NYSE:NOMD

Nomad Foods Competitors

$24.70

+0.58 (+2.40 %)

(As of 03/4/2021 12:00 AM ET)

Add

Compare

Today's Range

$24.15

Now: $24.70▼

$24.89

50-Day Range

$23.62

MA: $25.60▼

$26.61

52-Week Range

$14.08

Now: $24.70▼

$26.99

Volume982,600 shs

Average Volume933,350 shs

Market Capitalization$4.25 billion

P/E Ratio20.58

Dividend YieldN/A

Beta0.71

Nomad Foods (NYSE:NOMD) Vs. CAG, CPB, BYND, FLO, HAIN, and SMPL

Should you be buying NOMD stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "food & kindred products" are considered alternatives and competitors to Nomad Foods, including Conagra Brands (CAG), Campbell Soup (CPB), Beyond Meat (BYND), Flowers Foods (FLO), The Hain Celestial Group (HAIN), and The Simply Good Foods (SMPL).

Nomad Foods vs. Conagra Brands Stock

Conagra Brands (NYSE:CAG) and Nomad Foods (NYSE:NOMD) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, risk and analyst recommendations.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Conagra Brands and Nomad Foods' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Conagra Brands	$11.05 billion	1.53	$840.10 million	$2.28	15.21
Nomad Foods	$2.60 billion	1.63	$172.48 million	$1.38	17.90

Conagra Brands has higher revenue and earnings than Nomad Foods. Conagra Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nomad Foods, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Conagra Brands and Nomad Foods' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Conagra Brands	9.67%	16.50%	6.01%
Nomad Foods	8.56%	10.37%	4.38%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and target prices for Conagra Brands and Nomad Foods, as provided by MarketBeat.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Conagra Brands	1	6	1	1	2.22
Nomad Foods	0	1	8	0	2.89

Conagra Brands currently has a consensus target price of $35.4444, indicating a potential upside of 2.23%. Nomad Foods has a consensus target price of $27.6250, indicating a potential upside of 11.84%. Given Nomad Foods' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Nomad Foods is more favorable than Conagra Brands.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

82.1% of Conagra Brands shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 67.8% of Nomad Foods shares are held by institutional investors. 2.6% of Conagra Brands shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility and Risk

Conagra Brands has a beta of 0.86, suggesting that its share price is 14% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Nomad Foods has a beta of 0.71, suggesting that its share price is 29% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Conagra Brands beats Nomad Foods on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Nomad Foods vs. Campbell Soup Stock

Campbell Soup (NYSE:CPB) and Nomad Foods (NYSE:NOMD) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability and valuation.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Campbell Soup and Nomad Foods' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Campbell Soup	$8.69 billion	1.60	$1.63 billion	$2.95	15.53
Nomad Foods	$2.60 billion	1.63	$172.48 million	$1.38	17.90

Campbell Soup has higher revenue and earnings than Nomad Foods. Campbell Soup is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nomad Foods, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Campbell Soup and Nomad Foods' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Campbell Soup	20.02%	37.44%	7.94%
Nomad Foods	8.56%	10.37%	4.38%

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and price targets for Campbell Soup and Nomad Foods, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Campbell Soup	4	9	3	0	1.94
Nomad Foods	0	1	8	0	2.89

Campbell Soup presently has a consensus target price of $50.9333, suggesting a potential upside of 11.21%. Nomad Foods has a consensus target price of $27.6250, suggesting a potential upside of 11.84%. Given Nomad Foods' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Nomad Foods is more favorable than Campbell Soup.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

51.5% of Campbell Soup shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 67.8% of Nomad Foods shares are held by institutional investors. 35.6% of Campbell Soup shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility and Risk

Campbell Soup has a beta of 0.51, suggesting that its stock price is 49% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Nomad Foods has a beta of 0.71, suggesting that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Nomad Foods vs. Beyond Meat Stock

Beyond Meat (NASDAQ:BYND) and Nomad Foods (NYSE:NOMD) are both mid-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability and valuation.

Volatility and Risk

Beyond Meat has a beta of 1.96, suggesting that its stock price is 96% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Nomad Foods has a beta of 0.71, suggesting that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Beyond Meat and Nomad Foods' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Beyond Meat	-6.97%	-4.49%	-3.56%
Nomad Foods	8.56%	10.37%	4.38%

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and price targets for Beyond Meat and Nomad Foods, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Beyond Meat	8	8	2	0	1.67
Nomad Foods	0	1	8	0	2.89

Beyond Meat presently has a consensus target price of $117.2353, suggesting a potential downside of 14.06%. Nomad Foods has a consensus target price of $27.6250, suggesting a potential upside of 11.84%. Given Nomad Foods' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Nomad Foods is more favorable than Beyond Meat.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Beyond Meat and Nomad Foods' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Beyond Meat	$297.90 million	28.82	$-12,440,000.00	($0.04)	-3,410.50
Nomad Foods	$2.60 billion	1.63	$172.48 million	$1.38	17.90

Nomad Foods has higher revenue and earnings than Beyond Meat. Beyond Meat is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nomad Foods, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

42.1% of Beyond Meat shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 67.8% of Nomad Foods shares are held by institutional investors. 11.0% of Beyond Meat shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Nomad Foods beats Beyond Meat on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Nomad Foods vs. Flowers Foods Stock

Nomad Foods (NYSE:NOMD) and Flowers Foods (NYSE:FLO) are both mid-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership and dividends.

Risk and Volatility

Nomad Foods has a beta of 0.71, meaning that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Flowers Foods has a beta of 0.34, meaning that its stock price is 66% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Nomad Foods and Flowers Foods' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Nomad Foods	8.56%	10.37%	4.38%
Flowers Foods	2.30%	19.41%	7.65%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for Nomad Foods and Flowers Foods, as reported by MarketBeat.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Nomad Foods	0	1	8	0	2.89
Flowers Foods	0	4	0	0	2.00

Nomad Foods presently has a consensus price target of $27.6250, suggesting a potential upside of 11.84%. Flowers Foods has a consensus price target of $24.00, suggesting a potential upside of 7.14%. Given Nomad Foods' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Nomad Foods is more favorable than Flowers Foods.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Nomad Foods and Flowers Foods' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Nomad Foods	$2.60 billion	1.63	$172.48 million	$1.38	17.90
Flowers Foods	$4.12 billion	1.15	$164.54 million	$0.96	23.33

Nomad Foods has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Flowers Foods. Nomad Foods is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Flowers Foods, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

67.8% of Nomad Foods shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 64.5% of Flowers Foods shares are held by institutional investors. 8.2% of Flowers Foods shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Nomad Foods beats Flowers Foods on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Nomad Foods vs. The Hain Celestial Group Stock

Nomad Foods (NYSE:NOMD) and The Hain Celestial Group (NASDAQ:HAIN) are both mid-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership and dividends.

Risk and Volatility

Nomad Foods has a beta of 0.71, meaning that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, The Hain Celestial Group has a beta of 0.89, meaning that its stock price is 11% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Nomad Foods and The Hain Celestial Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Nomad Foods	8.56%	10.37%	4.38%
The Hain Celestial Group	1.31%	7.27%	4.77%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for Nomad Foods and The Hain Celestial Group, as reported by MarketBeat.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Nomad Foods	0	1	8	0	2.89
The Hain Celestial Group	0	4	8	0	2.67

Nomad Foods presently has a consensus price target of $27.6250, suggesting a potential upside of 11.84%. The Hain Celestial Group has a consensus price target of $39.00, suggesting a potential downside of 7.01%. Given Nomad Foods' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Nomad Foods is more favorable than The Hain Celestial Group.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Nomad Foods and The Hain Celestial Group's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Nomad Foods	$2.60 billion	1.63	$172.48 million	$1.38	17.90
The Hain Celestial Group	$2.05 billion	2.04	$-80,410,000.00	$0.84	49.93

Nomad Foods has higher revenue and earnings than The Hain Celestial Group. Nomad Foods is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than The Hain Celestial Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

67.8% of Nomad Foods shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.3% of The Hain Celestial Group shares are held by institutional investors. 16.2% of The Hain Celestial Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Nomad Foods beats The Hain Celestial Group on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Nomad Foods vs. The Simply Good Foods Stock

Nomad Foods (NYSE:NOMD) and The Simply Good Foods (NASDAQ:SMPL) are both mid-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership and dividends.

Risk and Volatility

Nomad Foods has a beta of 0.71, meaning that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, The Simply Good Foods has a beta of 0.98, meaning that its stock price is 2% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Nomad Foods and The Simply Good Foods' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Nomad Foods	8.56%	10.37%	4.38%
The Simply Good Foods	6.92%	7.36%	4.47%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for Nomad Foods and The Simply Good Foods, as reported by MarketBeat.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Nomad Foods	0	1	8	0	2.89
The Simply Good Foods	0	3	7	1	2.82

Nomad Foods presently has a consensus price target of $27.6250, suggesting a potential upside of 11.84%. The Simply Good Foods has a consensus price target of $31.5833, suggesting a potential upside of 9.13%. Given Nomad Foods' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Nomad Foods is more favorable than The Simply Good Foods.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Nomad Foods and The Simply Good Foods' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Nomad Foods	$2.60 billion	1.63	$172.48 million	$1.38	17.90
The Simply Good Foods	$816.64 million	3.39	$34.70 million	$0.91	31.80

Nomad Foods has higher revenue and earnings than The Simply Good Foods. Nomad Foods is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than The Simply Good Foods, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

67.8% of Nomad Foods shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.9% of The Simply Good Foods shares are held by institutional investors. 4.0% of The Simply Good Foods shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Nomad Foods beats The Simply Good Foods on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.