Korea Electric Power (KEP) Competitors

In the previous week, Energy Transfer had 44 more articles in the media than Korea Electric Power. MarketBeat recorded 46 mentions for Energy Transfer and 2 mentions for Korea Electric Power. Korea Electric Power's average media sentiment score of 0.96 beat Energy Transfer's score of 0.95 indicating that Korea Electric Power is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Korea Electric Power has a net margin of 8.80% compared to Energy Transfer's net margin of 5.11%. Korea Electric Power's return on equity of 18.76% beat Energy Transfer's return on equity.

Korea Electric Power has a beta of 0.99, meaning that its share price is 1% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Energy Transfer has a beta of 0.57, meaning that its share price is 43% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Energy Transfer has a consensus target price of $21.60, suggesting a potential upside of 5.97%. Given Energy Transfer's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Energy Transfer is more favorable than Korea Electric Power.

38.2% of Energy Transfer shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Korea Electric Power shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.3% of Energy Transfer shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Korea Electric Power pays an annual dividend of $0.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. Energy Transfer pays an annual dividend of $1.34 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.6%. Korea Electric Power pays out 11.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Energy Transfer pays out 110.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Energy Transfer has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Energy Transfer is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Korea Electric Power has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Energy Transfer. Korea Electric Power is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Energy Transfer, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

TC Energy currently has a consensus target price of $78.50, indicating a potential upside of 18.47%. Given TC Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe TC Energy is more favorable than Korea Electric Power.

Korea Electric Power has higher revenue and earnings than TC Energy. Korea Electric Power is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TC Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, TC Energy had 38 more articles in the media than Korea Electric Power. MarketBeat recorded 40 mentions for TC Energy and 2 mentions for Korea Electric Power. Korea Electric Power's average media sentiment score of 0.96 beat TC Energy's score of 0.72 indicating that Korea Electric Power is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

83.1% of TC Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Korea Electric Power shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

TC Energy has a beta of 0.67, meaning that its share price is 33% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Korea Electric Power has a beta of 0.99, meaning that its share price is 1% less volatile than the S&P 500.

TC Energy has a net margin of 22.22% compared to Korea Electric Power's net margin of 8.80%. Korea Electric Power's return on equity of 18.76% beat TC Energy's return on equity.

TC Energy pays an annual dividend of $2.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. Korea Electric Power pays an annual dividend of $0.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. TC Energy pays out 109.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Korea Electric Power pays out 11.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. TC Energy has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. TC Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Korea Electric Power has higher revenue and earnings than Vistra. Korea Electric Power is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vistra, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Vistra pays an annual dividend of $0.91 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Korea Electric Power pays an annual dividend of $0.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. Vistra pays out 41.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Korea Electric Power pays out 11.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Vistra has increased its dividend for 6 consecutive years. Korea Electric Power is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Vistra had 37 more articles in the media than Korea Electric Power. MarketBeat recorded 39 mentions for Vistra and 2 mentions for Korea Electric Power. Vistra's average media sentiment score of 1.04 beat Korea Electric Power's score of 0.96 indicating that Vistra is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Vistra has a beta of 1.43, indicating that its stock price is 43% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Korea Electric Power has a beta of 0.99, indicating that its stock price is 1% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Vistra currently has a consensus price target of $233.93, indicating a potential upside of 45.82%. Given Vistra's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Vistra is more favorable than Korea Electric Power.

90.9% of Vistra shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of Vistra shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Korea Electric Power shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Korea Electric Power has a net margin of 8.80% compared to Vistra's net margin of 5.32%. Vistra's return on equity of 81.09% beat Korea Electric Power's return on equity.

In the previous week, Xcel Energy had 22 more articles in the media than Korea Electric Power. MarketBeat recorded 24 mentions for Xcel Energy and 2 mentions for Korea Electric Power. Xcel Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.10 beat Korea Electric Power's score of 0.96 indicating that Xcel Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Xcel Energy currently has a consensus price target of $91.13, indicating a potential upside of 11.88%. Given Xcel Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Xcel Energy is more favorable than Korea Electric Power.

Xcel Energy has a beta of 0.41, indicating that its stock price is 59% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Korea Electric Power has a beta of 0.99, indicating that its stock price is 1% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Xcel Energy has a net margin of 14.14% compared to Korea Electric Power's net margin of 8.80%. Korea Electric Power's return on equity of 18.76% beat Xcel Energy's return on equity.

Xcel Energy pays an annual dividend of $2.37 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Korea Electric Power pays an annual dividend of $0.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. Xcel Energy pays out 68.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Korea Electric Power pays out 11.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Xcel Energy has increased its dividend for 22 consecutive years. Korea Electric Power is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Korea Electric Power has higher revenue and earnings than Xcel Energy. Korea Electric Power is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Xcel Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

78.4% of Xcel Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Xcel Energy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Korea Electric Power shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.