Smith-Midland (SMID) Competitors

Smith-Midland logo
$30.51 0.00 (0.00%)
Closing price 06/18/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$30.35 -0.16 (-0.52%)
As of 06/18/2026 05:18 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

SMID vs. LEGH, ELMT, CIX, VATE, and ACU

Should you buy Smith-Midland stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Smith-Midland with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Smith-Midland include Legacy Housing (LEGH), Elmet Group (ELMT), CompX International (CIX), INNOVATE (VATE), and Acme United (ACU). These companies are all part of the "construction materials" industry.

How does Smith-Midland compare to Legacy Housing?

Smith-Midland (NASDAQ:SMID) and Legacy Housing (NASDAQ:LEGH) are both small-cap construction materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation and earnings.

In the previous week, Legacy Housing had 1 more articles in the media than Smith-Midland. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Legacy Housing and 0 mentions for Smith-Midland. Smith-Midland's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Legacy Housing'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Smith-Midland Neutral
Legacy Housing Neutral

Smith-Midland has a beta of 1.73, suggesting that its share price is 73% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Legacy Housing has a beta of 0.79, suggesting that its share price is 21% less volatile than the broader market.

49.9% of Smith-Midland shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.4% of Legacy Housing shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.8% of Smith-Midland shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 30.1% of Legacy Housing shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Legacy Housing has a net margin of 26.01% compared to Smith-Midland's net margin of 11.36%. Smith-Midland's return on equity of 19.87% beat Legacy Housing's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Smith-Midland11.36% 19.87% 12.12%
Legacy Housing 26.01%8.08%7.44%

Legacy Housing has higher revenue and earnings than Smith-Midland. Legacy Housing is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Smith-Midland, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Smith-Midland$93.40M1.73$12.51M$1.9815.41
Legacy Housing$164.57M3.61$41.81M$1.7814.04

Legacy Housing has a consensus target price of $21.00, suggesting a potential downside of 16.00%. Given Legacy Housing's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Legacy Housing is more favorable than Smith-Midland.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Smith-Midland
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Legacy Housing
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Summary

Legacy Housing beats Smith-Midland on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Smith-Midland compare to Elmet Group?

Elmet Group (NASDAQ:ELMT) and Smith-Midland (NASDAQ:SMID) are both small-cap construction companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, dividends and earnings.

Smith-Midland has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Elmet Group.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Elmet Group$211.26M2.76N/AN/AN/A
Smith-Midland$93.40M1.73$12.51M$1.9815.41

Smith-Midland has a net margin of 11.36% compared to Elmet Group's net margin of 0.00%. Smith-Midland's return on equity of 19.87% beat Elmet Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Elmet GroupN/A N/A N/A
Smith-Midland 11.36%19.87%12.12%

Elmet Group presently has a consensus price target of $20.50, indicating a potential upside of 5.45%. Given Elmet Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Elmet Group is more favorable than Smith-Midland.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Elmet Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.80
Smith-Midland
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

49.9% of Smith-Midland shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.8% of Smith-Midland shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Elmet Group had 2 more articles in the media than Smith-Midland. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Elmet Group and 0 mentions for Smith-Midland. Elmet Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Smith-Midland'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Elmet Group Neutral
Smith-Midland Neutral

Summary

Elmet Group beats Smith-Midland on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Smith-Midland compare to CompX International?

CompX International (NYSE:CIX) and Smith-Midland (NASDAQ:SMID) are both small-cap construction materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, dividends and profitability.

CompX International has higher revenue and earnings than Smith-Midland. Smith-Midland is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CompX International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CompX International$158.58M2.11$22.59M$1.6416.54
Smith-Midland$93.40M1.73$12.51M$1.9815.41

CompX International has a net margin of 12.48% compared to Smith-Midland's net margin of 11.36%. Smith-Midland's return on equity of 19.87% beat CompX International's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CompX International12.48% 11.51% 10.52%
Smith-Midland 11.36%19.87%12.12%

CompX International has a beta of 0.9, indicating that its share price is 10% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Smith-Midland has a beta of 1.73, indicating that its share price is 73% more volatile than the broader market.

7.5% of CompX International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 49.9% of Smith-Midland shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of CompX International shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.8% of Smith-Midland shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
CompX International
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Smith-Midland
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

In the previous week, CompX International's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Smith-Midland'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
CompX International Neutral
Smith-Midland Neutral

Summary

Smith-Midland beats CompX International on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Smith-Midland compare to INNOVATE?

Smith-Midland (NASDAQ:SMID) and INNOVATE (NYSE:VATE) are both small-cap construction materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Smith-Midland has a beta of 1.73, indicating that its share price is 73% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, INNOVATE has a beta of 2.32, indicating that its share price is 132% more volatile than the broader market.

Smith-Midland has a net margin of 11.36% compared to INNOVATE's net margin of -3.96%. Smith-Midland's return on equity of 19.87% beat INNOVATE's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Smith-Midland11.36% 19.87% 12.12%
INNOVATE -3.96%N/A -5.73%

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Smith-Midland
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
INNOVATE
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Smith-Midland has higher earnings, but lower revenue than INNOVATE. INNOVATE is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Smith-Midland, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Smith-Midland$93.40M1.73$12.51M$1.9815.41
INNOVATE$1.25B0.22-$60.60M-$4.25N/A

49.9% of Smith-Midland shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 34.3% of INNOVATE shares are held by institutional investors. 3.8% of Smith-Midland shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 57.4% of INNOVATE shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, INNOVATE had 4 more articles in the media than Smith-Midland. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for INNOVATE and 0 mentions for Smith-Midland. INNOVATE's average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat Smith-Midland's score of 0.00 indicating that INNOVATE is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Smith-Midland Neutral
INNOVATE Positive

Summary

Smith-Midland beats INNOVATE on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Smith-Midland compare to Acme United?

Acme United (NYSE:ACU) and Smith-Midland (NASDAQ:SMID) are both small-cap construction materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, dividends, profitability, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

Acme United has a beta of 0.51, indicating that its stock price is 49% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Smith-Midland has a beta of 1.73, indicating that its stock price is 73% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Acme United had 2 more articles in the media than Smith-Midland. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Acme United and 0 mentions for Smith-Midland. Acme United's average media sentiment score of 0.50 beat Smith-Midland's score of 0.00 indicating that Acme United is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Acme United Positive
Smith-Midland Neutral

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Acme United
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
4.00
Smith-Midland
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Acme United has higher revenue and earnings than Smith-Midland. Smith-Midland is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Acme United, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Acme United$202.88M0.85$17.79M$2.3219.56
Smith-Midland$93.40M1.73$12.51M$1.9815.41

62.1% of Acme United shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 49.9% of Smith-Midland shares are owned by institutional investors. 29.5% of Acme United shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.8% of Smith-Midland shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Smith-Midland has a net margin of 11.36% compared to Acme United's net margin of 10.25%. Smith-Midland's return on equity of 19.87% beat Acme United's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Acme United10.25% 9.70% 6.10%
Smith-Midland 11.36%19.87%12.12%

Summary

Acme United beats Smith-Midland on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Smith-Midland News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for SMID and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding SMID and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

SMID vs. The Competition

MetricSmith-MidlandBLDG IndustryConstruction SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$161.90M$9.21B$10.07B$12.59B
Dividend YieldN/A1.96%1.93%5.81%
P/E Ratio15.4117.1218.9824.44
Price / Sales1.738.204.17122.31
Price / Cash10.5213.1017.6755.09
Price / Book2.983.325.406.58
Net Income$12.51M$422.65M$563.99M$337.17M
7 Day Performance-2.68%1.22%1.92%0.83%
1 Month Performance3.42%2.82%21.16%2.25%
1 Year Performance3.04%31.96%16.00%36.14%

Smith-Midland Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
SMID
Smith-Midland
0.5831 of 5 stars
$30.51
flat
N/A+3.0%$161.90M$93.40M15.41200
LEGH
Legacy Housing
0.6549 of 5 stars
$25.60
+3.9%
$21.00
-18.0%
+13.7%$586.22M$164.57M14.38880
ELMT
Elmet Group
3.2387 of 5 stars
$18.23
-11.7%
$20.50
+12.5%
N/A$546.54M$211.26MN/A543
CIX
CompX International
N/A$25.61
-0.7%
N/A+13.1%$315.54M$158.58M16.85610
VATE
INNOVATE
1.2236 of 5 stars
$17.43
+5.1%
N/A+281.8%$226.32M$1.25BN/A3,738

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:SMID) was last updated on 6/21/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners