Free Trial

New Fortress Energy (NFE) Competitors

New Fortress Energy logo
$0.63 0.00 (0.00%)
Closing price 05/22/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$0.63 0.00 (-0.63%)
As of 05/22/2026 07:52 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

NFE vs. SMC, OPAL, PCYO, RGCO, and MNTK

Should you buy New Fortress Energy stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares New Fortress Energy with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with New Fortress Energy include Summit Midstream Partners (SMC), OPAL Fuels (OPAL), Pure Cycle (PCYO), RGC Resources (RGCO), and Montauk Renewables (MNTK). These companies are all part of the "utilities" industry.

How does New Fortress Energy compare to Summit Midstream Partners?

Summit Midstream Partners (NYSE:SMC) and New Fortress Energy (NASDAQ:NFE) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability and valuation.

Summit Midstream Partners presently has a consensus target price of $47.00, indicating a potential upside of 53.14%. New Fortress Energy has a consensus target price of $6.25, indicating a potential upside of 885.80%. Given New Fortress Energy's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe New Fortress Energy is more favorable than Summit Midstream Partners.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Summit Midstream Partners
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
New Fortress Energy
2 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.86

Summit Midstream Partners has a beta of 0.83, suggesting that its share price is 17% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, New Fortress Energy has a beta of 1.34, suggesting that its share price is 34% more volatile than the broader market.

Summit Midstream Partners has higher earnings, but lower revenue than New Fortress Energy. Summit Midstream Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than New Fortress Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Summit Midstream Partners$562.09M1.04-$1.91M-$1.88N/A
New Fortress Energy$1.50B0.12-$1.84B-$2.24N/A

43.0% of Summit Midstream Partners shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 58.6% of New Fortress Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 43.0% of Summit Midstream Partners shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 29.4% of New Fortress Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Summit Midstream Partners had 5 more articles in the media than New Fortress Energy. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Summit Midstream Partners and 1 mentions for New Fortress Energy. Summit Midstream Partners' average media sentiment score of 0.34 beat New Fortress Energy's score of -1.13 indicating that Summit Midstream Partners is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Summit Midstream Partners
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
New Fortress Energy
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Negative

Summit Midstream Partners has a net margin of -1.09% compared to New Fortress Energy's net margin of -164.16%. Summit Midstream Partners' return on equity of 0.00% beat New Fortress Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Summit Midstream Partners-1.09% N/A N/A
New Fortress Energy -164.16%-253.73%-15.46%

Summary

Summit Midstream Partners beats New Fortress Energy on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does New Fortress Energy compare to OPAL Fuels?

New Fortress Energy (NASDAQ:NFE) and OPAL Fuels (NASDAQ:OPAL) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, earnings, profitability, dividends, risk, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

New Fortress Energy presently has a consensus target price of $6.25, indicating a potential upside of 885.80%. OPAL Fuels has a consensus target price of $2.72, indicating a potential upside of 25.77%. Given New Fortress Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe New Fortress Energy is more favorable than OPAL Fuels.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
New Fortress Energy
2 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.86
OPAL Fuels
2 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.60

New Fortress Energy has a beta of 1.34, meaning that its stock price is 34% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, OPAL Fuels has a beta of 0.76, meaning that its stock price is 24% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, OPAL Fuels had 8 more articles in the media than New Fortress Energy. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for OPAL Fuels and 1 mentions for New Fortress Energy. OPAL Fuels' average media sentiment score of 0.62 beat New Fortress Energy's score of -1.13 indicating that OPAL Fuels is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
New Fortress Energy
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Negative
OPAL Fuels
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

58.6% of New Fortress Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.2% of OPAL Fuels shares are held by institutional investors. 29.4% of New Fortress Energy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 84.6% of OPAL Fuels shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

OPAL Fuels has a net margin of 1.33% compared to New Fortress Energy's net margin of -164.16%. New Fortress Energy's return on equity of -253.73% beat OPAL Fuels' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
New Fortress Energy-164.16% -253.73% -15.46%
OPAL Fuels 1.33%-479.62%0.47%

OPAL Fuels has lower revenue, but higher earnings than New Fortress Energy. New Fortress Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than OPAL Fuels, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
New Fortress Energy$1.50B0.12-$1.84B-$2.24N/A
OPAL Fuels$348.98M1.07$14.75M$0.0730.86

Summary

OPAL Fuels beats New Fortress Energy on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does New Fortress Energy compare to Pure Cycle?

Pure Cycle (NASDAQ:PCYO) and New Fortress Energy (NASDAQ:NFE) are both small-cap utilities companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, risk, media sentiment, dividends and earnings.

Pure Cycle has a beta of 1.29, meaning that its share price is 29% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, New Fortress Energy has a beta of 1.34, meaning that its share price is 34% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, New Fortress Energy had 1 more articles in the media than Pure Cycle. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for New Fortress Energy and 0 mentions for Pure Cycle. Pure Cycle's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat New Fortress Energy's score of -1.13 indicating that Pure Cycle is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Pure Cycle Neutral
New Fortress Energy Negative

New Fortress Energy has a consensus target price of $6.25, indicating a potential upside of 885.80%. Given New Fortress Energy's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe New Fortress Energy is more favorable than Pure Cycle.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Pure Cycle
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
New Fortress Energy
2 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.86

51.4% of Pure Cycle shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 58.6% of New Fortress Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.1% of Pure Cycle shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 29.4% of New Fortress Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Pure Cycle has a net margin of 45.80% compared to New Fortress Energy's net margin of -164.16%. Pure Cycle's return on equity of 9.75% beat New Fortress Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pure Cycle45.80% 9.75% 8.65%
New Fortress Energy -164.16%-253.73%-15.46%

Pure Cycle has higher earnings, but lower revenue than New Fortress Energy. New Fortress Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pure Cycle, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pure Cycle$26.09M9.27$13.11M$0.5817.31
New Fortress Energy$1.50B0.12-$1.84B-$2.24N/A

Summary

Pure Cycle beats New Fortress Energy on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does New Fortress Energy compare to RGC Resources?

New Fortress Energy (NASDAQ:NFE) and RGC Resources (NASDAQ:RGCO) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment and earnings.

In the previous week, New Fortress Energy had 1 more articles in the media than RGC Resources. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for New Fortress Energy and 0 mentions for RGC Resources. RGC Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat New Fortress Energy's score of -1.13 indicating that RGC Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
New Fortress Energy Negative
RGC Resources Neutral

58.6% of New Fortress Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 35.8% of RGC Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 29.4% of New Fortress Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 7.2% of RGC Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

RGC Resources has a net margin of 13.01% compared to New Fortress Energy's net margin of -164.16%. RGC Resources' return on equity of 11.87% beat New Fortress Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
New Fortress Energy-164.16% -253.73% -15.46%
RGC Resources 13.01%11.87%4.19%

RGC Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than New Fortress Energy. New Fortress Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than RGC Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
New Fortress Energy$1.50B0.12-$1.84B-$2.24N/A
RGC Resources$95.33M2.46$13.28M$1.3416.79

New Fortress Energy presently has a consensus price target of $6.25, suggesting a potential upside of 885.80%. Given New Fortress Energy's higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe New Fortress Energy is more favorable than RGC Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
New Fortress Energy
2 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.86
RGC Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

New Fortress Energy has a beta of 1.34, suggesting that its share price is 34% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, RGC Resources has a beta of 0.52, suggesting that its share price is 48% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

RGC Resources beats New Fortress Energy on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does New Fortress Energy compare to Montauk Renewables?

New Fortress Energy (NASDAQ:NFE) and Montauk Renewables (NASDAQ:MNTK) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, media sentiment, dividends, valuation and earnings.

Montauk Renewables has lower revenue, but higher earnings than New Fortress Energy. New Fortress Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Montauk Renewables, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
New Fortress Energy$1.50B0.12-$1.84B-$2.24N/A
Montauk Renewables$176.38M1.25$1.75M$0.0277.50

58.6% of New Fortress Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 16.4% of Montauk Renewables shares are owned by institutional investors. 29.4% of New Fortress Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 54.3% of Montauk Renewables shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, New Fortress Energy and New Fortress Energy both had 1 articles in the media. Montauk Renewables' average media sentiment score of -0.10 beat New Fortress Energy's score of -1.13 indicating that Montauk Renewables is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
New Fortress Energy
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Negative
Montauk Renewables
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Montauk Renewables has a net margin of 0.40% compared to New Fortress Energy's net margin of -164.16%. Montauk Renewables' return on equity of 0.28% beat New Fortress Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
New Fortress Energy-164.16% -253.73% -15.46%
Montauk Renewables 0.40%0.28%0.17%

New Fortress Energy presently has a consensus target price of $6.25, indicating a potential upside of 885.80%. Montauk Renewables has a consensus target price of $1.80, indicating a potential upside of 16.13%. Given New Fortress Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe New Fortress Energy is more favorable than Montauk Renewables.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
New Fortress Energy
2 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.86
Montauk Renewables
1 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.80

New Fortress Energy has a beta of 1.34, meaning that its share price is 34% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Montauk Renewables has a beta of 0.47, meaning that its share price is 53% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Montauk Renewables beats New Fortress Energy on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get New Fortress Energy News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for NFE and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding NFE and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

NFE vs. The Competition

MetricNew Fortress EnergyOIL IndustryEnergy SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$181.09M$101.53B$10.58B$12.34B
Dividend YieldN/A3.25%10.23%5.28%
P/E Ratio-0.2816.3821.1025.66
Price / Sales0.121.88999.6186.31
Price / CashN/A7.4138.7456.67
Price / Book-3.341.604.667.14
Net Income-$1.84B$4.71B$4.24B$335.98M
7 Day Performance3.32%-2.20%-0.52%4.15%
1 Month Performance0.16%4.15%2.21%2.54%
1 Year Performance-77.19%51.47%53.92%35.06%

New Fortress Energy Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
NFE
New Fortress Energy
1.7507 of 5 stars
$0.63
flat
$6.25
+885.8%
-77.2%$181.09M$1.50BN/A670
SMC
Summit Midstream Partners
3.2375 of 5 stars
$31.76
-1.2%
$47.00
+48.0%
+14.1%$602.41M$562.09MN/A244
OPAL
OPAL Fuels
4.2285 of 5 stars
$1.98
+2.1%
$2.72
+37.2%
-20.3%$343.33M$348.98M28.29270
PCYO
Pure Cycle
1.0906 of 5 stars
$10.44
-0.2%
N/A-3.1%$251.60M$26.09M18.0040
RGCO
RGC Resources
2.4278 of 5 stars
$22.57
+1.9%
N/A+7.9%$234.95M$95.33M16.84100

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:NFE) was last updated on 5/26/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners