Go Pro

Terrestrial Energy (IMSR) Competitors

Terrestrial Energy logo
$5.38 -0.08 (-1.47%)
Closing price 07/22/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$5.36 -0.02 (-0.46%)
As of 07/22/2026 07:55 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

IMSR vs. VIASP, BKH, NWN, IDT, and TV

Should you buy Terrestrial Energy stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Terrestrial Energy with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Terrestrial Energy include Via Renewables (VIASP), Black Hills (BKH), Northwest Natural Gas (NWN), IDT (IDT), and Grupo Televisa (TV). These companies are all part of the "utilities" sector.

How does Terrestrial Energy compare to Via Renewables?

Via Renewables (NASDAQ:VIASP) and Terrestrial Energy (NASDAQ:IMSR) are both utilities companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings and risk.

Via Renewables has higher revenue and earnings than Terrestrial Energy.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Via Renewables$480.22MN/AN/AN/AN/A
Terrestrial Energy$250K2,279.61-$28.02M-$0.10N/A

In the previous week, Terrestrial Energy had 1 more articles in the media than Via Renewables. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Terrestrial Energy and 0 mentions for Via Renewables. Terrestrial Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.57 beat Via Renewables' score of 0.00 indicating that Terrestrial Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Via Renewables Neutral
Terrestrial Energy Very Positive

Via Renewables' return on equity of 0.00% beat Terrestrial Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Via RenewablesN/A N/A N/A
Terrestrial Energy N/A -23.24%-11.93%

Terrestrial Energy has a consensus target price of $13.50, suggesting a potential upside of 150.93%. Given Terrestrial Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Terrestrial Energy is more favorable than Via Renewables.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Via Renewables
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Terrestrial Energy
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25

Summary

Terrestrial Energy beats Via Renewables on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Terrestrial Energy compare to Black Hills?

Black Hills (NYSE:BKH) and Terrestrial Energy (NASDAQ:IMSR) are both utilities companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation and earnings.

Black Hills currently has a consensus target price of $81.67, suggesting a potential upside of 8.92%. Terrestrial Energy has a consensus target price of $13.50, suggesting a potential upside of 150.93%. Given Terrestrial Energy's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Terrestrial Energy is more favorable than Black Hills.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Black Hills
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Terrestrial Energy
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25

In the previous week, Black Hills had 6 more articles in the media than Terrestrial Energy. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Black Hills and 1 mentions for Terrestrial Energy. Terrestrial Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.57 beat Black Hills' score of 0.74 indicating that Terrestrial Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Black Hills
4 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Terrestrial Energy
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Black Hills has higher revenue and earnings than Terrestrial Energy. Terrestrial Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Black Hills, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Black Hills$2.31B2.47$291.60M$3.8419.53
Terrestrial Energy$250K2,279.61-$28.02M-$0.10N/A

Black Hills has a net margin of 12.61% compared to Terrestrial Energy's net margin of 0.00%. Black Hills' return on equity of 7.77% beat Terrestrial Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Black Hills12.61% 7.77% 2.86%
Terrestrial Energy N/A -23.24%-11.93%

86.7% of Black Hills shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Black Hills shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 28.6% of Terrestrial Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Black Hills has a beta of 0.71, meaning that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Terrestrial Energy has a beta of 2.24, meaning that its stock price is 124% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Black Hills beats Terrestrial Energy on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Terrestrial Energy compare to Northwest Natural Gas?

Northwest Natural Gas (NYSE:NWN) and Terrestrial Energy (NASDAQ:IMSR) are both utilities companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk and earnings.

In the previous week, Northwest Natural Gas had 2 more articles in the media than Terrestrial Energy. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Northwest Natural Gas and 1 mentions for Terrestrial Energy. Terrestrial Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.57 beat Northwest Natural Gas' score of 1.00 indicating that Terrestrial Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Northwest Natural Gas
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Terrestrial Energy
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Northwest Natural Gas has a beta of 0.43, indicating that its share price is 57% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Terrestrial Energy has a beta of 2.24, indicating that its share price is 124% more volatile than the broader market.

Northwest Natural Gas has higher revenue and earnings than Terrestrial Energy. Terrestrial Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Northwest Natural Gas, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Northwest Natural Gas$1.29B1.68$113.32M$2.9317.57
Terrestrial Energy$250K2,279.61-$28.02M-$0.10N/A

Northwest Natural Gas has a net margin of 9.56% compared to Terrestrial Energy's net margin of 0.00%. Northwest Natural Gas' return on equity of 8.46% beat Terrestrial Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Northwest Natural Gas9.56% 8.46% 2.08%
Terrestrial Energy N/A -23.24%-11.93%

Northwest Natural Gas presently has a consensus price target of $55.25, indicating a potential upside of 7.33%. Terrestrial Energy has a consensus price target of $13.50, indicating a potential upside of 150.93%. Given Terrestrial Energy's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Terrestrial Energy is more favorable than Northwest Natural Gas.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Northwest Natural Gas
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57
Terrestrial Energy
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25

75.1% of Northwest Natural Gas shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Northwest Natural Gas shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 28.6% of Terrestrial Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Northwest Natural Gas beats Terrestrial Energy on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Terrestrial Energy compare to IDT?

Terrestrial Energy (NASDAQ:IMSR) and IDT (NYSE:IDT) are both small-cap utilities companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk and dividends.

Terrestrial Energy currently has a consensus price target of $13.50, suggesting a potential upside of 150.93%. Given Terrestrial Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Terrestrial Energy is more favorable than IDT.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Terrestrial Energy
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25
IDT
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

In the previous week, Terrestrial Energy had 1 more articles in the media than IDT. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Terrestrial Energy and 0 mentions for IDT. Terrestrial Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.57 beat IDT's score of 0.45 indicating that Terrestrial Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Terrestrial Energy Very Positive
IDT Neutral

59.3% of IDT shares are owned by institutional investors. 28.6% of Terrestrial Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 25.4% of IDT shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

IDT has higher revenue and earnings than Terrestrial Energy. Terrestrial Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than IDT, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Terrestrial Energy$250K2,279.61-$28.02M-$0.10N/A
IDT$1.23B1.29$76.09M$3.2719.57

IDT has a net margin of 6.41% compared to Terrestrial Energy's net margin of 0.00%. IDT's return on equity of 24.36% beat Terrestrial Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Terrestrial EnergyN/A -23.24% -11.93%
IDT 6.41%24.36%12.72%

Terrestrial Energy has a beta of 2.24, meaning that its stock price is 124% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, IDT has a beta of 0.64, meaning that its stock price is 36% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Terrestrial Energy and IDT tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Terrestrial Energy compare to Grupo Televisa?

Terrestrial Energy (NASDAQ:IMSR) and Grupo Televisa (NYSE:TV) are both small-cap utilities companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, risk and valuation.

In the previous week, Grupo Televisa had 1 more articles in the media than Terrestrial Energy. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Grupo Televisa and 1 mentions for Terrestrial Energy. Terrestrial Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.57 beat Grupo Televisa's score of 1.21 indicating that Terrestrial Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Terrestrial Energy
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
Grupo Televisa
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Terrestrial Energy currently has a consensus target price of $13.50, suggesting a potential upside of 150.93%. Grupo Televisa has a consensus target price of $5.23, suggesting a potential upside of 85.91%. Given Terrestrial Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Terrestrial Energy is more favorable than Grupo Televisa.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Terrestrial Energy
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25
Grupo Televisa
2 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.86

Terrestrial Energy has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Grupo Televisa. Terrestrial Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Grupo Televisa, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Terrestrial Energy$250K2,279.61-$28.02M-$0.10N/A
Grupo Televisa$58.42B0.03-$478.58M-$0.81N/A

55.8% of Grupo Televisa shares are held by institutional investors. 28.6% of Terrestrial Energy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Terrestrial Energy has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Grupo Televisa's net margin of -13.93%. Grupo Televisa's return on equity of -7.65% beat Terrestrial Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Terrestrial EnergyN/A -23.24% -11.93%
Grupo Televisa -13.93%-7.65%-3.55%

Terrestrial Energy has a beta of 2.24, meaning that its share price is 124% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Grupo Televisa has a beta of 1.55, meaning that its share price is 55% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Terrestrial Energy beats Grupo Televisa on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Terrestrial Energy News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for IMSR and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding IMSR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

IMSR vs. The Competition

MetricTerrestrial EnergyUtilities IndustryUtilities SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$578.41M$22.31B$18.88B$12.68B
Dividend YieldN/A4.99%3.98%9.42%
P/E Ratio-53.8014.1120.0423.95
Price / Sales2,279.613,392.7934.79115.11
Price / CashN/A122.2819.3560.45
Price / Book1.931.922.446.16
Net Income-$28.02M$869.29M$785.96M$331.73M
7 Day Performance13.98%0.85%0.64%-0.92%
1 Month Performance-29.95%-0.26%0.79%-2.23%
1 Year PerformanceN/A17.35%12.16%14.79%

Terrestrial Energy Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
IMSR
Terrestrial Energy
1.8482 of 5 stars
$5.38
-1.5%
$13.50
+150.9%
N/A$578.41M$250KN/AN/A
VIASP
Via Renewables
N/A$25.62
flat
N/AN/A$0.00$480.22MN/A170
BKH
Black Hills
3.7819 of 5 stars
$73.88
-0.8%
$82.67
+11.9%
+29.1%$5.63B$2.31B19.262,795
NWN
Northwest Natural Gas
4.0511 of 5 stars
$50.52
-0.9%
$55.25
+9.4%
+21.3%$2.13B$1.29B17.271,619
IDT
IDT
1.4526 of 5 stars
$63.32
+0.4%
N/A+12.5%$1.57B$1.23B19.341,925

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:IMSR) was last updated on 7/23/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners