Go Pro
→ Look at this $5 stock’s address (From Freedom Financial) (Ad)tc pixel Free CSV Stock Alerts

Carriage Services (CSV) Competitors

Carriage Services logo
$34.40 -0.06 (-0.17%)
As of 03:58 PM Eastern
Compare

CSV vs. DRVN, MATW, KLC, MCTA, and WW

Should you buy Carriage Services stock or one of its competitors? Carriage Services's main competitors and comparable companies include Driven Brands (DRVN), Matthews International (MATW), KinderCare Learning Companies (KLC), Charming Medical (MCTA), and WW International (WW). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "specialized consumer services" industry.

How does Carriage Services compare to Driven Brands?

Carriage Services (NYSE:CSV) and Driven Brands (NASDAQ:DRVN) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Carriage Services has a beta of 0.84, meaning that its share price is 16% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Driven Brands has a beta of 0.95, meaning that its share price is 5% less volatile than the broader market.

Driven Brands has higher revenue and earnings than Carriage Services. Carriage Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Driven Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Carriage Services$417.44M1.31$51.51M$2.7912.33
Driven Brands$1.86B1.16$140.16M$1.0412.54

66.5% of Carriage Services shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.1% of Driven Brands shares are held by institutional investors. 2.7% of Carriage Services shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.4% of Driven Brands shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Carriage Services currently has a consensus price target of $51.00, indicating a potential upside of 48.26%. Driven Brands has a consensus price target of $16.78, indicating a potential upside of 28.64%. Given Carriage Services' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Carriage Services is more favorable than Driven Brands.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Carriage Services
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40
Driven Brands
1 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57

Carriage Services has a net margin of 10.69% compared to Driven Brands' net margin of 8.61%. Driven Brands' return on equity of 24.13% beat Carriage Services' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Carriage Services10.69% 19.23% 3.71%
Driven Brands 8.61%24.13%5.03%

In the previous week, Driven Brands had 1 more articles in the media than Carriage Services. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Driven Brands and 1 mentions for Carriage Services. Driven Brands' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Carriage Services' score of -0.06 indicating that Driven Brands is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Carriage Services
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Driven Brands
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Driven Brands beats Carriage Services on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Carriage Services compare to Matthews International?

Carriage Services (NYSE:CSV) and Matthews International (NASDAQ:MATW) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, dividends, profitability, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Matthews International had 3 more articles in the media than Carriage Services. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Matthews International and 1 mentions for Carriage Services. Matthews International's average media sentiment score of 1.93 beat Carriage Services' score of -0.06 indicating that Matthews International is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Carriage Services
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Matthews International
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Carriage Services presently has a consensus price target of $51.00, suggesting a potential upside of 48.26%. Given Carriage Services' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Carriage Services is more favorable than Matthews International.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Carriage Services
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40
Matthews International
2 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Carriage Services has a beta of 0.84, indicating that its share price is 16% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Matthews International has a beta of 1.09, indicating that its share price is 9% more volatile than the broader market.

Carriage Services pays an annual dividend of $0.45 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Matthews International pays an annual dividend of $1.02 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.7%. Carriage Services pays out 16.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Matthews International pays out -109.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Matthews International has raised its dividend for 30 consecutive years. Matthews International is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Carriage Services has a net margin of 10.69% compared to Matthews International's net margin of -2.65%. Carriage Services' return on equity of 19.23% beat Matthews International's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Carriage Services10.69% 19.23% 3.71%
Matthews International -2.65%4.51%1.45%

66.5% of Carriage Services shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.1% of Matthews International shares are held by institutional investors. 2.7% of Carriage Services shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.7% of Matthews International shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Carriage Services has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Matthews International. Matthews International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Carriage Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Carriage Services$417.44M1.31$51.51M$2.7912.33
Matthews International$1.50B0.45-$24.47M-$0.93N/A

Summary

Carriage Services beats Matthews International on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Carriage Services compare to KinderCare Learning Companies?

KinderCare Learning Companies (NYSE:KLC) and Carriage Services (NYSE:CSV) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership and dividends.

In the previous week, KinderCare Learning Companies had 10 more articles in the media than Carriage Services. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for KinderCare Learning Companies and 1 mentions for Carriage Services. Carriage Services' average media sentiment score of -0.06 beat KinderCare Learning Companies' score of -0.15 indicating that Carriage Services is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
KinderCare Learning Companies
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Carriage Services
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

KinderCare Learning Companies has a beta of 4, suggesting that its stock price is 300% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Carriage Services has a beta of 0.84, suggesting that its stock price is 16% less volatile than the broader market.

66.5% of Carriage Services shares are held by institutional investors. 5.8% of KinderCare Learning Companies shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.7% of Carriage Services shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Carriage Services has lower revenue, but higher earnings than KinderCare Learning Companies. KinderCare Learning Companies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Carriage Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
KinderCare Learning Companies$2.73B0.12-$112.88M-$3.98N/A
Carriage Services$417.44M1.31$51.51M$2.7912.33

KinderCare Learning Companies currently has a consensus price target of $4.13, indicating a potential upside of 47.45%. Carriage Services has a consensus price target of $51.00, indicating a potential upside of 48.26%. Given Carriage Services' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Carriage Services is more favorable than KinderCare Learning Companies.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
KinderCare Learning Companies
4 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.70
Carriage Services
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40

Carriage Services has a net margin of 10.69% compared to KinderCare Learning Companies' net margin of -17.23%. Carriage Services' return on equity of 19.23% beat KinderCare Learning Companies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
KinderCare Learning Companies-17.23% 6.65% 1.21%
Carriage Services 10.69%19.23%3.71%

Summary

Carriage Services beats KinderCare Learning Companies on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Carriage Services compare to Charming Medical?

Carriage Services (NYSE:CSV) and Charming Medical (NASDAQ:MCTA) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership and valuation.

Carriage Services presently has a consensus price target of $51.00, indicating a potential upside of 48.26%. Given Carriage Services' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Carriage Services is more favorable than Charming Medical.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Carriage Services
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40
Charming Medical
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Carriage Services has higher revenue and earnings than Charming Medical.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Carriage Services$417.44M1.31$51.51M$2.7912.33
Charming MedicalN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

Carriage Services has a net margin of 10.69% compared to Charming Medical's net margin of 0.00%. Carriage Services' return on equity of 19.23% beat Charming Medical's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Carriage Services10.69% 19.23% 3.71%
Charming Medical N/A N/A N/A

66.5% of Carriage Services shares are held by institutional investors. 2.7% of Carriage Services shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Carriage Services had 1 more articles in the media than Charming Medical. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Carriage Services and 0 mentions for Charming Medical. Charming Medical's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Carriage Services' score of -0.06 indicating that Charming Medical is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Carriage Services Neutral
Charming Medical Neutral

Summary

Carriage Services beats Charming Medical on 10 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Carriage Services compare to WW International?

WW International (NASDAQ:WW) and Carriage Services (NYSE:CSV) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, profitability and earnings.

Carriage Services has a consensus price target of $51.00, indicating a potential upside of 48.26%. Given Carriage Services' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Carriage Services is more favorable than WW International.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
WW International
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.67
Carriage Services
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40

WW International has a beta of 1.3, indicating that its stock price is 30% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Carriage Services has a beta of 0.84, indicating that its stock price is 16% less volatile than the broader market.

86.2% of WW International shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 66.5% of Carriage Services shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of WW International shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.7% of Carriage Services shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Carriage Services had 1 more articles in the media than WW International. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Carriage Services and 0 mentions for WW International. WW International's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Carriage Services' score of -0.06 indicating that WW International is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
WW International Neutral
Carriage Services Neutral

Carriage Services has a net margin of 10.69% compared to WW International's net margin of -56.84%. Carriage Services' return on equity of 19.23% beat WW International's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
WW International-56.84% N/A -0.32%
Carriage Services 10.69%19.23%3.71%

Carriage Services has lower revenue, but higher earnings than WW International. WW International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Carriage Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
WW International$710.64M0.21-$112.25M-$10.13N/A
Carriage Services$417.44M1.31$51.51M$2.7912.33

Summary

Carriage Services beats WW International on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Carriage Services News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CSV and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CSV and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CSV vs. The Competition

Export
MetricCarriage ServicesDiversified Consumer Services IndustryConsumer Discretionary SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$545.93M$4.40B$13.04B$24.07B
Dividend Yield1.31%2.80%54.44%3.72%
P/E Ratio12.3311.1346.7330.00
Price / Sales1.3137.8895.8219.76
Price / Cash7.0314.3126.1831.97
Price / Book1.954.043.976.79
Net Income$51.51M$242.43M$446.21M$1.07B
7 Day Performance-1.05%-1.10%-0.72%-1.25%
1 Month Performance-7.14%-1.70%0.69%2.27%
1 Year Performance-23.84%-4.95%-0.44%17.37%

Carriage Services Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CSV
Carriage Services
4.7408 of 5 stars		$34.40
-0.2%		$51.00
+48.3%		-24.7%$545.93M$417.44M12.332,321
DRVN
Driven Brands
3.2825 of 5 stars		$12.41
-1.0%		$16.78
+35.2%		-23.0%$2.05B$1.86B11.957,100
MATW
Matthews International
3.4999 of 5 stars		$22.94
-0.2%		N/A-7.8%$712.61M$1.50BN/A5,500
KLC
KinderCare Learning Companies
3.4377 of 5 stars		$4.90
-2.6%		$4.80
-2.0%		-59.6%$580.90M$2.73BN/A43,700
MCTA
Charming Medical
N/A$29.36
flat		N/AN/A$497.22M$4.81MN/A49

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:CSV) was last updated on 8/20/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Did you see this?
Joel Peterson's 75-minute Crypto Code workshop is now live as a replay. Twenty minutes in, he puts his real tr...
Crypto Swap Profits | Sponsoredtc pixel
The retirement stock I'd buy before Nvidia today
In 2014, Marc Chaikin pointed readers toward Nvidia. Now the 60-year Wall Street veteran and creator of the Ch...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
Look at this $5 stock’s address
A small public company trading under $5 a share operates inside the secure perimeter of Kennedy Space Center, ...
Freedom Financial | Sponsoredtc pixel
23,281 stocks. Only ONE survived.
One American energy producer just cleared a screen of 23281 stocks for elite operating profits, double-digit r...
Monument Traders Alliance | Sponsoredtc pixel
Why major institutions are piling into this digital asset now
BlackRock, JPMorgan, Goldman Sachs, and Fidelity are reportedly accumulating a scarce blockchain asset - one t...
Awesomely | Sponsoredtc pixel
They didn't warn anyone in 1971. This time someone is warning you.
On August 15, 1971, Nixon interrupted prime-time television and ended the gold standard in 15 minutes - no deb...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
Someone just dumped the biggest gold fund.
Investors pulled 2.9 billion dollars from the world's largest gold fund in a single day this March, pushing to...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel
My top 3 AI picks for the next decade
Alexander Green bought Apple in 1996, recommended Nvidia at a split-adjusted 66 cents in 2004, and picked up A...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel