Free Trial

Summit Midstream Partners (SMC) Competitors

Summit Midstream Partners logo
$29.37 -0.16 (-0.53%)
Closing price 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$29.34 -0.03 (-0.10%)
As of 05:29 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

SMC vs. CEPU, RNW, NEXT, NGL, and NNE

Should you buy Summit Midstream Partners stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Summit Midstream Partners with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Summit Midstream Partners include Central Puerto (CEPU), ReNew Energy Global (RNW), NextDecade (NEXT), NGL Energy Partners (NGL), and Nano Nuclear Energy (NNE). These companies are all part of the "utilities" industry.

How does Summit Midstream Partners compare to Central Puerto?

Summit Midstream Partners (NYSE:SMC) and Central Puerto (NYSE:CEPU) are both energy companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, dividends, earnings and valuation.

Summit Midstream Partners currently has a consensus target price of $47.00, suggesting a potential upside of 60.01%. Central Puerto has a consensus target price of $17.50, suggesting a potential upside of 18.28%. Given Summit Midstream Partners' higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Summit Midstream Partners is more favorable than Central Puerto.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Summit Midstream Partners
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Central Puerto
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Central Puerto has a net margin of 37.86% compared to Summit Midstream Partners' net margin of -1.09%. Central Puerto's return on equity of 15.93% beat Summit Midstream Partners' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Summit Midstream Partners-1.09% N/A N/A
Central Puerto 37.86%15.93%11.06%

In the previous week, Summit Midstream Partners had 1 more articles in the media than Central Puerto. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Summit Midstream Partners and 0 mentions for Central Puerto. Summit Midstream Partners' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Central Puerto'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Summit Midstream Partners Neutral
Central Puerto Neutral

Central Puerto has higher revenue and earnings than Summit Midstream Partners. Summit Midstream Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Central Puerto, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Summit Midstream Partners$562.09M1.06-$1.91M-$1.88N/A
Central Puerto$782.60M2.86$277.08M$2.087.11

43.0% of Summit Midstream Partners shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.0% of Central Puerto shares are held by institutional investors. 43.0% of Summit Midstream Partners shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Central Puerto shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summit Midstream Partners has a beta of 0.77, suggesting that its share price is 23% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Central Puerto has a beta of 0.84, suggesting that its share price is 16% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Central Puerto beats Summit Midstream Partners on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Summit Midstream Partners compare to ReNew Energy Global?

ReNew Energy Global (NASDAQ:RNW) and Summit Midstream Partners (NYSE:SMC) are both energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, media sentiment and valuation.

ReNew Energy Global has higher revenue and earnings than Summit Midstream Partners. Summit Midstream Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ReNew Energy Global, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
ReNew Energy Global$1.61B1.39$111M$0.3119.81
Summit Midstream Partners$562.09M1.06-$1.91M-$1.88N/A

ReNew Energy Global presently has a consensus price target of $6.39, suggesting a potential upside of 4.07%. Summit Midstream Partners has a consensus price target of $47.00, suggesting a potential upside of 60.01%. Given Summit Midstream Partners' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Summit Midstream Partners is more favorable than ReNew Energy Global.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
ReNew Energy Global
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Summit Midstream Partners
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

43.6% of ReNew Energy Global shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 43.0% of Summit Midstream Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.7% of ReNew Energy Global shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 43.0% of Summit Midstream Partners shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

ReNew Energy Global has a beta of 1.12, meaning that its stock price is 12% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Summit Midstream Partners has a beta of 0.77, meaning that its stock price is 23% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, ReNew Energy Global had 2 more articles in the media than Summit Midstream Partners. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for ReNew Energy Global and 1 mentions for Summit Midstream Partners. ReNew Energy Global's average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat Summit Midstream Partners' score of 0.00 indicating that ReNew Energy Global is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
ReNew Energy Global
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Summit Midstream Partners
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

ReNew Energy Global has a net margin of 7.18% compared to Summit Midstream Partners' net margin of -1.09%. ReNew Energy Global's return on equity of 7.57% beat Summit Midstream Partners' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
ReNew Energy Global7.18% 7.57% 1.05%
Summit Midstream Partners -1.09%N/A N/A

Summary

ReNew Energy Global beats Summit Midstream Partners on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Summit Midstream Partners compare to NextDecade?

NextDecade (NASDAQ:NEXT) and Summit Midstream Partners (NYSE:SMC) are both energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, earnings, profitability, media sentiment and valuation.

NextDecade presently has a consensus target price of $8.00, indicating a potential downside of 1.60%. Summit Midstream Partners has a consensus target price of $47.00, indicating a potential upside of 60.01%. Given Summit Midstream Partners' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Summit Midstream Partners is more favorable than NextDecade.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
NextDecade
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Summit Midstream Partners
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

In the previous week, NextDecade had 5 more articles in the media than Summit Midstream Partners. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for NextDecade and 1 mentions for Summit Midstream Partners. NextDecade's average media sentiment score of 0.58 beat Summit Midstream Partners' score of 0.00 indicating that NextDecade is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
NextDecade
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Summit Midstream Partners
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

NextDecade has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Summit Midstream Partners' net margin of -1.09%. Summit Midstream Partners' return on equity of 0.00% beat NextDecade's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
NextDecadeN/A -25.39% -4.96%
Summit Midstream Partners -1.09%N/A N/A

NextDecade has a beta of 1.6, indicating that its share price is 60% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Summit Midstream Partners has a beta of 0.77, indicating that its share price is 23% less volatile than the broader market.

66.7% of NextDecade shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 43.0% of Summit Midstream Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.6% of NextDecade shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 43.0% of Summit Midstream Partners shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summit Midstream Partners has higher revenue and earnings than NextDecade. Summit Midstream Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than NextDecade, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
NextDecadeN/AN/A-$306.43M-$1.34N/A
Summit Midstream Partners$562.09M1.06-$1.91M-$1.88N/A

Summary

NextDecade beats Summit Midstream Partners on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Summit Midstream Partners compare to NGL Energy Partners?

NGL Energy Partners (NYSE:NGL) and Summit Midstream Partners (NYSE:SMC) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends, valuation, risk, earnings, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

Summit Midstream Partners has a net margin of -1.09% compared to NGL Energy Partners' net margin of -4.51%. Summit Midstream Partners' return on equity of 0.00% beat NGL Energy Partners' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
NGL Energy Partners-4.51% -47.64% 3.64%
Summit Midstream Partners -1.09%N/A N/A

NGL Energy Partners has a beta of 0.58, suggesting that its share price is 42% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Summit Midstream Partners has a beta of 0.77, suggesting that its share price is 23% less volatile than the broader market.

Summit Midstream Partners has a consensus target price of $47.00, indicating a potential upside of 60.01%. Given Summit Midstream Partners' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Summit Midstream Partners is more favorable than NGL Energy Partners.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
NGL Energy Partners
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Summit Midstream Partners
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

Summit Midstream Partners has lower revenue, but higher earnings than NGL Energy Partners. Summit Midstream Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than NGL Energy Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
NGL Energy Partners$3.16B0.62-$142.29M-$3.28N/A
Summit Midstream Partners$562.09M1.06-$1.91M-$1.88N/A

40.6% of NGL Energy Partners shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 43.0% of Summit Midstream Partners shares are held by institutional investors. 7.3% of NGL Energy Partners shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 43.0% of Summit Midstream Partners shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, NGL Energy Partners had 1 more articles in the media than Summit Midstream Partners. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for NGL Energy Partners and 1 mentions for Summit Midstream Partners. NGL Energy Partners' average media sentiment score of 1.10 beat Summit Midstream Partners' score of 0.00 indicating that NGL Energy Partners is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
NGL Energy Partners
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Summit Midstream Partners
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Summit Midstream Partners beats NGL Energy Partners on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Summit Midstream Partners compare to Nano Nuclear Energy?

Nano Nuclear Energy (NASDAQ:NNE) and Summit Midstream Partners (NYSE:SMC) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership and dividends.

Summit Midstream Partners has higher revenue and earnings than Nano Nuclear Energy. Nano Nuclear Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Summit Midstream Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Nano Nuclear EnergyN/AN/A-$40.07M-$0.69N/A
Summit Midstream Partners$562.09M1.06-$1.91M-$1.88N/A

Nano Nuclear Energy has a beta of 5.05, suggesting that its stock price is 405% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Summit Midstream Partners has a beta of 0.77, suggesting that its stock price is 23% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Nano Nuclear Energy had 16 more articles in the media than Summit Midstream Partners. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Nano Nuclear Energy and 1 mentions for Summit Midstream Partners. Summit Midstream Partners' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Nano Nuclear Energy's score of -0.23 indicating that Summit Midstream Partners is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Nano Nuclear Energy
5 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Summit Midstream Partners
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

43.0% of Summit Midstream Partners shares are held by institutional investors. 32.8% of Nano Nuclear Energy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 43.0% of Summit Midstream Partners shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Nano Nuclear Energy has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Summit Midstream Partners' net margin of -1.09%. Summit Midstream Partners' return on equity of 0.00% beat Nano Nuclear Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Nano Nuclear EnergyN/A -7.62% -7.51%
Summit Midstream Partners -1.09%N/A N/A

Nano Nuclear Energy currently has a consensus price target of $47.00, indicating a potential upside of 96.32%. Summit Midstream Partners has a consensus price target of $47.00, indicating a potential upside of 60.01%. Given Nano Nuclear Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Nano Nuclear Energy is more favorable than Summit Midstream Partners.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Nano Nuclear Energy
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.86
Summit Midstream Partners
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

Summary

Nano Nuclear Energy and Summit Midstream Partners tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Summit Midstream Partners News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for SMC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding SMC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

SMC vs. The Competition

MetricSummit Midstream PartnersOil/Gas Prod Pipeline MLP IndustryEnergy SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$600.60M$34.80B$10.17B$22.98B
Dividend YieldN/A6.61%10.41%4.11%
P/E Ratio-15.6215.4320.0030.61
Price / Sales1.061.54758.0521.22
Price / Cash2.897.9437.7623.83
Price / BookN/A95.644.244.64
Net Income-$1.91M$2.21B$4.23B$1.07B
7 Day Performance-1.52%-0.95%-2.90%-0.71%
1 Month Performance-1.64%1.59%-1.23%0.06%
1 Year Performance18.49%11.96%42.27%21.50%

Summit Midstream Partners Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
SMC
Summit Midstream Partners
2.5043 of 5 stars
$29.37
-0.5%
$47.00
+60.0%
+17.9%$600.60M$562.09MN/A244
CEPU
Central Puerto
2.6674 of 5 stars
$15.73
-1.7%
$17.50
+11.3%
+18.0%$2.42B$782.60M7.561,269
RNW
ReNew Energy Global
3.8539 of 5 stars
$6.38
-2.1%
$6.39
+0.2%
-13.8%$2.37B$132.20B20.584,336
NEXT
NextDecade
2.3244 of 5 stars
$8.27
-0.1%
$8.00
-3.3%
+1.8%$2.19BN/AN/A60
NGL
NGL Energy Partners
1.7747 of 5 stars
$16.53
-3.2%
N/A+308.6%$2.06B$3.16BN/A840

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:SMC) was last updated on 6/9/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners