Himax Technologies (HIMX) Competitors

Himax Technologies logo
$14.39 -0.70 (-4.64%)
Closing price 06/26/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$14.33 -0.06 (-0.42%)
As of 06/26/2026 07:59 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

HIMX vs. PL, SIMO, ALGM, QRVO, and KLIC

Should you buy Himax Technologies stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Himax Technologies with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Himax Technologies include Planet Labs PBC (PL), Silicon Motion Technology (SIMO), Allegro MicroSystems (ALGM), Qorvo (QRVO), and Kulicke and Soffa Industries (KLIC). These companies are all part of the "electronic equipment" industry.

How does Himax Technologies compare to Planet Labs PBC?

Planet Labs PBC (NYSE:PL) and Himax Technologies (NASDAQ:HIMX) are both mid-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment and dividends.

Himax Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than Planet Labs PBC. Planet Labs PBC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Himax Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Planet Labs PBC$335.61M28.74-$246.86M-$1.14N/A
Himax Technologies$816.05M3.08$43.94M$0.2071.95

Planet Labs PBC pays an annual dividend of $0.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.5%. Himax Technologies pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Planet Labs PBC pays out -84.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Himax Technologies pays out 120.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Planet Labs PBC is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Planet Labs PBC had 1 more articles in the media than Himax Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Planet Labs PBC and 8 mentions for Himax Technologies. Planet Labs PBC's average media sentiment score of 1.05 beat Himax Technologies' score of 0.43 indicating that Planet Labs PBC is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Planet Labs PBC
4 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Himax Technologies
1 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

41.7% of Planet Labs PBC shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 69.8% of Himax Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 16.4% of Planet Labs PBC shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 31.5% of Himax Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Himax Technologies has a net margin of 3.91% compared to Planet Labs PBC's net margin of -111.17%. Himax Technologies' return on equity of 3.57% beat Planet Labs PBC's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Planet Labs PBC-111.17% -105.29% -35.54%
Himax Technologies 3.91%3.57%1.86%

Planet Labs PBC currently has a consensus target price of $35.11, suggesting a potential upside of 29.70%. Himax Technologies has a consensus target price of $8.00, suggesting a potential downside of 44.41%. Given Planet Labs PBC's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Planet Labs PBC is more favorable than Himax Technologies.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Planet Labs PBC
3 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25
Himax Technologies
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Planet Labs PBC has a beta of 1.99, meaning that its share price is 99% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Himax Technologies has a beta of 2.25, meaning that its share price is 125% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Himax Technologies beats Planet Labs PBC on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Himax Technologies compare to Silicon Motion Technology?

Silicon Motion Technology (NASDAQ:SIMO) and Himax Technologies (NASDAQ:HIMX) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and earnings.

78.0% of Silicon Motion Technology shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 69.8% of Himax Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. 5.3% of Silicon Motion Technology shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 31.5% of Himax Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Silicon Motion Technology pays an annual dividend of $1.99 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Himax Technologies pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Silicon Motion Technology pays out 39.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Himax Technologies pays out 120.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

In the previous week, Silicon Motion Technology had 3 more articles in the media than Himax Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Silicon Motion Technology and 8 mentions for Himax Technologies. Himax Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.43 beat Silicon Motion Technology's score of 0.28 indicating that Himax Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Silicon Motion Technology
3 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Himax Technologies
1 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Silicon Motion Technology has a beta of 1.72, meaning that its stock price is 72% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Himax Technologies has a beta of 2.25, meaning that its stock price is 125% more volatile than the broader market.

Silicon Motion Technology has a net margin of 16.02% compared to Himax Technologies' net margin of 3.91%. Silicon Motion Technology's return on equity of 20.24% beat Himax Technologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Silicon Motion Technology16.02% 20.24% 14.46%
Himax Technologies 3.91%3.57%1.86%

Silicon Motion Technology has higher revenue and earnings than Himax Technologies. Silicon Motion Technology is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Himax Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Silicon Motion Technology$1.06B9.75$122.64M$5.0360.69
Himax Technologies$816.05M3.08$43.94M$0.2071.95

Silicon Motion Technology currently has a consensus target price of $246.43, indicating a potential downside of 19.28%. Himax Technologies has a consensus target price of $8.00, indicating a potential downside of 44.41%. Given Silicon Motion Technology's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Silicon Motion Technology is more favorable than Himax Technologies.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Silicon Motion Technology
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Himax Technologies
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Summary

Silicon Motion Technology beats Himax Technologies on 14 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Himax Technologies compare to Allegro MicroSystems?

Himax Technologies (NASDAQ:HIMX) and Allegro MicroSystems (NASDAQ:ALGM) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings and profitability.

Himax Technologies presently has a consensus price target of $8.00, indicating a potential downside of 44.41%. Allegro MicroSystems has a consensus price target of $54.30, indicating a potential downside of 6.42%. Given Allegro MicroSystems' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Allegro MicroSystems is more favorable than Himax Technologies.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Himax Technologies
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Allegro MicroSystems
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75

Himax Technologies has a beta of 2.25, indicating that its stock price is 125% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Allegro MicroSystems has a beta of 1.98, indicating that its stock price is 98% more volatile than the broader market.

Himax Technologies has a net margin of 3.91% compared to Allegro MicroSystems' net margin of -1.67%. Allegro MicroSystems' return on equity of 6.09% beat Himax Technologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Himax Technologies3.91% 3.57% 1.86%
Allegro MicroSystems -1.67%6.09%4.11%

69.8% of Himax Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 56.5% of Allegro MicroSystems shares are held by institutional investors. 31.5% of Himax Technologies shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Allegro MicroSystems shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Himax Technologies has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Allegro MicroSystems. Allegro MicroSystems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Himax Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Himax Technologies$816.05M3.08$43.94M$0.2071.95
Allegro MicroSystems$890.10M12.14-$14.90M-$0.09N/A

In the previous week, Himax Technologies and Himax Technologies both had 8 articles in the media. Allegro MicroSystems' average media sentiment score of 0.44 beat Himax Technologies' score of 0.43 indicating that Allegro MicroSystems is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Himax Technologies
1 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Allegro MicroSystems
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Allegro MicroSystems beats Himax Technologies on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Himax Technologies compare to Qorvo?

Himax Technologies (NASDAQ:HIMX) and Qorvo (NASDAQ:QRVO) are both mid-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends, earnings, valuation, profitability, risk and institutional ownership.

Himax Technologies presently has a consensus price target of $8.00, suggesting a potential downside of 44.41%. Qorvo has a consensus price target of $96.63, suggesting a potential upside of 2.92%. Given Qorvo's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Qorvo is more favorable than Himax Technologies.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Himax Technologies
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Qorvo
1 Sell rating(s)
17 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.10

Qorvo has higher revenue and earnings than Himax Technologies. Qorvo is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Himax Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Himax Technologies$816.05M3.08$43.94M$0.2071.95
Qorvo$3.68B2.25$338.99M$3.6225.93

Qorvo has a net margin of 9.22% compared to Himax Technologies' net margin of 3.91%. Qorvo's return on equity of 15.32% beat Himax Technologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Himax Technologies3.91% 3.57% 1.86%
Qorvo 9.22%15.32%8.90%

69.8% of Himax Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.6% of Qorvo shares are owned by institutional investors. 31.5% of Himax Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Qorvo shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Qorvo had 2 more articles in the media than Himax Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Qorvo and 8 mentions for Himax Technologies. Qorvo's average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat Himax Technologies' score of 0.43 indicating that Qorvo is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Himax Technologies
1 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Qorvo
5 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Himax Technologies has a beta of 2.25, suggesting that its stock price is 125% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Qorvo has a beta of 1.43, suggesting that its stock price is 43% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Qorvo beats Himax Technologies on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Himax Technologies compare to Kulicke and Soffa Industries?

Himax Technologies (NASDAQ:HIMX) and Kulicke and Soffa Industries (NASDAQ:KLIC) are both mid-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends, earnings, institutional ownership, risk and profitability.

Himax Technologies pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Kulicke and Soffa Industries pays an annual dividend of $0.82 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Himax Technologies pays out 120.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Kulicke and Soffa Industries pays out 78.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Kulicke and Soffa Industries has raised its dividend for 7 consecutive years.

Himax Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than Kulicke and Soffa Industries. Himax Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kulicke and Soffa Industries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Himax Technologies$816.05M3.08$43.94M$0.2071.95
Kulicke and Soffa Industries$768.22M8.53$210K$1.04120.40

Kulicke and Soffa Industries has a net margin of 7.16% compared to Himax Technologies' net margin of 3.91%. Kulicke and Soffa Industries' return on equity of 7.29% beat Himax Technologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Himax Technologies3.91% 3.57% 1.86%
Kulicke and Soffa Industries 7.16%7.29%5.38%

Himax Technologies currently has a consensus target price of $8.00, indicating a potential downside of 44.41%. Kulicke and Soffa Industries has a consensus target price of $59.25, indicating a potential downside of 52.68%. Given Himax Technologies' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Himax Technologies is more favorable than Kulicke and Soffa Industries.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Himax Technologies
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Kulicke and Soffa Industries
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

69.8% of Himax Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.2% of Kulicke and Soffa Industries shares are owned by institutional investors. 31.5% of Himax Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Kulicke and Soffa Industries shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Himax Technologies had 2 more articles in the media than Kulicke and Soffa Industries. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Himax Technologies and 6 mentions for Kulicke and Soffa Industries. Kulicke and Soffa Industries' average media sentiment score of 0.61 beat Himax Technologies' score of 0.43 indicating that Kulicke and Soffa Industries is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Himax Technologies
1 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Kulicke and Soffa Industries
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Himax Technologies has a beta of 2.25, meaning that its stock price is 125% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kulicke and Soffa Industries has a beta of 1.7, meaning that its stock price is 70% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Kulicke and Soffa Industries beats Himax Technologies on 13 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Himax Technologies News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for HIMX and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding HIMX and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

HIMX vs. The Competition

MetricHimax TechnologiesELEC COMP IndustryComputer SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$2.51B$73.88B$37.89B$12.22B
Dividend Yield2.29%1.04%3.31%6.13%
P/E Ratio73.4288.4479.6524.17
Price / Sales3.08122.04623.58101.60
Price / Cash39.70215.6545.9654.37
Price / Book2.798.929.546.35
Net Income$43.94M$854.67M$1.07B$337.63M
7 Day Performance-20.54%-10.42%-0.31%0.06%
1 Month Performance-30.31%-9.99%0.18%-0.15%
1 Year Performance52.44%163.85%155.59%27.55%

Himax Technologies Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
HIMX
Himax Technologies
2.069 of 5 stars
$14.39
-4.6%
$8.00
-44.4%
+52.6%$2.51B$816.05M73.422,238
PL
Planet Labs PBC
3.7414 of 5 stars
$30.40
-2.4%
$35.11
+15.5%
+347.8%$11.10B$307.73MN/A800
SIMO
Silicon Motion Technology
4.6829 of 5 stars
$276.40
-1.5%
$205.63
-25.6%
+317.4%$9.51B$885.63M54.952,009
ALGM
Allegro MicroSystems
2.1277 of 5 stars
$55.00
+9.1%
$51.80
-5.8%
+72.3%$9.39B$890.10MN/A4,250
QRVO
Qorvo
3.4127 of 5 stars
$101.28
+2.7%
$96.63
-4.6%
+13.1%$8.68B$3.68B27.985,200

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:HIMX) was last updated on 6/27/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners