Go Pro

Pure Cycle (PCYO) Competitors

Pure Cycle logo
$11.31 -0.03 (-0.26%)
As of 11:20 AM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.

PCYO vs. YORW, CWCO, ARTNA, CDZI, and GWRS

Should you buy Pure Cycle stock or one of its competitors? Pure Cycle's main competitors and comparable companies include York Water (YORW), Consolidated Water (CWCO), Artesian Resources (ARTNA), Cadiz (CDZI), and Global Water Resources (GWRS). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "water utilities" industry.

How does Pure Cycle compare to York Water?

Pure Cycle (NASDAQ:PCYO) and York Water (NASDAQ:YORW) are both small-cap utilities companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends and risk.

York Water has higher revenue and earnings than Pure Cycle. Pure Cycle is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than York Water, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pure Cycle$26.09M10.50$13.11M$0.6118.63
York Water$77.49M6.93$20.06M$1.6120.56

51.4% of Pure Cycle shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 49.9% of York Water shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.1% of Pure Cycle shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of York Water shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Pure Cycle and Pure Cycle both had 2 articles in the media. York Water's average media sentiment score of 1.23 beat Pure Cycle's score of 0.94 indicating that York Water is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Pure Cycle
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
York Water
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Pure Cycle has a net margin of 43.66% compared to York Water's net margin of 28.53%. Pure Cycle's return on equity of 9.98% beat York Water's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pure Cycle43.66% 9.98% 8.75%
York Water 28.53%9.91%3.50%

York Water has a consensus price target of $31.00, suggesting a potential downside of 6.36%. Given York Water's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe York Water is more favorable than Pure Cycle.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Pure Cycle
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
York Water
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Pure Cycle has a beta of 1.22, suggesting that its stock price is 22% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, York Water has a beta of 0.6, suggesting that its stock price is 40% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Pure Cycle beats York Water on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pure Cycle compare to Consolidated Water?

Pure Cycle (NASDAQ:PCYO) and Consolidated Water (NASDAQ:CWCO) are both small-cap utilities companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, dividends, earnings, risk, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Pure Cycle
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Consolidated Water
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50

51.4% of Pure Cycle shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 55.2% of Consolidated Water shares are held by institutional investors. 6.1% of Pure Cycle shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.8% of Consolidated Water shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Consolidated Water had 10 more articles in the media than Pure Cycle. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Consolidated Water and 2 mentions for Pure Cycle. Pure Cycle's average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat Consolidated Water's score of 0.81 indicating that Pure Cycle is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Pure Cycle
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Consolidated Water
4 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Pure Cycle has a net margin of 43.66% compared to Consolidated Water's net margin of 12.66%. Pure Cycle's return on equity of 9.98% beat Consolidated Water's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pure Cycle43.66% 9.98% 8.75%
Consolidated Water 12.66%7.26%6.39%

Pure Cycle has a beta of 1.22, suggesting that its stock price is 22% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Consolidated Water has a beta of 0.51, suggesting that its stock price is 49% less volatile than the broader market.

Consolidated Water has higher revenue and earnings than Pure Cycle. Pure Cycle is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Consolidated Water, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pure Cycle$26.09M10.50$13.11M$0.6118.63
Consolidated Water$132.07M3.81$18.34M$0.9034.93

Summary

Pure Cycle beats Consolidated Water on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pure Cycle compare to Artesian Resources?

Pure Cycle (NASDAQ:PCYO) and Artesian Resources (NASDAQ:ARTNA) are both small-cap utilities companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, profitability and risk.

Pure Cycle has a beta of 1.22, meaning that its share price is 22% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Artesian Resources has a beta of 0.33, meaning that its share price is 67% less volatile than the broader market.

Pure Cycle has a net margin of 43.66% compared to Artesian Resources' net margin of 20.18%. Pure Cycle's return on equity of 9.98% beat Artesian Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pure Cycle43.66% 9.98% 8.75%
Artesian Resources 20.18%9.42%2.77%

51.4% of Pure Cycle shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 57.4% of Artesian Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 6.1% of Pure Cycle shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 20.6% of Artesian Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Artesian Resources had 1 more articles in the media than Pure Cycle. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Artesian Resources and 2 mentions for Pure Cycle. Pure Cycle's average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat Artesian Resources' score of 0.74 indicating that Pure Cycle is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Pure Cycle
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Artesian Resources
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Pure Cycle
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Artesian Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Artesian Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Pure Cycle. Artesian Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pure Cycle, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pure Cycle$26.09M10.50$13.11M$0.6118.63
Artesian Resources$112.94M3.26$22.82M$2.2915.56

Summary

Pure Cycle beats Artesian Resources on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pure Cycle compare to Cadiz?

Pure Cycle (NASDAQ:PCYO) and Cadiz (NASDAQ:CDZI) are both small-cap utilities companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends, risk, valuation, earnings and institutional ownership.

51.4% of Pure Cycle shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.8% of Cadiz shares are held by institutional investors. 6.1% of Pure Cycle shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.3% of Cadiz shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Pure Cycle has higher revenue and earnings than Cadiz. Cadiz is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pure Cycle, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pure Cycle$26.09M10.50$13.11M$0.6118.63
Cadiz$16.31M17.90-$34.15M-$0.46N/A

Cadiz has a consensus price target of $10.00, suggesting a potential upside of 188.02%. Given Cadiz's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Cadiz is more favorable than Pure Cycle.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Pure Cycle
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Cadiz
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

In the previous week, Cadiz had 2 more articles in the media than Pure Cycle. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Cadiz and 2 mentions for Pure Cycle. Pure Cycle's average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat Cadiz's score of -0.71 indicating that Pure Cycle is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Pure Cycle
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Cadiz
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Negative

Pure Cycle has a net margin of 43.66% compared to Cadiz's net margin of -221.43%. Pure Cycle's return on equity of 9.98% beat Cadiz's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pure Cycle43.66% 9.98% 8.75%
Cadiz -221.43%-129.97%-24.08%

Pure Cycle has a beta of 1.22, meaning that its stock price is 22% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cadiz has a beta of 1.86, meaning that its stock price is 86% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Pure Cycle beats Cadiz on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pure Cycle compare to Global Water Resources?

Global Water Resources (NASDAQ:GWRS) and Pure Cycle (NASDAQ:PCYO) are both small-cap utilities companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership and dividends.

Pure Cycle has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Global Water Resources. Pure Cycle is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Global Water Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Global Water Resources$55.76M4.39$2.96M$0.07121.54
Pure Cycle$26.09M10.50$13.11M$0.6118.63

Global Water Resources has a beta of 0.91, suggesting that its stock price is 9% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pure Cycle has a beta of 1.22, suggesting that its stock price is 22% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Global Water Resources had 10 more articles in the media than Pure Cycle. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Global Water Resources and 2 mentions for Pure Cycle. Pure Cycle's average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat Global Water Resources' score of 0.92 indicating that Pure Cycle is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Global Water Resources
4 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Pure Cycle
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

27.9% of Global Water Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 51.4% of Pure Cycle shares are held by institutional investors. 53.7% of Global Water Resources shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 6.1% of Pure Cycle shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Pure Cycle has a net margin of 43.66% compared to Global Water Resources' net margin of 3.53%. Pure Cycle's return on equity of 9.98% beat Global Water Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Global Water Resources3.53% 3.53% 0.63%
Pure Cycle 43.66%9.98%8.75%

Global Water Resources currently has a consensus price target of $15.00, indicating a potential upside of 76.30%. Given Global Water Resources' higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Global Water Resources is more favorable than Pure Cycle.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Global Water Resources
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50
Pure Cycle
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Summary

Pure Cycle beats Global Water Resources on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Pure Cycle News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PCYO and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PCYO and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PCYO vs. The Competition

MetricPure CycleWater Utilities IndustryUtilities SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$271.61M$6.17B$16.11B$13.10B
Dividend YieldN/A3.96%4.03%10.72%
P/E Ratio18.4824.3125.5525.32
Price / Sales10.5054.01459.46100.00
Price / Cash17.7014.6118.7850.75
Price / Book1.922.792.066.29
Net Income$13.11M$302.59M$701.59M$347.70M
7 Day Performance4.44%0.23%0.19%0.89%
1 Month Performance7.93%1.57%-1.28%0.85%
1 Year Performance12.66%3.70%9.98%20.25%

Pure Cycle Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PCYO
Pure Cycle
1.1437 of 5 stars
$11.31
-0.3%
N/A+8.5%$272.57M$26.09M18.5440
YORW
York Water
2.1861 of 5 stars
$32.50
+1.8%
$31.00
-4.6%
+5.6%$517.85M$77.49M20.19110
CWCO
Consolidated Water
2.0481 of 5 stars
$32.32
+6.9%
$40.00
+23.8%
-5.3%$483.85M$132.07M35.91200
ARTNA
Artesian Resources
2.1953 of 5 stars
$35.05
+1.3%
N/A+5.4%$357.12M$112.94M15.31240
CDZI
Cadiz
2.7397 of 5 stars
$3.55
+6.9%
$10.00
+181.7%
-2.8%$279.17M$14.99MN/A10

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:PCYO) was last updated on 8/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners