Free Trial

Nomad Foods (NOMD) Competitors

Nomad Foods logo
$10.34 +0.03 (+0.24%)
As of 02:50 PM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.

NOMD vs. CELH, FRPT, BRBR, UTZ, and OFRM

Should you buy Nomad Foods stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Nomad Foods with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Nomad Foods include Celsius (CELH), Freshpet (FRPT), BellRing Brands (BRBR), Utz Brands (UTZ), and Once Upon A Farm (OFRM). These companies are all part of the "consumer staples" sector.

How does Nomad Foods compare to Celsius?

Celsius (NASDAQ:CELH) and Nomad Foods (NYSE:NOMD) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment, profitability, risk, dividends, earnings and institutional ownership.

Celsius has a net margin of 5.85% compared to Nomad Foods' net margin of 4.43%. Celsius' return on equity of 37.95% beat Nomad Foods' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Celsius5.85% 37.95% 9.62%
Nomad Foods 4.43%9.05%3.61%

Celsius has a beta of 0.93, suggesting that its stock price is 7% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Nomad Foods has a beta of 0.7, suggesting that its stock price is 30% less volatile than the broader market.

61.0% of Celsius shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 75.3% of Nomad Foods shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.3% of Celsius shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 17.3% of Nomad Foods shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Celsius presently has a consensus price target of $64.53, indicating a potential upside of 125.55%. Nomad Foods has a consensus price target of $12.50, indicating a potential upside of 20.95%. Given Celsius' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Celsius is more favorable than Nomad Foods.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Celsius
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
20 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.83
Nomad Foods
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

Nomad Foods has higher revenue and earnings than Celsius. Nomad Foods is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Celsius, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Celsius$2.97B2.46$108M$0.4366.53
Nomad Foods$2.99B0.48$154.66M$1.0310.03

In the previous week, Celsius had 28 more articles in the media than Nomad Foods. MarketBeat recorded 30 mentions for Celsius and 2 mentions for Nomad Foods. Celsius' average media sentiment score of 0.48 beat Nomad Foods' score of 0.29 indicating that Celsius is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Celsius
10 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
11 Neutral mention(s)
4 Negative mention(s)
2 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Nomad Foods
0 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Celsius beats Nomad Foods on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Nomad Foods compare to Freshpet?

Freshpet (NASDAQ:FRPT) and Nomad Foods (NYSE:NOMD) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, risk, earnings, media sentiment, dividends, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Freshpet has a beta of 1.63, meaning that its share price is 63% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Nomad Foods has a beta of 0.7, meaning that its share price is 30% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Freshpet had 2 more articles in the media than Nomad Foods. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Freshpet and 2 mentions for Nomad Foods. Freshpet's average media sentiment score of 0.61 beat Nomad Foods' score of 0.29 indicating that Freshpet is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Freshpet
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Nomad Foods
0 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Freshpet has a net margin of 17.63% compared to Nomad Foods' net margin of 4.43%. Nomad Foods' return on equity of 9.05% beat Freshpet's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Freshpet17.63% 6.22% 4.19%
Nomad Foods 4.43%9.05%3.61%

75.3% of Nomad Foods shares are held by institutional investors. 4.3% of Freshpet shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 17.3% of Nomad Foods shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Freshpet currently has a consensus price target of $74.88, indicating a potential upside of 43.12%. Nomad Foods has a consensus price target of $12.50, indicating a potential upside of 20.95%. Given Freshpet's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Freshpet is more favorable than Nomad Foods.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Freshpet
1 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.56
Nomad Foods
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

Nomad Foods has higher revenue and earnings than Freshpet. Nomad Foods is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Freshpet, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Freshpet$1.14B2.26$139.14M$3.7413.99
Nomad Foods$2.99B0.48$154.66M$1.0310.03

Summary

Freshpet beats Nomad Foods on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Nomad Foods compare to BellRing Brands?

Nomad Foods (NYSE:NOMD) and BellRing Brands (NYSE:BRBR) are both small-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, dividends, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

In the previous week, BellRing Brands had 2 more articles in the media than Nomad Foods. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for BellRing Brands and 2 mentions for Nomad Foods. BellRing Brands' average media sentiment score of 0.60 beat Nomad Foods' score of 0.29 indicating that BellRing Brands is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Nomad Foods
0 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
BellRing Brands
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

75.3% of Nomad Foods shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.0% of BellRing Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. 17.3% of Nomad Foods shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of BellRing Brands shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

BellRing Brands has a net margin of 6.78% compared to Nomad Foods' net margin of 4.43%. Nomad Foods' return on equity of 9.05% beat BellRing Brands' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Nomad Foods4.43% 9.05% 3.61%
BellRing Brands 6.78%-44.06%19.42%

Nomad Foods has a beta of 0.7, suggesting that its stock price is 30% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, BellRing Brands has a beta of 0.56, suggesting that its stock price is 44% less volatile than the broader market.

Nomad Foods presently has a consensus price target of $12.50, indicating a potential upside of 20.95%. BellRing Brands has a consensus price target of $22.47, indicating a potential upside of 156.35%. Given BellRing Brands' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe BellRing Brands is more favorable than Nomad Foods.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Nomad Foods
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
BellRing Brands
2 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.37

BellRing Brands has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Nomad Foods. BellRing Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nomad Foods, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Nomad Foods$2.99B0.48$154.66M$1.0310.03
BellRing Brands$2.33B0.44$216.20M$1.296.79

Summary

BellRing Brands beats Nomad Foods on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Nomad Foods compare to Utz Brands?

Nomad Foods (NYSE:NOMD) and Utz Brands (NYSE:UTZ) are both small-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

Nomad Foods has a beta of 0.7, suggesting that its stock price is 30% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Utz Brands has a beta of 0.83, suggesting that its stock price is 17% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Nomad Foods and Nomad Foods both had 2 articles in the media. Utz Brands' average media sentiment score of 0.33 beat Nomad Foods' score of 0.29 indicating that Utz Brands is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Nomad Foods
0 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Utz Brands
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Nomad Foods presently has a consensus target price of $12.50, indicating a potential upside of 20.95%. Utz Brands has a consensus target price of $12.06, indicating a potential upside of 69.68%. Given Utz Brands' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Utz Brands is more favorable than Nomad Foods.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Nomad Foods
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Utz Brands
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.38

Nomad Foods has a net margin of 4.43% compared to Utz Brands' net margin of -0.58%. Nomad Foods' return on equity of 9.05% beat Utz Brands' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Nomad Foods4.43% 9.05% 3.61%
Utz Brands -0.58%8.61%4.17%

Nomad Foods has higher revenue and earnings than Utz Brands. Utz Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nomad Foods, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Nomad Foods$2.99B0.48$154.66M$1.0310.03
Utz Brands$1.45B0.71$800K-$0.10N/A

75.3% of Nomad Foods shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.0% of Utz Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. 17.3% of Nomad Foods shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 12.7% of Utz Brands shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Nomad Foods pays an annual dividend of $0.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.6%. Utz Brands pays an annual dividend of $0.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.5%. Nomad Foods pays out 66.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Utz Brands pays out -250.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Nomad Foods has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Utz Brands has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

Summary

Utz Brands beats Nomad Foods on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Nomad Foods compare to Once Upon A Farm?

Nomad Foods (NYSE:NOMD) and Once Upon A Farm (NYSE:OFRM) are both small-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment, profitability and earnings.

Nomad Foods currently has a consensus price target of $12.50, suggesting a potential upside of 20.95%. Once Upon A Farm has a consensus price target of $26.13, suggesting a potential upside of 40.91%. Given Once Upon A Farm's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Once Upon A Farm is more favorable than Nomad Foods.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Nomad Foods
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Once Upon A Farm
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.36

Nomad Foods has higher revenue and earnings than Once Upon A Farm.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Nomad Foods$2.99B0.48$154.66M$1.0310.03
Once Upon A Farm$262.80M2.96N/AN/AN/A

In the previous week, Nomad Foods and Nomad Foods both had 2 articles in the media. Nomad Foods' average media sentiment score of 0.29 beat Once Upon A Farm's score of 0.00 indicating that Nomad Foods is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Nomad Foods
0 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Once Upon A Farm
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

75.3% of Nomad Foods shares are held by institutional investors. 17.3% of Nomad Foods shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Nomad Foods has a net margin of 4.43% compared to Once Upon A Farm's net margin of 0.00%. Nomad Foods' return on equity of 9.05% beat Once Upon A Farm's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Nomad Foods4.43% 9.05% 3.61%
Once Upon A Farm N/A N/A N/A

Summary

Nomad Foods beats Once Upon A Farm on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Nomad Foods News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for NOMD and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding NOMD and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

NOMD vs. The Competition

MetricNomad FoodsFOOD IndustryStaples SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$1.44B$7.73B$16.31B$23.05B
Dividend Yield6.85%4.37%3.55%4.10%
P/E Ratio10.0315.5726.0030.82
Price / Sales0.481.2647.45114.18
Price / Cash3.889.5316.2524.20
Price / Book0.562.705.684.66
Net Income$154.66M$223.97M$673.17M$1.07B
7 Day Performance6.05%2.25%2.46%-0.29%
1 Month Performance9.08%0.93%2.87%0.67%
1 Year Performance-40.72%-13.45%-11.08%20.87%

Nomad Foods Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
NOMD
Nomad Foods
4.9637 of 5 stars
$10.34
+0.2%
$12.50
+20.9%
-40.4%$1.44B$2.99B10.037,752
CELH
Celsius
4.5353 of 5 stars
$28.00
-0.5%
$64.53
+130.5%
-33.3%$7.19B$2.52B65.121,497
FRPT
Freshpet
4.3396 of 5 stars
$51.40
+3.3%
$74.88
+45.7%
-35.9%$2.44B$1.10B13.741,288
BRBR
BellRing Brands
4.3556 of 5 stars
$7.90
-10.0%
$22.47
+184.6%
-85.9%$1.02B$2.32B6.12380
UTZ
Utz Brands
4.0169 of 5 stars
$6.92
-2.2%
$12.06
+74.3%
-47.6%$1.02B$1.44BN/A3,300

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:NOMD) was last updated on 6/11/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners