Heidrick & Struggles International (HSII) Competitors

Robert Half has higher revenue and earnings than Heidrick & Struggles International. Robert Half is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Heidrick & Struggles International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

90.1% of Heidrick & Struggles International shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.4% of Robert Half shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.4% of Heidrick & Struggles International shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.5% of Robert Half shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Heidrick & Struggles International presently has a consensus target price of $59.00, suggesting a potential downside of 0.02%. Robert Half has a consensus target price of $31.75, suggesting a potential upside of 18.25%. Given Robert Half's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Robert Half is more favorable than Heidrick & Struggles International.

Heidrick & Struggles International has a net margin of 3.04% compared to Robert Half's net margin of 2.43%. Heidrick & Struggles International's return on equity of 15.18% beat Robert Half's return on equity.

Heidrick & Struggles International pays an annual dividend of $0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Robert Half pays an annual dividend of $2.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.8%. Heidrick & Struggles International pays out 35.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Robert Half pays out 181.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Robert Half has increased its dividend for 22 consecutive years. Robert Half is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Robert Half had 8 more articles in the media than Heidrick & Struggles International. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Robert Half and 0 mentions for Heidrick & Struggles International. Heidrick & Struggles International's average media sentiment score of 0.42 beat Robert Half's score of 0.13 indicating that Heidrick & Struggles International is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Heidrick & Struggles International has a beta of 1.08, suggesting that its share price is 8% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Robert Half has a beta of 0.8, suggesting that its share price is 20% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Heidrick & Struggles International pays an annual dividend of $0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. ManpowerGroup pays an annual dividend of $1.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.9%. Heidrick & Struggles International pays out 35.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. ManpowerGroup pays out -389.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. ManpowerGroup is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Heidrick & Struggles International has higher earnings, but lower revenue than ManpowerGroup. ManpowerGroup is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Heidrick & Struggles International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Heidrick & Struggles International has a net margin of 3.04% compared to ManpowerGroup's net margin of -0.09%. Heidrick & Struggles International's return on equity of 15.18% beat ManpowerGroup's return on equity.

90.1% of Heidrick & Struggles International shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.0% of ManpowerGroup shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.4% of Heidrick & Struggles International shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.0% of ManpowerGroup shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Heidrick & Struggles International presently has a consensus target price of $59.00, suggesting a potential downside of 0.02%. ManpowerGroup has a consensus target price of $37.50, suggesting a potential upside of 26.39%. Given ManpowerGroup's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe ManpowerGroup is more favorable than Heidrick & Struggles International.

In the previous week, ManpowerGroup had 7 more articles in the media than Heidrick & Struggles International. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for ManpowerGroup and 0 mentions for Heidrick & Struggles International. ManpowerGroup's average media sentiment score of 0.48 beat Heidrick & Struggles International's score of 0.42 indicating that ManpowerGroup is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Heidrick & Struggles International has a beta of 1.08, suggesting that its share price is 8% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, ManpowerGroup has a beta of 0.74, suggesting that its share price is 26% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Heidrick & Struggles International pays an annual dividend of $0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Insperity pays an annual dividend of $2.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.4%. Heidrick & Struggles International pays out 35.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Insperity pays out -358.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Insperity has increased its dividend for 14 consecutive years. Insperity is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Heidrick & Struggles International has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Insperity. Insperity is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Heidrick & Struggles International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Heidrick & Struggles International has a net margin of 3.04% compared to Insperity's net margin of -0.37%. Heidrick & Struggles International's return on equity of 15.18% beat Insperity's return on equity.

90.1% of Heidrick & Struggles International shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.4% of Insperity shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.4% of Heidrick & Struggles International shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.8% of Insperity shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Heidrick & Struggles International presently has a consensus target price of $59.00, suggesting a potential downside of 0.02%. Insperity has a consensus target price of $46.00, suggesting a potential upside of 60.74%. Given Insperity's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Insperity is more favorable than Heidrick & Struggles International.

In the previous week, Insperity had 25 more articles in the media than Heidrick & Struggles International. MarketBeat recorded 25 mentions for Insperity and 0 mentions for Heidrick & Struggles International. Heidrick & Struggles International's average media sentiment score of 0.42 beat Insperity's score of 0.35 indicating that Heidrick & Struggles International is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Heidrick & Struggles International has a beta of 1.08, suggesting that its share price is 8% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Insperity has a beta of 0.6, suggesting that its share price is 40% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Heidrick & Struggles International pays an annual dividend of $0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Kforce pays an annual dividend of $1.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Heidrick & Struggles International pays out 35.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Kforce pays out 80.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Kforce has higher revenue and earnings than Heidrick & Struggles International. Kforce is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Heidrick & Struggles International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Kforce has a net margin of 3.59% compared to Heidrick & Struggles International's net margin of 3.04%. Kforce's return on equity of 30.34% beat Heidrick & Struggles International's return on equity.

90.1% of Heidrick & Struggles International shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.8% of Kforce shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.4% of Heidrick & Struggles International shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 7.3% of Kforce shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Heidrick & Struggles International presently has a consensus target price of $59.00, suggesting a potential downside of 0.02%. Kforce has a consensus target price of $39.67, suggesting a potential downside of 9.54%. Given Heidrick & Struggles International's higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Heidrick & Struggles International is more favorable than Kforce.

In the previous week, Kforce had 6 more articles in the media than Heidrick & Struggles International. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Kforce and 0 mentions for Heidrick & Struggles International. Kforce's average media sentiment score of 0.74 beat Heidrick & Struggles International's score of 0.42 indicating that Kforce is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Heidrick & Struggles International has a beta of 1.08, suggesting that its share price is 8% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Kforce has a beta of 0.86, suggesting that its share price is 14% less volatile than the S&P 500.