Go Pro

Nomad Foods (NOMD) Competitors

Nomad Foods logo
$11.26 +0.32 (+2.88%)
Closing price 07/1/2026 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$11.25 -0.01 (-0.12%)
As of 04:00 AM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

NOMD vs. CELH, FRPT, BRBR, UTZ, and OFRM

Should you buy Nomad Foods stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Nomad Foods with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Nomad Foods include Celsius (CELH), Freshpet (FRPT), BellRing Brands (BRBR), Utz Brands (UTZ), and Once Upon A Farm (OFRM). These companies are all part of the "consumer staples" sector.

How does Nomad Foods compare to Celsius?

Nomad Foods (NYSE:NOMD) and Celsius (NASDAQ:CELH) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings and profitability.

Celsius has a net margin of 5.85% compared to Nomad Foods' net margin of 4.43%. Celsius' return on equity of 37.95% beat Nomad Foods' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Nomad Foods4.43% 9.05% 3.61%
Celsius 5.85%37.95%9.62%

Nomad Foods has higher revenue and earnings than Celsius. Nomad Foods is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Celsius, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Nomad Foods$3.43B0.46$154.66M$1.0310.94
Celsius$2.52B3.24$108M$0.4374.12

75.3% of Nomad Foods shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 61.0% of Celsius shares are held by institutional investors. 17.3% of Nomad Foods shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.3% of Celsius shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Nomad Foods presently has a consensus target price of $12.50, suggesting a potential upside of 10.96%. Celsius has a consensus target price of $60.90, suggesting a potential upside of 91.09%. Given Celsius' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Celsius is more favorable than Nomad Foods.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Nomad Foods
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Celsius
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
21 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.84

Nomad Foods has a beta of 0.69, suggesting that its share price is 31% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Celsius has a beta of 0.94, suggesting that its share price is 6% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Celsius had 13 more articles in the media than Nomad Foods. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Celsius and 0 mentions for Nomad Foods. Nomad Foods' average media sentiment score of 0.48 beat Celsius' score of 0.37 indicating that Nomad Foods is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Nomad Foods Neutral
Celsius Neutral

Summary

Celsius beats Nomad Foods on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Nomad Foods compare to Freshpet?

Nomad Foods (NYSE:NOMD) and Freshpet (NASDAQ:FRPT) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership and dividends.

Nomad Foods has a beta of 0.69, meaning that its share price is 31% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Freshpet has a beta of 1.6, meaning that its share price is 60% more volatile than the broader market.

Nomad Foods has higher revenue and earnings than Freshpet. Nomad Foods is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Freshpet, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Nomad Foods$3.43B0.46$154.66M$1.0310.94
Freshpet$1.10B2.50$139.14M$3.7414.97

In the previous week, Freshpet had 8 more articles in the media than Nomad Foods. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Freshpet and 0 mentions for Nomad Foods. Nomad Foods' average media sentiment score of 0.48 beat Freshpet's score of 0.20 indicating that Nomad Foods is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Nomad Foods Neutral
Freshpet Neutral

Nomad Foods presently has a consensus price target of $12.50, suggesting a potential upside of 10.96%. Freshpet has a consensus price target of $74.56, suggesting a potential upside of 33.15%. Given Freshpet's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Freshpet is more favorable than Nomad Foods.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Nomad Foods
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Freshpet
1 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.56

75.3% of Nomad Foods shares are held by institutional investors. 17.3% of Nomad Foods shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.3% of Freshpet shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Freshpet has a net margin of 17.63% compared to Nomad Foods' net margin of 4.43%. Nomad Foods' return on equity of 9.05% beat Freshpet's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Nomad Foods4.43% 9.05% 3.61%
Freshpet 17.63%6.22%4.19%

Summary

Freshpet beats Nomad Foods on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Nomad Foods compare to BellRing Brands?

BellRing Brands (NYSE:BRBR) and Nomad Foods (NYSE:NOMD) are both small-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, profitability, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and valuation.

BellRing Brands has a net margin of 6.78% compared to Nomad Foods' net margin of 4.43%. Nomad Foods' return on equity of 9.05% beat BellRing Brands' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
BellRing Brands6.78% -44.06% 19.42%
Nomad Foods 4.43%9.05%3.61%

95.0% of BellRing Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 75.3% of Nomad Foods shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.5% of BellRing Brands shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 17.3% of Nomad Foods shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

BellRing Brands has a beta of 0.44, suggesting that its stock price is 56% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Nomad Foods has a beta of 0.69, suggesting that its stock price is 31% less volatile than the broader market.

BellRing Brands currently has a consensus target price of $22.47, indicating a potential upside of 67.74%. Nomad Foods has a consensus target price of $12.50, indicating a potential upside of 10.96%. Given BellRing Brands' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe BellRing Brands is more favorable than Nomad Foods.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
BellRing Brands
2 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.37
Nomad Foods
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

BellRing Brands has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Nomad Foods. BellRing Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nomad Foods, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
BellRing Brands$2.32B0.67$216.20M$1.2910.38
Nomad Foods$3.43B0.46$154.66M$1.0310.94

In the previous week, BellRing Brands had 4 more articles in the media than Nomad Foods. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for BellRing Brands and 0 mentions for Nomad Foods. BellRing Brands' average media sentiment score of 0.65 beat Nomad Foods' score of 0.48 indicating that BellRing Brands is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
BellRing Brands Positive
Nomad Foods Neutral

Summary

BellRing Brands beats Nomad Foods on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Nomad Foods compare to Utz Brands?

Nomad Foods (NYSE:NOMD) and Utz Brands (NYSE:UTZ) are both small-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, risk and institutional ownership.

Nomad Foods pays an annual dividend of $0.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.0%. Utz Brands pays an annual dividend of $0.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Nomad Foods pays out 66.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Utz Brands pays out -250.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Nomad Foods has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Utz Brands has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

Nomad Foods currently has a consensus target price of $12.50, suggesting a potential upside of 10.96%. Utz Brands has a consensus target price of $12.06, suggesting a potential upside of 46.54%. Given Utz Brands' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Utz Brands is more favorable than Nomad Foods.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Nomad Foods
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Utz Brands
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.38

Nomad Foods has a beta of 0.69, meaning that its share price is 31% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Utz Brands has a beta of 0.82, meaning that its share price is 18% less volatile than the broader market.

75.3% of Nomad Foods shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.0% of Utz Brands shares are held by institutional investors. 17.3% of Nomad Foods shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 12.7% of Utz Brands shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Utz Brands had 5 more articles in the media than Nomad Foods. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Utz Brands and 0 mentions for Nomad Foods. Nomad Foods' average media sentiment score of 0.48 beat Utz Brands' score of 0.11 indicating that Nomad Foods is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Nomad Foods Neutral
Utz Brands Neutral

Nomad Foods has a net margin of 4.43% compared to Utz Brands' net margin of -0.58%. Nomad Foods' return on equity of 9.05% beat Utz Brands' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Nomad Foods4.43% 9.05% 3.61%
Utz Brands -0.58%8.61%4.17%

Nomad Foods has higher revenue and earnings than Utz Brands. Utz Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nomad Foods, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Nomad Foods$3.43B0.46$154.66M$1.0310.94
Utz Brands$1.44B0.82$800K-$0.10N/A

Summary

Utz Brands beats Nomad Foods on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Nomad Foods compare to Once Upon A Farm?

Once Upon A Farm (NYSE:OFRM) and Nomad Foods (NYSE:NOMD) are both small-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, earnings, profitability, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Nomad Foods has higher revenue and earnings than Once Upon A Farm. Once Upon A Farm is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nomad Foods, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Once Upon A Farm$262.80M3.52-$10.06M-$0.24N/A
Nomad Foods$3.43B0.46$154.66M$1.0310.94

In the previous week, Once Upon A Farm had 1 more articles in the media than Nomad Foods. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Once Upon A Farm and 0 mentions for Nomad Foods. Nomad Foods' average media sentiment score of 0.48 beat Once Upon A Farm's score of 0.00 indicating that Nomad Foods is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Once Upon A Farm Neutral
Nomad Foods Neutral

Once Upon A Farm currently has a consensus price target of $26.13, indicating a potential upside of 18.39%. Nomad Foods has a consensus price target of $12.50, indicating a potential upside of 10.96%. Given Once Upon A Farm's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Once Upon A Farm is more favorable than Nomad Foods.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Once Upon A Farm
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.36
Nomad Foods
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

Nomad Foods has a net margin of 4.43% compared to Once Upon A Farm's net margin of 0.00%. Nomad Foods' return on equity of 9.05% beat Once Upon A Farm's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Once Upon A FarmN/A N/A N/A
Nomad Foods 4.43%9.05%3.61%

75.3% of Nomad Foods shares are owned by institutional investors. 17.3% of Nomad Foods shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Nomad Foods beats Once Upon A Farm on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Nomad Foods News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for NOMD and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding NOMD and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

NOMD vs. The Competition

MetricNomad FoodsFOOD IndustryStaples SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$1.53B$7.70B$16.36B$23.43B
Dividend Yield6.21%3.78%3.33%4.09%
P/E Ratio10.9416.6426.6831.23
Price / Sales0.461.2947.3421.43
Price / Cash4.159.8916.3625.08
Price / Book0.612.885.534.81
Net Income$154.66M$241.67M$680.96M$1.07B
7 Day Performance6.52%2.05%5.18%1.43%
1 Month Performance11.92%3.94%9.71%2.47%
1 Year Performance-35.11%-13.82%-12.62%20.45%

Nomad Foods Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
NOMD
Nomad Foods
4.8672 of 5 stars
$11.27
+2.9%
$12.50
+11.0%
-35.2%$1.53B$3.43B10.947,752
CELH
Celsius
4.5957 of 5 stars
$29.79
-0.2%
$61.50
+106.4%
-30.7%$7.63B$2.52B69.281,497
FRPT
Freshpet
3.7285 of 5 stars
$60.64
+5.6%
$74.88
+23.5%
-21.4%$2.82B$1.10B16.211,288
BRBR
BellRing Brands
4.1342 of 5 stars
$12.39
+7.2%
$22.47
+81.4%
-77.2%$1.34B$2.32B9.60380
UTZ
Utz Brands
3.8939 of 5 stars
$7.83
+1.5%
$12.06
+54.1%
-37.5%$1.11B$1.44BN/A3,300

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:NOMD) was last updated on 7/2/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners