QQQ   318.40 (-1.60%)
AAPL   125.12 (-2.09%)
MSFT   233.87 (-1.30%)
FB   259.00 (-2.23%)
GOOGL   2,064.48 (-0.25%)
TSLA   686.44 (-4.45%)
AMZN   3,094.53 (-1.64%)
NVDA   536.25 (-3.15%)
BABA   234.42 (-3.01%)
CGC   35.25 (+1.50%)
GE   12.98 (-0.99%)
MU   91.09 (-3.87%)
NIO   43.29 (-13.00%)
AMD   84.13 (-2.62%)
T   28.22 (+0.46%)
F   12.55 (+4.76%)
ACB   11.03 (-0.09%)
DIS   193.94 (-0.53%)
BA   223.14 (-0.56%)
NFLX   547.82 (-0.51%)
BAC   35.53 (-0.73%)
QQQ   318.40 (-1.60%)
AAPL   125.12 (-2.09%)
MSFT   233.87 (-1.30%)
FB   259.00 (-2.23%)
GOOGL   2,064.48 (-0.25%)
TSLA   686.44 (-4.45%)
AMZN   3,094.53 (-1.64%)
NVDA   536.25 (-3.15%)
BABA   234.42 (-3.01%)
CGC   35.25 (+1.50%)
GE   12.98 (-0.99%)
MU   91.09 (-3.87%)
NIO   43.29 (-13.00%)
AMD   84.13 (-2.62%)
T   28.22 (+0.46%)
F   12.55 (+4.76%)
ACB   11.03 (-0.09%)
DIS   193.94 (-0.53%)
BA   223.14 (-0.56%)
NFLX   547.82 (-0.51%)
BAC   35.53 (-0.73%)
QQQ   318.40 (-1.60%)
AAPL   125.12 (-2.09%)
MSFT   233.87 (-1.30%)
FB   259.00 (-2.23%)
GOOGL   2,064.48 (-0.25%)
TSLA   686.44 (-4.45%)
AMZN   3,094.53 (-1.64%)
NVDA   536.25 (-3.15%)
BABA   234.42 (-3.01%)
CGC   35.25 (+1.50%)
GE   12.98 (-0.99%)
MU   91.09 (-3.87%)
NIO   43.29 (-13.00%)
AMD   84.13 (-2.62%)
T   28.22 (+0.46%)
F   12.55 (+4.76%)
ACB   11.03 (-0.09%)
DIS   193.94 (-0.53%)
BA   223.14 (-0.56%)
NFLX   547.82 (-0.51%)
BAC   35.53 (-0.73%)
QQQ   318.40 (-1.60%)
AAPL   125.12 (-2.09%)
MSFT   233.87 (-1.30%)
FB   259.00 (-2.23%)
GOOGL   2,064.48 (-0.25%)
TSLA   686.44 (-4.45%)
AMZN   3,094.53 (-1.64%)
NVDA   536.25 (-3.15%)
BABA   234.42 (-3.01%)
CGC   35.25 (+1.50%)
GE   12.98 (-0.99%)
MU   91.09 (-3.87%)
NIO   43.29 (-13.00%)
AMD   84.13 (-2.62%)
T   28.22 (+0.46%)
F   12.55 (+4.76%)
ACB   11.03 (-0.09%)
DIS   193.94 (-0.53%)
BA   223.14 (-0.56%)
NFLX   547.82 (-0.51%)
BAC   35.53 (-0.73%)
Log in
NASDAQ:MATW

Matthews International Competitors

$36.99
-0.21 (-0.56 %)
(As of 03/2/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$36.45
Now: $36.99
$37.45
50-Day Range
$30.53
MA: $32.87
$37.20
52-Week Range
$17.01
Now: $36.99
$37.45
Volume137,756 shs
Average Volume137,366 shs
Market Capitalization$1.17 billion
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend Yield2.31%
Beta1.18

Competitors

Matthews International (NASDAQ:MATW) Vs. FLO, CELH, JOBS, FIZZ, LESL, and WDFC

Should you be buying MATW stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the sector of "consumer staples" are considered alternatives and competitors to Matthews International, including Flowers Foods (FLO), Celsius (CELH), 51job (JOBS), National Beverage (FIZZ), Leslie's (LESL), and WD-40 (WDFC).

Flowers Foods (NYSE:FLO) and Matthews International (NASDAQ:MATW) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for Flowers Foods and Matthews International, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Flowers Foods04002.00
Matthews International00103.00

Flowers Foods presently has a consensus price target of $24.00, indicating a potential upside of 8.60%. Matthews International has a consensus price target of $50.00, indicating a potential upside of 35.17%. Given Matthews International's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Matthews International is more favorable than Flowers Foods.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

64.5% of Flowers Foods shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.0% of Matthews International shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.2% of Flowers Foods shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.4% of Matthews International shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Flowers Foods and Matthews International's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Flowers Foods$4.12 billion1.13$164.54 million$0.9623.02
Matthews International$1.50 billion0.78$-87,150,000.00$3.0112.29

Flowers Foods has higher revenue and earnings than Matthews International. Matthews International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Flowers Foods, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk & Volatility

Flowers Foods has a beta of 0.34, meaning that its share price is 66% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Matthews International has a beta of 1.18, meaning that its share price is 18% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

Flowers Foods pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Matthews International pays an annual dividend of $0.86 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Flowers Foods pays out 83.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Matthews International pays out 28.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Flowers Foods has increased its dividend for 7 consecutive years and Matthews International has increased its dividend for 26 consecutive years.

Profitability

This table compares Flowers Foods and Matthews International's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Flowers Foods2.30%19.41%7.65%
Matthews International-5.82%14.90%4.35%

Summary

Flowers Foods beats Matthews International on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Celsius (NASDAQ:CELH) and Matthews International (NASDAQ:MATW) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

54.0% of Celsius shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.0% of Matthews International shares are held by institutional investors. 37.6% of Celsius shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.4% of Matthews International shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Celsius and Matthews International's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Celsius$75.15 million61.76$9.97 million($0.02)-3,200.00
Matthews International$1.50 billion0.78$-87,150,000.00$3.0112.29

Celsius has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Matthews International. Celsius is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Matthews International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for Celsius and Matthews International, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Celsius02202.50
Matthews International00103.00

Celsius presently has a consensus price target of $36.25, indicating a potential downside of 43.36%. Matthews International has a consensus price target of $50.00, indicating a potential upside of 35.17%. Given Matthews International's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Matthews International is more favorable than Celsius.

Risk & Volatility

Celsius has a beta of 2.17, meaning that its stock price is 117% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Matthews International has a beta of 1.18, meaning that its stock price is 18% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Celsius and Matthews International's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Celsius4.77%8.28%5.96%
Matthews International-5.82%14.90%4.35%

Summary

Celsius beats Matthews International on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Matthews International (NASDAQ:MATW) and 51job (NASDAQ:JOBS) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings and profitability.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

80.0% of Matthews International shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 44.4% of 51job shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.4% of Matthews International shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Matthews International and 51job's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Matthews International$1.50 billion0.78$-87,150,000.00$3.0112.29
51job$574.57 million7.89$76.46 million$1.1558.50

51job has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Matthews International. Matthews International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than 51job, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Matthews International and 51job, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Matthews International00103.00
51job00103.00

Matthews International currently has a consensus target price of $50.00, indicating a potential upside of 35.17%. 51job has a consensus target price of $72.00, indicating a potential upside of 7.03%. Given Matthews International's higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Matthews International is more favorable than 51job.

Volatility and Risk

Matthews International has a beta of 1.18, indicating that its share price is 18% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, 51job has a beta of 0.77, indicating that its share price is 23% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Matthews International and 51job's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Matthews International-5.82%14.90%4.35%
51job27.33%8.72%6.78%

Summary

Matthews International beats 51job on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Matthews International (NASDAQ:MATW) and National Beverage (NASDAQ:FIZZ) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, valuation, risk and earnings.

Profitability

This table compares Matthews International and National Beverage's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Matthews International-5.82%14.90%4.35%
National Beverage15.34%33.20%23.86%

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Matthews International and National Beverage's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Matthews International$1.50 billion0.78$-87,150,000.00$3.0112.29
National Beverage$1.00 billion4.51$129.97 million$2.7817.40

National Beverage has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Matthews International. Matthews International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than National Beverage, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

80.0% of Matthews International shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 32.7% of National Beverage shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.4% of Matthews International shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 75.2% of National Beverage shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk & Volatility

Matthews International has a beta of 1.18, indicating that its stock price is 18% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, National Beverage has a beta of 1.39, indicating that its stock price is 39% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations for Matthews International and National Beverage, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Matthews International00103.00
National Beverage31001.25

Matthews International presently has a consensus price target of $50.00, indicating a potential upside of 35.17%. National Beverage has a consensus price target of $32.50, indicating a potential downside of 32.82%. Given Matthews International's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Matthews International is more favorable than National Beverage.

Summary

National Beverage beats Matthews International on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Leslie's (NASDAQ:LESL) and Matthews International (NASDAQ:MATW) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends and earnings.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings for Leslie's and Matthews International, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Leslie's06602.50
Matthews International00103.00

Leslie's presently has a consensus price target of $26.2727, indicating a potential upside of 9.47%. Matthews International has a consensus price target of $50.00, indicating a potential upside of 35.17%. Given Matthews International's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Matthews International is more favorable than Leslie's.

Profitability

This table compares Leslie's and Matthews International's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Leslie'sN/AN/AN/A
Matthews International-5.82%14.90%4.35%

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Leslie's and Matthews International's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Leslie's$1.11 billion4.03$78.49 million$0.4257.14
Matthews International$1.50 billion0.78$-87,150,000.00$3.0112.29

Leslie's has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Matthews International. Matthews International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Leslie's, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

80.0% of Matthews International shares are held by institutional investors. 3.4% of Matthews International shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Matthews International beats Leslie's on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

WD-40 (NASDAQ:WDFC) and Matthews International (NASDAQ:MATW) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends and earnings.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings for WD-40 and Matthews International, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
WD-4001002.00
Matthews International00103.00

WD-40 presently has a consensus price target of $353.00, indicating a potential upside of 12.68%. Matthews International has a consensus price target of $50.00, indicating a potential upside of 35.17%. Given Matthews International's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Matthews International is more favorable than WD-40.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares WD-40 and Matthews International's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
WD-40$423.35 million10.13$55.91 million$4.4071.20
Matthews International$1.50 billion0.78$-87,150,000.00$3.0112.29

WD-40 has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Matthews International. Matthews International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than WD-40, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares WD-40 and Matthews International's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
WD-4012.30%33.97%14.82%
Matthews International-5.82%14.90%4.35%

Insider and Institutional Ownership

90.4% of WD-40 shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.0% of Matthews International shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.1% of WD-40 shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.4% of Matthews International shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Dividends

WD-40 pays an annual dividend of $2.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Matthews International pays an annual dividend of $0.86 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. WD-40 pays out 60.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Matthews International pays out 28.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. WD-40 has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Matthews International has raised its dividend for 26 consecutive years. Matthews International is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Volatility and Risk

WD-40 has a beta of -0.05, suggesting that its share price is 105% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Matthews International has a beta of 1.18, suggesting that its share price is 18% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Matthews International beats WD-40 on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.


Matthews International Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Flowers Foods logo
FLO
Flowers Foods
1.3$22.10-1.3%$4.68 billion$4.12 billion48.04News Coverage
Celsius logo
CELH
Celsius
1.5$64.00-2.2%$4.64 billion$75.15 million914.42
51job logo
JOBS
51job
1.7$67.27-1.9%$4.53 billion$574.57 million31.73
National Beverage logo
FIZZ
National Beverage
1.3$48.38-1.3%$4.51 billion$1.00 billion14.06Upcoming Earnings
Decrease in Short Interest
Leslie's logo
LESL
Leslie's
1.3$24.00-1.2%$4.48 billion$1.11 billion57.14
WD-40 logo
WDFC
WD-40
1.6$313.27-0.4%$4.29 billion$423.35 million71.20
The Hain Celestial Group logo
HAIN
The Hain Celestial Group
1.5$41.64-1.7%$4.16 billion$2.05 billion160.13
Nomad Foods logo
NOMD
Nomad Foods
1.8$23.95-0.9%$4.12 billion$2.60 billion19.96Earnings Announcement
Hillenbrand logo
HI
Hillenbrand
2.2$47.09-1.3%$3.53 billion$2.52 billion-58.14
Sanderson Farms logo
SAFM
Sanderson Farms
1.9$154.07-2.0%$3.44 billion$3.56 billion122.28Earnings Announcement
Insider Selling
Grocery Outlet logo
GO
Grocery Outlet
1.5$36.14-0.6%$3.40 billion$2.56 billion38.04News Coverage
Compañía Cervecerías Unidas logo
CCU
Compañía Cervecerías Unidas
1.4$17.90-1.7%$3.31 billion$2.41 billion26.32News Coverage
BRF logo
BRFS
BRF
1.5$3.88-0.3%$3.15 billion$8.13 billion12.52Analyst Upgrade
High Trading Volume
Decrease in Short Interest
Gap Up
Medifast logo
MED
Medifast
2.3$261.36-1.7%$3.08 billion$713.67 million32.71Earnings Announcement
Analyst Revision
Utz Brands logo
UTZ
Utz Brands
1.6$25.21-1.3%$3.04 billionN/A0.00
J & J Snack Foods logo
JJSF
J & J Snack Foods
1.6$158.93-0.8%$3.02 billion$1.02 billion167.30
JW.B
John Wiley & Sons
0.6$53.48-0.8%$3.00 billion$1.83 billion-77.51Upcoming Earnings
News Coverage
Energizer logo
ENR
Energizer
2.5$42.16-0.1%$2.88 billion$2.74 billion-26.68
The Simply Good Foods logo
SMPL
The Simply Good Foods
1.8$28.97-6.1%$2.77 billion$816.64 million45.98News Coverage
TreeHouse Foods logo
THS
TreeHouse Foods
1.2$49.34-1.5%$2.76 billion$4.29 billion-493.40
Nu Skin Enterprises logo
NUS
Nu Skin Enterprises
2.1$51.66-2.0%$2.63 billion$2.42 billion17.39Insider Selling
Coca-Cola Consolidated logo
COKE
Coca-Cola Consolidated
0.9$254.40-1.0%$2.38 billion$4.83 billion25.01Earnings Announcement
Purple Innovation logo
PRPL
Purple Innovation
2.1$37.90-2.9%$2.33 billion$428.36 million-122.25Upcoming Earnings
Analyst Revision
Inter Parfums logo
IPAR
Inter Parfums
1.4$72.13-4.3%$2.27 billion$713.51 million72.13Earnings Announcement
Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
Vector Group logo
VGR
Vector Group
1.6$13.78-2.4%$2.11 billion$1.90 billion31.32Earnings Announcement
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
Tootsie Roll Industries logo
TR
Tootsie Roll Industries
0.9$31.32-1.2%$2.08 billion$523.62 million35.85Dividend Cut
Decrease in Short Interest
Industrias Bachoco logo
IBA
Industrias Bachoco
1.4$40.23-1.9%$2.01 billion$3.26 billion14.90Decrease in Short Interest
B&G Foods logo
BGS
B&G Foods
1.7$30.40-1.3%$1.95 billion$1.66 billion15.05Decrease in Short Interest
Hostess Brands logo
TWNK
Hostess Brands
1.4$14.57-0.1%$1.91 billion$907.67 million29.14Earnings Announcement
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
Edgewell Personal Care logo
EPC
Edgewell Personal Care
2.2$30.17-2.5%$1.64 billion$1.95 billion24.33
Tupperware Brands logo
TUP
Tupperware Brands
1.0$31.94-2.4%$1.57 billion$1.80 billion99.82News Coverage
United Natural Foods logo
UNFI
United Natural Foods
1.4$27.84-2.2%$1.56 billion$26.51 billion14.65
Mission Produce logo
AVO
Mission Produce
1.6$21.56-0.6%$1.52 billionN/A0.00Increase in Short Interest
News Coverage
TTCF
Tattooed Chef
0.7$21.03-0.7%$1.50 billionN/A0.00Decrease in Short Interest
Schweitzer-Mauduit International logo
SWM
Schweitzer-Mauduit International
1.7$47.27-1.8%$1.48 billion$1.02 billion16.76Decrease in Short Interest
Meredith logo
MDP
Meredith
1.3$32.28-11.5%$1.47 billion$2.85 billion-3.50Analyst Upgrade
High Trading Volume
News Coverage
Franchise Group logo
FRG
Franchise Group
2.4$36.00-2.5%$1.44 billion$132.55 million0.00News Coverage
SunOpta logo
STKL
SunOpta
1.3$15.38-2.5%$1.39 billion$1.19 billion-118.31Upcoming Earnings
Decrease in Short Interest
Calavo Growers logo
CVGW
Calavo Growers
1.7$77.76-1.6%$1.38 billion$1.06 billion-99.69News Coverage
e.l.f. Beauty logo
ELF
e.l.f. Beauty
1.2$26.14-4.1%$1.34 billion$282.85 million137.59Analyst Report
Insider Selling
News Coverage
Gap Up
UVV
Universal
1.5$51.39-0.9%$1.26 billion$1.91 billion22.74
Fresh Del Monte Produce logo
FDP
Fresh Del Monte Produce
1.3$26.31-1.7%$1.25 billion$4.49 billion54.81Earnings Announcement
Dividend Announcement
Village Farms International logo
VFF
Village Farms International
1.7$15.93-4.8%$1.24 billion$144.57 million-318.54Decrease in Short Interest
The Chefs' Warehouse logo
CHEF
The Chefs' Warehouse
1.2$31.81-0.6%$1.20 billion$1.59 billion-31.81Decrease in Short Interest
ARKO
Arko
2.1$9.50-0.3%$1.18 billionN/A0.00News Coverage
Vital Farms logo
VITL
Vital Farms
1.0$27.81-0.9%$1.10 billionN/A0.00
MGP Ingredients logo
MGPI
MGP Ingredients
1.9$64.60-2.5%$1.09 billion$362.74 million26.48Earnings Announcement
Dividend Announcement
Analyst Downgrade
Insider Selling
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
John B. Sanfilippo & Son logo
JBSS
John B. Sanfilippo & Son
1.5$86.59-2.0%$992.84 million$880.09 million18.46
Scholastic logo
SCHL
Scholastic
1.8$28.69-3.2%$984.10 million$1.49 billion-16.21
Adecoagro logo
AGRO
Adecoagro
1.2$8.21-1.6%$961.28 million$887.14 million-25.66
This page was last updated on 3/2/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff

Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of analysts' upgrades, downgrades and new coverage with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.