Go Pro

DT Midstream (DTM) Competitors

DT Midstream logo
$136.84 +2.05 (+1.52%)
Closing price 08/14/2026 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$136.94 +0.09 (+0.07%)
As of 08/14/2026 07:34 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

DTM vs. AM, AROC, EQT, ET, and HESM

Should you buy DT Midstream stock or one of its competitors? DT Midstream's main competitors and comparable companies include Antero Midstream (AM), Archrock (AROC), EQT (EQT), Energy Transfer (ET), and Hess Midstream Partners (HESM). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "energy" sector.

How does DT Midstream compare to Antero Midstream?

Antero Midstream (NYSE:AM) and DT Midstream (NYSE:DTM) are both large-cap energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

DT Midstream has higher revenue and earnings than Antero Midstream. Antero Midstream is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than DT Midstream, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Antero Midstream$1.19B9.02$413.16M$0.8426.88
DT Midstream$1.31B10.66$441M$4.5729.94

Antero Midstream pays an annual dividend of $0.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.0%. DT Midstream pays an annual dividend of $3.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Antero Midstream pays out 107.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. DT Midstream pays out 77.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. DT Midstream has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

In the previous week, DT Midstream had 1 more articles in the media than Antero Midstream. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for DT Midstream and 1 mentions for Antero Midstream. Antero Midstream's average media sentiment score of 1.68 beat DT Midstream's score of 0.95 indicating that Antero Midstream is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Antero Midstream
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
DT Midstream
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

DT Midstream has a net margin of 35.72% compared to Antero Midstream's net margin of 32.41%. Antero Midstream's return on equity of 20.19% beat DT Midstream's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Antero Midstream32.41% 20.19% 6.56%
DT Midstream 35.72%9.58%4.62%

Antero Midstream currently has a consensus target price of $24.50, suggesting a potential upside of 8.53%. DT Midstream has a consensus target price of $154.08, suggesting a potential upside of 12.60%. Given DT Midstream's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe DT Midstream is more favorable than Antero Midstream.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Antero Midstream
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.17
DT Midstream
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

54.0% of Antero Midstream shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 81.5% of DT Midstream shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of Antero Midstream shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of DT Midstream shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Antero Midstream has a beta of 0.65, meaning that its stock price is 35% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, DT Midstream has a beta of 0.72, meaning that its stock price is 28% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

DT Midstream beats Antero Midstream on 14 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does DT Midstream compare to Archrock?

Archrock (NYSE:AROC) and DT Midstream (NYSE:DTM) are both energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment and dividends.

DT Midstream has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Archrock. Archrock is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than DT Midstream, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Archrock$1.50B4.04$322.29M$1.8618.62
DT Midstream$1.31B10.66$441M$4.5729.94

Archrock pays an annual dividend of $0.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. DT Midstream pays an annual dividend of $3.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Archrock pays out 49.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. DT Midstream pays out 77.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Archrock has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years and DT Midstream has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Archrock is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Archrock had 4 more articles in the media than DT Midstream. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Archrock and 2 mentions for DT Midstream. DT Midstream's average media sentiment score of 0.95 beat Archrock's score of 0.23 indicating that DT Midstream is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Archrock
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
DT Midstream
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

95.4% of Archrock shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 81.5% of DT Midstream shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.9% of Archrock shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of DT Midstream shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

DT Midstream has a net margin of 35.72% compared to Archrock's net margin of 21.84%. Archrock's return on equity of 22.22% beat DT Midstream's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Archrock21.84% 22.22% 7.56%
DT Midstream 35.72%9.58%4.62%

Archrock currently has a consensus target price of $41.29, suggesting a potential upside of 19.18%. DT Midstream has a consensus target price of $154.08, suggesting a potential upside of 12.60%. Given Archrock's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Archrock is more favorable than DT Midstream.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Archrock
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.90
DT Midstream
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Archrock has a beta of 0.86, meaning that its share price is 14% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, DT Midstream has a beta of 0.72, meaning that its share price is 28% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Archrock beats DT Midstream on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does DT Midstream compare to EQT?

DT Midstream (NYSE:DTM) and EQT (NYSE:EQT) are both large-cap energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, valuation, profitability, media sentiment, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

DT Midstream pays an annual dividend of $3.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. EQT pays an annual dividend of $0.66 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. DT Midstream pays out 77.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. EQT pays out 15.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. DT Midstream has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years and EQT has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

DT Midstream has a net margin of 35.72% compared to EQT's net margin of 28.44%. DT Midstream's return on equity of 9.58% beat EQT's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
DT Midstream35.72% 9.58% 4.62%
EQT 28.44%9.31%6.27%

EQT has higher revenue and earnings than DT Midstream. EQT is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than DT Midstream, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
DT Midstream$1.31B10.66$441M$4.5729.94
EQT$8.64B3.94$2.04B$4.3112.63

81.5% of DT Midstream shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.8% of EQT shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of DT Midstream shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of EQT shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

DT Midstream has a beta of 0.72, meaning that its share price is 28% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, EQT has a beta of 0.58, meaning that its share price is 42% less volatile than the broader market.

DT Midstream presently has a consensus price target of $154.08, suggesting a potential upside of 12.60%. EQT has a consensus price target of $68.08, suggesting a potential upside of 25.07%. Given EQT's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe EQT is more favorable than DT Midstream.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
DT Midstream
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
EQT
1 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
20 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.79

In the previous week, EQT had 14 more articles in the media than DT Midstream. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for EQT and 2 mentions for DT Midstream. DT Midstream's average media sentiment score of 0.95 beat EQT's score of -0.09 indicating that DT Midstream is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
DT Midstream
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
EQT
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
7 Neutral mention(s)
4 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

EQT beats DT Midstream on 12 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does DT Midstream compare to Energy Transfer?

DT Midstream (NYSE:DTM) and Energy Transfer (NYSE:ET) are both large-cap energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings and profitability.

DT Midstream has a beta of 0.72, indicating that its stock price is 28% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Energy Transfer has a beta of 0.55, indicating that its stock price is 45% less volatile than the broader market.

DT Midstream has a net margin of 35.72% compared to Energy Transfer's net margin of 4.87%. Energy Transfer's return on equity of 11.55% beat DT Midstream's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
DT Midstream35.72% 9.58% 4.62%
Energy Transfer 4.87%11.55%3.69%

DT Midstream pays an annual dividend of $3.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Energy Transfer pays an annual dividend of $1.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.5%. DT Midstream pays out 77.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Energy Transfer pays out 92.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. DT Midstream has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Energy Transfer has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Energy Transfer is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

DT Midstream currently has a consensus target price of $154.08, indicating a potential upside of 12.60%. Energy Transfer has a consensus target price of $23.92, indicating a potential upside of 13.76%. Given Energy Transfer's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Energy Transfer is more favorable than DT Midstream.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
DT Midstream
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Energy Transfer
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
12 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.93

81.5% of DT Midstream shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 38.2% of Energy Transfer shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of DT Midstream shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.3% of Energy Transfer shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Energy Transfer had 26 more articles in the media than DT Midstream. MarketBeat recorded 28 mentions for Energy Transfer and 2 mentions for DT Midstream. Energy Transfer's average media sentiment score of 1.01 beat DT Midstream's score of 0.95 indicating that Energy Transfer is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
DT Midstream
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Energy Transfer
15 Very Positive mention(s)
8 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Energy Transfer has higher revenue and earnings than DT Midstream. Energy Transfer is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than DT Midstream, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
DT Midstream$1.31B10.66$441M$4.5729.94
Energy Transfer$85.54B0.85$4.18B$1.4714.30

Summary

Energy Transfer beats DT Midstream on 12 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does DT Midstream compare to Hess Midstream Partners?

DT Midstream (NYSE:DTM) and Hess Midstream Partners (NYSE:HESM) are both energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

DT Midstream currently has a consensus price target of $154.08, indicating a potential upside of 12.60%. Hess Midstream Partners has a consensus price target of $38.86, indicating a potential downside of 4.02%. Given DT Midstream's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe DT Midstream is more favorable than Hess Midstream Partners.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
DT Midstream
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Hess Midstream Partners
2 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.89

DT Midstream has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Hess Midstream Partners. Hess Midstream Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than DT Midstream, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
DT Midstream$1.31B10.66$441M$4.5729.94
Hess Midstream Partners$1.61B5.19$352.90M$2.9013.96

DT Midstream has a net margin of 35.72% compared to Hess Midstream Partners' net margin of 23.23%. Hess Midstream Partners' return on equity of 92.18% beat DT Midstream's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
DT Midstream35.72% 9.58% 4.62%
Hess Midstream Partners 23.23%92.18%8.62%

81.5% of DT Midstream shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.0% of Hess Midstream Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of DT Midstream shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

DT Midstream pays an annual dividend of $3.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Hess Midstream Partners pays an annual dividend of $3.15 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.8%. DT Midstream pays out 77.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Hess Midstream Partners pays out 108.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. DT Midstream has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Hess Midstream Partners has increased its dividend for 8 consecutive years. Hess Midstream Partners is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Hess Midstream Partners had 3 more articles in the media than DT Midstream. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Hess Midstream Partners and 2 mentions for DT Midstream. DT Midstream's average media sentiment score of 0.95 beat Hess Midstream Partners' score of 0.90 indicating that DT Midstream is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
DT Midstream
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Hess Midstream Partners
4 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

DT Midstream has a beta of 0.72, indicating that its stock price is 28% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hess Midstream Partners has a beta of 0.52, indicating that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

DT Midstream beats Hess Midstream Partners on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get DT Midstream News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for DTM and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding DTM and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

DTM vs. The Competition

MetricDT MidstreamOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels IndustryEnergy SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$13.97B$11.09B$9.70B$24.30B
Dividend Yield2.59%11.32%11.57%3.68%
P/E Ratio29.9416.4520.2530.85
Price / Sales10.66480.37394.1766.92
Price / Cash19.1439.7336.0732.80
Price / Book2.843.112.956.82
Net Income$441M$5.27B$4.32B$1.06B
7 Day Performance4.08%3.25%3.61%0.55%
1 Month Performance-5.86%4.86%4.88%2.90%
1 Year Performance32.43%35.74%39.33%19.10%

DT Midstream Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
DTM
DT Midstream
3.9871 of 5 stars
$136.84
+1.5%
$154.08
+12.6%
+32.0%$13.97B$1.31B29.94360
AM
Antero Midstream
3.918 of 5 stars
$21.97
+3.3%
$24.50
+11.5%
+24.0%$10.10B$1.19B26.15590
AROC
Archrock
4.6152 of 5 stars
$33.06
-0.1%
$41.29
+24.9%
+44.8%$5.80B$1.49B17.771,350
EQT
EQT
4.7235 of 5 stars
$54.06
+4.6%
$68.08
+25.9%
+4.5%$32.33B$8.64B12.541,523
ET
Energy Transfer
4.693 of 5 stars
$20.62
+2.4%
$23.75
+15.2%
+21.0%$69.31B$85.54B14.0322,311

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:DTM) was last updated on 8/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners