Go Pro

Global Water Resources (GWRS) Competitors

Global Water Resources logo
$9.13 -0.04 (-0.44%)
As of 04:00 PM Eastern

GWRS vs. WTRG, YORW, CWCO, ARTNA, and CDZI

Should you buy Global Water Resources stock or one of its competitors? Global Water Resources's main competitors and comparable companies include Essential Utilities (WTRG), York Water (YORW), Consolidated Water (CWCO), Artesian Resources (ARTNA), and Cadiz (CDZI). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "water utilities" industry.

How does Global Water Resources compare to Essential Utilities?

Global Water Resources (NASDAQ:GWRS) and Essential Utilities (NYSE:WTRG) are both utilities companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, media sentiment, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability and earnings.

Essential Utilities has a net margin of 21.60% compared to Global Water Resources' net margin of 5.22%. Essential Utilities' return on equity of 8.23% beat Global Water Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Global Water Resources5.22% 3.05% 0.54%
Essential Utilities 21.60%8.23%2.91%

Global Water Resources presently has a consensus target price of $15.00, suggesting a potential upside of 64.29%. Essential Utilities has a consensus target price of $43.00, suggesting a potential upside of 4.72%. Given Global Water Resources' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Global Water Resources is more favorable than Essential Utilities.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Global Water Resources
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50
Essential Utilities
1 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.56

Essential Utilities has higher revenue and earnings than Global Water Resources. Essential Utilities is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Global Water Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Global Water Resources$55.76M4.72$2.96M$0.1183.00
Essential Utilities$2.47B4.71$616.37M$1.9620.95

Global Water Resources has a beta of 0.91, suggesting that its share price is 9% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Essential Utilities has a beta of 0.64, suggesting that its share price is 36% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Essential Utilities had 19 more articles in the media than Global Water Resources. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for Essential Utilities and 4 mentions for Global Water Resources. Global Water Resources' average media sentiment score of 1.67 beat Essential Utilities' score of 1.24 indicating that Global Water Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Global Water Resources
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
Essential Utilities
15 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Global Water Resources pays an annual dividend of $0.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. Essential Utilities pays an annual dividend of $1.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.5%. Global Water Resources pays out 272.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Essential Utilities pays out 73.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Global Water Resources has raised its dividend for 8 consecutive years and Essential Utilities has raised its dividend for 32 consecutive years. Essential Utilities is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

27.9% of Global Water Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 74.8% of Essential Utilities shares are held by institutional investors. 53.7% of Global Water Resources shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Essential Utilities shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Essential Utilities beats Global Water Resources on 14 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Global Water Resources compare to York Water?

York Water (NASDAQ:YORW) and Global Water Resources (NASDAQ:GWRS) are both small-cap utilities companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk and valuation.

In the previous week, Global Water Resources had 2 more articles in the media than York Water. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Global Water Resources and 2 mentions for York Water. Global Water Resources' average media sentiment score of 1.67 beat York Water's score of 0.97 indicating that Global Water Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
York Water Positive
Global Water Resources Very Positive

York Water has a beta of 0.6, indicating that its share price is 40% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Global Water Resources has a beta of 0.91, indicating that its share price is 9% less volatile than the broader market.

York Water has higher revenue and earnings than Global Water Resources. York Water is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Global Water Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
York Water$77.49M7.15$20.06M$1.6121.19
Global Water Resources$55.76M4.72$2.96M$0.1183.00

York Water currently has a consensus price target of $31.00, indicating a potential downside of 9.14%. Global Water Resources has a consensus price target of $15.00, indicating a potential upside of 64.29%. Given Global Water Resources' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Global Water Resources is more favorable than York Water.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
York Water
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Global Water Resources
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50

York Water has a net margin of 28.53% compared to Global Water Resources' net margin of 5.22%. York Water's return on equity of 9.38% beat Global Water Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
York Water28.53% 9.38% 3.47%
Global Water Resources 5.22%3.05%0.54%

York Water pays an annual dividend of $0.91 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Global Water Resources pays an annual dividend of $0.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. York Water pays out 56.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Global Water Resources pays out 272.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. York Water has increased its dividend for 27 consecutive years and Global Water Resources has increased its dividend for 8 consecutive years.

49.9% of York Water shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 27.9% of Global Water Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of York Water shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 53.7% of Global Water Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

York Water beats Global Water Resources on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Global Water Resources compare to Consolidated Water?

Consolidated Water (NASDAQ:CWCO) and Global Water Resources (NASDAQ:GWRS) are both small-cap utilities companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends and media sentiment.

Consolidated Water has a net margin of 12.66% compared to Global Water Resources' net margin of 5.22%. Consolidated Water's return on equity of 7.23% beat Global Water Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Consolidated Water12.66% 7.23% 6.36%
Global Water Resources 5.22%3.05%0.54%

55.2% of Consolidated Water shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 27.9% of Global Water Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 5.8% of Consolidated Water shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 53.7% of Global Water Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Consolidated Water has higher revenue and earnings than Global Water Resources. Consolidated Water is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Global Water Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Consolidated Water$127.61M3.73$18.34M$0.8335.84
Global Water Resources$55.76M4.72$2.96M$0.1183.00

In the previous week, Consolidated Water had 9 more articles in the media than Global Water Resources. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Consolidated Water and 4 mentions for Global Water Resources. Global Water Resources' average media sentiment score of 1.67 beat Consolidated Water's score of -0.32 indicating that Global Water Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Consolidated Water
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Global Water Resources
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Global Water Resources has a consensus price target of $15.00, indicating a potential upside of 64.29%. Given Global Water Resources' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Global Water Resources is more favorable than Consolidated Water.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Consolidated Water
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50
Global Water Resources
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50

Consolidated Water pays an annual dividend of $0.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Global Water Resources pays an annual dividend of $0.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. Consolidated Water pays out 67.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Global Water Resources pays out 272.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Consolidated Water has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Global Water Resources has raised its dividend for 8 consecutive years. Global Water Resources is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Consolidated Water has a beta of 0.51, indicating that its share price is 49% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Global Water Resources has a beta of 0.91, indicating that its share price is 9% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Consolidated Water beats Global Water Resources on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Global Water Resources compare to Artesian Resources?

Global Water Resources (NASDAQ:GWRS) and Artesian Resources (NASDAQ:ARTNA) are both small-cap utilities companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, profitability, valuation, dividends and risk.

Artesian Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Global Water Resources. Artesian Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Global Water Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Global Water Resources$55.76M4.72$2.96M$0.1183.00
Artesian Resources$112.94M3.26$22.82M$2.2915.56

27.9% of Global Water Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 57.4% of Artesian Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 53.7% of Global Water Resources shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 20.6% of Artesian Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Artesian Resources has a net margin of 20.18% compared to Global Water Resources' net margin of 5.22%. Artesian Resources' return on equity of 9.37% beat Global Water Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Global Water Resources5.22% 3.05% 0.54%
Artesian Resources 20.18%9.37%2.75%

Global Water Resources pays an annual dividend of $0.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. Artesian Resources pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Global Water Resources pays out 272.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Artesian Resources pays out 55.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Global Water Resources has raised its dividend for 8 consecutive years and Artesian Resources has raised its dividend for 8 consecutive years. Artesian Resources is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Global Water Resources has a beta of 0.91, suggesting that its share price is 9% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Artesian Resources has a beta of 0.33, suggesting that its share price is 67% less volatile than the broader market.

Global Water Resources presently has a consensus target price of $15.00, indicating a potential upside of 64.29%. Given Global Water Resources' higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Global Water Resources is more favorable than Artesian Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Global Water Resources
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50
Artesian Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

In the previous week, Artesian Resources had 1 more articles in the media than Global Water Resources. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Artesian Resources and 4 mentions for Global Water Resources. Global Water Resources' average media sentiment score of 1.67 beat Artesian Resources' score of 1.24 indicating that Global Water Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Global Water Resources
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
Artesian Resources
1 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Artesian Resources beats Global Water Resources on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Global Water Resources compare to Cadiz?

Cadiz (NASDAQ:CDZI) and Global Water Resources (NASDAQ:GWRS) are both small-cap utilities companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, valuation, earnings and institutional ownership.

Cadiz presently has a consensus price target of $10.00, suggesting a potential upside of 150.63%. Global Water Resources has a consensus price target of $15.00, suggesting a potential upside of 64.29%. Given Cadiz's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Cadiz is more favorable than Global Water Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Cadiz
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Global Water Resources
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50

Global Water Resources has a net margin of 5.22% compared to Cadiz's net margin of -311.03%. Global Water Resources' return on equity of 3.05% beat Cadiz's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cadiz-311.03% -206.79% -26.80%
Global Water Resources 5.22%3.05%0.54%

In the previous week, Global Water Resources had 2 more articles in the media than Cadiz. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Global Water Resources and 2 mentions for Cadiz. Global Water Resources' average media sentiment score of 1.67 beat Cadiz's score of 0.47 indicating that Global Water Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Cadiz
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Global Water Resources
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Cadiz has a beta of 1.86, meaning that its share price is 86% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Global Water Resources has a beta of 0.91, meaning that its share price is 9% less volatile than the broader market.

Global Water Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Cadiz. Cadiz is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Global Water Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cadiz$16.31M20.72-$34.15M-$0.50N/A
Global Water Resources$55.76M4.72$2.96M$0.1183.00

79.8% of Cadiz shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 27.9% of Global Water Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.3% of Cadiz shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 53.7% of Global Water Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Global Water Resources beats Cadiz on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Global Water Resources News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for GWRS and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GWRS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

GWRS vs. The Competition

MetricGlobal Water ResourcesWater Utilities IndustryUtilities SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$262.94M$6.21B$15.69B$12.87B
Dividend Yield3.28%3.90%4.01%11.02%
P/E Ratio83.0123.1724.9425.34
Price / Sales4.7254.48308.42123.72
Price / Cash14.0214.7818.7453.57
Price / Book3.095.502.256.15
Net Income$2.96M$302.59M$701.43M$347.93M
7 Day Performance2.82%1.08%-0.07%-0.77%
1 Month Performance22.22%2.11%-2.09%3.80%
1 Year Performance-5.97%4.84%9.25%14.69%

Global Water Resources Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
GWRS
Global Water Resources
4.3054 of 5 stars
$9.13
-0.4%
$15.00
+64.3%
-5.1%$262.94M$55.76M83.0190
WTRG
Essential Utilities
4.65 of 5 stars
$40.91
+0.9%
$43.00
+5.1%
+1.7%$11.61B$2.47B20.873,303
YORW
York Water
2.3192 of 5 stars
$33.84
+0.4%
$31.00
-8.4%
+7.8%$549.22M$77.49M21.02110
CWCO
Consolidated Water
1.6093 of 5 stars
$29.99
-0.4%
N/A-9.8%$480.23M$127.61M36.13200
ARTNA
Artesian Resources
3.0153 of 5 stars
$35.48
+0.4%
N/A+6.4%$366.51M$112.94M15.49240

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:GWRS) was last updated on 8/28/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners