Free Trial

NeoGenomics (NEO) Competitors

NeoGenomics logo
$10.95 +0.05 (+0.46%)
Closing price 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$11.19 +0.24 (+2.19%)
As of 07:05 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

NEO vs. LYFT, EQPT, XMTR, WSC, and HRI

Should you buy NeoGenomics stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares NeoGenomics with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with NeoGenomics include Lyft (LYFT), EquipmentShare.com (EQPT), Xometry (XMTR), WillScot (WSC), and Herc (HRI). These companies are all part of the "business services" industry.

How does NeoGenomics compare to Lyft?

NeoGenomics (NASDAQ:NEO) and Lyft (NASDAQ:LYFT) are both business services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, risk and earnings.

NeoGenomics presently has a consensus target price of $13.86, suggesting a potential upside of 26.55%. Lyft has a consensus target price of $18.83, suggesting a potential upside of 34.29%. Given Lyft's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Lyft is more favorable than NeoGenomics.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
NeoGenomics
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.42
Lyft
2 Sell rating(s)
23 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.18

In the previous week, Lyft had 24 more articles in the media than NeoGenomics. MarketBeat recorded 25 mentions for Lyft and 1 mentions for NeoGenomics. Lyft's average media sentiment score of 0.45 beat NeoGenomics' score of 0.00 indicating that Lyft is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
NeoGenomics
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Lyft
9 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
9 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
2 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Lyft has higher revenue and earnings than NeoGenomics. NeoGenomics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lyft, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
NeoGenomics$727.33M1.96-$108.03M-$0.77N/A
Lyft$6.32B0.84$2.84B$6.852.05

NeoGenomics has a beta of 1.82, suggesting that its stock price is 82% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lyft has a beta of 1.82, suggesting that its stock price is 82% more volatile than the broader market.

Lyft has a net margin of 43.82% compared to NeoGenomics' net margin of -13.30%. Lyft's return on equity of -2.09% beat NeoGenomics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
NeoGenomics-13.30% -2.80% -1.72%
Lyft 43.82%-2.09%-0.54%

98.5% of NeoGenomics shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.1% of Lyft shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of NeoGenomics shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Lyft shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Lyft beats NeoGenomics on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does NeoGenomics compare to EquipmentShare.com?

NeoGenomics (NASDAQ:NEO) and EquipmentShare.com (NASDAQ:EQPT) are both business services companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, valuation and earnings.

98.5% of NeoGenomics shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of NeoGenomics shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

EquipmentShare.com has a net margin of 0.00% compared to NeoGenomics' net margin of -13.30%. EquipmentShare.com's return on equity of 0.00% beat NeoGenomics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
NeoGenomics-13.30% -2.80% -1.72%
EquipmentShare.com N/A N/A N/A

EquipmentShare.com has higher revenue and earnings than NeoGenomics.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
NeoGenomics$727.33M1.96-$108.03M-$0.77N/A
EquipmentShare.com$4.38B1.15$40MN/AN/A

NeoGenomics presently has a consensus target price of $13.86, indicating a potential upside of 26.55%. EquipmentShare.com has a consensus target price of $40.25, indicating a potential upside of 101.55%. Given EquipmentShare.com's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe EquipmentShare.com is more favorable than NeoGenomics.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
NeoGenomics
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.42
EquipmentShare.com
1 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.45

In the previous week, NeoGenomics and NeoGenomics both had 1 articles in the media. EquipmentShare.com's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat NeoGenomics' score of 0.00 indicating that EquipmentShare.com is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
NeoGenomics
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
EquipmentShare.com
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

EquipmentShare.com beats NeoGenomics on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does NeoGenomics compare to Xometry?

NeoGenomics (NASDAQ:NEO) and Xometry (NASDAQ:XMTR) are both business services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Xometry has a net margin of -7.01% compared to NeoGenomics' net margin of -13.30%. NeoGenomics' return on equity of -2.80% beat Xometry's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
NeoGenomics-13.30% -2.80% -1.72%
Xometry -7.01%-4.37%-1.71%

Xometry has lower revenue, but higher earnings than NeoGenomics. Xometry is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than NeoGenomics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
NeoGenomics$727.33M1.96-$108.03M-$0.77N/A
Xometry$686.63M6.20-$61.74M-$1.02N/A

In the previous week, Xometry had 12 more articles in the media than NeoGenomics. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Xometry and 1 mentions for NeoGenomics. Xometry's average media sentiment score of 0.60 beat NeoGenomics' score of 0.00 indicating that Xometry is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
NeoGenomics
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Xometry
4 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

98.5% of NeoGenomics shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.3% of Xometry shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of NeoGenomics shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 9.1% of Xometry shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

NeoGenomics has a beta of 1.82, suggesting that its stock price is 82% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Xometry has a beta of 1.26, suggesting that its stock price is 26% more volatile than the broader market.

NeoGenomics currently has a consensus price target of $13.86, suggesting a potential upside of 26.55%. Xometry has a consensus price target of $76.00, suggesting a potential downside of 7.54%. Given NeoGenomics' higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe NeoGenomics is more favorable than Xometry.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
NeoGenomics
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.42
Xometry
1 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.45

Summary

Xometry beats NeoGenomics on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does NeoGenomics compare to WillScot?

WillScot (NASDAQ:WSC) and NeoGenomics (NASDAQ:NEO) are both business services companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk and dividends.

WillScot has a beta of 1.34, meaning that its stock price is 34% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, NeoGenomics has a beta of 1.82, meaning that its stock price is 82% more volatile than the broader market.

95.8% of WillScot shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.5% of NeoGenomics shares are held by institutional investors. 3.1% of WillScot shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of NeoGenomics shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

WillScot presently has a consensus price target of $25.88, suggesting a potential downside of 3.85%. NeoGenomics has a consensus price target of $13.86, suggesting a potential upside of 26.55%. Given NeoGenomics' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe NeoGenomics is more favorable than WillScot.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
WillScot
1 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.18
NeoGenomics
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.42

WillScot has a net margin of -2.99% compared to NeoGenomics' net margin of -13.30%. WillScot's return on equity of 20.65% beat NeoGenomics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
WillScot-2.99% 20.65% 3.31%
NeoGenomics -13.30%-2.80%-1.72%

WillScot has higher revenue and earnings than NeoGenomics. WillScot is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than NeoGenomics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
WillScot$2.28B2.13-$52.99M-$0.38N/A
NeoGenomics$727.33M1.96-$108.03M-$0.77N/A

In the previous week, WillScot had 1 more articles in the media than NeoGenomics. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for WillScot and 1 mentions for NeoGenomics. WillScot's average media sentiment score of 0.97 beat NeoGenomics' score of 0.00 indicating that WillScot is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
WillScot
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
NeoGenomics
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

WillScot beats NeoGenomics on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does NeoGenomics compare to Herc?

Herc (NYSE:HRI) and NeoGenomics (NASDAQ:NEO) are both business services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, profitability and dividends.

Herc presently has a consensus target price of $165.67, indicating a potential upside of 13.96%. NeoGenomics has a consensus target price of $13.86, indicating a potential upside of 26.55%. Given NeoGenomics' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe NeoGenomics is more favorable than Herc.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Herc
2 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.38
NeoGenomics
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.42

Herc has a beta of 1.89, meaning that its share price is 89% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, NeoGenomics has a beta of 1.82, meaning that its share price is 82% more volatile than the broader market.

93.1% of Herc shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.5% of NeoGenomics shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.2% of Herc shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of NeoGenomics shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Herc has higher revenue and earnings than NeoGenomics. Herc is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than NeoGenomics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Herc$4.38B1.11$1M-$0.27N/A
NeoGenomics$727.33M1.96-$108.03M-$0.77N/A

Herc has a net margin of -0.11% compared to NeoGenomics' net margin of -13.30%. Herc's return on equity of 10.72% beat NeoGenomics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Herc-0.11% 10.72% 1.49%
NeoGenomics -13.30%-2.80%-1.72%

In the previous week, Herc had 3 more articles in the media than NeoGenomics. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Herc and 1 mentions for NeoGenomics. Herc's average media sentiment score of 0.13 beat NeoGenomics' score of 0.00 indicating that Herc is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Herc
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
NeoGenomics
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Herc beats NeoGenomics on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get NeoGenomics News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for NEO and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding NEO and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

NEO vs. The Competition

MetricNeoGenomicsMED IndustryMedical SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$1.42B$3.34B$6.49B$11.99B
Dividend YieldN/A2.30%2.67%5.57%
P/E Ratio-14.2210.3820.2421.95
Price / Sales1.96298.43507.57108.00
Price / Cash32.5351.4526.9937.25
Price / Book1.698.0410.286.78
Net Income-$108.03M$23.89M$3.57B$337.51M
7 Day Performance4.89%-5.97%-1.43%-2.72%
1 Month Performance22.21%2.78%3.27%1.87%
1 Year Performance47.57%36.26%23.37%26.61%

NeoGenomics Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
NEO
NeoGenomics
2.7358 of 5 stars
$10.95
+0.5%
$13.86
+26.5%
+46.9%$1.42B$727.33MN/A2,500
LYFT
Lyft
4.6219 of 5 stars
$14.86
+5.3%
$18.83
+26.7%
-12.1%$5.36B$6.52B2.173,913
EQPT
EquipmentShare.com
4.2249 of 5 stars
$19.84
-4.8%
$40.25
+102.9%
N/A$5.26B$4.38BN/A7,700
XMTR
Xometry
2.2536 of 5 stars
$95.25
0.0%
$76.00
-20.2%
+119.5%$4.94B$686.63MN/A1,174
WSC
WillScot
3.2614 of 5 stars
$25.18
-2.1%
$25.88
+2.8%
-7.1%$4.65B$2.27BN/A4,700

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:NEO) was last updated on 6/8/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners