability

This table compares Regions Financial and First Republic Bank's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Regions Financial and First Republic Bank's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Regions Financial has higher revenue and earnings than First Republic Bank. Regions Financial is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than First Republic Bank, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

First Republic Bank beats Regions Financial on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Regions Financial (NYSE:RF) and SVB Financial Group (NASDAQ:SIVB) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, risk, institutional ownership and earnings.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Regions Financial and SVB Financial Group, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Regions Financial currently has a consensus price target of $15.5714, indicating a potential downside of 14.21%. SVB Financial Group has a consensus price target of $338.20, indicating a potential downside of 26.91%. Given Regions Financial's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Regions Financial is more favorable than SVB Financial Group.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

71.7% of Regions Financial shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.4% of SVB Financial Group shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Regions Financial shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of SVB Financial Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk & Volatility

Regions Financial has a beta of 1.58, meaning that its stock price is 58% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, SVB Financial Group has a beta of 2.14, meaning that its stock price is 114% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Regions Financial and SVB Financial Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Regions Financial and SVB Financial Group's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Regions Financial has higher revenue and earnings than SVB Financial Group. Regions Financial is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than SVB Financial Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

SVB Financial Group beats Regions Financial on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Regions Financial (NYSE:RF) and Fifth Third Bancorp (NASDAQ:FITB) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, risk, institutional ownership and earnings.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Regions Financial and Fifth Third Bancorp, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Regions Financial currently has a consensus price target of $15.5714, indicating a potential downside of 14.21%. Fifth Third Bancorp has a consensus price target of $26.5469, indicating a potential downside of 15.27%. Given Regions Financial's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Regions Financial is more favorable than Fifth Third Bancorp.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

71.7% of Regions Financial shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.2% of Fifth Third Bancorp shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Regions Financial shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Fifth Third Bancorp shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Risk and Volatility

Regions Financial has a beta of 1.58, meaning that its stock price is 58% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Fifth Third Bancorp has a beta of 1.63, meaning that its stock price is 63% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

Regions Financial pays an annual dividend of $0.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Fifth Third Bancorp pays an annual dividend of $1.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Regions Financial pays out 40.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Fifth Third Bancorp pays out 39.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Regions Financial has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Fifth Third Bancorp has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Fifth Third Bancorp is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Profitability

This table compares Regions Financial and Fifth Third Bancorp's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Regions Financial and Fifth Third Bancorp's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Fifth Third Bancorp has higher revenue and earnings than Regions Financial. Fifth Third Bancorp is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Regions Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Fifth Third Bancorp beats Regions Financial on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Regions Financial (NYSE:RF) and M&T Bank (NYSE:MTB) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, risk, institutional ownership and earnings.

Dividends

Regions Financial pays an annual dividend of $0.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. M&T Bank pays an annual dividend of $4.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. Regions Financial pays out 40.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. M&T Bank pays out 32.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Regions Financial has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Regions Financial is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Risk and Volatility

Regions Financial has a beta of 1.58, meaning that its stock price is 58% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, M&T Bank has a beta of 1.23, meaning that its stock price is 23% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Regions Financial and M&T Bank, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Regions Financial currently has a consensus price target of $15.5714, indicating a potential downside of 14.21%. M&T Bank has a consensus price target of $133.50, indicating a potential downside of 7.12%. Given M&T Bank's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe M&T Bank is more favorable than Regions Financial.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

71.7% of Regions Financial shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.7% of M&T Bank shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Regions Financial shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of M&T Bank shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Regions Financial and M&T Bank's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Regions Financial and M&T Bank's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

M&T Bank has higher revenue and earnings than Regions Financial. M&T Bank is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Regions Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

M&T Bank beats Regions Financial on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.