Go Pro
→ Here’s the stock symbol I’ve promised (From Stansberry Research) (Ad)tc pixel Free CSTE Stock Alerts

Caesarstone (CSTE) Competitors

Caesarstone logo
$3.44 +0.39 (+12.79%)
Closing price 08/14/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$3.40 -0.04 (-1.16%)
As of 08/14/2026 07:34 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.
Compare

CSTE vs. JELD, DRTT, APT, JCTC, and FGI

Should you buy Caesarstone stock or one of its competitors? Caesarstone's main competitors and comparable companies include JELD-WEN (JELD), DIRTT Environmental Solutions (DRTT), Alpha Pro Tech (APT), Jewett-Cameron Trading (JCTC), and FGI Industries (FGI). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "building products" industry.

How does Caesarstone compare to JELD-WEN?

Caesarstone (NASDAQ:CSTE) and JELD-WEN (NYSE:JELD) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Caesarstone and Caesarstone both had 1 articles in the media. Caesarstone's average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat JELD-WEN's score of 0.00 indicating that Caesarstone is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Caesarstone Very Positive
JELD-WEN Neutral

Caesarstone has a beta of 0.37, suggesting that its stock price is 63% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, JELD-WEN has a beta of 2.1, suggesting that its stock price is 110% more volatile than the broader market.

JELD-WEN has a net margin of -16.36% compared to Caesarstone's net margin of -37.37%. Caesarstone's return on equity of -32.36% beat JELD-WEN's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Caesarstone-37.37% -32.36% -11.71%
JELD-WEN -16.36%-246.42%-5.69%

JELD-WEN has a consensus price target of $2.10, indicating a potential upside of 9.09%. Given JELD-WEN's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe JELD-WEN is more favorable than Caesarstone.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Caesarstone
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
JELD-WEN
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.83

33.7% of Caesarstone shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.0% of JELD-WEN shares are held by institutional investors. 1.9% of JELD-WEN shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Caesarstone has higher earnings, but lower revenue than JELD-WEN. Caesarstone is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than JELD-WEN, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Caesarstone$397.23M0.30-$137.47M-$4.13N/A
JELD-WEN$3.21B0.05-$621.21M-$6.04N/A

Summary

JELD-WEN beats Caesarstone on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Caesarstone compare to DIRTT Environmental Solutions?

Caesarstone (NASDAQ:CSTE) and DIRTT Environmental Solutions (NASDAQ:DRTT) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends and valuation.

33.7% of Caesarstone shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 58.7% of DIRTT Environmental Solutions shares are held by institutional investors. 40.5% of DIRTT Environmental Solutions shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Caesarstone had 1 more articles in the media than DIRTT Environmental Solutions. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Caesarstone and 0 mentions for DIRTT Environmental Solutions. Caesarstone's average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat DIRTT Environmental Solutions' score of 0.00 indicating that Caesarstone is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Caesarstone Very Positive
DIRTT Environmental Solutions Neutral

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Caesarstone
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
DIRTT Environmental Solutions
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Caesarstone has a beta of 0.37, suggesting that its stock price is 63% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, DIRTT Environmental Solutions has a beta of 1.2, suggesting that its stock price is 20% more volatile than the broader market.

DIRTT Environmental Solutions has a net margin of -12.81% compared to Caesarstone's net margin of -37.37%. Caesarstone's return on equity of -32.36% beat DIRTT Environmental Solutions' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Caesarstone-37.37% -32.36% -11.71%
DIRTT Environmental Solutions -12.81%-150.32%-15.10%

DIRTT Environmental Solutions has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Caesarstone. DIRTT Environmental Solutions is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Caesarstone, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Caesarstone$397.23M0.30-$137.47M-$4.13N/A
DIRTT Environmental Solutions$170.64M0.37-$54.96M-$0.25N/A

Summary

Caesarstone and DIRTT Environmental Solutions tied by winning 7 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Caesarstone compare to Alpha Pro Tech?

Alpha Pro Tech (NYSE:APT) and Caesarstone (NASDAQ:CSTE) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, valuation and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Caesarstone had 1 more articles in the media than Alpha Pro Tech. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Caesarstone and 0 mentions for Alpha Pro Tech. Caesarstone's average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat Alpha Pro Tech's score of 0.00 indicating that Caesarstone is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Alpha Pro Tech Neutral
Caesarstone Very Positive

Alpha Pro Tech has a beta of 0.85, indicating that its stock price is 15% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Caesarstone has a beta of 0.37, indicating that its stock price is 63% less volatile than the broader market.

22.7% of Alpha Pro Tech shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 33.7% of Caesarstone shares are owned by institutional investors. 16.2% of Alpha Pro Tech shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Alpha Pro Tech has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Caesarstone. Caesarstone is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Alpha Pro Tech, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Alpha Pro Tech$61.91M0.90$4.19M$0.4113.24
Caesarstone$397.23M0.30-$137.47M-$4.13N/A

Alpha Pro Tech has a net margin of 6.99% compared to Caesarstone's net margin of -37.37%. Alpha Pro Tech's return on equity of 6.70% beat Caesarstone's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Alpha Pro Tech6.99% 6.70% 5.76%
Caesarstone -37.37%-32.36%-11.71%

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Alpha Pro Tech
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Caesarstone
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Summary

Alpha Pro Tech beats Caesarstone on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Caesarstone compare to Jewett-Cameron Trading?

Jewett-Cameron Trading (NASDAQ:JCTC) and Caesarstone (NASDAQ:CSTE) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Jewett-Cameron Trading
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Caesarstone
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Jewett-Cameron Trading has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Caesarstone. Jewett-Cameron Trading is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Caesarstone, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Jewett-Cameron Trading$41.30M0.25-$4.13M-$2.35N/A
Caesarstone$397.23M0.30-$137.47M-$4.13N/A

Jewett-Cameron Trading has a net margin of -20.94% compared to Caesarstone's net margin of -37.37%. Caesarstone's return on equity of -32.36% beat Jewett-Cameron Trading's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Jewett-Cameron Trading-20.94% -38.35% -29.29%
Caesarstone -37.37%-32.36%-11.71%

26.1% of Jewett-Cameron Trading shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 33.7% of Caesarstone shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.3% of Jewett-Cameron Trading shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Jewett-Cameron Trading had 10 more articles in the media than Caesarstone. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Jewett-Cameron Trading and 1 mentions for Caesarstone. Caesarstone's average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat Jewett-Cameron Trading's score of 0.85 indicating that Caesarstone is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Jewett-Cameron Trading Positive
Caesarstone Very Positive

Jewett-Cameron Trading has a beta of 0.34, indicating that its stock price is 66% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Caesarstone has a beta of 0.37, indicating that its stock price is 63% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Caesarstone beats Jewett-Cameron Trading on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Caesarstone compare to FGI Industries?

Caesarstone (NASDAQ:CSTE) and FGI Industries (NASDAQ:FGI) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, earnings, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Caesarstone has a beta of 0.37, indicating that its share price is 63% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, FGI Industries has a beta of 2.2, indicating that its share price is 120% more volatile than the broader market.

FGI Industries has a consensus target price of $13.00, indicating a potential upside of 30.13%. Given FGI Industries' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe FGI Industries is more favorable than Caesarstone.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Caesarstone
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
FGI Industries
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

FGI Industries has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Caesarstone. FGI Industries is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Caesarstone, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Caesarstone$397.23M0.30-$137.47M-$4.13N/A
FGI Industries$130.53M0.15-$6.14M-$2.08N/A

In the previous week, FGI Industries had 17 more articles in the media than Caesarstone. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for FGI Industries and 1 mentions for Caesarstone. Caesarstone's average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat FGI Industries' score of 0.20 indicating that Caesarstone is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Caesarstone Very Positive
FGI Industries Neutral

33.7% of Caesarstone shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.4% of FGI Industries shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

FGI Industries has a net margin of -3.07% compared to Caesarstone's net margin of -37.37%. FGI Industries' return on equity of 9.85% beat Caesarstone's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Caesarstone-37.37% -32.36% -11.71%
FGI Industries -3.07%9.85%2.26%

Summary

FGI Industries beats Caesarstone on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Caesarstone News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CSTE and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CSTE vs. The Competition

Export
MetricCaesarstoneBuilding Products IndustryIndustrials SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$118.93M$8.85B$10.90B$13.06B
Dividend YieldN/A2.09%97.21%10.63%
P/E Ratio-0.8351.3924.4321.68
Price / Sales0.3019.61344.1793.83
Price / CashN/A15.7724.8938.43
Price / Book0.857.784.996.52
Net Income-$137.47M$4.88B$609.88M$346.94M
7 Day Performance49.57%0.79%0.77%1.08%
1 Month Performance42.74%5.13%3.40%1.87%
1 Year Performance126.32%3.68%14.45%20.79%

Caesarstone Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CSTE
Caesarstone
0.9425 of 5 stars		$3.44
+12.8%		N/A+126.3%$118.93M$397.23MN/A1,266
JELD
JELD-WEN
0.4585 of 5 stars		$1.90
+1.3%		$2.10
+10.8%		-66.6%$162.25M$3.15BN/A13,900
DRTT
DIRTT Environmental Solutions
N/A$0.60
-0.9%		N/A+5.9%$62.63M$170.64MN/A990
APT
Alpha Pro Tech
N/A$5.38
+0.2%		N/A+17.8%$54.97M$61.91M14.54120
JCTC
Jewett-Cameron Trading
1.084 of 5 stars		$2.98
-3.6%		N/A-22.8%$10.88M$41.30MN/A68

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:CSTE) was last updated on 8/16/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Here’s the stock symbol I’ve promised
Whitney Tilson of Stansberry Research has long recommended Berkshire Hathaway as a core retirement holding - b...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Man who Predicted Trump 2016 Win: “Prepare for Mid-Term Meltdown”
In 2016, major election models gave Hillary Clinton a 99% chance of winning - but former CIA and Pentagon advi...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel
A Dark Day Is Coming to America
Keith Kaplan, CEO of TradeSmith, has spent more than $17 million studying AI since 2022. He says a major shift...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel
Gold Miners Post Record Cash Flow Even as Prices Pull Back
The four largest gold miners are generating record free cash flow, even with gold pulling back from recent hig...
Golden Portfolio | Sponsoredtc pixel
Elon admits defeat
Elon Musk just called Anthropic the clear leader in AI, admitting its Mythos model surpasses anything he's bui...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
My top 3 AI picks for the next decade
Alexander Green bought Apple in 1996, recommended Nvidia at a split-adjusted 66 cents in 2004, and picked up A...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel
The dollar just broke
Bloomberg research shows the U.S. dollar's share of global reserves has fallen to the lowest level this centur...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
This tiny piece of glass could be bigger than GPUs
Jensen Huang says AI can't scale without it. Google Ventures calls it the future of AI compute. Sequoia Capita...
Brownstone Research | Sponsoredtc pixel