Free Trial

Smith-Midland (SMID) Competitors

Smith-Midland logo
$31.60 -3.20 (-9.20%)
Closing price 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$31.74 +0.13 (+0.43%)
As of 04:10 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

SMID vs. JBI, LEGH, ELMT, CIX, and VATE

Should you be buying Smith-Midland stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Smith-Midland include Janus International Group (JBI), Legacy Housing (LEGH), Elmet Group (ELMT), CompX International (CIX), and INNOVATE (VATE). These companies are all part of the "construction materials" industry.

How does Smith-Midland compare to Janus International Group?

Smith-Midland (NASDAQ:SMID) and Janus International Group (NYSE:JBI) are both small-cap construction companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership and dividends.

49.9% of Smith-Midland shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.8% of Janus International Group shares are held by institutional investors. 3.9% of Smith-Midland shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.7% of Janus International Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Janus International Group has higher revenue and earnings than Smith-Midland. Janus International Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Smith-Midland, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Smith-Midland$93.45M1.79$12.51M$2.3513.45
Janus International Group$884.20M0.80$53.80M$0.3913.06

In the previous week, Janus International Group had 3 more articles in the media than Smith-Midland. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Janus International Group and 1 mentions for Smith-Midland. Smith-Midland's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Janus International Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Smith-Midland Neutral
Janus International Group Neutral

Smith-Midland has a beta of 1.77, indicating that its share price is 77% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Janus International Group has a beta of 1.49, indicating that its share price is 49% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Janus International Group has a consensus target price of $9.17, indicating a potential upside of 79.91%. Given Janus International Group's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Janus International Group is more favorable than Smith-Midland.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Smith-Midland
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Janus International Group
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Smith-Midland has a net margin of 13.37% compared to Janus International Group's net margin of 6.08%. Smith-Midland's return on equity of 24.91% beat Janus International Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Smith-Midland13.37% 24.91% 15.20%
Janus International Group 6.08%15.26%6.49%

Summary

Smith-Midland and Janus International Group tied by winning 7 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Smith-Midland compare to Legacy Housing?

Smith-Midland (NASDAQ:SMID) and Legacy Housing (NASDAQ:LEGH) are both small-cap construction materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, profitability and institutional ownership.

49.9% of Smith-Midland shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.3% of Legacy Housing shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.9% of Smith-Midland shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 30.1% of Legacy Housing shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Legacy Housing has higher revenue and earnings than Smith-Midland. Legacy Housing is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Smith-Midland, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Smith-Midland$93.45M1.79$12.51M$2.3513.45
Legacy Housing$163.26M3.29$41.81M$1.7812.66

In the previous week, Legacy Housing had 9 more articles in the media than Smith-Midland. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Legacy Housing and 1 mentions for Smith-Midland. Legacy Housing's average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat Smith-Midland's score of 0.00 indicating that Legacy Housing is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Smith-Midland Neutral
Legacy Housing Positive

Smith-Midland has a beta of 1.77, indicating that its stock price is 77% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Legacy Housing has a beta of 0.77, indicating that its stock price is 23% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Legacy Housing has a consensus target price of $21.00, indicating a potential downside of 6.83%. Given Legacy Housing's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Legacy Housing is more favorable than Smith-Midland.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Smith-Midland
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Legacy Housing
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Legacy Housing has a net margin of 26.01% compared to Smith-Midland's net margin of 13.37%. Smith-Midland's return on equity of 24.91% beat Legacy Housing's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Smith-Midland13.37% 24.91% 15.20%
Legacy Housing 26.01%8.08%7.44%

Summary

Legacy Housing beats Smith-Midland on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Smith-Midland compare to Elmet Group?

Smith-Midland (NASDAQ:SMID) and Elmet Group (NASDAQ:ELMT) are both small-cap construction companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, profitability and institutional ownership.

Smith-Midland has a net margin of 13.37% compared to Elmet Group's net margin of 0.00%. Smith-Midland's return on equity of 24.91% beat Elmet Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Smith-Midland13.37% 24.91% 15.20%
Elmet Group N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, Elmet Group had 2 more articles in the media than Smith-Midland. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Elmet Group and 1 mentions for Smith-Midland. Smith-Midland's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Elmet Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Smith-Midland Neutral
Elmet Group Neutral

Smith-Midland has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Elmet Group.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Smith-Midland$93.45M1.79$12.51M$2.3513.45
Elmet Group$201.64M2.23N/AN/AN/A

49.9% of Smith-Midland shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.9% of Smith-Midland shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Smith-Midland
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Elmet Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

Smith-Midland beats Elmet Group on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Smith-Midland compare to CompX International?

Smith-Midland (NASDAQ:SMID) and CompX International (NYSE:CIX) are both small-cap construction materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, profitability, valuation and institutional ownership.

Smith-Midland has a net margin of 13.37% compared to CompX International's net margin of 12.48%. Smith-Midland's return on equity of 24.91% beat CompX International's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Smith-Midland13.37% 24.91% 15.20%
CompX International 12.48%11.51%10.52%

Smith-Midland has a beta of 1.77, suggesting that its share price is 77% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, CompX International has a beta of 0.88, suggesting that its share price is 12% less volatile than the S&P 500.

In the previous week, Smith-Midland and Smith-Midland both had 1 articles in the media. Smith-Midland's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled CompX International'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Smith-Midland Neutral
CompX International Neutral

CompX International has higher revenue and earnings than Smith-Midland. Smith-Midland is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CompX International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Smith-Midland$93.45M1.79$12.51M$2.3513.45
CompX International$158.58M1.83$22.59M$1.6414.36

49.9% of Smith-Midland shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.5% of CompX International shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.9% of Smith-Midland shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of CompX International shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Smith-Midland
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
CompX International
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

Smith-Midland beats CompX International on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Smith-Midland compare to INNOVATE?

Smith-Midland (NASDAQ:SMID) and INNOVATE (NYSE:VATE) are both small-cap construction materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, profitability, valuation and institutional ownership.

Smith-Midland has a net margin of 13.37% compared to INNOVATE's net margin of -4.86%. Smith-Midland's return on equity of 24.91% beat INNOVATE's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Smith-Midland13.37% 24.91% 15.20%
INNOVATE -4.86%N/A -6.69%

Smith-Midland has a beta of 1.77, suggesting that its share price is 77% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, INNOVATE has a beta of 2.27, suggesting that its share price is 127% more volatile than the S&P 500.

In the previous week, Smith-Midland had 1 more articles in the media than INNOVATE. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Smith-Midland and 0 mentions for INNOVATE. Smith-Midland's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled INNOVATE'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Smith-Midland Neutral
INNOVATE Neutral

Smith-Midland has higher earnings, but lower revenue than INNOVATE. INNOVATE is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Smith-Midland, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Smith-Midland$93.45M1.79$12.51M$2.3513.45
INNOVATE$1.25B0.14-$60.60M-$4.85N/A

49.9% of Smith-Midland shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 34.3% of INNOVATE shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.9% of Smith-Midland shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 57.4% of INNOVATE shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Smith-Midland
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
INNOVATE
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Summary

Smith-Midland beats INNOVATE on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Smith-Midland News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for SMID and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding SMID and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

SMID vs. The Competition

MetricSmith-MidlandBLDG IndustryConstruction SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$167.70M$8.52B$9.87B$12.27B
Dividend YieldN/A1.38%1.78%5.22%
P/E Ratio13.4517.6218.5025.70
Price / Sales1.797.384.2064.14
Price / Cash12.0012.8817.8636.27
Price / Book3.093.255.306.74
Net Income$12.51M$425.95M$554.91M$333.09M
7 Day PerformanceN/AN/AN/A0.52%
1 Month Performance5.79%-2.73%4.00%8.97%
1 Year Performance5.86%34.99%20.20%42.42%

Smith-Midland Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
SMID
Smith-Midland
0.8024 of 5 stars
$31.60
-9.2%
N/A+16.6%$167.70M$93.45M13.45200
JBI
Janus International Group
2.2651 of 5 stars
$5.08
+2.9%
$9.17
+80.6%
-36.5%$684.57M$884.20M8.221,817
LEGH
Legacy Housing
1.1384 of 5 stars
$21.06
+2.7%
$21.00
-0.3%
-6.3%$488.39M$164.57M11.85880
ELMT
Elmet Group
N/A$15.06
-2.0%
N/AN/A$434.45M$201.64MN/A543
CIX
CompX International
N/A$23.20
0.0%
N/A-9.1%$285.89M$158.29M15.26610

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:SMID) was last updated on 5/11/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners