Go Pro

Matthews International (MATW) Competitors

Matthews International logo
$18.58 -0.61 (-3.18%)
Closing price 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$18.66 +0.08 (+0.43%)
As of 07:40 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

MATW vs. OSW, MCTA, CSV, KLC, and WW

Should you buy Matthews International stock or one of its competitors? Matthews International's main competitors and comparable companies include OneSpaWorld (OSW), Charming Medical (MCTA), Carriage Services (CSV), KinderCare Learning Companies (KLC), and WW International (WW). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "specialized consumer services" industry.

How does Matthews International compare to OneSpaWorld?

OneSpaWorld (NASDAQ:OSW) and Matthews International (NASDAQ:MATW) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk and earnings.

OneSpaWorld pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Matthews International pays an annual dividend of $1.02 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.5%. OneSpaWorld pays out 25.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Matthews International pays out -109.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Matthews International has increased its dividend for 30 consecutive years. Matthews International is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

OneSpaWorld has a net margin of 8.02% compared to Matthews International's net margin of -2.65%. OneSpaWorld's return on equity of 18.36% beat Matthews International's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
OneSpaWorld8.02% 18.36% 14.28%
Matthews International -2.65%4.51%1.45%

OneSpaWorld has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Matthews International. Matthews International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than OneSpaWorld, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
OneSpaWorld$961M2.40$71.62M$0.7928.77
Matthews International$1.50B0.39-$24.47M-$0.93N/A

OneSpaWorld has a beta of 0.9, meaning that its stock price is 10% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Matthews International has a beta of 1.05, meaning that its stock price is 5% more volatile than the broader market.

OneSpaWorld currently has a consensus price target of $30.60, suggesting a potential upside of 34.62%. Matthews International has a consensus price target of $24.00, suggesting a potential upside of 29.17%. Given OneSpaWorld's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe OneSpaWorld is more favorable than Matthews International.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
OneSpaWorld
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Matthews International
2 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.33

96.0% of OneSpaWorld shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.1% of Matthews International shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.6% of OneSpaWorld shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.7% of Matthews International shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Matthews International had 3 more articles in the media than OneSpaWorld. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Matthews International and 1 mentions for OneSpaWorld. OneSpaWorld's average media sentiment score of 0.82 beat Matthews International's score of 0.65 indicating that OneSpaWorld is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
OneSpaWorld
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Matthews International
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

OneSpaWorld beats Matthews International on 13 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Matthews International compare to Charming Medical?

Matthews International (NASDAQ:MATW) and Charming Medical (NASDAQ:MCTA) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, risk and profitability.

Matthews International currently has a consensus target price of $24.00, suggesting a potential upside of 29.17%. Given Matthews International's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Matthews International is more favorable than Charming Medical.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Matthews International
2 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.33
Charming Medical
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Charming Medical has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Matthews International's net margin of -2.65%. Matthews International's return on equity of 4.51% beat Charming Medical's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Matthews International-2.65% 4.51% 1.45%
Charming Medical N/A N/A N/A

83.1% of Matthews International shares are held by institutional investors. 4.7% of Matthews International shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Charming Medical has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Matthews International.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Matthews International$1.50B0.39-$24.47M-$0.93N/A
Charming MedicalN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

In the previous week, Matthews International had 4 more articles in the media than Charming Medical. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Matthews International and 0 mentions for Charming Medical. Charming Medical's average media sentiment score of 1.89 beat Matthews International's score of 0.65 indicating that Charming Medical is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Matthews International Positive
Charming Medical Very Positive

Summary

Matthews International beats Charming Medical on 8 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Matthews International compare to Carriage Services?

Matthews International (NASDAQ:MATW) and Carriage Services (NYSE:CSV) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership and valuation.

Matthews International presently has a consensus price target of $24.00, indicating a potential upside of 29.17%. Carriage Services has a consensus price target of $51.00, indicating a potential upside of 60.11%. Given Carriage Services' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Carriage Services is more favorable than Matthews International.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Matthews International
2 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.33
Carriage Services
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25

In the previous week, Carriage Services had 4 more articles in the media than Matthews International. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Carriage Services and 4 mentions for Matthews International. Matthews International's average media sentiment score of 0.65 beat Carriage Services' score of 0.59 indicating that Matthews International is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Matthews International
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Carriage Services
2 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Matthews International pays an annual dividend of $1.02 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.5%. Carriage Services pays an annual dividend of $0.45 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Matthews International pays out -109.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Carriage Services pays out 16.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Matthews International has raised its dividend for 30 consecutive years. Matthews International is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Matthews International has a beta of 1.05, suggesting that its stock price is 5% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Carriage Services has a beta of 0.79, suggesting that its stock price is 21% less volatile than the broader market.

83.1% of Matthews International shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 66.5% of Carriage Services shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.7% of Matthews International shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.7% of Carriage Services shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Carriage Services has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Matthews International. Matthews International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Carriage Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Matthews International$1.50B0.39-$24.47M-$0.93N/A
Carriage Services$417.44M1.21$51.51M$2.7911.42

Carriage Services has a net margin of 10.69% compared to Matthews International's net margin of -2.65%. Carriage Services' return on equity of 19.23% beat Matthews International's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Matthews International-2.65% 4.51% 1.45%
Carriage Services 10.69%19.23%3.71%

Summary

Carriage Services beats Matthews International on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Matthews International compare to KinderCare Learning Companies?

Matthews International (NASDAQ:MATW) and KinderCare Learning Companies (NYSE:KLC) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, risk and profitability.

Matthews International has a net margin of -2.65% compared to KinderCare Learning Companies' net margin of -17.23%. KinderCare Learning Companies' return on equity of 6.65% beat Matthews International's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Matthews International-2.65% 4.51% 1.45%
KinderCare Learning Companies -17.23%6.65%1.21%

Matthews International currently has a consensus target price of $24.00, suggesting a potential upside of 29.17%. KinderCare Learning Companies has a consensus target price of $4.06, suggesting a potential upside of 118.71%. Given KinderCare Learning Companies' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe KinderCare Learning Companies is more favorable than Matthews International.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Matthews International
2 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.33
KinderCare Learning Companies
4 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.70

Matthews International has higher earnings, but lower revenue than KinderCare Learning Companies. Matthews International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than KinderCare Learning Companies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Matthews International$1.50B0.39-$24.47M-$0.93N/A
KinderCare Learning Companies$2.73B0.08-$112.88M-$3.98N/A

In the previous week, KinderCare Learning Companies had 1 more articles in the media than Matthews International. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for KinderCare Learning Companies and 4 mentions for Matthews International. Matthews International's average media sentiment score of 0.65 beat KinderCare Learning Companies' score of 0.59 indicating that Matthews International is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Matthews International
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
KinderCare Learning Companies
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Matthews International has a beta of 1.05, indicating that its stock price is 5% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, KinderCare Learning Companies has a beta of 3.86, indicating that its stock price is 286% more volatile than the broader market.

83.1% of Matthews International shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.7% of Matthews International shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 5.8% of KinderCare Learning Companies shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

KinderCare Learning Companies beats Matthews International on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Matthews International compare to WW International?

WW International (NASDAQ:WW) and Matthews International (NASDAQ:MATW) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability, earnings, dividends and risk.

Matthews International has higher revenue and earnings than WW International. Matthews International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than WW International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
WW International$710.64M0.19-$112.25M-$10.13N/A
Matthews International$1.50B0.39-$24.47M-$0.93N/A

Matthews International has a net margin of -2.65% compared to WW International's net margin of -56.84%. Matthews International's return on equity of 4.51% beat WW International's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
WW International-56.84% N/A -0.32%
Matthews International -2.65%4.51%1.45%

86.2% of WW International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.1% of Matthews International shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of WW International shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.7% of Matthews International shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, WW International had 1 more articles in the media than Matthews International. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for WW International and 4 mentions for Matthews International. Matthews International's average media sentiment score of 0.65 beat WW International's score of 0.39 indicating that Matthews International is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
WW International
0 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Matthews International
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

WW International has a beta of 1.73, meaning that its stock price is 73% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Matthews International has a beta of 1.05, meaning that its stock price is 5% more volatile than the broader market.

Matthews International has a consensus price target of $24.00, suggesting a potential upside of 29.17%. Given Matthews International's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Matthews International is more favorable than WW International.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
WW International
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50
Matthews International
2 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.33

Summary

Matthews International beats WW International on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Matthews International News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for MATW and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding MATW and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

MATW vs. The Competition

MetricMatthews InternationalDiversified Consumer Services IndustryConsumer Discretionary SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$598.98M$4.21B$12.25B$13.08B
Dividend Yield5.32%2.94%69.35%15.88%
P/E Ratio-19.9810.0044.1025.80
Price / Sales0.3936.7092.9290.99
Price / Cash5.3313.4628.1751.29
Price / Book1.192.993.916.26
Net Income-$24.47M$241.17M$445.63M$360.95M
7 Day Performance-3.33%-0.81%-0.57%-1.89%
1 Month Performance-8.79%-2.85%-4.10%-3.43%
1 Year Performance-22.78%-8.26%-7.40%2.60%

Matthews International Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
MATW
Matthews International
4.5447 of 5 stars
$18.58
-3.2%
$24.00
+29.2%
-21.0%$598.98M$1.50BN/A5,500
OSW
OneSpaWorld
4.3143 of 5 stars
$22.54
+3.1%
$30.60
+35.8%
+6.4%$2.22B$961M28.535,395
MCTA
Charming Medical
N/A$29.36
0.0%
N/AN/A$504.26MN/AN/A53
CSV
Carriage Services
4.6085 of 5 stars
$30.87
+1.3%
$51.00
+65.2%
-30.0%$483.79M$417.44M11.062,321
KLC
KinderCare Learning Companies
4.4849 of 5 stars
$2.30
+2.7%
$4.13
+79.5%
-72.0%$265.48M$2.73BN/A43,700

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:MATW) was last updated on 10/1/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners