Go Pro

Celsius (CELH) Competitors

Celsius logo
$28.11 -1.45 (-4.91%)
As of 03:25 PM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.

CELH vs. MNST, PEP, VITL, COKE, and PRMB

Should you buy Celsius stock or one of its competitors? Celsius's main competitors and comparable companies include Monster Beverage (MNST), PepsiCo (PEP), Vital Farms (VITL), Coca-Cola Consolidated (COKE), and Primo Brands (PRMB). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "consumer staples" sector.

How does Celsius compare to Monster Beverage?

Celsius (NASDAQ:CELH) and Monster Beverage (NASDAQ:MNST) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, profitability, risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings and dividends.

Monster Beverage has higher revenue and earnings than Celsius. Monster Beverage is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Celsius, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Celsius$2.52B2.86$108M$0.24118.27
Monster Beverage$8.29B10.06$1.91B$1.0839.44

Celsius has a beta of 0.93, indicating that its stock price is 7% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Monster Beverage has a beta of 0.52, indicating that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the broader market.

Celsius currently has a consensus price target of $43.38, suggesting a potential upside of 52.81%. Monster Beverage has a consensus price target of $50.33, suggesting a potential upside of 18.16%. Given Celsius' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Celsius is more favorable than Monster Beverage.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Celsius
2 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
15 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.59
Monster Beverage
0 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
13 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.59

61.0% of Celsius shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.4% of Monster Beverage shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.3% of Celsius shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 8.1% of Monster Beverage shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Celsius had 7 more articles in the media than Monster Beverage. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Celsius and 7 mentions for Monster Beverage. Celsius' average media sentiment score of 0.69 beat Monster Beverage's score of 0.32 indicating that Celsius is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Celsius
4 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
7 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Monster Beverage
0 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Monster Beverage has a net margin of 23.08% compared to Celsius' net margin of 4.24%. Celsius' return on equity of 36.52% beat Monster Beverage's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Celsius4.24% 36.52% 8.53%
Monster Beverage 23.08%26.02%21.21%

Summary

Monster Beverage beats Celsius on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Celsius compare to PepsiCo?

PepsiCo (NASDAQ:PEP) and Celsius (NASDAQ:CELH) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment and dividends.

73.1% of PepsiCo shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 61.0% of Celsius shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of PepsiCo shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.3% of Celsius shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

PepsiCo has a net margin of 10.78% compared to Celsius' net margin of 4.24%. PepsiCo's return on equity of 54.63% beat Celsius' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
PepsiCo10.78% 54.63% 10.49%
Celsius 4.24%36.52%8.53%

PepsiCo currently has a consensus target price of $157.90, suggesting a potential upside of 14.97%. Celsius has a consensus target price of $43.38, suggesting a potential upside of 52.81%. Given Celsius' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Celsius is more favorable than PepsiCo.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
PepsiCo
1 Sell rating(s)
12 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.30
Celsius
2 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
15 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.59

PepsiCo has a beta of 0.35, meaning that its stock price is 65% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Celsius has a beta of 0.93, meaning that its stock price is 7% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, PepsiCo had 48 more articles in the media than Celsius. MarketBeat recorded 62 mentions for PepsiCo and 14 mentions for Celsius. PepsiCo's average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat Celsius' score of 0.69 indicating that PepsiCo is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
PepsiCo
39 Very Positive mention(s)
7 Positive mention(s)
8 Neutral mention(s)
4 Negative mention(s)
4 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Celsius
4 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
7 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

PepsiCo has higher revenue and earnings than Celsius. PepsiCo is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Celsius, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
PepsiCo$93.93B2.00$8.24B$7.6318.00
Celsius$2.52B2.86$108M$0.24118.27

Summary

PepsiCo beats Celsius on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Celsius compare to Vital Farms?

Celsius (NASDAQ:CELH) and Vital Farms (NASDAQ:VITL) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, media sentiment, risk and valuation.

Celsius has a net margin of 4.24% compared to Vital Farms' net margin of 0.02%. Celsius' return on equity of 36.52% beat Vital Farms' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Celsius4.24% 36.52% 8.53%
Vital Farms 0.02%3.46%2.25%

Celsius presently has a consensus price target of $43.38, indicating a potential upside of 52.81%. Vital Farms has a consensus price target of $17.18, indicating a potential upside of 74.17%. Given Vital Farms' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Vital Farms is more favorable than Celsius.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Celsius
2 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
15 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.59
Vital Farms
1 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.29

61.0% of Celsius shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.6% of Vital Farms shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.3% of Celsius shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.9% of Vital Farms shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Celsius has higher revenue and earnings than Vital Farms. Vital Farms is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Celsius, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Celsius$2.52B2.86$108M$0.24118.27
Vital Farms$765.67M0.55$66.28M-$0.04N/A

Celsius has a beta of 0.93, meaning that its share price is 7% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Vital Farms has a beta of 1.05, meaning that its share price is 5% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Celsius had 12 more articles in the media than Vital Farms. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Celsius and 2 mentions for Vital Farms. Vital Farms' average media sentiment score of 1.90 beat Celsius' score of 0.69 indicating that Vital Farms is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Celsius
4 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
7 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Vital Farms
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Summary

Celsius beats Vital Farms on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Celsius compare to Coca-Cola Consolidated?

Coca-Cola Consolidated (NASDAQ:COKE) and Celsius (NASDAQ:CELH) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, risk, media sentiment and valuation.

Coca-Cola Consolidated has higher revenue and earnings than Celsius. Coca-Cola Consolidated is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Celsius, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Coca-Cola Consolidated$7.23B1.73$570.58M$7.5424.86
Celsius$2.52B2.86$108M$0.24118.27

Coca-Cola Consolidated has a beta of 0.56, indicating that its stock price is 44% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Celsius has a beta of 0.93, indicating that its stock price is 7% less volatile than the broader market.

48.2% of Coca-Cola Consolidated shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 61.0% of Celsius shares are held by institutional investors. 0.0% of Coca-Cola Consolidated shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.3% of Celsius shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Celsius had 9 more articles in the media than Coca-Cola Consolidated. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Celsius and 5 mentions for Coca-Cola Consolidated. Coca-Cola Consolidated's average media sentiment score of 0.96 beat Celsius' score of 0.69 indicating that Coca-Cola Consolidated is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Coca-Cola Consolidated
4 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Celsius
4 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
7 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Coca-Cola Consolidated has a net margin of 7.15% compared to Celsius' net margin of 4.24%. Celsius' return on equity of 36.52% beat Coca-Cola Consolidated's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Coca-Cola Consolidated7.15% -1,041.59% 13.71%
Celsius 4.24%36.52%8.53%

Celsius has a consensus price target of $43.38, suggesting a potential upside of 52.81%. Given Celsius' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Celsius is more favorable than Coca-Cola Consolidated.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Coca-Cola Consolidated
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Celsius
2 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
15 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.59

Summary

Celsius beats Coca-Cola Consolidated on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Celsius compare to Primo Brands?

Celsius (NASDAQ:CELH) and Primo Brands (NYSE:PRMB) are both mid-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk and media sentiment.

Celsius has a beta of 0.93, suggesting that its share price is 7% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Primo Brands has a beta of 0.73, suggesting that its share price is 27% less volatile than the broader market.

Celsius has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Primo Brands. Primo Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Celsius, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Celsius$2.52B2.86$108M$0.24118.27
Primo Brands$6.66B1.15$60.10M$0.2681.60

61.0% of Celsius shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.7% of Primo Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.3% of Celsius shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 32.9% of Primo Brands shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Celsius has a net margin of 4.24% compared to Primo Brands' net margin of 1.49%. Celsius' return on equity of 36.52% beat Primo Brands' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Celsius4.24% 36.52% 8.53%
Primo Brands 1.49%14.24%4.03%

Celsius presently has a consensus price target of $43.38, indicating a potential upside of 52.81%. Primo Brands has a consensus price target of $28.25, indicating a potential upside of 33.16%. Given Celsius' higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Celsius is more favorable than Primo Brands.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Celsius
2 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
15 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.59
Primo Brands
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.73

In the previous week, Celsius had 10 more articles in the media than Primo Brands. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Celsius and 4 mentions for Primo Brands. Primo Brands' average media sentiment score of 0.74 beat Celsius' score of 0.69 indicating that Primo Brands is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Celsius
4 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
7 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Primo Brands
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Celsius beats Primo Brands on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Celsius News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CELH and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CELH and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CELH vs. The Competition

MetricCelsiusBeverages IndustryConsumer Staples SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$7.18B$22.37B$15.58B$12.79B
Dividend YieldN/A2.67%3.22%9.15%
P/E Ratio118.2716.5713.2225.27
Price / Sales2.8629.55262,948.37108.08
Price / Cash17.8817.6657.2252.39
Price / Book6.203.904.766.34
Net Income$108M$906.50M$835.37M$357.86M
7 Day Performance-9.28%-1.71%-1.22%-0.06%
1 Month Performance2.21%-2.06%-1.30%-0.94%
1 Year Performance-49.35%-7.86%11.11%11.89%

Celsius Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CELH
Celsius
4.1766 of 5 stars
$28.11
-4.9%
$43.38
+54.3%
-46.9%$7.11B$2.52B117.121,497
MNST
Monster Beverage
3.4145 of 5 stars
$44.08
-0.8%
$50.33
+14.2%
+36.9%$87.02B$9.22B40.826,891
PEP
PepsiCo
4.6361 of 5 stars
$140.02
-0.4%
$157.90
+12.8%
-2.3%$191.79B$93.93B18.35306,000
VITL
Vital Farms
3.1353 of 5 stars
$10.10
-0.2%
$17.18
+70.1%
-78.7%$434.47M$759.44MN/A290
COKE
Coca-Cola Consolidated
1.5754 of 5 stars
$197.40
+1.1%
N/A+53.7%$13.00B$7.69B26.1817,000

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:CELH) was last updated on 9/9/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners