Does the media favor NNE or MNTK?

In the previous week, Nano Nuclear Energy had 2 more articles in the media than Montauk Renewables. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Nano Nuclear Energy and 4 mentions for Montauk Renewables. Nano Nuclear Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.01 beat Montauk Renewables' score of 0.34 indicating that Nano Nuclear Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Nano Nuclear Energy 3 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Montauk Renewables 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media favor SMC or MNTK?

In the previous week, Summit Midstream Partners had 2 more articles in the media than Montauk Renewables. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Summit Midstream Partners and 4 mentions for Montauk Renewables. Montauk Renewables' average media sentiment score of 0.34 beat Summit Midstream Partners' score of 0.18 indicating that Montauk Renewables is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Summit Midstream Partners 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Montauk Renewables 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has better earnings & valuation, MNTK or OPAL?

OPAL Fuels has higher revenue and earnings than Montauk Renewables. OPAL Fuels is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Montauk Renewables, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Montauk Renewables $176.38M 1.38 $1.75M $0.02 85.50 OPAL Fuels $348.98M 1.17 $14.75M $0.07 33.71

Does the media prefer MNTK or OPAL?

In the previous week, Montauk Renewables had 3 more articles in the media than OPAL Fuels. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Montauk Renewables and 1 mentions for OPAL Fuels. OPAL Fuels' average media sentiment score of 0.50 beat Montauk Renewables' score of 0.34 indicating that OPAL Fuels is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Montauk Renewables 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral OPAL Fuels 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts prefer PCYO or MNTK?

Montauk Renewables has a consensus target price of $1.80, indicating a potential upside of 5.26%. Given Montauk Renewables' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Montauk Renewables is more favorable than Pure Cycle. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Pure Cycle 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00 Montauk Renewables 1 Sell rating(s) 4 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.80

Do analysts rate MNTK or RGCO?

Montauk Renewables currently has a consensus target price of $1.80, indicating a potential upside of 5.26%. Given Montauk Renewables' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Montauk Renewables is more favorable than RGC Resources. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Montauk Renewables 1 Sell rating(s) 4 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.80 RGC Resources 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Does the media prefer MNTK or RGCO?

In the previous week, RGC Resources had 2 more articles in the media than Montauk Renewables. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for RGC Resources and 4 mentions for Montauk Renewables. Montauk Renewables' average media sentiment score of 0.34 beat RGC Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that Montauk Renewables is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Montauk Renewables 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral RGC Resources 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Live Earnings Conference Call: Montauk Renewables will host a live Q2 2026 earnings call on August 6, 2026 at 8:30AM ET. Get details.

Montauk Renewables (MNTK) Competitors

$1.71 +0.01 (+0.59%)

Closing price 08/5/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$1.70 -0.01 (-0.35%)

As of 04:01 AM Eastern

Compare

MNTK vs. NNE, SMC, OPAL, PCYO, and RGCO

Should you buy Montauk Renewables stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Montauk Renewables with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Montauk Renewables include Nano Nuclear Energy (NNE), Summit Midstream Partners (SMC), OPAL Fuels (OPAL), Pure Cycle (PCYO), and RGC Resources (RGCO).

How does Montauk Renewables compare to Nano Nuclear Energy?

Nano Nuclear Energy (NASDAQ:NNE) and Montauk Renewables (NASDAQ:MNTK) are related small-cap companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, media sentiment, valuation, risk and earnings.

Montauk Renewables has higher revenue and earnings than Nano Nuclear Energy. Nano Nuclear Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Montauk Renewables, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Nano Nuclear Energy	N/A	N/A	-$40.07M	-$0.69	N/A
Montauk Renewables	$176.38M	1.38	$1.75M	$0.02	85.50

Montauk Renewables has a net margin of 0.40% compared to Nano Nuclear Energy's net margin of 0.00%. Montauk Renewables' return on equity of 0.28% beat Nano Nuclear Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Nano Nuclear Energy	N/A	-7.62%	-7.51%
Montauk Renewables	0.40%	0.28%	0.17%

Nano Nuclear Energy currently has a consensus target price of $40.75, suggesting a potential upside of 127.91%. Montauk Renewables has a consensus target price of $1.80, suggesting a potential upside of 5.26%. Given Nano Nuclear Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Nano Nuclear Energy is more favorable than Montauk Renewables.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Nano Nuclear Energy	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.63
Montauk Renewables	1 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.80

Nano Nuclear Energy has a beta of 5.42, meaning that its stock price is 442% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Montauk Renewables has a beta of 0.57, meaning that its stock price is 43% less volatile than the broader market.

16.4% of Montauk Renewables shares are held by institutional investors. 18.6% of Nano Nuclear Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 54.3% of Montauk Renewables shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Nano Nuclear Energy had 2 more articles in the media than Montauk Renewables. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Nano Nuclear Energy and 4 mentions for Montauk Renewables. Nano Nuclear Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.01 beat Montauk Renewables' score of 0.34 indicating that Nano Nuclear Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Nano Nuclear Energy	3 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Montauk Renewables	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

Montauk Renewables beats Nano Nuclear Energy on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Montauk Renewables compare to Summit Midstream Partners?

Summit Midstream Partners (NYSE:SMC) and Montauk Renewables (NASDAQ:MNTK) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, risk, dividends, valuation, media sentiment and earnings.

In the previous week, Summit Midstream Partners had 2 more articles in the media than Montauk Renewables. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Summit Midstream Partners and 4 mentions for Montauk Renewables. Montauk Renewables' average media sentiment score of 0.34 beat Summit Midstream Partners' score of 0.18 indicating that Montauk Renewables is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Summit Midstream Partners	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Montauk Renewables	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summit Midstream Partners has a beta of 0.71, meaning that its share price is 29% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Montauk Renewables has a beta of 0.57, meaning that its share price is 43% less volatile than the broader market.

43.0% of Summit Midstream Partners shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 16.4% of Montauk Renewables shares are held by institutional investors. 43.0% of Summit Midstream Partners shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 54.3% of Montauk Renewables shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summit Midstream Partners presently has a consensus price target of $41.67, suggesting a potential upside of 37.64%. Montauk Renewables has a consensus price target of $1.80, suggesting a potential upside of 5.26%. Given Summit Midstream Partners' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Summit Midstream Partners is more favorable than Montauk Renewables.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Summit Midstream Partners	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Montauk Renewables	1 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.80

Summit Midstream Partners has higher revenue and earnings than Montauk Renewables. Summit Midstream Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Montauk Renewables, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Summit Midstream Partners	$568.54M	1.08	$8.93M	-$1.88	N/A
Montauk Renewables	$176.38M	1.38	$1.75M	$0.02	85.50

Montauk Renewables has a net margin of 0.40% compared to Summit Midstream Partners' net margin of -1.09%. Montauk Renewables' return on equity of 0.28% beat Summit Midstream Partners' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Summit Midstream Partners	-1.09%	-0.73%	-0.26%
Montauk Renewables	0.40%	0.28%	0.17%

Summary

Summit Midstream Partners and Montauk Renewables tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Montauk Renewables compare to OPAL Fuels?

Montauk Renewables (NASDAQ:MNTK) and OPAL Fuels (NASDAQ:OPAL) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability and earnings.

Montauk Renewables has a beta of 0.57, indicating that its share price is 43% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, OPAL Fuels has a beta of 0.76, indicating that its share price is 24% less volatile than the broader market.

OPAL Fuels has a net margin of 1.33% compared to Montauk Renewables' net margin of 0.40%. Montauk Renewables' return on equity of 0.28% beat OPAL Fuels' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Montauk Renewables	0.40%	0.28%	0.17%
OPAL Fuels	1.33%	-479.62%	0.47%

OPAL Fuels has higher revenue and earnings than Montauk Renewables. OPAL Fuels is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Montauk Renewables, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Montauk Renewables	$176.38M	1.38	$1.75M	$0.02	85.50
OPAL Fuels	$348.98M	1.17	$14.75M	$0.07	33.71

16.4% of Montauk Renewables shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.2% of OPAL Fuels shares are held by institutional investors. 54.3% of Montauk Renewables shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 85.7% of OPAL Fuels shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Montauk Renewables presently has a consensus target price of $1.80, indicating a potential upside of 5.26%. OPAL Fuels has a consensus target price of $2.40, indicating a potential upside of 1.69%. Given Montauk Renewables' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Montauk Renewables is more favorable than OPAL Fuels.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Montauk Renewables	1 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.80
OPAL Fuels	2 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.33

In the previous week, Montauk Renewables had 3 more articles in the media than OPAL Fuels. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Montauk Renewables and 1 mentions for OPAL Fuels. OPAL Fuels' average media sentiment score of 0.50 beat Montauk Renewables' score of 0.34 indicating that OPAL Fuels is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Montauk Renewables	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
OPAL Fuels	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

OPAL Fuels beats Montauk Renewables on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Montauk Renewables compare to Pure Cycle?

Pure Cycle (NASDAQ:PCYO) and Montauk Renewables (NASDAQ:MNTK) are related small-cap companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment, dividends and earnings.

Pure Cycle has a beta of 1.22, meaning that its stock price is 22% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Montauk Renewables has a beta of 0.57, meaning that its stock price is 43% less volatile than the broader market.

Montauk Renewables has a consensus target price of $1.80, indicating a potential upside of 5.26%. Given Montauk Renewables' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Montauk Renewables is more favorable than Pure Cycle.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Pure Cycle	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Montauk Renewables	1 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.80

In the previous week, Montauk Renewables had 4 more articles in the media than Pure Cycle. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Montauk Renewables and 0 mentions for Pure Cycle. Montauk Renewables' average media sentiment score of 0.34 beat Pure Cycle's score of 0.00 indicating that Montauk Renewables is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Pure Cycle	Neutral
Montauk Renewables	Neutral

Pure Cycle has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Montauk Renewables. Pure Cycle is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Montauk Renewables, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Pure Cycle	$26.09M	9.76	$13.11M	$0.61	17.33
Montauk Renewables	$176.38M	1.38	$1.75M	$0.02	85.50

51.4% of Pure Cycle shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 16.4% of Montauk Renewables shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.1% of Pure Cycle shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 54.3% of Montauk Renewables shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Pure Cycle has a net margin of 43.66% compared to Montauk Renewables' net margin of 0.40%. Pure Cycle's return on equity of 9.98% beat Montauk Renewables' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Pure Cycle	43.66%	9.98%	8.75%
Montauk Renewables	0.40%	0.28%	0.17%

Summary

Pure Cycle beats Montauk Renewables on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Montauk Renewables compare to RGC Resources?

Montauk Renewables (NASDAQ:MNTK) and RGC Resources (NASDAQ:RGCO) are related small-cap companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends and valuation.

RGC Resources has a net margin of 13.01% compared to Montauk Renewables' net margin of 0.40%. RGC Resources' return on equity of 11.87% beat Montauk Renewables' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Montauk Renewables	0.40%	0.28%	0.17%
RGC Resources	13.01%	11.87%	4.19%

Montauk Renewables has a beta of 0.57, suggesting that its stock price is 43% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, RGC Resources has a beta of 0.51, suggesting that its stock price is 49% less volatile than the broader market.

16.4% of Montauk Renewables shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 35.8% of RGC Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 54.3% of Montauk Renewables shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 7.2% of RGC Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

RGC Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Montauk Renewables. RGC Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Montauk Renewables, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Montauk Renewables	$176.38M	1.38	$1.75M	$0.02	85.50
RGC Resources	$95.33M	2.37	$13.28M	$1.34	16.19

In the previous week, RGC Resources had 2 more articles in the media than Montauk Renewables. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for RGC Resources and 4 mentions for Montauk Renewables. Montauk Renewables' average media sentiment score of 0.34 beat RGC Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that Montauk Renewables is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Montauk Renewables	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
RGC Resources	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Montauk Renewables currently has a consensus target price of $1.80, indicating a potential upside of 5.26%. Given Montauk Renewables' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Montauk Renewables is more favorable than RGC Resources.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Montauk Renewables	1 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.80
RGC Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Summary

RGC Resources beats Montauk Renewables on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Montauk Renewables News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding MNTK and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

MNTK vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Montauk Renewables	Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry	Energy Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$241.98M	$10.84B	$9.48B	$12.98B
Dividend Yield	N/A	11.38%	11.63%	9.79%
P/E Ratio	85.54	16.39	16.91	25.25
Price / Sales	1.38	454.30	372.74	77.68
Price / Cash	7.53	39.56	36.10	50.79
Price / Book	0.92	4.24	3.85	6.09
Net Income	$1.75M	$5.28B	$4.35B	$347.95M
7 Day Performance	-6.56%	-0.66%	-0.18%	3.08%
1 Month Performance	3.01%	3.25%	3.07%	-3.01%
1 Year Performance	-17.79%	31.34%	33.39%	20.49%

Montauk Renewables Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
MNTK Montauk Renewables	1.2648 of 5 stars	$1.71 +0.6%	$1.80 +5.3%	-17.4%	$241.98M	$176.38M	85.54	130	News Coverage
NNE Nano Nuclear Energy	2.5291 of 5 stars	$16.06 -4.3%	$40.75 +153.7%	-52.9%	$874.48M	N/A	N/A	N/A	Upcoming Earnings Gap Up
SMC Summit Midstream Partners	3.0009 of 5 stars	$29.86 flat	$47.00 +57.4%	+21.7%	$607.32M	$562.09M	N/A	244	News Coverage Upcoming Earnings Analyst Forecast
OPAL OPAL Fuels	0.8721 of 5 stars	$2.23 -0.9%	$2.40 +7.6%	+0.9%	$390.15M	$348.98M	31.86	270	Upcoming Earnings
PCYO Pure Cycle	1.0119 of 5 stars	$10.76 -0.2%	N/A	+8.3%	$259.77M	$26.09M	17.64	40	Positive News Analyst Downgrade

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:MNTK) was last updated on 8/6/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Montauk Renewables (MNTK) Competitors

MNTK vs. NNE, SMC, OPAL, PCYO, and RGCO

How does Montauk Renewables compare to Nano Nuclear Energy?

Summary

How does Montauk Renewables compare to Summit Midstream Partners?

Summary

How does Montauk Renewables compare to OPAL Fuels?

Summary

How does Montauk Renewables compare to Pure Cycle?

Summary

How does Montauk Renewables compare to RGC Resources?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

MNTK vs. The Competition

Montauk Renewables Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Montauk Renewables (MNTK) Competitors

MNTK vs. NNE, SMC, OPAL, PCYO, and RGCO

How does Montauk Renewables compare to Nano Nuclear Energy?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, NNE or MNTK?

Is NNE or MNTK more profitable?

Do analysts recommend NNE or MNTK?

Which has more risk & volatility, NNE or MNTK?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in NNE or MNTK?

Does the media favor NNE or MNTK?

Summary

How does Montauk Renewables compare to Summit Midstream Partners?

Does the media favor SMC or MNTK?

Which has more volatility & risk, SMC or MNTK?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in SMC or MNTK?

Do analysts recommend SMC or MNTK?

Which has better valuation and earnings, SMC or MNTK?

Is SMC or MNTK more profitable?

Summary

How does Montauk Renewables compare to OPAL Fuels?

Which has more volatility and risk, MNTK or OPAL?

Is MNTK or OPAL more profitable?

Which has better earnings & valuation, MNTK or OPAL?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in MNTK or OPAL?

Do analysts prefer MNTK or OPAL?

Does the media prefer MNTK or OPAL?

Summary

How does Montauk Renewables compare to Pure Cycle?

Which has more risk & volatility, PCYO or MNTK?

Do analysts prefer PCYO or MNTK?

Does the media refer more to PCYO or MNTK?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, PCYO or MNTK?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in PCYO or MNTK?

Is PCYO or MNTK more profitable?

Summary

How does Montauk Renewables compare to RGC Resources?

Is MNTK or RGCO more profitable?

Which has more risk & volatility, MNTK or RGCO?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in MNTK or RGCO?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, MNTK or RGCO?

Does the media prefer MNTK or RGCO?

Do analysts rate MNTK or RGCO?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

MNTK vs. The Competition

Montauk Renewables Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools