NASDAQ:III

Information Services Group Competitors

$4.32
0.00 (0.00 %)
(As of 04/12/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$4.19
Now: $4.32
$4.38
50-Day Range
$3.64
MA: $4.10
$4.52
52-Week Range
$1.70
Now: $4.32
$4.58
Volume160,103 shs
Average Volume234,543 shs
Market Capitalization$209.09 million
P/E Ratio72.01
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta0.7

Competitors

Information Services Group (NASDAQ:III) Vs. GIB, BAH, G, EXPO, FCN, and ICFI

Should you be buying III stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "management consulting services" are considered alternatives and competitors to Information Services Group, including CGI (GIB), Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH), Genpact (G), Exponent (EXPO), FTI Consulting (FCN), and ICF International (ICFI).

CGI (NYSE:GIB) and Information Services Group (NASDAQ:III) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, valuation and analyst recommendations.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares CGI and Information Services Group's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CGI$9.04 billion2.42$831.69 million$3.6323.73
Information Services Group$265.76 million0.79$3.34 million$0.1627.00

CGI has higher revenue and earnings than Information Services Group. CGI is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Information Services Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares CGI and Information Services Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
CGI9.20%18.58%8.79%
Information Services Group1.37%8.44%3.44%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

51.3% of CGI shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 48.3% of Information Services Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.9% of CGI shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 15.0% of Information Services Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for CGI and Information Services Group, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
CGI04902.69
Information Services Group01202.67

CGI presently has a consensus target price of $107.95, indicating a potential upside of 25.32%. Information Services Group has a consensus target price of $3.5750, indicating a potential downside of 17.25%. Given CGI's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe CGI is more favorable than Information Services Group.

Volatility and Risk

CGI has a beta of 1.03, indicating that its share price is 3% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Information Services Group has a beta of 0.7, indicating that its share price is 30% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

CGI beats Information Services Group on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Booz Allen Hamilton (NYSE:BAH) and Information Services Group (NASDAQ:III) are both business services companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability and earnings.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Booz Allen Hamilton and Information Services Group's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Booz Allen Hamilton$7.46 billion1.53$482.60 million$3.1826.11
Information Services Group$265.76 million0.79$3.34 million$0.1627.00

Booz Allen Hamilton has higher revenue and earnings than Information Services Group. Booz Allen Hamilton is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Information Services Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Booz Allen Hamilton and Information Services Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Booz Allen Hamilton6.62%54.01%10.09%
Information Services Group1.37%8.44%3.44%

Institutional & Insider Ownership

89.9% of Booz Allen Hamilton shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 48.3% of Information Services Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.0% of Booz Allen Hamilton shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 15.0% of Information Services Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations for Booz Allen Hamilton and Information Services Group, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Booz Allen Hamilton05702.58
Information Services Group01202.67

Booz Allen Hamilton presently has a consensus target price of $85.1111, suggesting a potential upside of 2.51%. Information Services Group has a consensus target price of $3.5750, suggesting a potential downside of 17.25%. Given Booz Allen Hamilton's higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Booz Allen Hamilton is more favorable than Information Services Group.

Volatility and Risk

Booz Allen Hamilton has a beta of 0.81, indicating that its stock price is 19% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Information Services Group has a beta of 0.7, indicating that its stock price is 30% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Booz Allen Hamilton beats Information Services Group on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Genpact (NYSE:G) and Information Services Group (NASDAQ:III) are both business services companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability and earnings.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

97.5% of Genpact shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 48.3% of Information Services Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.9% of Genpact shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 15.0% of Information Services Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Genpact and Information Services Group's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Genpact$3.52 billion2.37$304.88 million$1.5628.62
Information Services Group$265.76 million0.79$3.34 million$0.1627.00

Genpact has higher revenue and earnings than Information Services Group. Information Services Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Genpact, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations for Genpact and Information Services Group, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Genpact02502.71
Information Services Group01202.67

Genpact presently has a consensus target price of $43.00, suggesting a potential downside of 3.67%. Information Services Group has a consensus target price of $3.5750, suggesting a potential downside of 17.25%. Given Genpact's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Genpact is more favorable than Information Services Group.

Profitability

This table compares Genpact and Information Services Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Genpact8.53%21.81%7.90%
Information Services Group1.37%8.44%3.44%

Volatility and Risk

Genpact has a beta of 1.32, indicating that its stock price is 32% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Information Services Group has a beta of 0.7, indicating that its stock price is 30% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Genpact beats Information Services Group on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Information Services Group (NASDAQ:III) and Exponent (NASDAQ:EXPO) are both business services companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

48.3% of Information Services Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.3% of Exponent shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.0% of Information Services Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of Exponent shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Information Services Group and Exponent's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Information Services Group$265.76 million0.79$3.34 million$0.1627.00
Exponent$417.20 million12.66$82.46 million$1.5366.62

Exponent has higher revenue and earnings than Information Services Group. Information Services Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Exponent, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings for Information Services Group and Exponent, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Information Services Group01202.67
Exponent01102.50

Information Services Group presently has a consensus target price of $3.5750, suggesting a potential downside of 17.25%. Exponent has a consensus target price of $94.00, suggesting a potential downside of 7.78%. Given Exponent's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Exponent is more favorable than Information Services Group.

Profitability

This table compares Information Services Group and Exponent's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Information Services Group1.37%8.44%3.44%
Exponent19.63%23.66%15.24%

Volatility and Risk

Information Services Group has a beta of 0.7, indicating that its share price is 30% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Exponent has a beta of 0.32, indicating that its share price is 68% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Exponent beats Information Services Group on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Information Services Group (NASDAQ:III) and FTI Consulting (NYSE:FCN) are both business services companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

48.3% of Information Services Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.3% of FTI Consulting shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.0% of Information Services Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of FTI Consulting shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Information Services Group and FTI Consulting's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Information Services Group$265.76 million0.79$3.34 million$0.1627.00
FTI Consulting$2.35 billion2.12$216.73 million$5.8025.11

FTI Consulting has higher revenue and earnings than Information Services Group. FTI Consulting is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Information Services Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings for Information Services Group and FTI Consulting, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Information Services Group01202.67
FTI Consulting00103.00

Information Services Group presently has a consensus target price of $3.5750, suggesting a potential downside of 17.25%. FTI Consulting has a consensus target price of $167.00, suggesting a potential upside of 14.67%. Given FTI Consulting's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe FTI Consulting is more favorable than Information Services Group.

Profitability

This table compares Information Services Group and FTI Consulting's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Information Services Group1.37%8.44%3.44%
FTI Consulting7.56%13.27%7.18%

Volatility and Risk

Information Services Group has a beta of 0.7, indicating that its share price is 30% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, FTI Consulting has a beta of 0.41, indicating that its share price is 59% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

FTI Consulting beats Information Services Group on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Information Services Group (NASDAQ:III) and ICF International (NASDAQ:ICFI) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

48.3% of Information Services Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.3% of ICF International shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.0% of Information Services Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 4.3% of ICF International shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Information Services Group and ICF International's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Information Services Group$265.76 million0.79$3.34 million$0.1627.00
ICF International$1.48 billion1.17$68.94 million$4.1522.05

ICF International has higher revenue and earnings than Information Services Group. ICF International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Information Services Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings for Information Services Group and ICF International, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Information Services Group01202.67
ICF International00503.00

Information Services Group presently has a consensus target price of $3.5750, suggesting a potential downside of 17.25%. ICF International has a consensus target price of $101.1250, suggesting a potential upside of 10.52%. Given ICF International's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe ICF International is more favorable than Information Services Group.

Profitability

This table compares Information Services Group and ICF International's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Information Services Group1.37%8.44%3.44%
ICF International4.19%10.77%4.85%

Volatility and Risk

Information Services Group has a beta of 0.7, indicating that its share price is 30% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, ICF International has a beta of 0.58, indicating that its share price is 42% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

ICF International beats Information Services Group on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.


Information Services Group Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
CGI logo
GIB
CGI
1.9$86.14flat$21.86 billion$9.04 billion27.52Analyst Upgrade
Booz Allen Hamilton logo
BAH
Booz Allen Hamilton
2.1$83.03flat$11.43 billion$7.46 billion22.62
Genpact logo
G
Genpact
1.9$44.64flat$8.35 billion$3.52 billion27.73
Exponent logo
EXPO
Exponent
1.6$101.93flat$5.28 billion$417.20 million67.95
FTI Consulting logo
FCN
FTI Consulting
1.6$145.64flat$4.99 billion$2.35 billion29.91News Coverage
ICF International logo
ICFI
ICF International
2.1$91.50flat$1.73 billion$1.48 billion28.42Insider Selling
News Coverage
Apollo Medical logo
AMEH
Apollo Medical
0.8$26.58flat$1.45 billion$560.62 million28.58
Huron Consulting Group logo
HURN
Huron Consulting Group
1.7$54.48flat$1.26 billion$965.47 million-272.39
The RMR Group logo
RMR
The RMR Group
1.4$39.89flat$1.25 billion$589.51 million22.66
The Hackett Group logo
HCKT
The Hackett Group
2.2$17.51flat$529.43 million$282.47 million87.55Decrease in Short Interest
Atlas Technical Consultants logo
ATCX
Atlas Technical Consultants
1.1$10.30flat$363.38 millionN/A-11.32Increase in Short Interest
BlackRock Capital Investment logo
BKCC
BlackRock Capital Investment
1.0$3.67flat$273.29 million$78.12 million-2.20Decrease in Short Interest
Avalon GloboCare logo
AVCO
Avalon GloboCare
0.8$1.05flat$88.63 million$1.55 million0.00Gap Up
ATIF
ATIF
0.5$1.20flat$56.42 million$690,000.000.00Decrease in Short Interest
Lightbridge logo
LTBR
Lightbridge
0.6$5.98flat$39.32 millionN/A-2.17
Wilhelmina International logo
WHLM
Wilhelmina International
0.8$6.96flat$35.89 million$75.50 million-3.43High Trading Volume
Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
Gap Down
HUSN
Hudson Capital
0.2$2.45flat$15.70 million$1.37 million0.00Increase in Short Interest
This page was last updated on 4/13/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security. Learn more.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.