Go Pro

Montauk Renewables (MNTK) Competitors

Montauk Renewables logo
$1.70 +0.01 (+0.29%)
As of 02:48 PM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.

MNTK vs. SMC, OPAL, PCYO, RGCO, and GWRS

Should you buy Montauk Renewables stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Montauk Renewables with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Montauk Renewables include Summit Midstream Partners (SMC), OPAL Fuels (OPAL), Pure Cycle (PCYO), RGC Resources (RGCO), and Global Water Resources (GWRS). These companies are all part of the "utilities" industry.

How does Montauk Renewables compare to Summit Midstream Partners?

Summit Midstream Partners (NYSE:SMC) and Montauk Renewables (NASDAQ:MNTK) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, media sentiment, dividends, valuation and profitability.

Summit Midstream Partners presently has a consensus target price of $47.00, suggesting a potential upside of 51.13%. Montauk Renewables has a consensus target price of $1.80, suggesting a potential upside of 5.57%. Given Summit Midstream Partners' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Summit Midstream Partners is more favorable than Montauk Renewables.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Summit Midstream Partners
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Montauk Renewables
1 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.80

Montauk Renewables has a net margin of 0.40% compared to Summit Midstream Partners' net margin of -1.09%. Montauk Renewables' return on equity of 0.28% beat Summit Midstream Partners' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Summit Midstream Partners-1.09% -0.73% -0.26%
Montauk Renewables 0.40%0.28%0.17%

43.0% of Summit Midstream Partners shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 16.4% of Montauk Renewables shares are held by institutional investors. 43.0% of Summit Midstream Partners shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 54.3% of Montauk Renewables shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summit Midstream Partners has higher revenue and earnings than Montauk Renewables. Summit Midstream Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Montauk Renewables, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Summit Midstream Partners$568.54M1.11$8.93M-$1.88N/A
Montauk Renewables$180.21M1.35$1.75M$0.0285.25

In the previous week, Summit Midstream Partners and Summit Midstream Partners both had 1 articles in the media. Montauk Renewables' average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat Summit Midstream Partners' score of 0.00 indicating that Montauk Renewables is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Summit Midstream Partners Neutral
Montauk Renewables Positive

Summit Midstream Partners has a beta of 0.74, indicating that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Montauk Renewables has a beta of 0.57, indicating that its stock price is 43% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Montauk Renewables beats Summit Midstream Partners on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Montauk Renewables compare to OPAL Fuels?

Montauk Renewables (NASDAQ:MNTK) and OPAL Fuels (NASDAQ:OPAL) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, dividends and profitability.

OPAL Fuels has a net margin of 1.33% compared to Montauk Renewables' net margin of 0.40%. Montauk Renewables' return on equity of 0.28% beat OPAL Fuels' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Montauk Renewables0.40% 0.28% 0.17%
OPAL Fuels 1.33%-479.62%0.47%

Montauk Renewables has a beta of 0.57, meaning that its share price is 43% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, OPAL Fuels has a beta of 0.77, meaning that its share price is 23% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, OPAL Fuels had 3 more articles in the media than Montauk Renewables. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for OPAL Fuels and 1 mentions for Montauk Renewables. OPAL Fuels' average media sentiment score of 1.21 beat Montauk Renewables' score of 0.94 indicating that OPAL Fuels is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Montauk Renewables Positive
OPAL Fuels Positive

Montauk Renewables presently has a consensus target price of $1.80, suggesting a potential upside of 5.57%. OPAL Fuels has a consensus target price of $2.72, suggesting a potential upside of 11.98%. Given OPAL Fuels' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe OPAL Fuels is more favorable than Montauk Renewables.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Montauk Renewables
1 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.80
OPAL Fuels
2 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.60

OPAL Fuels has higher revenue and earnings than Montauk Renewables. OPAL Fuels is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Montauk Renewables, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Montauk Renewables$180.21M1.35$1.75M$0.0285.25
OPAL Fuels$336.94M1.25$14.75M$0.0734.66

16.4% of Montauk Renewables shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.2% of OPAL Fuels shares are held by institutional investors. 54.3% of Montauk Renewables shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 85.7% of OPAL Fuels shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

OPAL Fuels beats Montauk Renewables on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Montauk Renewables compare to Pure Cycle?

Montauk Renewables (NASDAQ:MNTK) and Pure Cycle (NASDAQ:PCYO) are both small-cap utilities companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings and media sentiment.

Pure Cycle has a net margin of 43.66% compared to Montauk Renewables' net margin of 0.40%. Pure Cycle's return on equity of 9.98% beat Montauk Renewables' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Montauk Renewables0.40% 0.28% 0.17%
Pure Cycle 43.66%9.98%8.75%

Pure Cycle has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Montauk Renewables. Pure Cycle is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Montauk Renewables, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Montauk Renewables$180.21M1.35$1.75M$0.0285.25
Pure Cycle$26.09M9.99$13.11M$0.6117.73

Montauk Renewables has a beta of 0.57, meaning that its stock price is 43% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pure Cycle has a beta of 1.23, meaning that its stock price is 23% more volatile than the broader market.

Montauk Renewables presently has a consensus target price of $1.80, suggesting a potential upside of 5.57%. Given Montauk Renewables' higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Montauk Renewables is more favorable than Pure Cycle.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Montauk Renewables
1 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.80
Pure Cycle
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

16.4% of Montauk Renewables shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 51.4% of Pure Cycle shares are owned by institutional investors. 54.3% of Montauk Renewables shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.1% of Pure Cycle shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Pure Cycle had 6 more articles in the media than Montauk Renewables. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Pure Cycle and 1 mentions for Montauk Renewables. Montauk Renewables' average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat Pure Cycle's score of 0.72 indicating that Montauk Renewables is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Montauk Renewables Positive
Pure Cycle Positive

Summary

Pure Cycle beats Montauk Renewables on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Montauk Renewables compare to RGC Resources?

Montauk Renewables (NASDAQ:MNTK) and RGC Resources (NASDAQ:RGCO) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, earnings, profitability, risk, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

16.4% of Montauk Renewables shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 35.8% of RGC Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 54.3% of Montauk Renewables shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 7.2% of RGC Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

RGC Resources has a net margin of 13.01% compared to Montauk Renewables' net margin of 0.40%. RGC Resources' return on equity of 11.87% beat Montauk Renewables' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Montauk Renewables0.40% 0.28% 0.17%
RGC Resources 13.01%11.87%4.19%

Montauk Renewables presently has a consensus target price of $1.80, suggesting a potential upside of 5.57%. Given Montauk Renewables' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Montauk Renewables is more favorable than RGC Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Montauk Renewables
1 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.80
RGC Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

RGC Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Montauk Renewables. RGC Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Montauk Renewables, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Montauk Renewables$180.21M1.35$1.75M$0.0285.25
RGC Resources$95.33M2.90$13.28M$1.3419.85

Montauk Renewables has a beta of 0.57, meaning that its stock price is 43% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, RGC Resources has a beta of 0.5, meaning that its stock price is 50% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Montauk Renewables and Montauk Renewables both had 1 articles in the media. RGC Resources' average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat Montauk Renewables' score of 0.94 indicating that RGC Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Montauk Renewables Positive
RGC Resources Very Positive

Summary

RGC Resources beats Montauk Renewables on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Montauk Renewables compare to Global Water Resources?

Montauk Renewables (NASDAQ:MNTK) and Global Water Resources (NASDAQ:GWRS) are both small-cap utilities companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation and dividends.

Montauk Renewables has a beta of 0.57, indicating that its stock price is 43% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Global Water Resources has a beta of 0.92, indicating that its stock price is 8% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Montauk Renewables and Montauk Renewables both had 1 articles in the media. Global Water Resources' average media sentiment score of 1.89 beat Montauk Renewables' score of 0.94 indicating that Global Water Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Montauk Renewables Positive
Global Water Resources Very Positive

16.4% of Montauk Renewables shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 27.9% of Global Water Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 54.3% of Montauk Renewables shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 53.7% of Global Water Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Montauk Renewables currently has a consensus price target of $1.80, indicating a potential upside of 5.57%. Global Water Resources has a consensus price target of $15.00, indicating a potential upside of 107.76%. Given Global Water Resources' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Global Water Resources is more favorable than Montauk Renewables.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Montauk Renewables
1 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.80
Global Water Resources
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50

Global Water Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Montauk Renewables. Montauk Renewables is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Global Water Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Montauk Renewables$180.21M1.35$1.75M$0.0285.25
Global Water Resources$55.76M3.72$2.96M$0.07103.14

Global Water Resources has a net margin of 3.53% compared to Montauk Renewables' net margin of 0.40%. Global Water Resources' return on equity of 3.53% beat Montauk Renewables' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Montauk Renewables0.40% 0.28% 0.17%
Global Water Resources 3.53%3.53%0.63%

Summary

Global Water Resources beats Montauk Renewables on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Montauk Renewables News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for MNTK and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding MNTK and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

MNTK vs. The Competition

MetricMontauk RenewablesOther Alt Energy IndustryEnergy SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$242.69M$13.76B$9.91B$12.54B
Dividend YieldN/A4.16%10.69%9.44%
P/E Ratio85.2947.1319.0624.24
Price / Sales1.3556.60447.8587.79
Price / Cash7.3132.1137.1460.03
Price / Book0.926.064.096.22
Net Income$1.75M$277.64M$4.25B$331.84M
7 Day Performance9.29%-2.49%0.15%-1.90%
1 Month Performance5.90%-6.20%-2.52%-0.95%
1 Year Performance-19.58%20.94%29.02%18.07%

Montauk Renewables Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
MNTK
Montauk Renewables
1.3694 of 5 stars
$1.71
+0.3%
$1.80
+5.6%
-19.0%$242.69M$180.21M85.29130
SMC
Summit Midstream Partners
2.4346 of 5 stars
$30.22
+0.2%
$47.00
+55.5%
+25.3%$613.21M$562.09MN/A244
OPAL
OPAL Fuels
1.9374 of 5 stars
$2.07
-1.0%
$2.72
+31.2%
-3.7%$362.41M$348.98M29.58270
PCYO
Pure Cycle
1.0921 of 5 stars
$10.65
+0.9%
N/A+6.5%$254.30M$26.09M18.3640
RGCO
RGC Resources
3.0588 of 5 stars
$23.72
+0.9%
N/A+13.9%$244.67M$95.33M17.70100

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:MNTK) was last updated on 7/16/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners