Do analysts recommend CSTE or VATE?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Caesarstone 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 INNOVATE 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, CSTE or VATE?

INNOVATE has higher revenue and earnings than Caesarstone. INNOVATE is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Caesarstone, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Caesarstone $397.23M 0.15 -$137.47M -$4.22 N/A INNOVATE $1.25B 0.21 -$60.60M -$4.25 N/A

Is CSTE or VATE more profitable?

INNOVATE has a net margin of -3.96% compared to Caesarstone's net margin of -37.70%. INNOVATE's return on equity of 0.00% beat Caesarstone's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Caesarstone -37.70% -29.41% -11.96% INNOVATE -3.96% N/A -5.73%

Does the media refer more to CSTE or VATE?

In the previous week, Caesarstone and Caesarstone both had 1 articles in the media. Caesarstone's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat INNOVATE's score of 0.00 indicating that Caesarstone is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Caesarstone 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive INNOVATE 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts prefer CSTE or SMID?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Caesarstone 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Smith-Midland 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00

Does the media prefer CSTE or SMID?

In the previous week, Caesarstone and Caesarstone both had 1 articles in the media. Caesarstone's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Smith-Midland's score of 0.00 indicating that Caesarstone is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Caesarstone 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Smith-Midland 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts prefer CSTE or JELD?

JELD-WEN has a consensus price target of $2.11, suggesting a potential upside of 13.27%. Given JELD-WEN's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe JELD-WEN is more favorable than Caesarstone. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Caesarstone 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 JELD-WEN 1 Sell rating(s) 5 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.83

Is CSTE or JELD more profitable?

JELD-WEN has a net margin of -16.02% compared to Caesarstone's net margin of -37.70%. Caesarstone's return on equity of -29.41% beat JELD-WEN's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Caesarstone -37.70% -29.41% -11.96% JELD-WEN -16.02% -65.79% -5.14%

Does the media prefer CSTE or JELD?

In the previous week, Caesarstone and Caesarstone both had 1 articles in the media. Caesarstone's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat JELD-WEN's score of 0.00 indicating that Caesarstone is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Caesarstone 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive JELD-WEN 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts prefer ACU or CSTE?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Acme United 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 4.00 Caesarstone 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Is ACU or CSTE more profitable?

Acme United has a net margin of 10.25% compared to Caesarstone's net margin of -37.70%. Acme United's return on equity of 9.70% beat Caesarstone's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Acme United 10.25% 9.70% 6.10% Caesarstone -37.70% -29.41% -11.96%

Does the media prefer ACU or CSTE?

In the previous week, Acme United and Acme United both had 1 articles in the media. Acme United's average media sentiment score of 1.41 beat Caesarstone's score of 0.75 indicating that Acme United is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Acme United 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Caesarstone 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts prefer CSTE or ZJK?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Caesarstone 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 ZJK Industrial 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.50

Which has higher earnings and valuation, CSTE or ZJK?

ZJK Industrial has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Caesarstone. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Caesarstone $397.23M 0.15 -$137.47M -$4.22 N/A ZJK Industrial $56.10M 2.44 $10.19M N/A N/A

Does the media refer more to CSTE or ZJK?

In the previous week, Caesarstone and Caesarstone both had 1 articles in the media. Caesarstone's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat ZJK Industrial's score of 0.00 indicating that Caesarstone is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Caesarstone 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive ZJK Industrial 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Caesarstone (CSTE) Competitors

$1.71 -0.02 (-1.16%)

Closing price 06/5/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$1.72 +0.01 (+0.29%)

As of 06/5/2026 07:02 PM Eastern

Compare

CSTE vs. VATE, SMID, JELD, ACU, and ZJK

Should you buy Caesarstone stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Caesarstone with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Caesarstone include INNOVATE (VATE), Smith-Midland (SMID), JELD-WEN (JELD), Acme United (ACU), and ZJK Industrial (ZJK). These companies are all part of the "construction materials" industry.

How does Caesarstone compare to INNOVATE?

Caesarstone (NASDAQ:CSTE) and INNOVATE (NYSE:VATE) are both small-cap construction materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, valuation, earnings, risk and analyst recommendations.

INNOVATE has a net margin of -3.96% compared to Caesarstone's net margin of -37.70%. INNOVATE's return on equity of 0.00% beat Caesarstone's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Caesarstone	-37.70%	-29.41%	-11.96%
INNOVATE	-3.96%	N/A	-5.73%

INNOVATE has higher revenue and earnings than Caesarstone. INNOVATE is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Caesarstone, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Caesarstone	$397.23M	0.15	-$137.47M	-$4.22	N/A
INNOVATE	$1.25B	0.21	-$60.60M	-$4.25	N/A

33.7% of Caesarstone shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 34.3% of INNOVATE shares are held by institutional investors. 57.4% of INNOVATE shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Caesarstone	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
INNOVATE	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

In the previous week, Caesarstone and Caesarstone both had 1 articles in the media. Caesarstone's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat INNOVATE's score of 0.00 indicating that Caesarstone is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Caesarstone	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
INNOVATE	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Caesarstone has a beta of 0.38, indicating that its share price is 62% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, INNOVATE has a beta of 2.32, indicating that its share price is 132% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

INNOVATE beats Caesarstone on 9 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Caesarstone compare to Smith-Midland?

Caesarstone (NASDAQ:CSTE) and Smith-Midland (NASDAQ:SMID) are both small-cap construction companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership and dividends.

Smith-Midland has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Caesarstone. Caesarstone is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Smith-Midland, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Caesarstone	$397.23M	0.15	-$137.47M	-$4.22	N/A
Smith-Midland	$93.40M	1.70	$12.51M	$2.35	12.73

Smith-Midland has a net margin of 13.37% compared to Caesarstone's net margin of -37.70%. Smith-Midland's return on equity of 24.91% beat Caesarstone's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Caesarstone	-37.70%	-29.41%	-11.96%
Smith-Midland	13.37%	24.91%	15.20%

In the previous week, Caesarstone and Caesarstone both had 1 articles in the media. Caesarstone's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Smith-Midland's score of 0.00 indicating that Caesarstone is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Caesarstone	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Smith-Midland	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

33.7% of Caesarstone shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 49.9% of Smith-Midland shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.9% of Smith-Midland shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Caesarstone has a beta of 0.38, suggesting that its share price is 62% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Smith-Midland has a beta of 1.73, suggesting that its share price is 73% more volatile than the broader market.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Caesarstone	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Smith-Midland	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Summary

Smith-Midland beats Caesarstone on 11 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Caesarstone compare to JELD-WEN?

Caesarstone (NASDAQ:CSTE) and JELD-WEN (NYSE:JELD) are both small-cap construction companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, dividends, earnings and analyst recommendations.

JELD-WEN has a consensus price target of $2.11, suggesting a potential upside of 13.27%. Given JELD-WEN's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe JELD-WEN is more favorable than Caesarstone.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Caesarstone	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
JELD-WEN	1 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.83

In the previous week, Caesarstone and Caesarstone both had 1 articles in the media. Caesarstone's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat JELD-WEN's score of 0.00 indicating that Caesarstone is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Caesarstone	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
JELD-WEN	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

33.7% of Caesarstone shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.0% of JELD-WEN shares are held by institutional investors. 1.9% of JELD-WEN shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Caesarstone has higher earnings, but lower revenue than JELD-WEN. Caesarstone is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than JELD-WEN, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Caesarstone	$397.23M	0.15	-$137.47M	-$4.22	N/A
JELD-WEN	$3.21B	0.05	-$621.21M	-$5.92	N/A

Caesarstone has a beta of 0.38, suggesting that its stock price is 62% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, JELD-WEN has a beta of 2.05, suggesting that its stock price is 105% more volatile than the broader market.

JELD-WEN has a net margin of -16.02% compared to Caesarstone's net margin of -37.70%. Caesarstone's return on equity of -29.41% beat JELD-WEN's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Caesarstone	-37.70%	-29.41%	-11.96%
JELD-WEN	-16.02%	-65.79%	-5.14%

Summary

JELD-WEN beats Caesarstone on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Caesarstone compare to Acme United?

Acme United (NYSE:ACU) and Caesarstone (NASDAQ:CSTE) are both small-cap construction materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation and dividends.

In the previous week, Acme United and Acme United both had 1 articles in the media. Acme United's average media sentiment score of 1.41 beat Caesarstone's score of 0.75 indicating that Acme United is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Acme United	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Caesarstone	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

62.1% of Acme United shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 33.7% of Caesarstone shares are owned by institutional investors. 29.5% of Acme United shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Acme United has a beta of 0.51, suggesting that its stock price is 49% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Caesarstone has a beta of 0.38, suggesting that its stock price is 62% less volatile than the broader market.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Acme United	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	4.00
Caesarstone	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

Acme United has a net margin of 10.25% compared to Caesarstone's net margin of -37.70%. Acme United's return on equity of 9.70% beat Caesarstone's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Acme United	10.25%	9.70%	6.10%
Caesarstone	-37.70%	-29.41%	-11.96%

Acme United has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Caesarstone. Caesarstone is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Acme United, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Acme United	$202.88M	0.82	$17.79M	$2.32	18.85
Caesarstone	$397.23M	0.15	-$137.47M	-$4.22	N/A

Summary

Acme United beats Caesarstone on 13 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Caesarstone compare to ZJK Industrial?

Caesarstone (NASDAQ:CSTE) and ZJK Industrial (NASDAQ:ZJK) are both small-cap construction materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment, dividends, risk, valuation, earnings and institutional ownership.

ZJK Industrial has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Caesarstone's net margin of -37.70%. ZJK Industrial's return on equity of 0.00% beat Caesarstone's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Caesarstone	-37.70%	-29.41%	-11.96%
ZJK Industrial	N/A	N/A	N/A

In the previous week, Caesarstone and Caesarstone both had 1 articles in the media. Caesarstone's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat ZJK Industrial's score of 0.00 indicating that Caesarstone is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Caesarstone	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
ZJK Industrial	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Caesarstone	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
ZJK Industrial	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.50

Caesarstone has a beta of 0.38, indicating that its stock price is 62% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ZJK Industrial has a beta of 2.25, indicating that its stock price is 125% more volatile than the broader market.

33.7% of Caesarstone shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

ZJK Industrial has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Caesarstone.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Caesarstone	$397.23M	0.15	-$137.47M	-$4.22	N/A
ZJK Industrial	$56.10M	2.44	$10.19M	N/A	N/A

Summary

ZJK Industrial beats Caesarstone on 7 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Caesarstone News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CSTE and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

CSTE vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Caesarstone	BLDG&CONST Industry	Construction Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$59.12M	$10.83B	$9.72B	$12.42B
Dividend Yield	N/A	1.23%	1.90%	5.34%
P/E Ratio	-0.41	21.51	17.90	23.63
Price / Sales	0.15	1.79	3.74	137.68
Price / Cash	N/A	16.31	17.57	57.17
Price / Book	0.42	9.08	5.12	6.35
Net Income	-$137.47M	$855.33M	$560.55M	$337.59M
7 Day Performance	-8.06%	-1.01%	-1.23%	-2.51%
1 Month Performance	23.02%	-6.25%	-3.48%	-0.69%
1 Year Performance	-7.07%	6.76%	10.34%	25.37%

Caesarstone Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
CSTE Caesarstone	0.9917 of 5 stars	$1.71 -1.2%	N/A	-5.0%	$59.12M	$397.23M	N/A	1,266
VATE INNOVATE	0.2681 of 5 stars	$15.91 +0.1%	N/A	+240.2%	$216.77M	$1.25B	N/A	3,738
SMID Smith-Midland	0.6209 of 5 stars	$31.21 -3.8%	N/A	+0.8%	$172.09M	$93.40M	13.28	200	News Coverage
JELD JELD-WEN	1.3125 of 5 stars	$2.03 +1.8%	$2.11 +4.3%	-51.7%	$171.44M	$3.21B	N/A	13,900
ACU Acme United	1.2151 of 5 stars	$42.20 -0.9%	N/A	+10.2%	$160.78M	$202.88M	8.63	650	Positive News

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:CSTE) was last updated on 6/6/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Caesarstone (CSTE) Competitors

CSTE vs. VATE, SMID, JELD, ACU, and ZJK

How does Caesarstone compare to INNOVATE?

Summary

How does Caesarstone compare to Smith-Midland?

Summary

How does Caesarstone compare to JELD-WEN?

Summary

How does Caesarstone compare to Acme United?

Summary

How does Caesarstone compare to ZJK Industrial?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CSTE vs. The Competition

Caesarstone Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Caesarstone (CSTE) Competitors

CSTE vs. VATE, SMID, JELD, ACU, and ZJK

How does Caesarstone compare to INNOVATE?

Is CSTE or VATE more profitable?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, CSTE or VATE?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in CSTE or VATE?

Do analysts recommend CSTE or VATE?

Does the media refer more to CSTE or VATE?

Which has more volatility & risk, CSTE or VATE?

Summary

How does Caesarstone compare to Smith-Midland?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, CSTE or SMID?

Is CSTE or SMID more profitable?

Does the media prefer CSTE or SMID?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in CSTE or SMID?

Which has more risk and volatility, CSTE or SMID?

Do analysts prefer CSTE or SMID?

Summary

How does Caesarstone compare to JELD-WEN?

Do analysts prefer CSTE or JELD?

Does the media prefer CSTE or JELD?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in CSTE or JELD?

Which has better valuation & earnings, CSTE or JELD?

Which has more risk and volatility, CSTE or JELD?

Is CSTE or JELD more profitable?

Summary

How does Caesarstone compare to Acme United?

Does the media prefer ACU or CSTE?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in ACU or CSTE?

Which has more risk & volatility, ACU or CSTE?

Do analysts prefer ACU or CSTE?

Is ACU or CSTE more profitable?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, ACU or CSTE?

Summary

How does Caesarstone compare to ZJK Industrial?

Is CSTE or ZJK more profitable?

Does the media refer more to CSTE or ZJK?

Do analysts prefer CSTE or ZJK?

Which has more risk and volatility, CSTE or ZJK?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of CSTE or ZJK?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, CSTE or ZJK?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CSTE vs. The Competition

Caesarstone Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools