Do analysts rate SMID or CRH?

CRH has a consensus target price of $138.98, indicating a potential upside of 58.54%. Given CRH's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe CRH is more favorable than Smith-Midland. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Smith-Midland 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00 CRH 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 14 Buy rating(s) 2 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, SMID or CRH?

CRH has higher revenue and earnings than Smith-Midland. CRH is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Smith-Midland, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Smith-Midland $93.40M 1.37 $12.51M $1.45 16.71 CRH $37.45B 1.56 $3.73B $5.67 15.46

Is SMID or CRH more profitable?

CRH has a net margin of 9.93% compared to Smith-Midland's net margin of 8.59%. CRH's return on equity of 15.76% beat Smith-Midland's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Smith-Midland 8.59% 14.06% 8.75% CRH 9.93% 15.76% 6.64%

Does the media refer more to SMID or CRH?

In the previous week, CRH had 11 more articles in the media than Smith-Midland. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for CRH and 2 mentions for Smith-Midland. Smith-Midland's average media sentiment score of 1.83 beat CRH's score of 1.11 indicating that Smith-Midland is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Smith-Midland 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive CRH 9 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts prefer VMC or SMID?

Vulcan Materials currently has a consensus target price of $325.00, indicating a potential upside of 29.51%. Given Vulcan Materials' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Vulcan Materials is more favorable than Smith-Midland. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Vulcan Materials 2 Sell rating(s) 6 Hold rating(s) 7 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.44 Smith-Midland 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00

Does the media refer more to VMC or SMID?

In the previous week, Vulcan Materials had 10 more articles in the media than Smith-Midland. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Vulcan Materials and 2 mentions for Smith-Midland. Smith-Midland's average media sentiment score of 1.83 beat Vulcan Materials' score of 0.75 indicating that Smith-Midland is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Vulcan Materials 7 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 3 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Smith-Midland 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive

Do analysts prefer SMID or MLM?

Martin Marietta Materials has a consensus price target of $667.53, indicating a potential upside of 32.71%. Given Martin Marietta Materials' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Martin Marietta Materials is more favorable than Smith-Midland. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Smith-Midland 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00 Martin Marietta Materials 1 Sell rating(s) 7 Hold rating(s) 12 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.55

Does the media refer more to SMID or MLM?

In the previous week, Martin Marietta Materials had 10 more articles in the media than Smith-Midland. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Martin Marietta Materials and 2 mentions for Smith-Midland. Smith-Midland's average media sentiment score of 1.83 beat Martin Marietta Materials' score of 0.86 indicating that Smith-Midland is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Smith-Midland 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive Martin Marietta Materials 8 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts rate SMID or AMRZ?

Amrize has a consensus target price of $55.50, suggesting a potential upside of 37.25%. Given Amrize's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Amrize is more favorable than Smith-Midland. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Smith-Midland 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00 Amrize 4 Sell rating(s) 8 Hold rating(s) 6 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.21

Which has better valuation and earnings, SMID or AMRZ?

Amrize has higher revenue and earnings than Smith-Midland. Smith-Midland is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Amrize, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Smith-Midland $93.40M 1.37 $12.51M $1.45 16.71 Amrize $11.82B 1.89 $1.19B $2.17 18.64

Is SMID or AMRZ more profitable?

Amrize has a net margin of 9.89% compared to Smith-Midland's net margin of 8.59%. Smith-Midland's return on equity of 14.06% beat Amrize's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Smith-Midland 8.59% 14.06% 8.75% Amrize 9.89% 10.22% 5.48%

Does the media prefer SMID or AMRZ?

In the previous week, Amrize had 6 more articles in the media than Smith-Midland. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Amrize and 2 mentions for Smith-Midland. Smith-Midland's average media sentiment score of 1.83 beat Amrize's score of 0.30 indicating that Smith-Midland is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Smith-Midland 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive Amrize 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts recommend JHX or SMID?

James Hardie Industries currently has a consensus price target of $32.50, suggesting a potential upside of 15.50%. Given James Hardie Industries' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe James Hardie Industries is more favorable than Smith-Midland. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score James Hardie Industries 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 9 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.82 Smith-Midland 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00

Does the media favor JHX or SMID?

In the previous week, James Hardie Industries had 7 more articles in the media than Smith-Midland. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for James Hardie Industries and 2 mentions for Smith-Midland. Smith-Midland's average media sentiment score of 1.83 beat James Hardie Industries' score of 0.93 indicating that Smith-Midland is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment James Hardie Industries 5 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Smith-Midland 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive

Smith-Midland (SMID) Competitors

$24.23 -0.71 (-2.85%)

Closing price 04:00 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$24.23 0.00 (0.00%)

As of 07:30 PM Eastern

Compare

SMID vs. CRH, VMC, MLM, AMRZ, and JHX

Should you buy Smith-Midland stock or one of its competitors? Smith-Midland's main competitors and comparable companies include CRH (CRH), Vulcan Materials (VMC), Martin Marietta Materials (MLM), Amrize (AMRZ), and James Hardie Industries (JHX). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "construction materials" industry.

How does Smith-Midland compare to CRH?

Smith-Midland (NASDAQ:SMID) and CRH (NYSE:CRH) are both materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations and risk.

Smith-Midland has a beta of 1.75, suggesting that its share price is 75% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CRH has a beta of 1.33, suggesting that its share price is 33% more volatile than the broader market.

CRH has higher revenue and earnings than Smith-Midland. CRH is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Smith-Midland, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Smith-Midland	$93.40M	1.37	$12.51M	$1.45	16.71
CRH	$37.45B	1.56	$3.73B	$5.67	15.46

49.9% of Smith-Midland shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 62.5% of CRH shares are held by institutional investors. 3.8% of Smith-Midland shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of CRH shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

CRH has a net margin of 9.93% compared to Smith-Midland's net margin of 8.59%. CRH's return on equity of 15.76% beat Smith-Midland's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Smith-Midland	8.59%	14.06%	8.75%
CRH	9.93%	15.76%	6.64%

CRH has a consensus target price of $138.98, indicating a potential upside of 58.54%. Given CRH's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe CRH is more favorable than Smith-Midland.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Smith-Midland	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
CRH	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	14 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

In the previous week, CRH had 11 more articles in the media than Smith-Midland. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for CRH and 2 mentions for Smith-Midland. Smith-Midland's average media sentiment score of 1.83 beat CRH's score of 1.11 indicating that Smith-Midland is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Smith-Midland	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive
CRH	9 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

CRH beats Smith-Midland on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Smith-Midland compare to Vulcan Materials?

Vulcan Materials (NYSE:VMC) and Smith-Midland (NASDAQ:SMID) are both materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment, dividends and earnings.

Vulcan Materials has a beta of 1.05, meaning that its stock price is 5% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Smith-Midland has a beta of 1.75, meaning that its stock price is 75% more volatile than the broader market.

Vulcan Materials currently has a consensus target price of $325.00, indicating a potential upside of 29.51%. Given Vulcan Materials' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Vulcan Materials is more favorable than Smith-Midland.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Vulcan Materials	2 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	7 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.44
Smith-Midland	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

In the previous week, Vulcan Materials had 10 more articles in the media than Smith-Midland. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Vulcan Materials and 2 mentions for Smith-Midland. Smith-Midland's average media sentiment score of 1.83 beat Vulcan Materials' score of 0.75 indicating that Smith-Midland is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Vulcan Materials	7 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	3 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Smith-Midland	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive

Vulcan Materials has higher revenue and earnings than Smith-Midland. Smith-Midland is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vulcan Materials, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Vulcan Materials	$7.94B	4.09	$1.08B	$8.47	29.63
Smith-Midland	$93.40M	1.37	$12.51M	$1.45	16.71

90.4% of Vulcan Materials shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 49.9% of Smith-Midland shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Vulcan Materials shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.8% of Smith-Midland shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Vulcan Materials has a net margin of 13.75% compared to Smith-Midland's net margin of 8.59%. Smith-Midland's return on equity of 14.06% beat Vulcan Materials' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Vulcan Materials	13.75%	13.05%	6.70%
Smith-Midland	8.59%	14.06%	8.75%

Summary

Vulcan Materials beats Smith-Midland on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Smith-Midland compare to Martin Marietta Materials?

Smith-Midland (NASDAQ:SMID) and Martin Marietta Materials (NYSE:MLM) are both materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation and earnings.

In the previous week, Martin Marietta Materials had 10 more articles in the media than Smith-Midland. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Martin Marietta Materials and 2 mentions for Smith-Midland. Smith-Midland's average media sentiment score of 1.83 beat Martin Marietta Materials' score of 0.86 indicating that Smith-Midland is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Smith-Midland	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive
Martin Marietta Materials	8 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Martin Marietta Materials has a consensus price target of $667.53, indicating a potential upside of 32.71%. Given Martin Marietta Materials' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Martin Marietta Materials is more favorable than Smith-Midland.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Smith-Midland	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Martin Marietta Materials	1 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	12 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.55

Martin Marietta Materials has higher revenue and earnings than Smith-Midland. Martin Marietta Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Smith-Midland, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Smith-Midland	$93.40M	1.37	$12.51M	$1.45	16.71
Martin Marietta Materials	$6.15B	4.91	$1.14B	$40.70	12.36

Martin Marietta Materials has a net margin of 36.73% compared to Smith-Midland's net margin of 8.59%. Smith-Midland's return on equity of 14.06% beat Martin Marietta Materials' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Smith-Midland	8.59%	14.06%	8.75%
Martin Marietta Materials	36.73%	9.49%	5.11%

49.9% of Smith-Midland shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.0% of Martin Marietta Materials shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.8% of Smith-Midland shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Martin Marietta Materials shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Smith-Midland has a beta of 1.75, meaning that its share price is 75% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Martin Marietta Materials has a beta of 1.1, meaning that its share price is 10% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Martin Marietta Materials beats Smith-Midland on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Smith-Midland compare to Amrize?

Smith-Midland (NASDAQ:SMID) and Amrize (NYSE:AMRZ) are both materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, profitability, risk and analyst recommendations.

Amrize has higher revenue and earnings than Smith-Midland. Smith-Midland is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Amrize, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Smith-Midland	$93.40M	1.37	$12.51M	$1.45	16.71
Amrize	$11.82B	1.89	$1.19B	$2.17	18.64

In the previous week, Amrize had 6 more articles in the media than Smith-Midland. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Amrize and 2 mentions for Smith-Midland. Smith-Midland's average media sentiment score of 1.83 beat Amrize's score of 0.30 indicating that Smith-Midland is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Smith-Midland	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive
Amrize	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

49.9% of Smith-Midland shares are held by institutional investors. 3.8% of Smith-Midland shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Amrize shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Amrize has a consensus target price of $55.50, suggesting a potential upside of 37.25%. Given Amrize's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Amrize is more favorable than Smith-Midland.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Smith-Midland	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Amrize	4 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.21

Smith-Midland has a beta of 1.75, indicating that its share price is 75% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Amrize has a beta of 0.04, indicating that its share price is 96% less volatile than the broader market.

Amrize has a net margin of 9.89% compared to Smith-Midland's net margin of 8.59%. Smith-Midland's return on equity of 14.06% beat Amrize's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Smith-Midland	8.59%	14.06%	8.75%
Amrize	9.89%	10.22%	5.48%

Summary

Amrize beats Smith-Midland on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Smith-Midland compare to James Hardie Industries?

James Hardie Industries (NYSE:JHX) and Smith-Midland (NASDAQ:SMID) are both materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership and dividends.

James Hardie Industries has higher revenue and earnings than Smith-Midland. Smith-Midland is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than James Hardie Industries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
James Hardie Industries	$4.84B	3.38	$104M	$0.25	112.56
Smith-Midland	$93.40M	1.37	$12.51M	$1.45	16.71

Smith-Midland has a net margin of 8.59% compared to James Hardie Industries' net margin of 2.69%. Smith-Midland's return on equity of 14.06% beat James Hardie Industries' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
James Hardie Industries	2.69%	10.56%	4.93%
Smith-Midland	8.59%	14.06%	8.75%

James Hardie Industries has a beta of 1.77, meaning that its share price is 77% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Smith-Midland has a beta of 1.75, meaning that its share price is 75% more volatile than the broader market.

8.0% of James Hardie Industries shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 49.9% of Smith-Midland shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.2% of James Hardie Industries shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.8% of Smith-Midland shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

James Hardie Industries currently has a consensus price target of $32.50, suggesting a potential upside of 15.50%. Given James Hardie Industries' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe James Hardie Industries is more favorable than Smith-Midland.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
James Hardie Industries	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	9 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.82
Smith-Midland	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

In the previous week, James Hardie Industries had 7 more articles in the media than Smith-Midland. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for James Hardie Industries and 2 mentions for Smith-Midland. Smith-Midland's average media sentiment score of 1.83 beat James Hardie Industries' score of 0.93 indicating that Smith-Midland is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
James Hardie Industries	5 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Smith-Midland	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive

Summary

James Hardie Industries beats Smith-Midland on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Smith-Midland News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding SMID and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

SMID vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Smith-Midland	Construction Materials Industry	Materials Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$132.30M	$8.13B	$5.00B	$12.81B
Dividend Yield	N/A	2.53%	4.67%	10.55%
P/E Ratio	16.71	14.39	26.33	25.11
Price / Sales	1.37	37.73	5,252.70	90.53
Price / Cash	8.60	30.68	27.09	51.83
Price / Book	2.37	1.78	10.61	6.18
Net Income	$12.51M	$632.08M	$158.35M	$358.18M
7 Day Performance	-7.77%	-1.69%	-1.18%	-2.34%
1 Month Performance	-12.05%	-2.71%	7.40%	-2.50%
1 Year Performance	-40.11%	-2.69%	39.76%	9.87%

Smith-Midland Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
SMID Smith-Midland	1.1856 of 5 stars	$24.23 -2.8%	N/A	-37.0%	$132.30M	$93.40M	16.71	200	Positive News
CRH CRH	4.9271 of 5 stars	$94.61 +2.8%	$140.57 +48.6%	-19.2%	$62.95B	$37.45B	16.69	83,032	News Coverage Analyst Forecast Gap Down
VMC Vulcan Materials	4.7369 of 5 stars	$263.71 +1.3%	$328.64 +24.6%	-14.6%	$34.17B	$7.94B	31.14	11,172	Analyst Downgrade
MLM Martin Marietta Materials	4.6404 of 5 stars	$517.40 +1.7%	$665.88 +28.7%	-18.0%	$31.09B	$6.15B	12.72	9,600	Positive News Analyst Upgrade
AMRZ Amrize	4.7666 of 5 stars	$43.98 -0.1%	$56.38 +28.2%	-24.8%	$24.33B	$11.82B	20.27	19,000	Dividend Announcement Analyst Downgrade

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:SMID) was last updated on 9/10/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Smith-Midland (SMID) Competitors

SMID vs. CRH, VMC, MLM, AMRZ, and JHX

How does Smith-Midland compare to CRH?

Summary

How does Smith-Midland compare to Vulcan Materials?

Summary

How does Smith-Midland compare to Martin Marietta Materials?

Summary

How does Smith-Midland compare to Amrize?

Summary

How does Smith-Midland compare to James Hardie Industries?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

SMID vs. The Competition

Smith-Midland Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Smith-Midland (SMID) Competitors

SMID vs. CRH, VMC, MLM, AMRZ, and JHX

How does Smith-Midland compare to CRH?

Which has more volatility & risk, SMID or CRH?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, SMID or CRH?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in SMID or CRH?

Is SMID or CRH more profitable?

Do analysts rate SMID or CRH?

Does the media refer more to SMID or CRH?

Summary

How does Smith-Midland compare to Vulcan Materials?

Which has more risk & volatility, VMC or SMID?

Do analysts prefer VMC or SMID?

Does the media refer more to VMC or SMID?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, VMC or SMID?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in VMC or SMID?

Is VMC or SMID more profitable?

Summary

How does Smith-Midland compare to Martin Marietta Materials?

Does the media refer more to SMID or MLM?

Do analysts prefer SMID or MLM?

Which has better valuation & earnings, SMID or MLM?

Is SMID or MLM more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in SMID or MLM?

Which has more risk and volatility, SMID or MLM?

Summary

How does Smith-Midland compare to Amrize?

Which has better valuation and earnings, SMID or AMRZ?

Does the media prefer SMID or AMRZ?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in SMID or AMRZ?

Do analysts rate SMID or AMRZ?

Which has more volatility and risk, SMID or AMRZ?

Is SMID or AMRZ more profitable?

Summary

How does Smith-Midland compare to James Hardie Industries?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, JHX or SMID?

Is JHX or SMID more profitable?

Which has more risk and volatility, JHX or SMID?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of JHX or SMID?

Do analysts recommend JHX or SMID?

Does the media favor JHX or SMID?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

SMID vs. The Competition

Smith-Midland Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools