Go Pro

Matthews International (MATW) Competitors

Matthews International logo
$26.66 -0.32 (-1.19%)
Closing price 07/10/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$26.75 +0.09 (+0.34%)
As of 07/10/2026 05:04 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

MATW vs. CSV, WW, HRB, SCI, and WDFC

Should you buy Matthews International stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Matthews International with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Matthews International include Carriage Services (CSV), WW International (WW), H&R Block (HRB), Service Corporation International (SCI), and WD-40 (WDFC).

How does Matthews International compare to Carriage Services?

Matthews International (NASDAQ:MATW) and Carriage Services (NYSE:CSV) are both small-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

Carriage Services has a net margin of 10.58% compared to Matthews International's net margin of 0.80%. Carriage Services' return on equity of 19.78% beat Matthews International's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Matthews International0.80% 5.88% 1.86%
Carriage Services 10.58%19.78%3.72%

In the previous week, Matthews International and Matthews International both had 2 articles in the media. Carriage Services' average media sentiment score of 1.45 beat Matthews International's score of 0.94 indicating that Carriage Services is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Matthews International
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Carriage Services
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Carriage Services has a consensus target price of $61.67, suggesting a potential upside of 62.75%. Given Carriage Services' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Carriage Services is more favorable than Matthews International.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Matthews International
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50
Carriage Services
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.80

Carriage Services has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Matthews International. Carriage Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Matthews International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Matthews International$1.50B0.56-$24.47M$0.3186.00
Carriage Services$417.44M1.44$51.51M$2.7613.73

Matthews International has a beta of 1.08, indicating that its share price is 8% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Carriage Services has a beta of 0.84, indicating that its share price is 16% less volatile than the broader market.

83.1% of Matthews International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 66.5% of Carriage Services shares are held by institutional investors. 4.7% of Matthews International shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.7% of Carriage Services shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Matthews International pays an annual dividend of $1.02 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. Carriage Services pays an annual dividend of $0.45 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Matthews International pays out 329.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Carriage Services pays out 16.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Matthews International has increased its dividend for 30 consecutive years. Matthews International is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Carriage Services beats Matthews International on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Matthews International compare to WW International?

Matthews International (NASDAQ:MATW) and WW International (NASDAQ:WW) are both small-cap specialized consumer services companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk and dividends.

Matthews International has a net margin of 0.80% compared to WW International's net margin of -56.84%. Matthews International's return on equity of 5.88% beat WW International's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Matthews International0.80% 5.88% 1.86%
WW International -56.84%N/A -0.32%

In the previous week, WW International had 4 more articles in the media than Matthews International. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for WW International and 2 mentions for Matthews International. WW International's average media sentiment score of 1.05 beat Matthews International's score of 0.94 indicating that WW International is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Matthews International
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
WW International
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Matthews International has a beta of 1.08, suggesting that its stock price is 8% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, WW International has a beta of 1.3, suggesting that its stock price is 30% more volatile than the broader market.

Matthews International has higher revenue and earnings than WW International. WW International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Matthews International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Matthews International$1.50B0.56-$24.47M$0.3186.00
WW International$710.64M0.22-$112.25M-$6.22N/A

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Matthews International
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50
WW International
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.75

83.1% of Matthews International shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.2% of WW International shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.7% of Matthews International shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of WW International shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Matthews International beats WW International on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Matthews International compare to H&R Block?

H&R Block (NYSE:HRB) and Matthews International (NASDAQ:MATW) are both specialized consumer services companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, valuation, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and profitability.

90.1% of H&R Block shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.1% of Matthews International shares are held by institutional investors. 1.4% of H&R Block shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.7% of Matthews International shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

H&R Block has higher revenue and earnings than Matthews International. H&R Block is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Matthews International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
H&R Block$3.76B1.33$605.77M$5.627.04
Matthews International$1.50B0.56-$24.47M$0.3186.00

H&R Block currently has a consensus target price of $41.00, suggesting a potential upside of 3.70%. Given H&R Block's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe H&R Block is more favorable than Matthews International.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
H&R Block
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Matthews International
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50

H&R Block has a net margin of 18.90% compared to Matthews International's net margin of 0.80%. Matthews International's return on equity of 5.88% beat H&R Block's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
H&R Block18.90% -211.62% 22.70%
Matthews International 0.80%5.88%1.86%

In the previous week, H&R Block had 1 more articles in the media than Matthews International. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for H&R Block and 2 mentions for Matthews International. Matthews International's average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat H&R Block's score of 0.68 indicating that Matthews International is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
H&R Block
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Matthews International
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

H&R Block pays an annual dividend of $1.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.2%. Matthews International pays an annual dividend of $1.02 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. H&R Block pays out 29.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Matthews International pays out 329.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. H&R Block has increased its dividend for 9 consecutive years and Matthews International has increased its dividend for 30 consecutive years. H&R Block is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

H&R Block has a beta of 0.36, indicating that its share price is 64% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Matthews International has a beta of 1.08, indicating that its share price is 8% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

H&R Block beats Matthews International on 14 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Matthews International compare to Service Corporation International?

Matthews International (NASDAQ:MATW) and Service Corporation International (NYSE:SCI) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, earnings, media sentiment and valuation.

In the previous week, Matthews International had 2 more articles in the media than Service Corporation International. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Matthews International and 0 mentions for Service Corporation International. Matthews International's average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat Service Corporation International's score of 0.00 indicating that Matthews International is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Matthews International Positive
Service Corporation International Neutral

Matthews International has a beta of 1.08, suggesting that its stock price is 8% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Service Corporation International has a beta of 0.84, suggesting that its stock price is 16% less volatile than the broader market.

Matthews International pays an annual dividend of $1.02 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. Service Corporation International pays an annual dividend of $1.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Matthews International pays out 329.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Service Corporation International pays out 38.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Matthews International has increased its dividend for 30 consecutive years and Service Corporation International has increased its dividend for 15 consecutive years. Matthews International is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Service Corporation International has higher revenue and earnings than Matthews International. Service Corporation International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Matthews International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Matthews International$1.50B0.56-$24.47M$0.3186.00
Service Corporation International$4.31B2.48$542.61M$3.7920.45

83.1% of Matthews International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.5% of Service Corporation International shares are held by institutional investors. 4.7% of Matthews International shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.4% of Service Corporation International shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Service Corporation International has a consensus target price of $95.00, indicating a potential upside of 22.59%. Given Service Corporation International's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Service Corporation International is more favorable than Matthews International.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Matthews International
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50
Service Corporation International
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.80

Service Corporation International has a net margin of 12.36% compared to Matthews International's net margin of 0.80%. Service Corporation International's return on equity of 34.30% beat Matthews International's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Matthews International0.80% 5.88% 1.86%
Service Corporation International 12.36%34.30%2.96%

Summary

Service Corporation International beats Matthews International on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Matthews International compare to WD-40?

WD-40 (NASDAQ:WDFC) and Matthews International (NASDAQ:MATW) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, valuation, risk, media sentiment, dividends and analyst recommendations.

WD-40 has a net margin of 13.23% compared to Matthews International's net margin of 0.80%. WD-40's return on equity of 33.90% beat Matthews International's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
WD-4013.23% 33.90% 19.27%
Matthews International 0.80%5.88%1.86%

WD-40 has a beta of 0.26, indicating that its stock price is 74% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Matthews International has a beta of 1.08, indicating that its stock price is 8% more volatile than the broader market.

WD-40 has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Matthews International. WD-40 is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Matthews International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
WD-40$619.98M5.75$90.99M$5.8845.05
Matthews International$1.50B0.56-$24.47M$0.3186.00

WD-40 presently has a consensus price target of $305.00, indicating a potential upside of 15.13%. Given WD-40's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe WD-40 is more favorable than Matthews International.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
WD-40
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.80
Matthews International
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50

91.5% of WD-40 shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.1% of Matthews International shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of WD-40 shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.7% of Matthews International shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, WD-40 had 35 more articles in the media than Matthews International. MarketBeat recorded 37 mentions for WD-40 and 2 mentions for Matthews International. Matthews International's average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat WD-40's score of 0.65 indicating that Matthews International is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
WD-40
11 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
19 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Matthews International
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

WD-40 pays an annual dividend of $4.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Matthews International pays an annual dividend of $1.02 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. WD-40 pays out 69.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Matthews International pays out 329.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. WD-40 has increased its dividend for 17 consecutive years and Matthews International has increased its dividend for 30 consecutive years. Matthews International is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

WD-40 beats Matthews International on 13 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Matthews International News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for MATW and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding MATW and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

MATW vs. The Competition

MetricMatthews InternationalFUNERAL SVS&REL IndustryStaples SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$831.85M$4.04B$16.48B$12.66B
Dividend Yield3.83%2.29%3.33%8.00%
P/E Ratio86.0040.0626.9324.53
Price / Sales0.561.4944.2896.17
Price / Cash7.419.0816.8760.03
Price / Book1.713.565.746.38
Net Income-$24.47M$189.88M$668.96M$331.87M
7 Day Performance-0.11%-1.37%-1.52%0.37%
1 Month Performance-0.60%-1.99%-1.66%0.59%
1 Year Performance4.92%-5.80%-12.84%22.26%

Matthews International Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
MATW
Matthews International
1.6912 of 5 stars
$26.66
-1.2%
N/A+4.9%$831.85M$1.50B86.005,500
CSV
Carriage Services
4.8245 of 5 stars
$38.20
-2.1%
$61.67
+61.4%
-18.3%$619.34M$417.44M13.842,321
WW
WW International
1.4169 of 5 stars
$16.18
-0.8%
N/A-60.6%$161.78M$710.64MN/A7,700
HRB
H&R Block
4.2568 of 5 stars
$39.23
-2.0%
$41.00
+4.5%
-29.5%$5.08B$3.76B6.984,300
SCI
Service Corporation International
4.2283 of 5 stars
$77.72
-1.1%
$95.00
+22.2%
-4.1%$10.84B$4.31B20.5125,187

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:MATW) was last updated on 7/12/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners