Paysafe (PSFE) Competitors

In the previous week, Cass Information Systems had 1 more articles in the media than Paysafe. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Cass Information Systems and 1 mentions for Paysafe. Cass Information Systems' average media sentiment score of 1.23 beat Paysafe's score of 0.00 indicating that Cass Information Systems is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Cass Information Systems has a net margin of 18.45% compared to Paysafe's net margin of -11.82%. Cass Information Systems' return on equity of 14.89% beat Paysafe's return on equity.

Cass Information Systems has a beta of 0.4, indicating that its stock price is 60% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Paysafe has a beta of 1.75, indicating that its stock price is 75% more volatile than the broader market.

59.1% of Cass Information Systems shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 54.4% of Paysafe shares are held by institutional investors. 3.4% of Cass Information Systems shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Cass Information Systems has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Paysafe. Paysafe is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cass Information Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Cass Information Systems presently has a consensus price target of $58.50, suggesting a potential upside of 6.02%. Paysafe has a consensus price target of $8.50, suggesting a potential upside of 34.39%. Given Paysafe's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Paysafe is more favorable than Cass Information Systems.

OBOOK has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Paysafe.

In the previous week, Paysafe and Paysafe both had 1 articles in the media. OBOOK's average media sentiment score of 1.89 beat Paysafe's score of 0.00 indicating that OBOOK is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

OBOOK has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Paysafe's net margin of -11.82%. Paysafe's return on equity of 10.31% beat OBOOK's return on equity.

54.4% of Paysafe shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Paysafe presently has a consensus price target of $8.50, suggesting a potential upside of 34.39%. OBOOK has a consensus price target of $11.00, suggesting a potential upside of 104.46%. Given OBOOK's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe OBOOK is more favorable than Paysafe.

Paysafe has a beta of 1.75, indicating that its share price is 75% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Priority Technology has a beta of 1.55, indicating that its share price is 55% more volatile than the broader market.

54.4% of Paysafe shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 11.5% of Priority Technology shares are owned by institutional investors. 59.4% of Priority Technology shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Priority Technology has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Paysafe. Paysafe is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Priority Technology, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Priority Technology had 2 more articles in the media than Paysafe. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Priority Technology and 1 mentions for Paysafe. Priority Technology's average media sentiment score of 0.87 beat Paysafe's score of 0.00 indicating that Priority Technology is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Paysafe presently has a consensus target price of $8.50, indicating a potential upside of 34.39%. Priority Technology has a consensus target price of $8.50, indicating a potential upside of 43.10%. Given Priority Technology's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Priority Technology is more favorable than Paysafe.

Priority Technology has a net margin of 5.61% compared to Paysafe's net margin of -11.82%. Paysafe's return on equity of 10.31% beat Priority Technology's return on equity.

In the previous week, International Money Express had 2 more articles in the media than Paysafe. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for International Money Express and 1 mentions for Paysafe. International Money Express' average media sentiment score of 1.72 beat Paysafe's score of 0.00 indicating that International Money Express is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Paysafe has a beta of 1.75, meaning that its share price is 75% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, International Money Express has a beta of 0.77, meaning that its share price is 23% less volatile than the broader market.

International Money Express has a net margin of 3.35% compared to Paysafe's net margin of -11.82%. International Money Express' return on equity of 17.01% beat Paysafe's return on equity.

Paysafe presently has a consensus price target of $8.50, suggesting a potential upside of 34.39%. Given Paysafe's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Paysafe is more favorable than International Money Express.

International Money Express has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Paysafe. Paysafe is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than International Money Express, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

54.4% of Paysafe shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.7% of International Money Express shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.1% of International Money Express shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.