Kinetik (KNTK) Competitors

Kinetik has a beta of 0.56, suggesting that its stock price is 44% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pembina Pipeline has a beta of 0.57, suggesting that its stock price is 43% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Kinetik had 31 more articles in the media than Pembina Pipeline. MarketBeat recorded 34 mentions for Kinetik and 3 mentions for Pembina Pipeline. Pembina Pipeline's average media sentiment score of 1.33 beat Kinetik's score of 0.56 indicating that Pembina Pipeline is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Pembina Pipeline has higher revenue and earnings than Kinetik. Kinetik is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pembina Pipeline, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Kinetik presently has a consensus target price of $52.87, suggesting a potential downside of 1.72%. Pembina Pipeline has a consensus target price of $64.00, suggesting a potential upside of 29.93%. Given Pembina Pipeline's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Pembina Pipeline is more favorable than Kinetik.

Kinetik has a net margin of 26.19% compared to Pembina Pipeline's net margin of 22.41%. Pembina Pipeline's return on equity of 11.41% beat Kinetik's return on equity.

Kinetik pays an annual dividend of $3.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.0%. Pembina Pipeline pays an annual dividend of $2.13 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.3%. Kinetik pays out 117.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Pembina Pipeline pays out 104.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Kinetik has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Pembina Pipeline has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years.

21.1% of Kinetik shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 55.4% of Pembina Pipeline shares are held by institutional investors. 3.6% of Kinetik shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Pembina Pipeline shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Kinetik pays an annual dividend of $3.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.0%. Western Midstream Partners pays an annual dividend of $3.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.6%. Kinetik pays out 117.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Western Midstream Partners pays out 117.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Kinetik has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Western Midstream Partners has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years. Western Midstream Partners is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Kinetik had 18 more articles in the media than Western Midstream Partners. MarketBeat recorded 34 mentions for Kinetik and 16 mentions for Western Midstream Partners. Western Midstream Partners' average media sentiment score of 0.73 beat Kinetik's score of 0.56 indicating that Western Midstream Partners is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Western Midstream Partners has a net margin of 29.44% compared to Kinetik's net margin of 26.19%. Western Midstream Partners' return on equity of 34.79% beat Kinetik's return on equity.

Kinetik presently has a consensus price target of $52.87, indicating a potential downside of 1.72%. Western Midstream Partners has a consensus price target of $47.00, indicating a potential downside of 3.62%. Given Kinetik's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Kinetik is more favorable than Western Midstream Partners.

Kinetik has a beta of 0.56, indicating that its stock price is 44% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Western Midstream Partners has a beta of 0.68, indicating that its stock price is 32% less volatile than the broader market.

21.1% of Kinetik shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.8% of Western Midstream Partners shares are held by institutional investors. 3.6% of Kinetik shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Western Midstream Partners shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Western Midstream Partners has higher revenue and earnings than Kinetik. Western Midstream Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kinetik, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Plains All American Pipeline has higher revenue and earnings than Kinetik. Plains All American Pipeline is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kinetik, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Kinetik has a beta of 0.56, indicating that its stock price is 44% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Plains All American Pipeline has a beta of 0.5, indicating that its stock price is 50% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Kinetik had 24 more articles in the media than Plains All American Pipeline. MarketBeat recorded 34 mentions for Kinetik and 10 mentions for Plains All American Pipeline. Kinetik's average media sentiment score of 0.56 beat Plains All American Pipeline's score of 0.52 indicating that Kinetik is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Kinetik presently has a consensus target price of $52.87, suggesting a potential downside of 1.72%. Plains All American Pipeline has a consensus target price of $23.23, suggesting a potential downside of 1.89%. Given Kinetik's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Kinetik is more favorable than Plains All American Pipeline.

21.1% of Kinetik shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 41.8% of Plains All American Pipeline shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.6% of Kinetik shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Plains All American Pipeline shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Kinetik pays an annual dividend of $3.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.0%. Plains All American Pipeline pays an annual dividend of $1.67 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.1%. Kinetik pays out 117.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Plains All American Pipeline pays out 46.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Kinetik has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Plains All American Pipeline has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years. Plains All American Pipeline is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Kinetik has a net margin of 26.19% compared to Plains All American Pipeline's net margin of 5.29%. Plains All American Pipeline's return on equity of 12.50% beat Kinetik's return on equity.

Sunoco has a beta of 0.41, suggesting that its share price is 59% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kinetik has a beta of 0.56, suggesting that its share price is 44% less volatile than the broader market.

Kinetik has a net margin of 26.19% compared to Sunoco's net margin of 2.88%. Sunoco's return on equity of 18.78% beat Kinetik's return on equity.

Sunoco has higher revenue and earnings than Kinetik. Sunoco is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kinetik, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Sunoco presently has a consensus target price of $79.00, indicating a potential upside of 5.38%. Kinetik has a consensus target price of $52.87, indicating a potential downside of 1.72%. Given Sunoco's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Sunoco is more favorable than Kinetik.

24.3% of Sunoco shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 21.1% of Kinetik shares are held by institutional investors. 3.6% of Kinetik shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Sunoco pays an annual dividend of $4.01 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.3%. Kinetik pays an annual dividend of $3.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.0%. Sunoco pays out 88.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Kinetik pays out 117.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Sunoco has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Kinetik has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

In the previous week, Kinetik had 25 more articles in the media than Sunoco. MarketBeat recorded 34 mentions for Kinetik and 9 mentions for Sunoco. Kinetik's average media sentiment score of 0.56 beat Sunoco's score of 0.50 indicating that Kinetik is being referred to more favorably in the news media.