Utz Brands Competitors

Natura &Co (NYSE:NTCO) and Utz Brands (NYSE:UTZ) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Natura &Co and Utz Brands, as reported by MarketBeat.

Utz Brands has a consensus price target of $25.95, suggesting a potential downside of 3.21%. Given Utz Brands' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Utz Brands is more favorable than Natura &Co.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

4.8% of Natura &Co shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 34.6% of Utz Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Natura &Co and Utz Brands' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Natura &Co and Utz Brands' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Natura &Co has higher revenue and earnings than Utz Brands.

Utz Brands (NYSE:UTZ) and Lamb Weston (NYSE:LW) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends and valuation.

Dividends

Utz Brands pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Lamb Weston pays an annual dividend of $0.94 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Lamb Weston pays out 37.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Utz Brands has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Lamb Weston has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for Utz Brands and Lamb Weston, as provided by MarketBeat.

Utz Brands currently has a consensus target price of $25.95, suggesting a potential downside of 3.21%. Lamb Weston has a consensus target price of $82.50, suggesting a potential upside of 2.86%. Given Lamb Weston's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Lamb Weston is more favorable than Utz Brands.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

34.6% of Utz Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.4% of Lamb Weston shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of Lamb Weston shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk & Volatility

Utz Brands has a beta of 0.62, suggesting that its stock price is 38% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Lamb Weston has a beta of 0.78, suggesting that its stock price is 22% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Utz Brands and Lamb Weston's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Utz Brands and Lamb Weston's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Lamb Weston has higher revenue and earnings than Utz Brands.

Summary

Lamb Weston beats Utz Brands on 11 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Utz Brands (NYSE:UTZ) and Molson Coors Beverage (NYSE:TAP) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends and valuation.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for Utz Brands and Molson Coors Beverage, as provided by MarketBeat.

Utz Brands currently has a consensus target price of $25.95, suggesting a potential downside of 3.21%. Molson Coors Beverage has a consensus target price of $49.75, suggesting a potential downside of 6.06%. Given Utz Brands' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Utz Brands is more favorable than Molson Coors Beverage.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

34.6% of Utz Brands shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 40.0% of Molson Coors Beverage shares are held by institutional investors. 2.4% of Molson Coors Beverage shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk & Volatility

Utz Brands has a beta of 0.62, suggesting that its stock price is 38% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Molson Coors Beverage has a beta of 1.14, suggesting that its stock price is 14% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Utz Brands and Molson Coors Beverage's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Utz Brands and Molson Coors Beverage's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Molson Coors Beverage has higher revenue and earnings than Utz Brands.

Summary

Molson Coors Beverage beats Utz Brands on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Utz Brands (NYSE:UTZ) and Newell Brands (NASDAQ:NWL) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends and valuation.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Utz Brands and Newell Brands' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Newell Brands has higher revenue and earnings than Utz Brands.

Profitability

This table compares Utz Brands and Newell Brands' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

34.6% of Utz Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.5% of Newell Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Newell Brands shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Dividends

Utz Brands pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Newell Brands pays an annual dividend of $0.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Newell Brands pays out 54.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Utz Brands has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Newell Brands has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Risk & Volatility

Utz Brands has a beta of 0.62, suggesting that its stock price is 38% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Newell Brands has a beta of 1.06, suggesting that its stock price is 6% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for Utz Brands and Newell Brands, as provided by MarketBeat.

Utz Brands currently has a consensus target price of $25.95, suggesting a potential downside of 3.21%. Newell Brands has a consensus target price of $22.60, suggesting a potential downside of 15.99%. Given Utz Brands' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Utz Brands is more favorable than Newell Brands.

Summary

Newell Brands beats Utz Brands on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Utz Brands (NYSE:UTZ) and Darling Ingredients (NYSE:DAR) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations and earnings.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Utz Brands and Darling Ingredients' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Darling Ingredients has higher revenue and earnings than Utz Brands.

Profitability

This table compares Utz Brands and Darling Ingredients' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

34.6% of Utz Brands shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.7% of Darling Ingredients shares are held by institutional investors. 3.0% of Darling Ingredients shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility & Risk

Utz Brands has a beta of 0.62, suggesting that its share price is 38% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Darling Ingredients has a beta of 1.33, suggesting that its share price is 33% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for Utz Brands and Darling Ingredients, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Utz Brands currently has a consensus target price of $25.95, indicating a potential downside of 3.21%. Darling Ingredients has a consensus target price of $68.90, indicating a potential downside of 1.66%. Given Darling Ingredients' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Darling Ingredients is more favorable than Utz Brands.

Summary

Darling Ingredients beats Utz Brands on 11 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Utz Brands (NYSE:UTZ) and Coca-Cola FEMSA (NYSE:KOF) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations and earnings.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Utz Brands and Coca-Cola FEMSA's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Coca-Cola FEMSA has higher revenue and earnings than Utz Brands.

Profitability

This table compares Utz Brands and Coca-Cola FEMSA's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

34.6% of Utz Brands shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.4% of Coca-Cola FEMSA shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Coca-Cola FEMSA shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Dividends

Utz Brands pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Coca-Cola FEMSA pays an annual dividend of $2.31 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.8%. Coca-Cola FEMSA pays out 77.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Utz Brands has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Volatility & Risk

Utz Brands has a beta of 0.62, indicating that its share price is 38% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Coca-Cola FEMSA has a beta of 0.81, indicating that its share price is 19% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for Utz Brands and Coca-Cola FEMSA, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Utz Brands currently has a consensus target price of $25.95, indicating a potential downside of 3.21%. Coca-Cola FEMSA has a consensus target price of $50.00, indicating a potential upside of 4.01%. Given Coca-Cola FEMSA's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Coca-Cola FEMSA is more favorable than Utz Brands.

Summary

Coca-Cola FEMSA beats Utz Brands on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.