Do analysts rate PCYO or SMC?

Summit Midstream Partners has a consensus price target of $47.00, suggesting a potential upside of 57.73%. Given Summit Midstream Partners' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Summit Midstream Partners is more favorable than Pure Cycle. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Pure Cycle 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00 Summit Midstream Partners 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.33

Do analysts prefer PCYO or OPAL?

OPAL Fuels has a consensus price target of $2.72, suggesting a potential upside of 28.75%. Given OPAL Fuels' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe OPAL Fuels is more favorable than Pure Cycle. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Pure Cycle 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00 OPAL Fuels 2 Sell rating(s) 3 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.60

Which has better valuation & earnings, PCYO or OPAL?

OPAL Fuels has higher revenue and earnings than Pure Cycle. Pure Cycle is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than OPAL Fuels, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Pure Cycle $26.09M 9.99 $13.11M $0.58 18.64 OPAL Fuels $348.98M 1.05 $14.75M $0.07 30.14

Is PCYO or OPAL more profitable?

Pure Cycle has a net margin of 45.80% compared to OPAL Fuels' net margin of 1.33%. Pure Cycle's return on equity of 9.75% beat OPAL Fuels' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Pure Cycle 45.80% 9.75% 8.65% OPAL Fuels 1.33% -479.62% 0.47%

Does the media prefer PCYO or OPAL?

In the previous week, Pure Cycle and Pure Cycle both had 1 articles in the media. OPAL Fuels' average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat Pure Cycle's score of 0.00 indicating that OPAL Fuels is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Pure Cycle 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral OPAL Fuels 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts prefer RGCO or PCYO?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score RGC Resources 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00 Pure Cycle 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, RGCO or PCYO?

RGC Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Pure Cycle. RGC Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pure Cycle, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio RGC Resources $95.33M 2.63 $13.28M $1.34 17.96 Pure Cycle $26.09M 9.99 $13.11M $0.58 18.64

Is RGCO or PCYO more profitable?

Pure Cycle has a net margin of 45.80% compared to RGC Resources' net margin of 13.01%. RGC Resources' return on equity of 11.87% beat Pure Cycle's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets RGC Resources 13.01% 11.87% 4.19% Pure Cycle 45.80% 9.75% 8.65%

Does the media favor RGCO or PCYO?

In the previous week, RGC Resources had 3 more articles in the media than Pure Cycle. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for RGC Resources and 1 mentions for Pure Cycle. RGC Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.60 beat Pure Cycle's score of 0.00 indicating that RGC Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment RGC Resources 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Pure Cycle 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts prefer MNTK or PCYO?

Montauk Renewables presently has a consensus price target of $1.80, indicating a potential upside of 6.51%. Given Montauk Renewables' higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Montauk Renewables is more favorable than Pure Cycle. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Montauk Renewables 1 Sell rating(s) 4 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.80 Pure Cycle 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00

Do analysts rate GWRS or PCYO?

Global Water Resources currently has a consensus price target of $15.00, indicating a potential upside of 108.33%. Given Global Water Resources' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Global Water Resources is more favorable than Pure Cycle. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Global Water Resources 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.50 Pure Cycle 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00

Does the media favor GWRS or PCYO?

In the previous week, Global Water Resources had 3 more articles in the media than Pure Cycle. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Global Water Resources and 1 mentions for Pure Cycle. Global Water Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.85 beat Pure Cycle's score of 0.00 indicating that Global Water Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Global Water Resources 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Pure Cycle 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Pure Cycle (PCYO) Competitors

$10.81 0.00 (0.00%)

Closing price 07/2/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$10.82 +0.01 (+0.14%)

As of 07/2/2026 04:10 PM Eastern

Compare

PCYO vs. SMC, OPAL, RGCO, MNTK, and GWRS

Should you buy Pure Cycle stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Pure Cycle with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Pure Cycle include Summit Midstream Partners (SMC), OPAL Fuels (OPAL), RGC Resources (RGCO), Montauk Renewables (MNTK), and Global Water Resources (GWRS). These companies are all part of the "utilities" industry.

How does Pure Cycle compare to Summit Midstream Partners?

Pure Cycle (NASDAQ:PCYO) and Summit Midstream Partners (NYSE:SMC) are both small-cap utilities companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, earnings, dividends and media sentiment.

Pure Cycle has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Summit Midstream Partners. Summit Midstream Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pure Cycle, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Pure Cycle	$26.09M	9.99	$13.11M	$0.58	18.64
Summit Midstream Partners	$562.09M	1.08	-$1.91M	-$1.88	N/A

Pure Cycle has a beta of 1.23, indicating that its share price is 23% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Summit Midstream Partners has a beta of 0.74, indicating that its share price is 26% less volatile than the broader market.

Summit Midstream Partners has a consensus price target of $47.00, suggesting a potential upside of 57.73%. Given Summit Midstream Partners' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Summit Midstream Partners is more favorable than Pure Cycle.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Pure Cycle	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Summit Midstream Partners	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33

Pure Cycle has a net margin of 45.80% compared to Summit Midstream Partners' net margin of -1.09%. Pure Cycle's return on equity of 9.75% beat Summit Midstream Partners' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Pure Cycle	45.80%	9.75%	8.65%
Summit Midstream Partners	-1.09%	N/A	N/A

51.4% of Pure Cycle shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 43.0% of Summit Midstream Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.1% of Pure Cycle shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 43.0% of Summit Midstream Partners shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Pure Cycle had 1 more articles in the media than Summit Midstream Partners. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Pure Cycle and 0 mentions for Summit Midstream Partners. Pure Cycle's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Summit Midstream Partners'average media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Pure Cycle	Neutral
Summit Midstream Partners	Neutral

Summary

Pure Cycle beats Summit Midstream Partners on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pure Cycle compare to OPAL Fuels?

Pure Cycle (NASDAQ:PCYO) and OPAL Fuels (NASDAQ:OPAL) are both small-cap utilities companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability and analyst recommendations.

51.4% of Pure Cycle shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.2% of OPAL Fuels shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.1% of Pure Cycle shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 85.7% of OPAL Fuels shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Pure Cycle has a beta of 1.23, suggesting that its share price is 23% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, OPAL Fuels has a beta of 0.77, suggesting that its share price is 23% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Pure Cycle and Pure Cycle both had 1 articles in the media. OPAL Fuels' average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat Pure Cycle's score of 0.00 indicating that OPAL Fuels is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Pure Cycle	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
OPAL Fuels	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

OPAL Fuels has a consensus price target of $2.72, suggesting a potential upside of 28.75%. Given OPAL Fuels' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe OPAL Fuels is more favorable than Pure Cycle.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Pure Cycle	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
OPAL Fuels	2 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.60

OPAL Fuels has higher revenue and earnings than Pure Cycle. Pure Cycle is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than OPAL Fuels, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Pure Cycle	$26.09M	9.99	$13.11M	$0.58	18.64
OPAL Fuels	$348.98M	1.05	$14.75M	$0.07	30.14

Pure Cycle has a net margin of 45.80% compared to OPAL Fuels' net margin of 1.33%. Pure Cycle's return on equity of 9.75% beat OPAL Fuels' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Pure Cycle	45.80%	9.75%	8.65%
OPAL Fuels	1.33%	-479.62%	0.47%

Summary

Pure Cycle beats OPAL Fuels on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pure Cycle compare to RGC Resources?

RGC Resources (NASDAQ:RGCO) and Pure Cycle (NASDAQ:PCYO) are both small-cap utilities companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, dividends, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership and valuation.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
RGC Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Pure Cycle	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Pure Cycle has a net margin of 45.80% compared to RGC Resources' net margin of 13.01%. RGC Resources' return on equity of 11.87% beat Pure Cycle's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
RGC Resources	13.01%	11.87%	4.19%
Pure Cycle	45.80%	9.75%	8.65%

RGC Resources has a beta of 0.5, suggesting that its stock price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pure Cycle has a beta of 1.23, suggesting that its stock price is 23% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, RGC Resources had 3 more articles in the media than Pure Cycle. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for RGC Resources and 1 mentions for Pure Cycle. RGC Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.60 beat Pure Cycle's score of 0.00 indicating that RGC Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
RGC Resources	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Pure Cycle	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

35.8% of RGC Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 51.4% of Pure Cycle shares are held by institutional investors. 7.2% of RGC Resources shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.1% of Pure Cycle shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

RGC Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Pure Cycle. RGC Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pure Cycle, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
RGC Resources	$95.33M	2.63	$13.28M	$1.34	17.96
Pure Cycle	$26.09M	9.99	$13.11M	$0.58	18.64

Summary

RGC Resources beats Pure Cycle on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pure Cycle compare to Montauk Renewables?

Montauk Renewables (NASDAQ:MNTK) and Pure Cycle (NASDAQ:PCYO) are both small-cap utilities companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, dividends, risk, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

Montauk Renewables has a beta of 0.57, meaning that its share price is 43% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pure Cycle has a beta of 1.23, meaning that its share price is 23% more volatile than the broader market.

Pure Cycle has a net margin of 45.80% compared to Montauk Renewables' net margin of 0.40%. Pure Cycle's return on equity of 9.75% beat Montauk Renewables' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Montauk Renewables	0.40%	0.28%	0.17%
Pure Cycle	45.80%	9.75%	8.65%

In the previous week, Pure Cycle had 1 more articles in the media than Montauk Renewables. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Pure Cycle and 0 mentions for Montauk Renewables. Montauk Renewables' average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Pure Cycle's score of 0.00 indicating that Montauk Renewables is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Montauk Renewables	Positive
Pure Cycle	Neutral

16.4% of Montauk Renewables shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 51.4% of Pure Cycle shares are held by institutional investors. 54.3% of Montauk Renewables shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 6.1% of Pure Cycle shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Pure Cycle has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Montauk Renewables. Pure Cycle is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Montauk Renewables, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Montauk Renewables	$176.38M	1.36	$1.75M	$0.02	84.50
Pure Cycle	$26.09M	9.99	$13.11M	$0.58	18.64

Montauk Renewables presently has a consensus price target of $1.80, indicating a potential upside of 6.51%. Given Montauk Renewables' higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Montauk Renewables is more favorable than Pure Cycle.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Montauk Renewables	1 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.80
Pure Cycle	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Summary

Pure Cycle beats Montauk Renewables on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pure Cycle compare to Global Water Resources?

Global Water Resources (NASDAQ:GWRS) and Pure Cycle (NASDAQ:PCYO) are both small-cap utilities companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, valuation, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership and dividends.

In the previous week, Global Water Resources had 3 more articles in the media than Pure Cycle. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Global Water Resources and 1 mentions for Pure Cycle. Global Water Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.85 beat Pure Cycle's score of 0.00 indicating that Global Water Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Global Water Resources	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Pure Cycle	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Pure Cycle has a net margin of 45.80% compared to Global Water Resources' net margin of 3.53%. Pure Cycle's return on equity of 9.75% beat Global Water Resources' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Global Water Resources	3.53%	3.53%	0.63%
Pure Cycle	45.80%	9.75%	8.65%

Pure Cycle has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Global Water Resources. Pure Cycle is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Global Water Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Global Water Resources	$55.76M	3.71	$2.96M	$0.07	102.86
Pure Cycle	$26.09M	9.99	$13.11M	$0.58	18.64

Global Water Resources has a beta of 0.92, meaning that its stock price is 8% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pure Cycle has a beta of 1.23, meaning that its stock price is 23% more volatile than the broader market.

Global Water Resources currently has a consensus price target of $15.00, indicating a potential upside of 108.33%. Given Global Water Resources' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Global Water Resources is more favorable than Pure Cycle.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Global Water Resources	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.50
Pure Cycle	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

27.9% of Global Water Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 51.4% of Pure Cycle shares are owned by institutional investors. 53.7% of Global Water Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.1% of Pure Cycle shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Pure Cycle beats Global Water Resources on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Pure Cycle News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PCYO and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

PCYO vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Pure Cycle	UTIL Industry	Utilities Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$260.56M	$8.20B	$18.97B	$12.47B
Dividend Yield	N/A	2.81%	3.94%	6.51%
P/E Ratio	18.64	24.91	20.03	24.70
Price / Sales	9.99	4.49	38.66	99.70
Price / Cash	16.89	13.01	19.42	57.09
Price / Book	1.82	2.10	2.43	6.46
Net Income	$13.11M	$416.55M	$785.96M	$337.01M
7 Day Performance	-3.74%	1.27%	-0.53%	1.69%
1 Month Performance	3.15%	5.10%	-0.95%	3.81%
1 Year Performance	-4.80%	-7.96%	12.18%	23.90%

Pure Cycle Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
PCYO Pure Cycle	0.6338 of 5 stars	$10.81 flat	N/A	-4.8%	$260.56M	$26.09M	18.64	40	Upcoming Earnings
SMC Summit Midstream Partners	2.2498 of 5 stars	$28.46 +0.5%	$47.00 +65.2%	+17.8%	$575.79M	$562.09M	N/A	244	Positive News
OPAL OPAL Fuels	3.4242 of 5 stars	$2.20 -4.8%	$2.72 +23.5%	-21.1%	$400.55M	$348.98M	31.43	270	News Coverage Positive News Analyst Upgrade
RGCO RGC Resources	2.7448 of 5 stars	$23.90 +0.5%	N/A	+5.9%	$247.59M	$95.33M	17.84	100	Dividend Announcement
MNTK Montauk Renewables	1.4942 of 5 stars	$1.56 flat	$1.80 +15.4%	-37.3%	$222.05M	$176.38M	78.04	130	Positive News

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:PCYO) was last updated on 7/5/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Pure Cycle (PCYO) Competitors

PCYO vs. SMC, OPAL, RGCO, MNTK, and GWRS

How does Pure Cycle compare to Summit Midstream Partners?

Summary

How does Pure Cycle compare to OPAL Fuels?

Summary

How does Pure Cycle compare to RGC Resources?

Summary

How does Pure Cycle compare to Montauk Renewables?

Summary

How does Pure Cycle compare to Global Water Resources?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

PCYO vs. The Competition

Pure Cycle Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Pure Cycle (PCYO) Competitors

PCYO vs. SMC, OPAL, RGCO, MNTK, and GWRS

How does Pure Cycle compare to Summit Midstream Partners?

Which has better valuation and earnings, PCYO or SMC?

Which has more risk and volatility, PCYO or SMC?

Do analysts rate PCYO or SMC?

Is PCYO or SMC more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of PCYO or SMC?

Does the media favor PCYO or SMC?

Summary

How does Pure Cycle compare to OPAL Fuels?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of PCYO or OPAL?

Which has more risk & volatility, PCYO or OPAL?

Does the media prefer PCYO or OPAL?

Do analysts prefer PCYO or OPAL?

Which has better valuation & earnings, PCYO or OPAL?

Is PCYO or OPAL more profitable?

Summary

How does Pure Cycle compare to RGC Resources?

Do analysts prefer RGCO or PCYO?

Is RGCO or PCYO more profitable?

Which has more volatility and risk, RGCO or PCYO?

Does the media favor RGCO or PCYO?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in RGCO or PCYO?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, RGCO or PCYO?

Summary

How does Pure Cycle compare to Montauk Renewables?

Which has more volatility & risk, MNTK or PCYO?

Is MNTK or PCYO more profitable?

Does the media prefer MNTK or PCYO?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in MNTK or PCYO?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, MNTK or PCYO?

Do analysts prefer MNTK or PCYO?

Summary

How does Pure Cycle compare to Global Water Resources?

Does the media favor GWRS or PCYO?

Is GWRS or PCYO more profitable?

Which has better earnings and valuation, GWRS or PCYO?

Which has more risk and volatility, GWRS or PCYO?

Do analysts rate GWRS or PCYO?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in GWRS or PCYO?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

PCYO vs. The Competition

Pure Cycle Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools