Information Services Group Competitors

CGI (NYSE:GIB) and Information Services Group (NASDAQ:III) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, valuation and analyst recommendations.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares CGI and Information Services Group's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

CGI has higher revenue and earnings than Information Services Group. CGI is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Information Services Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares CGI and Information Services Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

51.3% of CGI shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 48.3% of Information Services Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.9% of CGI shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 15.0% of Information Services Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for CGI and Information Services Group, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

CGI presently has a consensus target price of $107.95, indicating a potential upside of 25.32%. Information Services Group has a consensus target price of $3.5750, indicating a potential downside of 17.25%. Given CGI's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe CGI is more favorable than Information Services Group.

Volatility and Risk

CGI has a beta of 1.03, indicating that its share price is 3% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Information Services Group has a beta of 0.7, indicating that its share price is 30% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

CGI beats Information Services Group on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Booz Allen Hamilton (NYSE:BAH) and Information Services Group (NASDAQ:III) are both business services companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability and earnings.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Booz Allen Hamilton and Information Services Group's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Booz Allen Hamilton has higher revenue and earnings than Information Services Group. Booz Allen Hamilton is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Information Services Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Booz Allen Hamilton and Information Services Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

89.9% of Booz Allen Hamilton shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 48.3% of Information Services Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.0% of Booz Allen Hamilton shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 15.0% of Information Services Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations for Booz Allen Hamilton and Information Services Group, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Booz Allen Hamilton presently has a consensus target price of $85.1111, suggesting a potential upside of 2.51%. Information Services Group has a consensus target price of $3.5750, suggesting a potential downside of 17.25%. Given Booz Allen Hamilton's higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Booz Allen Hamilton is more favorable than Information Services Group.

Volatility and Risk

Booz Allen Hamilton has a beta of 0.81, indicating that its stock price is 19% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Information Services Group has a beta of 0.7, indicating that its stock price is 30% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Booz Allen Hamilton beats Information Services Group on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Genpact (NYSE:G) and Information Services Group (NASDAQ:III) are both business services companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability and earnings.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

97.5% of Genpact shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 48.3% of Information Services Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.9% of Genpact shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 15.0% of Information Services Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Genpact and Information Services Group's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Genpact has higher revenue and earnings than Information Services Group. Information Services Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Genpact, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations for Genpact and Information Services Group, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Genpact presently has a consensus target price of $43.00, suggesting a potential downside of 3.67%. Information Services Group has a consensus target price of $3.5750, suggesting a potential downside of 17.25%. Given Genpact's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Genpact is more favorable than Information Services Group.

Profitability

This table compares Genpact and Information Services Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility and Risk

Genpact has a beta of 1.32, indicating that its stock price is 32% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Information Services Group has a beta of 0.7, indicating that its stock price is 30% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Genpact beats Information Services Group on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Information Services Group (NASDAQ:III) and Exponent (NASDAQ:EXPO) are both business services companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

48.3% of Information Services Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.3% of Exponent shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.0% of Information Services Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of Exponent shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Information Services Group and Exponent's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Exponent has higher revenue and earnings than Information Services Group. Information Services Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Exponent, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings for Information Services Group and Exponent, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Information Services Group presently has a consensus target price of $3.5750, suggesting a potential downside of 17.25%. Exponent has a consensus target price of $94.00, suggesting a potential downside of 7.78%. Given Exponent's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Exponent is more favorable than Information Services Group.

Profitability

This table compares Information Services Group and Exponent's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility and Risk

Information Services Group has a beta of 0.7, indicating that its share price is 30% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Exponent has a beta of 0.32, indicating that its share price is 68% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Exponent beats Information Services Group on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Information Services Group (NASDAQ:III) and FTI Consulting (NYSE:FCN) are both business services companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

48.3% of Information Services Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.3% of FTI Consulting shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.0% of Information Services Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of FTI Consulting shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Information Services Group and FTI Consulting's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

FTI Consulting has higher revenue and earnings than Information Services Group. FTI Consulting is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Information Services Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings for Information Services Group and FTI Consulting, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Information Services Group presently has a consensus target price of $3.5750, suggesting a potential downside of 17.25%. FTI Consulting has a consensus target price of $167.00, suggesting a potential upside of 14.67%. Given FTI Consulting's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe FTI Consulting is more favorable than Information Services Group.

Profitability

This table compares Information Services Group and FTI Consulting's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility and Risk

Information Services Group has a beta of 0.7, indicating that its share price is 30% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, FTI Consulting has a beta of 0.41, indicating that its share price is 59% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

FTI Consulting beats Information Services Group on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Information Services Group (NASDAQ:III) and ICF International (NASDAQ:ICFI) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

48.3% of Information Services Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.3% of ICF International shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.0% of Information Services Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 4.3% of ICF International shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Information Services Group and ICF International's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

ICF International has higher revenue and earnings than Information Services Group. ICF International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Information Services Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings for Information Services Group and ICF International, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Information Services Group presently has a consensus target price of $3.5750, suggesting a potential downside of 17.25%. ICF International has a consensus target price of $101.1250, suggesting a potential upside of 10.52%. Given ICF International's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe ICF International is more favorable than Information Services Group.

Profitability

This table compares Information Services Group and ICF International's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility and Risk

Information Services Group has a beta of 0.7, indicating that its share price is 30% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, ICF International has a beta of 0.58, indicating that its share price is 42% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

ICF International beats Information Services Group on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.