Go Pro
→ You’ve never seen anything like this before (From Porter & Company) (Ad)tc pixel Free CSTE Stock Alerts

Caesarstone (CSTE) Competitors

Caesarstone logo
$2.87 +0.06 (+2.14%)
Closing price 09/18/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$2.87 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 09/18/2026 07:30 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.
Compare

CSTE vs. AIRJ, JELD, DRTT, APT, and FGI

Should you buy Caesarstone stock or one of its competitors? Caesarstone's main competitors and comparable companies include AirJoule Technologies (AIRJ), JELD-WEN (JELD), DIRTT Environmental Solutions (DRTT), Alpha Pro Tech (APT), and FGI Industries (FGI). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "building products" industry.

How does Caesarstone compare to AirJoule Technologies?

Caesarstone (NASDAQ:CSTE) and AirJoule Technologies (NASDAQ:AIRJ) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

AirJoule Technologies has a consensus price target of $9.50, suggesting a potential upside of 119.40%. Given AirJoule Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe AirJoule Technologies is more favorable than Caesarstone.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Caesarstone
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
AirJoule Technologies
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

Caesarstone has a beta of 0.42, suggesting that its share price is 58% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, AirJoule Technologies has a beta of 0.87, suggesting that its share price is 13% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, AirJoule Technologies had 5 more articles in the media than Caesarstone. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for AirJoule Technologies and 2 mentions for Caesarstone. AirJoule Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.45 beat Caesarstone's score of 0.37 indicating that AirJoule Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Caesarstone
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
AirJoule Technologies
1 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

AirJoule Technologies has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Caesarstone. AirJoule Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Caesarstone, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Caesarstone$397.23M0.25-$137.47M-$4.13N/A
AirJoule TechnologiesN/AN/A-$9.04M-$1.30N/A

33.7% of Caesarstone shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 63.7% of AirJoule Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 50.9% of AirJoule Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

AirJoule Technologies has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Caesarstone's net margin of -37.37%. AirJoule Technologies' return on equity of -7.06% beat Caesarstone's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Caesarstone-37.37% -32.36% -11.71%
AirJoule Technologies N/A -7.06%-5.60%

Summary

AirJoule Technologies beats Caesarstone on 14 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Caesarstone compare to JELD-WEN?

Caesarstone (NASDAQ:CSTE) and JELD-WEN (NYSE:JELD) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, valuation, profitability, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Caesarstone has higher earnings, but lower revenue than JELD-WEN. Caesarstone is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than JELD-WEN, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Caesarstone$397.23M0.25-$137.47M-$4.13N/A
JELD-WEN$3.21B0.05-$621.21M-$6.04N/A

JELD-WEN has a consensus target price of $2.10, suggesting a potential upside of 20.27%. Given JELD-WEN's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe JELD-WEN is more favorable than Caesarstone.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Caesarstone
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
JELD-WEN
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.83

Caesarstone has a beta of 0.42, meaning that its stock price is 58% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, JELD-WEN has a beta of 2.18, meaning that its stock price is 118% more volatile than the broader market.

33.7% of Caesarstone shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.0% of JELD-WEN shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.9% of JELD-WEN shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

JELD-WEN has a net margin of -16.36% compared to Caesarstone's net margin of -37.37%. Caesarstone's return on equity of -32.36% beat JELD-WEN's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Caesarstone-37.37% -32.36% -11.71%
JELD-WEN -16.36%-246.42%-5.69%

In the previous week, Caesarstone had 1 more articles in the media than JELD-WEN. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Caesarstone and 1 mentions for JELD-WEN. Caesarstone's average media sentiment score of 0.37 beat JELD-WEN's score of -0.61 indicating that Caesarstone is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Caesarstone
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
JELD-WEN
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Negative

Summary

JELD-WEN beats Caesarstone on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Caesarstone compare to DIRTT Environmental Solutions?

Caesarstone (NASDAQ:CSTE) and DIRTT Environmental Solutions (NASDAQ:DRTT) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment and profitability.

In the previous week, Caesarstone had 2 more articles in the media than DIRTT Environmental Solutions. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Caesarstone and 0 mentions for DIRTT Environmental Solutions. Caesarstone's average media sentiment score of 0.37 beat DIRTT Environmental Solutions' score of 0.00 indicating that Caesarstone is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Caesarstone Neutral
DIRTT Environmental Solutions Neutral

DIRTT Environmental Solutions has a net margin of -12.81% compared to Caesarstone's net margin of -37.37%. Caesarstone's return on equity of -32.36% beat DIRTT Environmental Solutions' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Caesarstone-37.37% -32.36% -11.71%
DIRTT Environmental Solutions -12.81%-150.32%-15.10%

33.7% of Caesarstone shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 58.7% of DIRTT Environmental Solutions shares are owned by institutional investors. 40.5% of DIRTT Environmental Solutions shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

DIRTT Environmental Solutions has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Caesarstone. DIRTT Environmental Solutions is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Caesarstone, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Caesarstone$397.23M0.25-$137.47M-$4.13N/A
DIRTT Environmental Solutions$170.64M0.37-$54.96M-$0.25N/A

Caesarstone has a beta of 0.42, suggesting that its share price is 58% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, DIRTT Environmental Solutions has a beta of 1.2, suggesting that its share price is 20% more volatile than the broader market.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Caesarstone
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
DIRTT Environmental Solutions
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

Caesarstone and DIRTT Environmental Solutions tied by winning 7 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Caesarstone compare to Alpha Pro Tech?

Caesarstone (NASDAQ:CSTE) and Alpha Pro Tech (NYSE:APT) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, dividends, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Caesarstone had 2 more articles in the media than Alpha Pro Tech. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Caesarstone and 0 mentions for Alpha Pro Tech. Caesarstone's average media sentiment score of 0.37 beat Alpha Pro Tech's score of 0.00 indicating that Caesarstone is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Caesarstone Neutral
Alpha Pro Tech Neutral

Alpha Pro Tech has a net margin of 6.99% compared to Caesarstone's net margin of -37.37%. Alpha Pro Tech's return on equity of 6.70% beat Caesarstone's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Caesarstone-37.37% -32.36% -11.71%
Alpha Pro Tech 6.99%6.70%5.76%

Alpha Pro Tech has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Caesarstone. Caesarstone is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Alpha Pro Tech, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Caesarstone$397.23M0.25-$137.47M-$4.13N/A
Alpha Pro Tech$61.91M0.84$4.19M$0.4112.46

Caesarstone has a beta of 0.42, meaning that its share price is 58% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Alpha Pro Tech has a beta of 0.91, meaning that its share price is 9% less volatile than the broader market.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Caesarstone
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Alpha Pro Tech
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

33.7% of Caesarstone shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 22.7% of Alpha Pro Tech shares are owned by institutional investors. 16.2% of Alpha Pro Tech shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Alpha Pro Tech beats Caesarstone on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Caesarstone compare to FGI Industries?

Caesarstone (NASDAQ:CSTE) and FGI Industries (NASDAQ:FGI) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

FGI Industries has a net margin of -3.07% compared to Caesarstone's net margin of -37.37%. FGI Industries' return on equity of 10.02% beat Caesarstone's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Caesarstone-37.37% -32.36% -11.71%
FGI Industries -3.07%10.02%2.28%

Caesarstone has a beta of 0.42, meaning that its stock price is 58% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, FGI Industries has a beta of 2.29, meaning that its stock price is 129% more volatile than the broader market.

FGI Industries has a consensus target price of $13.00, indicating a potential upside of 40.24%. Given FGI Industries' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe FGI Industries is more favorable than Caesarstone.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Caesarstone
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
FGI Industries
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

FGI Industries has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Caesarstone. FGI Industries is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Caesarstone, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Caesarstone$397.23M0.25-$137.47M-$4.13N/A
FGI Industries$130.53M0.14-$6.14M-$2.08N/A

33.7% of Caesarstone shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.4% of FGI Industries shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Caesarstone had 2 more articles in the media than FGI Industries. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Caesarstone and 0 mentions for FGI Industries. Caesarstone's average media sentiment score of 0.37 beat FGI Industries' score of 0.00 indicating that Caesarstone is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Caesarstone Neutral
FGI Industries Neutral

Summary

FGI Industries beats Caesarstone on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Caesarstone News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CSTE and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CSTE and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CSTE vs. The Competition

Export
MetricCaesarstoneBuilding Products IndustryIndustrials SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$99.23M$8.05B$10.21B$13.19B
Dividend YieldN/A2.20%97.05%12.81%
P/E Ratio-0.6947.3025.5225.38
Price / Sales0.2518.26281.5689.45
Price / CashN/A14.4723.8151.42
Price / Book0.717.034.806.33
Net Income-$137.47M$4.88B$614.67M$358.33M
7 Day Performance-10.03%-2.65%1.21%1.12%
1 Month Performance-19.38%-6.76%-2.56%-2.39%
1 Year Performance79.38%-6.77%4.34%5.35%

Caesarstone Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CSTE
Caesarstone
1.0669 of 5 stars		$2.87
+2.1%		N/A+79.4%$99.23M$397.23MN/A1,266
AIRJ
AirJoule Technologies
2.4759 of 5 stars		$4.06
-2.2%		$9.50
+134.0%		-8.6%$304.39MN/AN/A16
JELD
JELD-WEN
2.0079 of 5 stars		$2.04
-0.7%		$2.10
+3.2%		-68.5%$177.87M$3.21BN/A13,900
DRTT
DIRTT Environmental Solutions
N/A$0.60
+0.6%		N/A-0.4%$62.67M$170.64MN/A990
APT
Alpha Pro Tech
N/A$5.29
+1.7%		N/A+9.0%$53.99M$61.91M14.30120

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:CSTE) was last updated on 9/20/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
$40,000,000,000,000
The national debt just hit 40 trillion dollars, and the U.S. now spends more on interest payments than on its ...
American Alternative | Sponsoredtc pixel
“Elon’s nightmare” could fund your retirement
Marc Chaikin, the 60 year Wall Street veteran whose Chaikin Money Flow indicator sits on every Bloomberg termi...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
You’ve never seen anything like this before
For centuries, families like the Rothschilds, Morgans, and Rockefellers have quietly used one overlooked type ...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
Bank of America: 'Digital Dollar Inevitable'
Bank of America just revealed your expiration date. In their Bloomberg interview, they didn't just predict the...
Decentralized Masters | Sponsoredtc pixel
My top 3 AI picks for the next decade
Alexander Green bought Apple in 1996, recommended Nvidia at a split-adjusted 66 cents in 2004, and picked up A...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump goes "all-in" on Grand Canyon energy breakthrough
A drilling crew near the Grand Canyon uncovered a clean energy well producing nearly eight times the output of...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel
A “bloodbath” Is Coming
Reports suggest some Silicon Valley billionaires are stockpiling gold, guns, and gas masks - or leaving the co...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel
Here’s the stock symbol I’ve promised
Whitney Tilson of Stansberry Research has long recommended Berkshire Hathaway as a core retirement holding - b...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel