Go Pro

IM Cannabis (IMCC) Competitors

IM Cannabis logo
$0.16 -0.01 (-7.90%)
Closing price 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$0.16 +0.00 (+0.58%)
As of 07:56 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

IMCC vs. FBLG, SPRC, BGMS, CUPR, and CAPS

Should you buy IM Cannabis stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares IM Cannabis with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with IM Cannabis include FibroBiologics (FBLG), SciSparc (SPRC), Cyclacel Pharmaceuticals (BGMS), Cuprina Holdings (Cayman) (CUPR), and Capstone Therapeutics (CAPS). These companies are all part of the "pharmaceutical products" industry.

How does IM Cannabis compare to FibroBiologics?

FibroBiologics (NASDAQ:FBLG) and IM Cannabis (NASDAQ:IMCC) are both small-cap medical companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, dividends and analyst recommendations.

7.7% of IM Cannabis shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.3% of FibroBiologics shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 5.9% of IM Cannabis shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

FibroBiologics currently has a consensus target price of $74.00, suggesting a potential upside of 8,065.07%. Given FibroBiologics' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe FibroBiologics is more favorable than IM Cannabis.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
FibroBiologics
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
IM Cannabis
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

FibroBiologics has a net margin of 0.00% compared to IM Cannabis' net margin of -27.65%. IM Cannabis' return on equity of -585.96% beat FibroBiologics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
FibroBiologicsN/A -767.07% -195.56%
IM Cannabis -27.65%-585.96%-39.96%

IM Cannabis has higher revenue and earnings than FibroBiologics. FibroBiologics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than IM Cannabis, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
FibroBiologicsN/AN/A-$18.65M-$6.93N/A
IM Cannabis$39.17M0.02-$8.10M-$1.75N/A

FibroBiologics has a beta of 1.14, meaning that its share price is 14% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, IM Cannabis has a beta of 2.05, meaning that its share price is 105% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, FibroBiologics had 3 more articles in the media than IM Cannabis. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for FibroBiologics and 2 mentions for IM Cannabis. IM Cannabis' average media sentiment score of 1.89 beat FibroBiologics' score of 0.50 indicating that IM Cannabis is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
FibroBiologics
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
IM Cannabis
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Summary

IM Cannabis beats FibroBiologics on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does IM Cannabis compare to SciSparc?

SciSparc (NASDAQ:SPRC) and IM Cannabis (NASDAQ:IMCC) are both small-cap medical companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, risk and analyst recommendations.

SciSparc has a net margin of 0.00% compared to IM Cannabis' net margin of -27.65%. SciSparc's return on equity of 0.00% beat IM Cannabis' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
SciSparcN/A N/A N/A
IM Cannabis -27.65%-585.96%-39.96%

25.1% of SciSparc shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.7% of IM Cannabis shares are held by institutional investors. 1.5% of SciSparc shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 5.9% of IM Cannabis shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

SciSparc has a beta of 2.79, indicating that its stock price is 179% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, IM Cannabis has a beta of 2.05, indicating that its stock price is 105% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, SciSparc had 1 more articles in the media than IM Cannabis. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for SciSparc and 2 mentions for IM Cannabis. IM Cannabis' average media sentiment score of 1.89 beat SciSparc's score of 0.96 indicating that IM Cannabis is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
SciSparc
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
IM Cannabis
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
SciSparc
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
IM Cannabis
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

IM Cannabis has higher revenue and earnings than SciSparc.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
SciSparc$860K3.41-$12.18MN/AN/A
IM Cannabis$39.17M0.02-$8.10M-$1.75N/A

Summary

SciSparc beats IM Cannabis on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does IM Cannabis compare to Cyclacel Pharmaceuticals?

Cyclacel Pharmaceuticals (NASDAQ:BGMS) and IM Cannabis (NASDAQ:IMCC) are both small-cap pharmaceutical products companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations and risk.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Cyclacel Pharmaceuticals
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
IM Cannabis
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Cyclacel Pharmaceuticals has a net margin of 0.00% compared to IM Cannabis' net margin of -27.65%. Cyclacel Pharmaceuticals' return on equity of -51.21% beat IM Cannabis' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cyclacel PharmaceuticalsN/A -51.21% -44.00%
IM Cannabis -27.65%-585.96%-39.96%

In the previous week, Cyclacel Pharmaceuticals had 1 more articles in the media than IM Cannabis. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Cyclacel Pharmaceuticals and 2 mentions for IM Cannabis. IM Cannabis' average media sentiment score of 1.89 beat Cyclacel Pharmaceuticals' score of 0.29 indicating that IM Cannabis is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Cyclacel Pharmaceuticals
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
IM Cannabis
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Cyclacel Pharmaceuticals has higher earnings, but lower revenue than IM Cannabis. Cyclacel Pharmaceuticals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than IM Cannabis, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cyclacel Pharmaceuticals$750K8.10-$3M-$4.54N/A
IM Cannabis$39.17M0.02-$8.10M-$1.75N/A

Cyclacel Pharmaceuticals has a beta of -0.38, indicating that its stock price is 138% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, IM Cannabis has a beta of 2.05, indicating that its stock price is 105% more volatile than the broader market.

23.6% of Cyclacel Pharmaceuticals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.7% of IM Cannabis shares are owned by institutional investors. 23.8% of Cyclacel Pharmaceuticals shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 5.9% of IM Cannabis shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Cyclacel Pharmaceuticals beats IM Cannabis on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does IM Cannabis compare to Cuprina Holdings (Cayman)?

Cuprina Holdings (Cayman) (NASDAQ:CUPR) and IM Cannabis (NASDAQ:IMCC) are both small-cap pharmaceutical products companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, media sentiment, earnings, dividends and risk.

Cuprina Holdings (Cayman) has a beta of -1.2, meaning that its stock price is 220% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, IM Cannabis has a beta of 2.05, meaning that its stock price is 105% more volatile than the broader market.

Cuprina Holdings (Cayman) has higher earnings, but lower revenue than IM Cannabis.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cuprina Holdings (Cayman)$40K137.08-$3.63MN/AN/A
IM Cannabis$39.17M0.02-$8.10M-$1.75N/A

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Cuprina Holdings (Cayman)
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
IM Cannabis
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Cuprina Holdings (Cayman) has a net margin of 0.00% compared to IM Cannabis' net margin of -27.65%. Cuprina Holdings (Cayman)'s return on equity of 0.00% beat IM Cannabis' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cuprina Holdings (Cayman)N/A N/A N/A
IM Cannabis -27.65%-585.96%-39.96%

In the previous week, Cuprina Holdings (Cayman) had 1 more articles in the media than IM Cannabis. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Cuprina Holdings (Cayman) and 2 mentions for IM Cannabis. IM Cannabis' average media sentiment score of 1.89 beat Cuprina Holdings (Cayman)'s score of 0.49 indicating that IM Cannabis is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Cuprina Holdings (Cayman)
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
IM Cannabis
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

7.7% of IM Cannabis shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.9% of IM Cannabis shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Cuprina Holdings (Cayman) beats IM Cannabis on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does IM Cannabis compare to Capstone Therapeutics?

Capstone Therapeutics (NASDAQ:CAPS) and IM Cannabis (NASDAQ:IMCC) are both small-cap medical companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, institutional ownership and profitability.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Capstone Therapeutics
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
IM Cannabis
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

IM Cannabis has a net margin of -27.65% compared to Capstone Therapeutics' net margin of -41.26%. Capstone Therapeutics' return on equity of -114.15% beat IM Cannabis' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Capstone Therapeutics-41.26% -114.15% -39.74%
IM Cannabis -27.65%-585.96%-39.96%

In the previous week, IM Cannabis had 1 more articles in the media than Capstone Therapeutics. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for IM Cannabis and 1 mentions for Capstone Therapeutics. Capstone Therapeutics' average media sentiment score of 1.89 equaled IM Cannabis'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Capstone Therapeutics Very Positive
IM Cannabis Very Positive

IM Cannabis has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Capstone Therapeutics. IM Cannabis is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Capstone Therapeutics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Capstone Therapeutics$48.11M0.09-$21.23M-$3.37N/A
IM Cannabis$39.17M0.02-$8.10M-$1.75N/A

2.6% of Capstone Therapeutics shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.7% of IM Cannabis shares are held by institutional investors. 39.3% of Capstone Therapeutics shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 5.9% of IM Cannabis shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Capstone Therapeutics has a beta of -1.51, indicating that its share price is 251% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, IM Cannabis has a beta of 2.05, indicating that its share price is 105% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Capstone Therapeutics and IM Cannabis tied by winning 6 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get IM Cannabis News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for IMCC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding IMCC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

IMCC vs. The Competition

MetricIM CannabisMED PRODUCTS IndustryMedical SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$1.05M$8.32B$6.81B$12.59B
Dividend YieldN/A2.52%2.67%6.15%
P/E Ratio-0.0915.7027.6725.26
Price / Sales0.027.23533.70101.14
Price / CashN/A17.6547.9959.26
Price / Book-0.323.5510.966.62
Net Income-$8.10M$226.25M$3.57B$336.83M
7 Day Performance-3.24%1.68%2.58%2.52%
1 Month Performance-51.58%-2.87%1.67%0.44%
1 Year Performance-94.26%3.97%35.96%29.40%

IM Cannabis Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
IMCC
IM Cannabis
0.6633 of 5 stars
$0.16
-7.9%
N/A-93.2%$1.05M$39.17MN/A340
FBLG
FibroBiologics
2.5484 of 5 stars
$0.77
+2.5%
$74.00
+9,517.9%
-92.6%$3.91MN/AN/A10
SPRC
SciSparc
1.2949 of 5 stars
$5.86
-15.3%
N/A-90.6%$3.91M$860KN/A4
BGMS
Cyclacel Pharmaceuticals
0.7285 of 5 stars
$0.64
-4.5%
N/AN/A$3.68M$750KN/A14
CUPR
Cuprina Holdings (Cayman)
0.4124 of 5 stars
$5.74
+45.7%
N/AN/A$3.63M$40KN/A14

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:IMCC) was last updated on 7/1/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners