Go Pro

NeoGenomics (NEO) Competitors

NeoGenomics logo
$14.24 -0.37 (-2.53%)
Closing price 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$14.47 +0.23 (+1.61%)
As of 07:57 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

NEO vs. BILI, ZG, HNGE, QMMM, and SEZL

Should you buy NeoGenomics stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares NeoGenomics with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with NeoGenomics include Bilibili (BILI), Zillow Group (ZG), Hinge Health (HNGE), QMMM (QMMM), and Sezzle (SEZL). These companies are all part of the "business services" industry.

How does NeoGenomics compare to Bilibili?

NeoGenomics (NASDAQ:NEO) and Bilibili (NASDAQ:BILI) are both business services companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings and media sentiment.

98.5% of NeoGenomics shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 16.1% of Bilibili shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of NeoGenomics shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 22.2% of Bilibili shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

NeoGenomics presently has a consensus price target of $13.86, suggesting a potential downside of 2.69%. Bilibili has a consensus price target of $30.78, suggesting a potential upside of 67.18%. Given Bilibili's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Bilibili is more favorable than NeoGenomics.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
NeoGenomics
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.42
Bilibili
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.78

In the previous week, NeoGenomics had 1 more articles in the media than Bilibili. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for NeoGenomics and 3 mentions for Bilibili. NeoGenomics' average media sentiment score of 0.66 beat Bilibili's score of 0.43 indicating that NeoGenomics is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
NeoGenomics
1 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Bilibili
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Bilibili has a net margin of 4.58% compared to NeoGenomics' net margin of -13.30%. Bilibili's return on equity of 10.81% beat NeoGenomics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
NeoGenomics-13.30% -2.80% -1.72%
Bilibili 4.58%10.81%4.04%

NeoGenomics has a beta of 1.74, suggesting that its stock price is 74% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Bilibili has a beta of 0.7, suggesting that its stock price is 30% less volatile than the broader market.

Bilibili has higher revenue and earnings than NeoGenomics. NeoGenomics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Bilibili, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
NeoGenomics$727.33M2.55-$108.03M-$0.77N/A
Bilibili$4.34B1.76$170.67M$0.4540.91

Summary

Bilibili beats NeoGenomics on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does NeoGenomics compare to Zillow Group?

NeoGenomics (NASDAQ:NEO) and Zillow Group (NASDAQ:ZG) are both business services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends and earnings.

In the previous week, Zillow Group had 9 more articles in the media than NeoGenomics. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Zillow Group and 4 mentions for NeoGenomics. NeoGenomics' average media sentiment score of 0.66 beat Zillow Group's score of 0.00 indicating that NeoGenomics is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
NeoGenomics
1 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Zillow Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
13 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Zillow Group has a net margin of 2.27% compared to NeoGenomics' net margin of -13.30%. Zillow Group's return on equity of 1.41% beat NeoGenomics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
NeoGenomics-13.30% -2.80% -1.72%
Zillow Group 2.27%1.41%1.22%

Zillow Group has higher revenue and earnings than NeoGenomics. NeoGenomics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Zillow Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
NeoGenomics$727.33M2.55-$108.03M-$0.77N/A
Zillow Group$2.58B2.91$23M$0.25131.36

NeoGenomics currently has a consensus target price of $13.86, suggesting a potential downside of 2.69%. Zillow Group has a consensus target price of $69.48, suggesting a potential upside of 111.56%. Given Zillow Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Zillow Group is more favorable than NeoGenomics.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
NeoGenomics
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.42
Zillow Group
1 Sell rating(s)
11 Hold rating(s)
13 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.54

98.5% of NeoGenomics shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 20.3% of Zillow Group shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of NeoGenomics shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 29.9% of Zillow Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

NeoGenomics has a beta of 1.74, meaning that its stock price is 74% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Zillow Group has a beta of 1.95, meaning that its stock price is 95% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Zillow Group beats NeoGenomics on 15 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does NeoGenomics compare to Hinge Health?

NeoGenomics (NASDAQ:NEO) and Hinge Health (NYSE:HNGE) are both medical companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings and media sentiment.

In the previous week, NeoGenomics had 1 more articles in the media than Hinge Health. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for NeoGenomics and 3 mentions for Hinge Health. Hinge Health's average media sentiment score of 1.20 beat NeoGenomics' score of 0.66 indicating that Hinge Health is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
NeoGenomics
1 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Hinge Health
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

NeoGenomics has a net margin of -13.30% compared to Hinge Health's net margin of -78.95%. NeoGenomics' return on equity of -2.80% beat Hinge Health's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
NeoGenomics-13.30% -2.80% -1.72%
Hinge Health -78.95%-310.62%-71.08%

NeoGenomics has higher revenue and earnings than Hinge Health. NeoGenomics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hinge Health, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
NeoGenomics$727.33M2.55-$108.03M-$0.77N/A
Hinge Health$587.86M11.52-$528.26M-$12.34N/A

98.5% of NeoGenomics shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of NeoGenomics shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 18.9% of Hinge Health shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

NeoGenomics presently has a consensus price target of $13.86, suggesting a potential downside of 2.69%. Hinge Health has a consensus price target of $82.67, suggesting a potential downside of 5.55%. Given NeoGenomics' higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe NeoGenomics is more favorable than Hinge Health.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
NeoGenomics
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.42
Hinge Health
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
15 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.95

NeoGenomics has a beta of 1.74, meaning that its share price is 74% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hinge Health has a beta of 1.13, meaning that its share price is 13% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

NeoGenomics beats Hinge Health on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does NeoGenomics compare to QMMM?

QMMM (NASDAQ:QMMM) and NeoGenomics (NASDAQ:NEO) are both business services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends and institutional ownership.

QMMM has a beta of 14.57, indicating that its stock price is 1,357% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, NeoGenomics has a beta of 1.74, indicating that its stock price is 74% more volatile than the broader market.

QMMM has higher earnings, but lower revenue than NeoGenomics.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
QMMM$2.70M2,529.95-$1.58MN/AN/A
NeoGenomics$727.33M2.55-$108.03M-$0.77N/A

98.5% of NeoGenomics shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of NeoGenomics shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, NeoGenomics had 4 more articles in the media than QMMM. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for NeoGenomics and 0 mentions for QMMM. NeoGenomics' average media sentiment score of 0.66 beat QMMM's score of 0.00 indicating that NeoGenomics is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
QMMM Neutral
NeoGenomics Positive

QMMM has a net margin of 0.00% compared to NeoGenomics' net margin of -13.30%. QMMM's return on equity of 0.00% beat NeoGenomics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
QMMMN/A N/A N/A
NeoGenomics -13.30%-2.80%-1.72%

NeoGenomics has a consensus target price of $13.86, suggesting a potential downside of 2.69%. Given NeoGenomics' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe NeoGenomics is more favorable than QMMM.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
QMMM
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
NeoGenomics
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.42

Summary

NeoGenomics beats QMMM on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does NeoGenomics compare to Sezzle?

NeoGenomics (NASDAQ:NEO) and Sezzle (NASDAQ:SEZL) are both business services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, risk, dividends and valuation.

Sezzle has lower revenue, but higher earnings than NeoGenomics. NeoGenomics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sezzle, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
NeoGenomics$727.33M2.55-$108.03M-$0.77N/A
Sezzle$450.28M12.83$133.13M$4.2140.80

98.5% of NeoGenomics shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.0% of Sezzle shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of NeoGenomics shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 49.5% of Sezzle shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Sezzle had 6 more articles in the media than NeoGenomics. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Sezzle and 4 mentions for NeoGenomics. NeoGenomics' average media sentiment score of 0.66 beat Sezzle's score of 0.17 indicating that NeoGenomics is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
NeoGenomics
1 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Sezzle
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

NeoGenomics presently has a consensus price target of $13.86, suggesting a potential downside of 2.69%. Sezzle has a consensus price target of $151.33, suggesting a potential downside of 11.89%. Given NeoGenomics' higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe NeoGenomics is more favorable than Sezzle.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
NeoGenomics
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.42
Sezzle
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.56

NeoGenomics has a beta of 1.74, indicating that its stock price is 74% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sezzle has a beta of 6.7, indicating that its stock price is 570% more volatile than the broader market.

Sezzle has a net margin of 30.83% compared to NeoGenomics' net margin of -13.30%. Sezzle's return on equity of 87.46% beat NeoGenomics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
NeoGenomics-13.30% -2.80% -1.72%
Sezzle 30.83%87.46%36.29%

Summary

Sezzle beats NeoGenomics on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get NeoGenomics News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for NEO and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding NEO and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

NEO vs. The Competition

MetricNeoGenomicsMED IndustryMedical SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$1.90B$3.69B$6.89B$12.28B
Dividend YieldN/A2.16%2.67%9.39%
P/E Ratio-18.4920.4927.1023.94
Price / Sales2.55300.39517.5191.95
Price / Cash43.6160.3126.6847.25
Price / Book2.207.9210.666.14
Net Income-$108.03M$23.81M$3.60B$331.74M
7 Day Performance0.92%-1.27%-1.51%-1.72%
1 Month Performance27.94%2.56%1.11%-1.44%
1 Year Performance128.21%42.49%23.77%16.97%

NeoGenomics Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
NEO
NeoGenomics
1.5723 of 5 stars
$14.24
-2.5%
$13.86
-2.7%
+134.1%$1.90B$727.33MN/A2,500
BILI
Bilibili
3.5088 of 5 stars
$17.59
-0.6%
$30.78
+75.0%
-28.4%$7.34B$4.34B39.098,423
ZG
Zillow Group
4.0919 of 5 stars
$31.94
-0.2%
$69.48
+117.5%
-54.7%$7.32B$2.58B127.767,068
HNGE
Hinge Health
2.5034 of 5 stars
$90.04
+1.4%
$82.67
-8.2%
+84.5%$6.87B$587.86MN/A1,437
QMMM
QMMM
0.0845 of 5 stars
$119.40
flat
N/AN/A$6.83B$2.70MN/AN/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:NEO) was last updated on 7/20/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners