Is VITL or UTZ more profitable?

Vital Farms has a net margin of 0.02% compared to Utz Brands' net margin of -2.00%. Utz Brands' return on equity of 8.97% beat Vital Farms' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Vital Farms 0.02% 3.46% 2.25% Utz Brands -2.00% 8.97% 4.32%

Does the media prefer VITL or UTZ?

In the previous week, Utz Brands had 8 more articles in the media than Vital Farms. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Utz Brands and 3 mentions for Vital Farms. Vital Farms' average media sentiment score of 1.16 beat Utz Brands' score of 0.68 indicating that Vital Farms is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Vital Farms 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Utz Brands 3 Very Positive mention(s) 4 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, NOMD or VITL?

Nomad Foods has higher revenue and earnings than Vital Farms. Vital Farms is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nomad Foods, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Nomad Foods $3.43B 0.45 $154.66M $1.02 10.75 Vital Farms $759.44M 0.55 $66.28M -$0.04 N/A

Is NOMD or VITL more profitable?

Nomad Foods has a net margin of 4.20% compared to Vital Farms' net margin of 0.02%. Nomad Foods' return on equity of 8.88% beat Vital Farms' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Nomad Foods 4.20% 8.88% 3.53% Vital Farms 0.02% 3.46% 2.25%

Does the media refer more to NOMD or VITL?

In the previous week, Vital Farms had 2 more articles in the media than Nomad Foods. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Vital Farms and 1 mentions for Nomad Foods. Vital Farms' average media sentiment score of 1.16 beat Nomad Foods' score of 0.00 indicating that Vital Farms is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Nomad Foods 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Vital Farms 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Is JJSF or VITL more profitable?

J & J Snack Foods has a net margin of 3.23% compared to Vital Farms' net margin of 0.02%. J & J Snack Foods' return on equity of 8.93% beat Vital Farms' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets J & J Snack Foods 3.23% 8.93% 6.07% Vital Farms 0.02% 3.46% 2.25%

Does the media refer more to JJSF or VITL?

In the previous week, Vital Farms had 1 more articles in the media than J & J Snack Foods. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Vital Farms and 2 mentions for J & J Snack Foods. J & J Snack Foods' average media sentiment score of 1.22 beat Vital Farms' score of 1.16 indicating that J & J Snack Foods is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment J & J Snack Foods 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Vital Farms 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, FLO or VITL?

Flowers Foods has higher revenue and earnings than Vital Farms. Vital Farms is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Flowers Foods, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Flowers Foods $5.26B 0.25 $83.82M $0.26 23.44 Vital Farms $759.44M 0.55 $66.28M -$0.04 N/A

Is FLO or VITL more profitable?

Flowers Foods has a net margin of 1.06% compared to Vital Farms' net margin of 0.02%. Flowers Foods' return on equity of 14.91% beat Vital Farms' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Flowers Foods 1.06% 14.91% 4.72% Vital Farms 0.02% 3.46% 2.25%

Does the media favor FLO or VITL?

In the previous week, Flowers Foods had 11 more articles in the media than Vital Farms. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Flowers Foods and 3 mentions for Vital Farms. Vital Farms' average media sentiment score of 1.16 beat Flowers Foods' score of -0.51 indicating that Vital Farms is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Flowers Foods 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Negative Vital Farms 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts prefer SENEA or VITL?

Vital Farms has a consensus price target of $17.18, indicating a potential upside of 76.40%. Given Vital Farms' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Vital Farms is more favorable than Seneca Foods. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Seneca Foods 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.50 Vital Farms 1 Sell rating(s) 8 Hold rating(s) 5 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.29

Which has better valuation & earnings, SENEA or VITL?

Seneca Foods has higher revenue and earnings than Vital Farms. Vital Farms is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Seneca Foods, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Seneca Foods $1.66B 0.78 $114.67M $17.31 11.01 Vital Farms $759.44M 0.55 $66.28M -$0.04 N/A

Is SENEA or VITL more profitable?

Seneca Foods has a net margin of 6.75% compared to Vital Farms' net margin of 0.02%. Seneca Foods' return on equity of 14.96% beat Vital Farms' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Seneca Foods 6.75% 14.96% 8.56% Vital Farms 0.02% 3.46% 2.25%

Does the media favor SENEA or VITL?

In the previous week, Seneca Foods had 2 more articles in the media than Vital Farms. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Seneca Foods and 3 mentions for Vital Farms. Vital Farms' average media sentiment score of 1.16 beat Seneca Foods' score of 1.08 indicating that Vital Farms is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Seneca Foods 3 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Vital Farms 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Vital Farms (VITL) Competitors

$9.74 0.00 (0.00%)

Closing price 09/11/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$9.68 -0.06 (-0.62%)

As of 09/11/2026 07:47 PM Eastern

Compare

VITL vs. UTZ, NOMD, JJSF, FLO, and SENEA

Should you buy Vital Farms stock or one of its competitors? Vital Farms's main competitors and comparable companies include Utz Brands (UTZ), Nomad Foods (NOMD), J & J Snack Foods (JJSF), Flowers Foods (FLO), and Seneca Foods (SENEA). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "packaged foods & meats" industry.

How does Vital Farms compare to Utz Brands?

Vital Farms (NASDAQ:VITL) and Utz Brands (NYSE:UTZ) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation and earnings.

Vital Farms has a net margin of 0.02% compared to Utz Brands' net margin of -2.00%. Utz Brands' return on equity of 8.97% beat Vital Farms' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Vital Farms	0.02%	3.46%	2.25%
Utz Brands	-2.00%	8.97%	4.32%

98.6% of Vital Farms shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.0% of Utz Brands shares are held by institutional investors. 3.9% of Vital Farms shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 12.7% of Utz Brands shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Vital Farms presently has a consensus price target of $17.18, indicating a potential upside of 76.40%. Utz Brands has a consensus price target of $13.39, indicating a potential downside of 6.16%. Given Vital Farms' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Vital Farms is more favorable than Utz Brands.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Vital Farms	1 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.29
Utz Brands	1 Sell rating(s)	9 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

In the previous week, Utz Brands had 8 more articles in the media than Vital Farms. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Utz Brands and 3 mentions for Vital Farms. Vital Farms' average media sentiment score of 1.16 beat Utz Brands' score of 0.68 indicating that Vital Farms is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Vital Farms	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Utz Brands	3 Very Positive mention(s)	4 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Vital Farms has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Utz Brands. Vital Farms is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Utz Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Vital Farms	$759.44M	0.55	$66.28M	-$0.04	N/A
Utz Brands	$1.44B	1.43	$800K	-$0.33	N/A

Vital Farms has a beta of 1.05, indicating that its share price is 5% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Utz Brands has a beta of 0.76, indicating that its share price is 24% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Vital Farms beats Utz Brands on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Vital Farms compare to Nomad Foods?

Nomad Foods (NYSE:NOMD) and Vital Farms (NASDAQ:VITL) are both small-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, valuation, risk and earnings.

75.3% of Nomad Foods shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.6% of Vital Farms shares are held by institutional investors. 3.9% of Vital Farms shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Vital Farms had 2 more articles in the media than Nomad Foods. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Vital Farms and 1 mentions for Nomad Foods. Vital Farms' average media sentiment score of 1.16 beat Nomad Foods' score of 0.00 indicating that Vital Farms is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Nomad Foods	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Vital Farms	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Nomad Foods has higher revenue and earnings than Vital Farms. Vital Farms is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nomad Foods, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Nomad Foods	$3.43B	0.45	$154.66M	$1.02	10.75
Vital Farms	$759.44M	0.55	$66.28M	-$0.04	N/A

Nomad Foods has a net margin of 4.20% compared to Vital Farms' net margin of 0.02%. Nomad Foods' return on equity of 8.88% beat Vital Farms' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Nomad Foods	4.20%	8.88%	3.53%
Vital Farms	0.02%	3.46%	2.25%

Nomad Foods currently has a consensus price target of $13.25, suggesting a potential upside of 20.79%. Vital Farms has a consensus price target of $17.18, suggesting a potential upside of 76.40%. Given Vital Farms' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Vital Farms is more favorable than Nomad Foods.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Nomad Foods	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33
Vital Farms	1 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.29

Nomad Foods has a beta of 0.69, meaning that its share price is 31% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Vital Farms has a beta of 1.05, meaning that its share price is 5% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Nomad Foods and Vital Farms tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Vital Farms compare to J & J Snack Foods?

J & J Snack Foods (NASDAQ:JJSF) and Vital Farms (NASDAQ:VITL) are both small-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, media sentiment, earnings and valuation.

Vital Farms has lower revenue, but higher earnings than J & J Snack Foods. Vital Farms is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than J & J Snack Foods, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
J & J Snack Foods	$1.58B	0.99	$65.60M	$2.60	32.03
Vital Farms	$759.44M	0.55	$66.28M	-$0.04	N/A

J & J Snack Foods has a net margin of 3.23% compared to Vital Farms' net margin of 0.02%. J & J Snack Foods' return on equity of 8.93% beat Vital Farms' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
J & J Snack Foods	3.23%	8.93%	6.07%
Vital Farms	0.02%	3.46%	2.25%

76.0% of J & J Snack Foods shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.6% of Vital Farms shares are owned by institutional investors. 20.4% of J & J Snack Foods shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.9% of Vital Farms shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

J & J Snack Foods presently has a consensus target price of $110.50, indicating a potential upside of 32.67%. Vital Farms has a consensus target price of $17.18, indicating a potential upside of 76.40%. Given Vital Farms' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Vital Farms is more favorable than J & J Snack Foods.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
J & J Snack Foods	2 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Vital Farms	1 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.29

In the previous week, Vital Farms had 1 more articles in the media than J & J Snack Foods. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Vital Farms and 2 mentions for J & J Snack Foods. J & J Snack Foods' average media sentiment score of 1.22 beat Vital Farms' score of 1.16 indicating that J & J Snack Foods is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
J & J Snack Foods	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Vital Farms	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

J & J Snack Foods has a beta of 0.4, meaning that its stock price is 60% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Vital Farms has a beta of 1.05, meaning that its stock price is 5% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

J & J Snack Foods beats Vital Farms on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Vital Farms compare to Flowers Foods?

Flowers Foods (NYSE:FLO) and Vital Farms (NASDAQ:VITL) are both small-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, dividends, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership and valuation.

Flowers Foods has a beta of 0.39, suggesting that its stock price is 61% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Vital Farms has a beta of 1.05, suggesting that its stock price is 5% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Flowers Foods had 11 more articles in the media than Vital Farms. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Flowers Foods and 3 mentions for Vital Farms. Vital Farms' average media sentiment score of 1.16 beat Flowers Foods' score of -0.51 indicating that Vital Farms is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Flowers Foods	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Negative
Vital Farms	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Flowers Foods presently has a consensus price target of $7.60, indicating a potential upside of 24.69%. Vital Farms has a consensus price target of $17.18, indicating a potential upside of 76.40%. Given Vital Farms' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Vital Farms is more favorable than Flowers Foods.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Flowers Foods	2 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.67
Vital Farms	1 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.29

Flowers Foods has a net margin of 1.06% compared to Vital Farms' net margin of 0.02%. Flowers Foods' return on equity of 14.91% beat Vital Farms' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Flowers Foods	1.06%	14.91%	4.72%
Vital Farms	0.02%	3.46%	2.25%

75.5% of Flowers Foods shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.6% of Vital Farms shares are held by institutional investors. 7.2% of Flowers Foods shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.9% of Vital Farms shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Flowers Foods has higher revenue and earnings than Vital Farms. Vital Farms is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Flowers Foods, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Flowers Foods	$5.26B	0.25	$83.82M	$0.26	23.44
Vital Farms	$759.44M	0.55	$66.28M	-$0.04	N/A

Summary

Flowers Foods beats Vital Farms on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Vital Farms compare to Seneca Foods?

Seneca Foods (NASDAQ:SENEA) and Vital Farms (NASDAQ:VITL) are both small-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment and dividends.

Seneca Foods has a beta of -0.03, suggesting that its stock price is 103% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Vital Farms has a beta of 1.05, suggesting that its stock price is 5% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Seneca Foods had 2 more articles in the media than Vital Farms. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Seneca Foods and 3 mentions for Vital Farms. Vital Farms' average media sentiment score of 1.16 beat Seneca Foods' score of 1.08 indicating that Vital Farms is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Seneca Foods	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Vital Farms	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Vital Farms has a consensus price target of $17.18, indicating a potential upside of 76.40%. Given Vital Farms' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Vital Farms is more favorable than Seneca Foods.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Seneca Foods	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Vital Farms	1 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.29

Seneca Foods has higher revenue and earnings than Vital Farms. Vital Farms is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Seneca Foods, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Seneca Foods	$1.66B	0.78	$114.67M	$17.31	11.01
Vital Farms	$759.44M	0.55	$66.28M	-$0.04	N/A

42.5% of Seneca Foods shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.6% of Vital Farms shares are held by institutional investors. 8.2% of Seneca Foods shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.9% of Vital Farms shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Seneca Foods has a net margin of 6.75% compared to Vital Farms' net margin of 0.02%. Seneca Foods' return on equity of 14.96% beat Vital Farms' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Seneca Foods	6.75%	14.96%	8.56%
Vital Farms	0.02%	3.46%	2.25%

Summary

Seneca Foods beats Vital Farms on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Vital Farms News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding VITL and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

VITL vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Vital Farms	Food Products Industry	Consumer Staples Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$418.14M	$5.58B	$15.63B	$12.84B
Dividend Yield	N/A	3.18%	3.26%	11.71%
P/E Ratio	-243.50	13.70	14.09	25.35
Price / Sales	0.55	83.69	262,948.62	90.72
Price / Cash	5.48	113.08	55.98	34.96
Price / Book	1.24	3.82	4.78	6.21
Net Income	$66.28M	$770.96M	$836.60M	$358.54M
7 Day Performance	-1.81%	-1.09%	-1.40%	-2.35%
1 Month Performance	-10.64%	-1.67%	-2.13%	-3.37%
1 Year Performance	-79.94%	38.19%	10.48%	8.81%

Vital Farms Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
VITL Vital Farms	2.7344 of 5 stars	$9.74 flat	$17.18 +76.4%	-79.9%	$418.14M	$759.44M	N/A	290	Positive News
UTZ Utz Brands	2.1299 of 5 stars	$14.22 +0.1%	$13.39 -5.9%	+10.4%	$2.05B	$1.44B	N/A	3,300	Dividend Announcement
NOMD Nomad Foods	4.9231 of 5 stars	$11.65 +0.1%	$13.25 +13.7%	-22.4%	$1.63B	$3.43B	11.42	7,752
JJSF J & J Snack Foods	4.24 of 5 stars	$84.11 flat	$110.50 +31.4%	-19.8%	$1.58B	$1.58B	32.35	4,600	Positive News
FLO Flowers Foods	3.1925 of 5 stars	$6.30 +0.5%	$7.60 +20.6%	-55.7%	$1.33B	$5.26B	24.23	10,300	Trending News Ex-Dividend Analyst Revision

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:VITL) was last updated on 9/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Vital Farms (VITL) Competitors

VITL vs. UTZ, NOMD, JJSF, FLO, and SENEA

How does Vital Farms compare to Utz Brands?

Summary

How does Vital Farms compare to Nomad Foods?

Summary

How does Vital Farms compare to J & J Snack Foods?

Summary

How does Vital Farms compare to Flowers Foods?

Summary

How does Vital Farms compare to Seneca Foods?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

VITL vs. The Competition

Vital Farms Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Vital Farms (VITL) Competitors

VITL vs. UTZ, NOMD, JJSF, FLO, and SENEA

How does Vital Farms compare to Utz Brands?

Is VITL or UTZ more profitable?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in VITL or UTZ?

Do analysts prefer VITL or UTZ?

Does the media prefer VITL or UTZ?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, VITL or UTZ?

Which has more volatility & risk, VITL or UTZ?

Summary

How does Vital Farms compare to Nomad Foods?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in NOMD or VITL?

Does the media refer more to NOMD or VITL?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, NOMD or VITL?

Is NOMD or VITL more profitable?

Do analysts prefer NOMD or VITL?

Which has more volatility and risk, NOMD or VITL?

Summary

How does Vital Farms compare to J & J Snack Foods?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, JJSF or VITL?

Is JJSF or VITL more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in JJSF or VITL?

Do analysts prefer JJSF or VITL?

Does the media refer more to JJSF or VITL?

Which has more risk & volatility, JJSF or VITL?

Summary

How does Vital Farms compare to Flowers Foods?

Which has more volatility and risk, FLO or VITL?

Does the media favor FLO or VITL?

Do analysts prefer FLO or VITL?

Is FLO or VITL more profitable?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in FLO or VITL?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, FLO or VITL?

Summary

How does Vital Farms compare to Seneca Foods?

Which has more risk & volatility, SENEA or VITL?

Does the media favor SENEA or VITL?

Do analysts prefer SENEA or VITL?

Which has better valuation & earnings, SENEA or VITL?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in SENEA or VITL?

Is SENEA or VITL more profitable?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

VITL vs. The Competition

Vital Farms Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools