Which has higher earnings and valuation, EXP or BW?

Eagle Materials has higher revenue and earnings than Babcock. Babcock is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Eagle Materials, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Eagle Materials $2.31B 2.96 $423.81M $13.12 16.83 Babcock $587.70M 3.28 -$36.16M -$0.88 N/A

Does the media prefer EXP or BW?

In the previous week, Babcock had 3 more articles in the media than Eagle Materials. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Babcock and 3 mentions for Eagle Materials. Eagle Materials' average media sentiment score of 0.59 beat Babcock's score of 0.18 indicating that Eagle Materials is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Eagle Materials 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Babcock 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 5 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has better valuation and earnings, ACA or BW?

Arcosa has higher revenue and earnings than Babcock. Babcock is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Arcosa, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Arcosa $2.88B 2.47 $208.40M $4.53 32.02 Babcock $587.70M 3.28 -$36.16M -$0.88 N/A

Is ACA or BW more profitable?

Arcosa has a net margin of 7.88% compared to Babcock's net margin of -13.63%. Arcosa's return on equity of 8.52% beat Babcock's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Arcosa 7.88% 8.52% 4.41% Babcock -13.63% N/A -1.41%

Does the media refer more to ACA or BW?

In the previous week, Babcock had 4 more articles in the media than Arcosa. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Babcock and 2 mentions for Arcosa. Babcock's average media sentiment score of 0.18 beat Arcosa's score of 0.01 indicating that Babcock is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Arcosa 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Babcock 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 5 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media refer more to FBIN or BW?

In the previous week, Fortune Brands Innovations had 5 more articles in the media than Babcock. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Fortune Brands Innovations and 6 mentions for Babcock. Fortune Brands Innovations' average media sentiment score of 0.90 beat Babcock's score of 0.18 indicating that Fortune Brands Innovations is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Fortune Brands Innovations 5 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 5 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Babcock 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 5 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has better valuation & earnings, BW or SKY?

Champion Homes has higher revenue and earnings than Babcock. Babcock is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Champion Homes, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Babcock $587.70M 3.28 -$36.16M -$0.88 N/A Champion Homes $2.66B 1.76 $206.90M $3.66 23.36

Is BW or SKY more profitable?

Champion Homes has a net margin of 7.77% compared to Babcock's net margin of -13.63%. Champion Homes' return on equity of 13.80% beat Babcock's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Babcock -13.63% N/A -1.41% Champion Homes 7.77% 13.80% 10.24%

Babcock (BW) Competitors

$12.96 -1.14 (-8.05%)

As of 02:45 PM Eastern

Compare

BW vs. EXP, ACA, WFG, FBIN, and SKY

Should you buy Babcock stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Babcock with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Babcock include Eagle Materials (EXP), Arcosa (ACA), West Fraser Timber (WFG), Fortune Brands Innovations (FBIN), and Champion Homes (SKY). These companies are all part of the "construction materials" industry.

How does Babcock compare to Eagle Materials?

Eagle Materials (NYSE:EXP) and Babcock (NYSE:BW) are both construction materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation and risk.

96.1% of Eagle Materials shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.2% of Babcock shares are held by institutional investors. 1.7% of Eagle Materials shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.8% of Babcock shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Eagle Materials has a net margin of 18.36% compared to Babcock's net margin of -13.63%. Eagle Materials' return on equity of 28.27% beat Babcock's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Eagle Materials	18.36%	28.27%	11.70%
Babcock	-13.63%	N/A	-1.41%

In the previous week, Babcock had 3 more articles in the media than Eagle Materials. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Babcock and 3 mentions for Eagle Materials. Eagle Materials' average media sentiment score of 0.59 beat Babcock's score of 0.18 indicating that Eagle Materials is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Eagle Materials	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Babcock	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Eagle Materials has a beta of 1.37, meaning that its stock price is 37% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Babcock has a beta of 1.1, meaning that its stock price is 10% more volatile than the broader market.

Eagle Materials has higher revenue and earnings than Babcock. Babcock is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Eagle Materials, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Eagle Materials	$2.31B	2.96	$423.81M	$13.12	16.83
Babcock	$587.70M	3.28	-$36.16M	-$0.88	N/A

Eagle Materials presently has a consensus price target of $224.30, suggesting a potential upside of 1.55%. Babcock has a consensus price target of $14.25, suggesting a potential upside of 9.91%. Given Babcock's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Babcock is more favorable than Eagle Materials.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Eagle Materials	0 Sell rating(s)	10 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.09
Babcock	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33

Summary

Eagle Materials beats Babcock on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Babcock compare to Arcosa?

Arcosa (NYSE:ACA) and Babcock (NYSE:BW) are both construction materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and risk.

Arcosa has higher revenue and earnings than Babcock. Babcock is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Arcosa, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Arcosa	$2.88B	2.47	$208.40M	$4.53	32.02
Babcock	$587.70M	3.28	-$36.16M	-$0.88	N/A

Arcosa has a net margin of 7.88% compared to Babcock's net margin of -13.63%. Arcosa's return on equity of 8.52% beat Babcock's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Arcosa	7.88%	8.52%	4.41%
Babcock	-13.63%	N/A	-1.41%

Arcosa has a beta of 1.06, suggesting that its share price is 6% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Babcock has a beta of 1.1, suggesting that its share price is 10% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Babcock had 4 more articles in the media than Arcosa. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Babcock and 2 mentions for Arcosa. Babcock's average media sentiment score of 0.18 beat Arcosa's score of 0.01 indicating that Babcock is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Arcosa	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Babcock	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Arcosa presently has a consensus price target of $138.33, indicating a potential downside of 4.62%. Babcock has a consensus price target of $14.25, indicating a potential upside of 9.91%. Given Babcock's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Babcock is more favorable than Arcosa.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Arcosa	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.29
Babcock	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33

90.7% of Arcosa shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.2% of Babcock shares are held by institutional investors. 1.8% of Arcosa shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.8% of Babcock shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Arcosa and Babcock tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Babcock compare to West Fraser Timber?

West Fraser Timber (NYSE:WFG) and Babcock (NYSE:BW) are both construction materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, earnings and risk.

In the previous week, Babcock had 6 more articles in the media than West Fraser Timber. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Babcock and 0 mentions for West Fraser Timber. Babcock's average media sentiment score of 0.18 beat West Fraser Timber's score of 0.00 indicating that Babcock is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
West Fraser Timber	Neutral
Babcock	Neutral

West Fraser Timber has a beta of 0.99, suggesting that its share price is 1% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Babcock has a beta of 1.1, suggesting that its share price is 10% more volatile than the broader market.

Babcock has lower revenue, but higher earnings than West Fraser Timber. Babcock is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than West Fraser Timber, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
West Fraser Timber	$5.46B	0.96	-$937M	-$15.04	N/A
Babcock	$587.70M	3.28	-$36.16M	-$0.88	N/A

40.2% of West Fraser Timber shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.2% of Babcock shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.8% of West Fraser Timber shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.8% of Babcock shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

West Fraser Timber currently has a consensus target price of $82.60, suggesting a potential upside of 23.66%. Babcock has a consensus target price of $14.25, suggesting a potential upside of 9.91%. Given West Fraser Timber's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe West Fraser Timber is more favorable than Babcock.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
West Fraser Timber	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.38
Babcock	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33

Babcock has a net margin of -13.63% compared to West Fraser Timber's net margin of -21.86%. Babcock's return on equity of 0.00% beat West Fraser Timber's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
West Fraser Timber	-21.86%	-9.67%	-7.41%
Babcock	-13.63%	N/A	-1.41%

Summary

Babcock beats West Fraser Timber on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Babcock compare to Fortune Brands Innovations?

Fortune Brands Innovations (NYSE:FBIN) and Babcock (NYSE:BW) are both construction materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, risk, valuation, institutional ownership and analyst recommendations.

Fortune Brands Innovations has a net margin of 6.12% compared to Babcock's net margin of -13.63%. Fortune Brands Innovations' return on equity of 17.72% beat Babcock's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Fortune Brands Innovations	6.12%	17.72%	6.40%
Babcock	-13.63%	N/A	-1.41%

In the previous week, Fortune Brands Innovations had 5 more articles in the media than Babcock. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Fortune Brands Innovations and 6 mentions for Babcock. Fortune Brands Innovations' average media sentiment score of 0.90 beat Babcock's score of 0.18 indicating that Fortune Brands Innovations is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Fortune Brands Innovations	5 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Babcock	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Fortune Brands Innovations has a beta of 1.37, meaning that its share price is 37% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Babcock has a beta of 1.1, meaning that its share price is 10% more volatile than the broader market.

Fortune Brands Innovations currently has a consensus price target of $53.23, suggesting a potential downside of 2.66%. Babcock has a consensus price target of $14.25, suggesting a potential upside of 9.91%. Given Babcock's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Babcock is more favorable than Fortune Brands Innovations.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Fortune Brands Innovations	3 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.13
Babcock	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33

87.6% of Fortune Brands Innovations shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.2% of Babcock shares are held by institutional investors. 3.3% of Fortune Brands Innovations shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.8% of Babcock shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Fortune Brands Innovations has higher revenue and earnings than Babcock. Babcock is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fortune Brands Innovations, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Fortune Brands Innovations	$4.46B	1.46	$298.80M	$2.25	24.30
Babcock	$587.70M	3.28	-$36.16M	-$0.88	N/A

Summary

Fortune Brands Innovations beats Babcock on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Babcock compare to Champion Homes?

Babcock (NYSE:BW) and Champion Homes (NYSE:SKY) are both construction materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, earnings and institutional ownership.

Champion Homes has a net margin of 7.77% compared to Babcock's net margin of -13.63%. Champion Homes' return on equity of 13.80% beat Babcock's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Babcock	-13.63%	N/A	-1.41%
Champion Homes	7.77%	13.80%	10.24%

In the previous week, Babcock had 6 more articles in the media than Champion Homes. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Babcock and 0 mentions for Champion Homes. Babcock's average media sentiment score of 0.18 beat Champion Homes' score of -1.00 indicating that Babcock is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Babcock	Neutral
Champion Homes	Negative

Babcock has a beta of 1.1, suggesting that its share price is 10% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Champion Homes has a beta of 1.04, suggesting that its share price is 4% more volatile than the broader market.

Babcock currently has a consensus price target of $14.25, suggesting a potential upside of 9.91%. Champion Homes has a consensus price target of $93.00, suggesting a potential upside of 8.77%. Given Babcock's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Babcock is more favorable than Champion Homes.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Babcock	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33
Champion Homes	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.63

Champion Homes has higher revenue and earnings than Babcock. Babcock is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Champion Homes, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Babcock	$587.70M	3.28	-$36.16M	-$0.88	N/A
Champion Homes	$2.66B	1.76	$206.90M	$3.66	23.36

83.2% of Babcock shares are held by institutional investors. 2.8% of Babcock shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Champion Homes shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Champion Homes beats Babcock on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Babcock News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding BW and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

BW vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Babcock	ELEC POWER Industry	Computer Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$1.93B	$7.42B	$38.78B	$23.38B
Dividend Yield	N/A	1.78%	3.30%	4.07%
P/E Ratio	-14.74	7.52	80.27	31.80
Price / Sales	3.28	21.49	621.65	22.14
Price / Cash	N/A	26.93	47.85	25.04
Price / Book	-10.99	1.79	9.84	4.83
Net Income	-$36.16M	$209.88M	$1.07B	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	-10.18%	-3.32%	3.61%	1.94%
1 Month Performance	-24.16%	-10.96%	-2.05%	3.15%
1 Year Performance	1,264.74%	201.42%	154.29%	22.21%

Babcock Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
BW Babcock	1.6474 of 5 stars	$12.97 -8.0%	$14.25 +9.9%	+1,363.4%	$1.93B	$587.70M	N/A	1,650	Gap Down
EXP Eagle Materials	2.7145 of 5 stars	$223.18 -0.6%	$224.30 +0.5%	+11.5%	$6.94B	$2.31B	17.01	2,800	Positive News
ACA Arcosa	2.4237 of 5 stars	$144.85 +6.6%	$138.33 -4.5%	+67.2%	$6.67B	$2.88B	31.98	6,390	Gap Up High Trading Volume
WFG West Fraser Timber	2.8251 of 5 stars	$68.74 -2.1%	$82.60 +20.2%	-7.7%	$5.50B	$5.46B	N/A	9,600
FBIN Fortune Brands Innovations	4.1451 of 5 stars	$41.27 -2.7%	$51.31 +24.3%	+6.5%	$5.06B	$4.46B	18.34	10,000	News Coverage Positive News Analyst Upgrade

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:BW) was last updated on 7/1/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Babcock (BW) Competitors

BW vs. EXP, ACA, WFG, FBIN, and SKY

How does Babcock compare to Eagle Materials?

Summary

How does Babcock compare to Arcosa?

Summary

How does Babcock compare to West Fraser Timber?

Summary

How does Babcock compare to Fortune Brands Innovations?

Summary

How does Babcock compare to Champion Homes?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

BW vs. The Competition

Babcock Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Babcock (BW) Competitors

BW vs. EXP, ACA, WFG, FBIN, and SKY

How does Babcock compare to Eagle Materials?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of EXP or BW?

Is EXP or BW more profitable?

Does the media prefer EXP or BW?

Which has more volatility & risk, EXP or BW?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, EXP or BW?

Do analysts recommend EXP or BW?

Summary

How does Babcock compare to Arcosa?

Which has better valuation and earnings, ACA or BW?

Is ACA or BW more profitable?

Which has more risk and volatility, ACA or BW?

Does the media refer more to ACA or BW?

Do analysts prefer ACA or BW?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in ACA or BW?

Summary

How does Babcock compare to West Fraser Timber?

Does the media refer more to WFG or BW?

Which has more volatility and risk, WFG or BW?

Which has better earnings and valuation, WFG or BW?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in WFG or BW?

Do analysts prefer WFG or BW?

Is WFG or BW more profitable?

Summary

How does Babcock compare to Fortune Brands Innovations?

Is FBIN or BW more profitable?

Does the media refer more to FBIN or BW?

Which has more volatility and risk, FBIN or BW?

Do analysts recommend FBIN or BW?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of FBIN or BW?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, FBIN or BW?

Summary

How does Babcock compare to Champion Homes?

Is BW or SKY more profitable?

Does the media prefer BW or SKY?

Which has more volatility and risk, BW or SKY?

Do analysts prefer BW or SKY?

Which has better valuation & earnings, BW or SKY?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in BW or SKY?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

BW vs. The Competition

Babcock Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools