Does the media favor MNTK or SMC?

In the previous week, Summit Midstream Partners had 3 more articles in the media than Montauk Renewables. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Summit Midstream Partners and 1 mentions for Montauk Renewables. Montauk Renewables' average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat Summit Midstream Partners' score of 0.55 indicating that Montauk Renewables is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Montauk Renewables 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Summit Midstream Partners 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, MNTK or OPAL?

OPAL Fuels has higher revenue and earnings than Montauk Renewables. OPAL Fuels is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Montauk Renewables, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Montauk Renewables $176.38M 1.37 $1.75M $0.02 85.00 OPAL Fuels $348.98M 1.15 $14.75M $0.07 33.00

Does the media favor MNTK or OPAL?

In the previous week, Montauk Renewables and Montauk Renewables both had 1 articles in the media. OPAL Fuels' average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat Montauk Renewables' score of 0.63 indicating that OPAL Fuels is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Montauk Renewables 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive OPAL Fuels 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts rate PCYO or MNTK?

Montauk Renewables has a consensus price target of $1.80, suggesting a potential upside of 5.88%. Given Montauk Renewables' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Montauk Renewables is more favorable than Pure Cycle. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Pure Cycle 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00 Montauk Renewables 1 Sell rating(s) 4 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.80

Does the media prefer PCYO or MNTK?

In the previous week, Pure Cycle had 1 more articles in the media than Montauk Renewables. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Pure Cycle and 1 mentions for Montauk Renewables. Pure Cycle's average media sentiment score of 0.63 equaled Montauk Renewables'average media sentiment score. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Pure Cycle 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Montauk Renewables 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts prefer RGCO or MNTK?

Montauk Renewables has a consensus target price of $1.80, suggesting a potential upside of 5.88%. Given Montauk Renewables' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Montauk Renewables is more favorable than RGC Resources. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score RGC Resources 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00 Montauk Renewables 1 Sell rating(s) 4 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.80

Does the media refer more to RGCO or MNTK?

In the previous week, RGC Resources had 2 more articles in the media than Montauk Renewables. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for RGC Resources and 1 mentions for Montauk Renewables. RGC Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.97 beat Montauk Renewables' score of 0.63 indicating that RGC Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment RGC Resources 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Montauk Renewables 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media favor MNTK or GWRS?

In the previous week, Global Water Resources had 2 more articles in the media than Montauk Renewables. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Global Water Resources and 1 mentions for Montauk Renewables. Global Water Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.87 beat Montauk Renewables' score of 0.63 indicating that Global Water Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Montauk Renewables 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Global Water Resources 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Montauk Renewables (MNTK) Competitors

$1.70 +0.08 (+4.94%)

Closing price 04:00 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$1.70 +0.01 (+0.29%)

As of 04:10 PM Eastern

Compare

MNTK vs. SMC, OPAL, PCYO, RGCO, and GWRS

Should you buy Montauk Renewables stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Montauk Renewables with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Montauk Renewables include Summit Midstream Partners (SMC), OPAL Fuels (OPAL), Pure Cycle (PCYO), RGC Resources (RGCO), and Global Water Resources (GWRS). These companies are all part of the "utilities" industry.

How does Montauk Renewables compare to Summit Midstream Partners?

Montauk Renewables (NASDAQ:MNTK) and Summit Midstream Partners (NYSE:SMC) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, earnings, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Montauk Renewables currently has a consensus price target of $1.80, suggesting a potential upside of 5.88%. Summit Midstream Partners has a consensus price target of $47.00, suggesting a potential upside of 56.22%. Given Summit Midstream Partners' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Summit Midstream Partners is more favorable than Montauk Renewables.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Montauk Renewables	1 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.80
Summit Midstream Partners	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33

16.4% of Montauk Renewables shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 43.0% of Summit Midstream Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. 54.3% of Montauk Renewables shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 43.0% of Summit Midstream Partners shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Montauk Renewables has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Summit Midstream Partners. Summit Midstream Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Montauk Renewables, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Montauk Renewables	$176.38M	1.37	$1.75M	$0.02	85.00
Summit Midstream Partners	$562.09M	1.09	-$1.91M	-$1.88	N/A

Montauk Renewables has a net margin of 0.40% compared to Summit Midstream Partners' net margin of -1.09%. Montauk Renewables' return on equity of 0.28% beat Summit Midstream Partners' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Montauk Renewables	0.40%	0.28%	0.17%
Summit Midstream Partners	-1.09%	N/A	N/A

In the previous week, Summit Midstream Partners had 3 more articles in the media than Montauk Renewables. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Summit Midstream Partners and 1 mentions for Montauk Renewables. Montauk Renewables' average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat Summit Midstream Partners' score of 0.55 indicating that Montauk Renewables is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Montauk Renewables	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Summit Midstream Partners	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Montauk Renewables has a beta of 0.53, suggesting that its share price is 47% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Summit Midstream Partners has a beta of 0.77, suggesting that its share price is 23% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Montauk Renewables beats Summit Midstream Partners on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Montauk Renewables compare to OPAL Fuels?

Montauk Renewables (NASDAQ:MNTK) and OPAL Fuels (NASDAQ:OPAL) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, earnings, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Montauk Renewables currently has a consensus price target of $1.80, suggesting a potential upside of 5.88%. OPAL Fuels has a consensus price target of $2.72, suggesting a potential upside of 17.60%. Given OPAL Fuels' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe OPAL Fuels is more favorable than Montauk Renewables.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Montauk Renewables	1 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.80
OPAL Fuels	2 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.60

Montauk Renewables has a beta of 0.53, suggesting that its share price is 47% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, OPAL Fuels has a beta of 0.77, suggesting that its share price is 23% less volatile than the broader market.

16.4% of Montauk Renewables shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.2% of OPAL Fuels shares are owned by institutional investors. 54.3% of Montauk Renewables shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 85.7% of OPAL Fuels shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

OPAL Fuels has a net margin of 1.33% compared to Montauk Renewables' net margin of 0.40%. Montauk Renewables' return on equity of 0.28% beat OPAL Fuels' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Montauk Renewables	0.40%	0.28%	0.17%
OPAL Fuels	1.33%	-479.62%	0.47%

In the previous week, Montauk Renewables and Montauk Renewables both had 1 articles in the media. OPAL Fuels' average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat Montauk Renewables' score of 0.63 indicating that OPAL Fuels is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Montauk Renewables	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
OPAL Fuels	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

OPAL Fuels has higher revenue and earnings than Montauk Renewables. OPAL Fuels is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Montauk Renewables, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Montauk Renewables	$176.38M	1.37	$1.75M	$0.02	85.00
OPAL Fuels	$348.98M	1.15	$14.75M	$0.07	33.00

Summary

OPAL Fuels beats Montauk Renewables on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Montauk Renewables compare to Pure Cycle?

Pure Cycle (NASDAQ:PCYO) and Montauk Renewables (NASDAQ:MNTK) are both small-cap utilities companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership and profitability.

Pure Cycle has a beta of 1.24, indicating that its stock price is 24% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Montauk Renewables has a beta of 0.53, indicating that its stock price is 47% less volatile than the broader market.

Montauk Renewables has a consensus price target of $1.80, suggesting a potential upside of 5.88%. Given Montauk Renewables' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Montauk Renewables is more favorable than Pure Cycle.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Pure Cycle	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Montauk Renewables	1 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.80

Pure Cycle has a net margin of 45.80% compared to Montauk Renewables' net margin of 0.40%. Pure Cycle's return on equity of 9.75% beat Montauk Renewables' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Pure Cycle	45.80%	9.75%	8.65%
Montauk Renewables	0.40%	0.28%	0.17%

51.4% of Pure Cycle shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 16.4% of Montauk Renewables shares are held by institutional investors. 6.1% of Pure Cycle shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 54.3% of Montauk Renewables shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Pure Cycle had 1 more articles in the media than Montauk Renewables. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Pure Cycle and 1 mentions for Montauk Renewables. Pure Cycle's average media sentiment score of 0.63 equaled Montauk Renewables'average media sentiment score.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Pure Cycle	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Montauk Renewables	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Pure Cycle has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Montauk Renewables. Pure Cycle is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Montauk Renewables, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Pure Cycle	$26.09M	9.53	$13.11M	$0.58	17.79
Montauk Renewables	$176.38M	1.37	$1.75M	$0.02	85.00

Summary

Pure Cycle beats Montauk Renewables on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Montauk Renewables compare to RGC Resources?

RGC Resources (NASDAQ:RGCO) and Montauk Renewables (NASDAQ:MNTK) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, earnings and risk.

RGC Resources has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Montauk Renewables. RGC Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Montauk Renewables, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
RGC Resources	$95.33M	2.45	$13.28M	$1.34	16.72
Montauk Renewables	$176.38M	1.37	$1.75M	$0.02	85.00

RGC Resources has a net margin of 13.01% compared to Montauk Renewables' net margin of 0.40%. RGC Resources' return on equity of 11.87% beat Montauk Renewables' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
RGC Resources	13.01%	11.87%	4.19%
Montauk Renewables	0.40%	0.28%	0.17%

RGC Resources has a beta of 0.52, suggesting that its share price is 48% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Montauk Renewables has a beta of 0.53, suggesting that its share price is 47% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, RGC Resources had 2 more articles in the media than Montauk Renewables. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for RGC Resources and 1 mentions for Montauk Renewables. RGC Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.97 beat Montauk Renewables' score of 0.63 indicating that RGC Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
RGC Resources	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Montauk Renewables	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Montauk Renewables has a consensus target price of $1.80, suggesting a potential upside of 5.88%. Given Montauk Renewables' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Montauk Renewables is more favorable than RGC Resources.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
RGC Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Montauk Renewables	1 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.80

35.8% of RGC Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 16.4% of Montauk Renewables shares are owned by institutional investors. 7.2% of RGC Resources shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 54.3% of Montauk Renewables shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

RGC Resources beats Montauk Renewables on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Montauk Renewables compare to Global Water Resources?

Montauk Renewables (NASDAQ:MNTK) and Global Water Resources (NASDAQ:GWRS) are both small-cap utilities companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, earnings, dividends and profitability.

Global Water Resources has a net margin of 3.53% compared to Montauk Renewables' net margin of 0.40%. Global Water Resources' return on equity of 3.53% beat Montauk Renewables' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Montauk Renewables	0.40%	0.28%	0.17%
Global Water Resources	3.53%	3.53%	0.63%

16.4% of Montauk Renewables shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 27.9% of Global Water Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 54.3% of Montauk Renewables shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 53.7% of Global Water Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Global Water Resources had 2 more articles in the media than Montauk Renewables. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Global Water Resources and 1 mentions for Montauk Renewables. Global Water Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.87 beat Montauk Renewables' score of 0.63 indicating that Global Water Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Montauk Renewables	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Global Water Resources	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Montauk Renewables currently has a consensus price target of $1.80, indicating a potential upside of 5.88%. Global Water Resources has a consensus price target of $15.00, indicating a potential upside of 105.20%. Given Global Water Resources' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Global Water Resources is more favorable than Montauk Renewables.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Montauk Renewables	1 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.80
Global Water Resources	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.50

Global Water Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Montauk Renewables. Montauk Renewables is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Global Water Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Montauk Renewables	$176.38M	1.37	$1.75M	$0.02	85.00
Global Water Resources	$55.76M	3.77	$2.96M	$0.07	104.43

Montauk Renewables has a beta of 0.53, indicating that its share price is 47% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Global Water Resources has a beta of 0.92, indicating that its share price is 8% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Global Water Resources beats Montauk Renewables on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Montauk Renewables News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding MNTK and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

MNTK vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Montauk Renewables	Other Alt Energy Industry	Energy Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$241.98M	$14.35B	$10.40B	$12.47B
Dividend Yield	N/A	3.75%	10.42%	5.22%
P/E Ratio	85.04	55.49	21.17	24.40
Price / Sales	1.37	64.29	803.17	117.01
Price / Cash	7.58	36.02	38.70	57.13
Price / Book	0.92	7.16	4.43	6.73
Net Income	$1.75M	$277.69M	$4.23B	$337.03M
7 Day Performance	-2.86%	-0.83%	2.17%	0.11%
1 Month Performance	N/A	N/A	N/A	-1.70%
1 Year Performance	-10.99%	60.07%	52.22%	34.24%

Montauk Renewables Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
MNTK Montauk Renewables	1.6984 of 5 stars	$1.70 +4.9%	$1.80 +5.9%	-14.3%	$241.98M	$176.38M	85.04	130
SMC Summit Midstream Partners	3.7085 of 5 stars	$29.83 0.0%	$47.00 +57.6%	+13.3%	$606.71M	$562.09M	N/A	244	Buyback Announcement
OPAL OPAL Fuels	3.1188 of 5 stars	$2.28 +0.4%	$2.72 +19.2%	-31.9%	$393.62M	$348.98M	32.43	270
PCYO Pure Cycle	1.2202 of 5 stars	$10.45 -0.6%	N/A	-1.1%	$253.33M	$26.09M	18.02	40	News Coverage
RGCO RGC Resources	3.8877 of 5 stars	$22.92 +0.1%	N/A	+7.5%	$238.32M	$95.33M	17.10	100

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:MNTK) was last updated on 6/4/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Montauk Renewables (MNTK) Competitors

MNTK vs. SMC, OPAL, PCYO, RGCO, and GWRS

How does Montauk Renewables compare to Summit Midstream Partners?

Summary

How does Montauk Renewables compare to OPAL Fuels?

Summary

How does Montauk Renewables compare to Pure Cycle?

Summary

How does Montauk Renewables compare to RGC Resources?

Summary

How does Montauk Renewables compare to Global Water Resources?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

MNTK vs. The Competition

Montauk Renewables Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Montauk Renewables (MNTK) Competitors

MNTK vs. SMC, OPAL, PCYO, RGCO, and GWRS

How does Montauk Renewables compare to Summit Midstream Partners?

Do analysts rate MNTK or SMC?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of MNTK or SMC?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, MNTK or SMC?

Is MNTK or SMC more profitable?

Does the media favor MNTK or SMC?

Which has more volatility and risk, MNTK or SMC?

Summary

How does Montauk Renewables compare to OPAL Fuels?

Do analysts rate MNTK or OPAL?

Which has more volatility and risk, MNTK or OPAL?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of MNTK or OPAL?

Is MNTK or OPAL more profitable?

Does the media favor MNTK or OPAL?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, MNTK or OPAL?

Summary

How does Montauk Renewables compare to Pure Cycle?

Which has more risk and volatility, PCYO or MNTK?

Do analysts rate PCYO or MNTK?

Is PCYO or MNTK more profitable?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in PCYO or MNTK?

Does the media prefer PCYO or MNTK?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, PCYO or MNTK?

Summary

How does Montauk Renewables compare to RGC Resources?

Which has better earnings and valuation, RGCO or MNTK?

Is RGCO or MNTK more profitable?

Which has more volatility and risk, RGCO or MNTK?

Does the media refer more to RGCO or MNTK?

Do analysts prefer RGCO or MNTK?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in RGCO or MNTK?

Summary

How does Montauk Renewables compare to Global Water Resources?

Is MNTK or GWRS more profitable?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in MNTK or GWRS?

Does the media favor MNTK or GWRS?

Do analysts prefer MNTK or GWRS?

Which has better earnings and valuation, MNTK or GWRS?

Which has more volatility & risk, MNTK or GWRS?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

MNTK vs. The Competition

Montauk Renewables Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools