Kinetik (KNTK) Competitors

In the previous week, Kinetik had 15 more articles in the media than Cheniere Energy Partners. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Kinetik and 1 mentions for Cheniere Energy Partners. Cheniere Energy Partners' average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat Kinetik's score of 0.42 indicating that Cheniere Energy Partners is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Kinetik currently has a consensus price target of $54.00, indicating a potential upside of 5.51%. Cheniere Energy Partners has a consensus price target of $62.00, indicating a potential downside of 1.20%. Given Kinetik's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Kinetik is more favorable than Cheniere Energy Partners.

Kinetik pays an annual dividend of $3.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.3%. Cheniere Energy Partners pays an annual dividend of $3.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.9%. Kinetik pays out 117.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Cheniere Energy Partners pays out 56.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Kinetik has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Kinetik is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Cheniere Energy Partners has a net margin of 27.31% compared to Kinetik's net margin of 26.19%. Cheniere Energy Partners' return on equity of 1,121.60% beat Kinetik's return on equity.

Cheniere Energy Partners has higher revenue and earnings than Kinetik. Cheniere Energy Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kinetik, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

21.1% of Kinetik shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 46.6% of Cheniere Energy Partners shares are held by institutional investors. 3.6% of Kinetik shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Kinetik has a beta of 0.57, suggesting that its share price is 43% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cheniere Energy Partners has a beta of 0.32, suggesting that its share price is 68% less volatile than the broader market.

Pembina Pipeline has higher revenue and earnings than Kinetik. Kinetik is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pembina Pipeline, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Kinetik pays an annual dividend of $3.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.3%. Pembina Pipeline pays an annual dividend of $2.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.7%. Kinetik pays out 117.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Pembina Pipeline pays out 103.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Kinetik has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Pembina Pipeline has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years.

Kinetik currently has a consensus target price of $54.00, suggesting a potential upside of 5.51%. Pembina Pipeline has a consensus target price of $64.00, suggesting a potential upside of 41.97%. Given Pembina Pipeline's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Pembina Pipeline is more favorable than Kinetik.

In the previous week, Kinetik had 16 more articles in the media than Pembina Pipeline. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Kinetik and 0 mentions for Pembina Pipeline. Pembina Pipeline's average media sentiment score of 1.84 beat Kinetik's score of 0.42 indicating that Pembina Pipeline is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Kinetik has a net margin of 26.19% compared to Pembina Pipeline's net margin of 22.41%. Pembina Pipeline's return on equity of 11.41% beat Kinetik's return on equity.

21.1% of Kinetik shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 55.4% of Pembina Pipeline shares are held by institutional investors. 3.6% of Kinetik shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Pembina Pipeline shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Kinetik has a beta of 0.57, meaning that its share price is 43% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pembina Pipeline has a beta of 0.58, meaning that its share price is 42% less volatile than the broader market.

Western Midstream Partners has higher revenue and earnings than Kinetik. Western Midstream Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kinetik, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Kinetik had 15 more articles in the media than Western Midstream Partners. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Kinetik and 1 mentions for Western Midstream Partners. Western Midstream Partners' average media sentiment score of 0.58 beat Kinetik's score of 0.42 indicating that Western Midstream Partners is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

21.1% of Kinetik shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.8% of Western Midstream Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.6% of Kinetik shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Western Midstream Partners shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Kinetik has a beta of 0.57, indicating that its share price is 43% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Western Midstream Partners has a beta of 0.69, indicating that its share price is 31% less volatile than the broader market.

Kinetik pays an annual dividend of $3.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.3%. Western Midstream Partners pays an annual dividend of $3.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.2%. Kinetik pays out 117.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Western Midstream Partners pays out 117.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Kinetik has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Western Midstream Partners has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years. Western Midstream Partners is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Western Midstream Partners has a net margin of 29.44% compared to Kinetik's net margin of 26.19%. Western Midstream Partners' return on equity of 33.13% beat Kinetik's return on equity.

Kinetik presently has a consensus target price of $54.00, suggesting a potential upside of 5.51%. Western Midstream Partners has a consensus target price of $49.89, suggesting a potential upside of 10.07%. Given Western Midstream Partners' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Western Midstream Partners is more favorable than Kinetik.

Kinetik pays an annual dividend of $3.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.3%. Plains All American Pipeline pays an annual dividend of $1.67 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.8%. Kinetik pays out 117.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Plains All American Pipeline pays out 46.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Kinetik has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Plains All American Pipeline has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years. Plains All American Pipeline is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Kinetik had 7 more articles in the media than Plains All American Pipeline. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Kinetik and 9 mentions for Plains All American Pipeline. Plains All American Pipeline's average media sentiment score of 0.81 beat Kinetik's score of 0.42 indicating that Plains All American Pipeline is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

21.1% of Kinetik shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 41.8% of Plains All American Pipeline shares are held by institutional investors. 3.6% of Kinetik shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Plains All American Pipeline shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Kinetik currently has a consensus target price of $54.00, indicating a potential upside of 5.51%. Plains All American Pipeline has a consensus target price of $25.43, indicating a potential upside of 3.66%. Given Kinetik's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Kinetik is more favorable than Plains All American Pipeline.

Kinetik has a net margin of 26.19% compared to Plains All American Pipeline's net margin of 5.29%. Plains All American Pipeline's return on equity of 12.13% beat Kinetik's return on equity.

Plains All American Pipeline has higher revenue and earnings than Kinetik. Plains All American Pipeline is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kinetik, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Kinetik has a beta of 0.57, meaning that its stock price is 43% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Plains All American Pipeline has a beta of 0.52, meaning that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the broader market.