Evertec (EVTC) Competitors

Evertec has higher revenue and earnings than Hinge Health. Hinge Health is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Evertec, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

96.8% of Evertec shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of Evertec shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 18.9% of Hinge Health shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Evertec has a net margin of 13.95% compared to Hinge Health's net margin of -78.95%. Evertec's return on equity of 31.40% beat Hinge Health's return on equity.

In the previous week, Hinge Health had 21 more articles in the media than Evertec. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for Hinge Health and 1 mentions for Evertec. Hinge Health's average media sentiment score of 0.38 beat Evertec's score of 0.00 indicating that Hinge Health is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Evertec currently has a consensus target price of $33.20, suggesting a potential upside of 20.24%. Hinge Health has a consensus target price of $75.80, suggesting a potential downside of 7.21%. Given Evertec's higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Evertec is more favorable than Hinge Health.

96.8% of Evertec shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.1% of Lyft shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of Evertec shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Lyft shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Evertec has a beta of 0.74, indicating that its share price is 26% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lyft has a beta of 1.82, indicating that its share price is 82% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Lyft had 20 more articles in the media than Evertec. MarketBeat recorded 21 mentions for Lyft and 1 mentions for Evertec. Lyft's average media sentiment score of 0.39 beat Evertec's score of 0.00 indicating that Lyft is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Evertec presently has a consensus price target of $33.20, suggesting a potential upside of 20.24%. Lyft has a consensus price target of $19.40, suggesting a potential upside of 27.21%. Given Lyft's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Lyft is more favorable than Evertec.

Lyft has higher revenue and earnings than Evertec. Lyft is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Evertec, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Lyft has a net margin of 43.82% compared to Evertec's net margin of 13.95%. Evertec's return on equity of 31.40% beat Lyft's return on equity.

Sezzle has a net margin of 30.83% compared to Evertec's net margin of 13.95%. Sezzle's return on equity of 87.46% beat Evertec's return on equity.

Evertec has a beta of 0.74, indicating that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sezzle has a beta of 6.96, indicating that its stock price is 596% more volatile than the broader market.

Evertec has higher revenue and earnings than Sezzle. Evertec is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sezzle, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Evertec currently has a consensus target price of $33.20, indicating a potential upside of 20.24%. Sezzle has a consensus target price of $136.00, indicating a potential downside of 20.33%. Given Evertec's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Evertec is more favorable than Sezzle.

In the previous week, Sezzle had 12 more articles in the media than Evertec. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Sezzle and 1 mentions for Evertec. Sezzle's average media sentiment score of 0.80 beat Evertec's score of 0.00 indicating that Sezzle is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

96.8% of Evertec shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.0% of Sezzle shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of Evertec shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 49.5% of Sezzle shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

96.8% of Evertec shares are held by institutional investors. 26.6% of Figure Technology Solutions shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Evertec shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Figure Technology Solutions presently has a consensus target price of $53.63, indicating a potential upside of 98.10%. Evertec has a consensus target price of $33.20, indicating a potential upside of 20.24%. Given Figure Technology Solutions' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Figure Technology Solutions is more favorable than Evertec.

In the previous week, Figure Technology Solutions had 6 more articles in the media than Evertec. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Figure Technology Solutions and 1 mentions for Evertec. Figure Technology Solutions' average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat Evertec's score of 0.00 indicating that Figure Technology Solutions is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Evertec has higher revenue and earnings than Figure Technology Solutions. Evertec is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Figure Technology Solutions, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Evertec has a net margin of 13.95% compared to Figure Technology Solutions' net margin of 0.00%. Evertec's return on equity of 31.40% beat Figure Technology Solutions' return on equity.