Go Pro

Vital Farms (VITL) Competitors

Vital Farms logo
$10.98 -0.21 (-1.84%)
As of 02:51 PM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.

VITL vs. UTZ, NOMD, BRBR, OFRM, and MAMA

Should you buy Vital Farms stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Vital Farms with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Vital Farms include Utz Brands (UTZ), Nomad Foods (NOMD), BellRing Brands (BRBR), Once Upon A Farm (OFRM), and Mama's Creations (MAMA). These companies are all part of the "food products" industry.

How does Vital Farms compare to Utz Brands?

Vital Farms (NASDAQ:VITL) and Utz Brands (NYSE:UTZ) are both small-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, institutional ownership and valuation.

Vital Farms has a beta of 1.1, indicating that its share price is 10% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Utz Brands has a beta of 0.83, indicating that its share price is 17% less volatile than the broader market.

Vital Farms has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Utz Brands. Utz Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vital Farms, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Vital Farms$759.44M0.62$66.28M$1.0410.56
Utz Brands$1.44B0.78$800K-$0.10N/A

98.6% of Vital Farms shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.0% of Utz Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.9% of Vital Farms shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 12.7% of Utz Brands shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Utz Brands had 1 more articles in the media than Vital Farms. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Utz Brands and 3 mentions for Vital Farms. Vital Farms' average media sentiment score of 1.46 beat Utz Brands' score of 0.50 indicating that Vital Farms is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Vital Farms
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Utz Brands
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Vital Farms has a net margin of 6.10% compared to Utz Brands' net margin of -0.58%. Vital Farms' return on equity of 14.47% beat Utz Brands' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Vital Farms6.10% 14.47% 9.95%
Utz Brands -0.58%8.61%4.17%

Vital Farms currently has a consensus price target of $27.33, indicating a potential upside of 148.85%. Utz Brands has a consensus price target of $12.06, indicating a potential upside of 55.44%. Given Vital Farms' higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Vital Farms is more favorable than Utz Brands.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Vital Farms
2 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.20
Utz Brands
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.38

Summary

Vital Farms beats Utz Brands on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Vital Farms compare to Nomad Foods?

Nomad Foods (NYSE:NOMD) and Vital Farms (NASDAQ:VITL) are both small-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, dividends, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability and earnings.

Nomad Foods presently has a consensus price target of $12.50, suggesting a potential upside of 11.36%. Vital Farms has a consensus price target of $27.33, suggesting a potential upside of 148.85%. Given Vital Farms' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Vital Farms is more favorable than Nomad Foods.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Nomad Foods
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Vital Farms
2 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.20

Nomad Foods has a beta of 0.7, meaning that its stock price is 30% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Vital Farms has a beta of 1.1, meaning that its stock price is 10% more volatile than the broader market.

75.3% of Nomad Foods shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.6% of Vital Farms shares are held by institutional investors. 17.3% of Nomad Foods shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.9% of Vital Farms shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Vital Farms had 1 more articles in the media than Nomad Foods. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Vital Farms and 2 mentions for Nomad Foods. Vital Farms' average media sentiment score of 1.46 beat Nomad Foods' score of 0.35 indicating that Vital Farms is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Nomad Foods
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Vital Farms
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Nomad Foods has higher revenue and earnings than Vital Farms. Vital Farms is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nomad Foods, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Nomad Foods$2.99B0.53$154.66M$1.0310.90
Vital Farms$759.44M0.62$66.28M$1.0410.56

Vital Farms has a net margin of 6.10% compared to Nomad Foods' net margin of 4.43%. Vital Farms' return on equity of 14.47% beat Nomad Foods' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Nomad Foods4.43% 9.05% 3.61%
Vital Farms 6.10%14.47%9.95%

Summary

Vital Farms beats Nomad Foods on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Vital Farms compare to BellRing Brands?

BellRing Brands (NYSE:BRBR) and Vital Farms (NASDAQ:VITL) are both small-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations and valuation.

BellRing Brands has a net margin of 6.78% compared to Vital Farms' net margin of 6.10%. Vital Farms' return on equity of 14.47% beat BellRing Brands' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
BellRing Brands6.78% -44.06% 19.42%
Vital Farms 6.10%14.47%9.95%

BellRing Brands currently has a consensus target price of $22.47, indicating a potential upside of 81.98%. Vital Farms has a consensus target price of $27.33, indicating a potential upside of 148.85%. Given Vital Farms' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Vital Farms is more favorable than BellRing Brands.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
BellRing Brands
2 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.37
Vital Farms
2 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.20

95.0% of BellRing Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.6% of Vital Farms shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.5% of BellRing Brands shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.9% of Vital Farms shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

BellRing Brands has higher revenue and earnings than Vital Farms. BellRing Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vital Farms, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
BellRing Brands$2.32B0.62$216.20M$1.299.57
Vital Farms$759.44M0.62$66.28M$1.0410.56

In the previous week, BellRing Brands and BellRing Brands both had 3 articles in the media. Vital Farms' average media sentiment score of 1.46 beat BellRing Brands' score of 0.55 indicating that Vital Farms is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
BellRing Brands
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Vital Farms
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

BellRing Brands has a beta of 0.56, suggesting that its share price is 44% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Vital Farms has a beta of 1.1, suggesting that its share price is 10% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Vital Farms beats BellRing Brands on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Vital Farms compare to Once Upon A Farm?

Once Upon A Farm (NYSE:OFRM) and Vital Farms (NASDAQ:VITL) are both small-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, media sentiment, risk, earnings and valuation.

In the previous week, Vital Farms had 2 more articles in the media than Once Upon A Farm. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Vital Farms and 1 mentions for Once Upon A Farm. Vital Farms' average media sentiment score of 1.46 beat Once Upon A Farm's score of 0.00 indicating that Vital Farms is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Once Upon A Farm
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Vital Farms
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Once Upon A Farm presently has a consensus price target of $26.13, indicating a potential upside of 24.35%. Vital Farms has a consensus price target of $27.33, indicating a potential upside of 148.85%. Given Vital Farms' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Vital Farms is more favorable than Once Upon A Farm.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Once Upon A Farm
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.36
Vital Farms
2 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.20

Vital Farms has higher revenue and earnings than Once Upon A Farm. Once Upon A Farm is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vital Farms, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Once Upon A Farm$262.80M3.35-$10.06M-$0.24N/A
Vital Farms$759.44M0.62$66.28M$1.0410.56

Vital Farms has a net margin of 6.10% compared to Once Upon A Farm's net margin of 0.00%. Vital Farms' return on equity of 14.47% beat Once Upon A Farm's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Once Upon A FarmN/A N/A N/A
Vital Farms 6.10%14.47%9.95%

98.6% of Vital Farms shares are held by institutional investors. 3.9% of Vital Farms shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Vital Farms beats Once Upon A Farm on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Vital Farms compare to Mama's Creations?

Mama's Creations (NASDAQ:MAMA) and Vital Farms (NASDAQ:VITL) are both small-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends, risk, institutional ownership and valuation.

Mama's Creations has a beta of 0.6, suggesting that its stock price is 40% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Vital Farms has a beta of 1.1, suggesting that its stock price is 10% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Mama's Creations and Mama's Creations both had 3 articles in the media. Vital Farms' average media sentiment score of 1.46 beat Mama's Creations' score of 1.09 indicating that Vital Farms is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Mama's Creations
0 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Vital Farms
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

45.2% of Mama's Creations shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.6% of Vital Farms shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Mama's Creations shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.9% of Vital Farms shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Mama's Creations currently has a consensus target price of $18.80, suggesting a potential downside of 9.10%. Vital Farms has a consensus target price of $27.33, suggesting a potential upside of 148.85%. Given Vital Farms' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Vital Farms is more favorable than Mama's Creations.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Mama's Creations
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
Vital Farms
2 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.20

Vital Farms has higher revenue and earnings than Mama's Creations. Vital Farms is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Mama's Creations, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Mama's Creations$171.71M4.90$5.29M$0.14147.72
Vital Farms$759.44M0.62$66.28M$1.0410.56

Vital Farms has a net margin of 6.10% compared to Mama's Creations' net margin of 3.21%. Mama's Creations' return on equity of 14.69% beat Vital Farms' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Mama's Creations3.21% 14.69% 8.91%
Vital Farms 6.10%14.47%9.95%

Summary

Vital Farms beats Mama's Creations on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Vital Farms News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for VITL and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding VITL and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

VITL vs. The Competition

MetricVital FarmsFOOD IndustryStaples SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$469.29M$7.80B$16.40B$12.42B
Dividend YieldN/A4.01%3.37%6.11%
P/E Ratio10.5316.7226.8324.32
Price / Sales0.621.2747.11102.14
Price / Cash6.2910.0713.3536.93
Price / Book1.402.895.546.47
Net Income$66.28M$241.67M$678.29M$336.72M
7 Day Performance8.97%3.35%2.17%0.67%
1 Month Performance9.73%1.25%5.59%-0.58%
1 Year Performance-71.71%-11.82%-11.62%30.43%

Vital Farms Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
VITL
Vital Farms
4.5748 of 5 stars
$10.98
-1.8%
$27.33
+148.8%
-71.2%$469.29M$759.44M10.53290
UTZ
Utz Brands
3.8044 of 5 stars
$6.84
-3.0%
$12.06
+76.4%
-38.1%$1.01B$1.44BN/A3,300
NOMD
Nomad Foods
4.8843 of 5 stars
$9.90
-1.2%
$12.50
+26.2%
-34.7%$1.40B$3.43B9.617,752
BRBR
BellRing Brands
4.2631 of 5 stars
$10.24
+8.2%
$22.47
+119.5%
-80.3%$1.10B$2.32B7.94380
OFRM
Once Upon A Farm
1.517 of 5 stars
$19.54
+0.8%
$26.13
+33.7%
N/A$818.72M$262.80MN/A144

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:VITL) was last updated on 6/29/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners