S&P 500   3,768.47
DOW   30,924.14
QQQ   304.10
S&P 500   3,768.47
DOW   30,924.14
QQQ   304.10
S&P 500   3,768.47
DOW   30,924.14
QQQ   304.10
S&P 500   3,768.47
DOW   30,924.14
QQQ   304.10
Log in
NASDAQ:CELH

Celsius Competitors

$53.04
-4.72 (-8.17 %)
(As of 03/4/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$51.22
Now: $53.04
$59.77
50-Day Range
$53.40
MA: $61.24
$69.58
52-Week Range
$3.22
Now: $53.04
$70.66
Volume1.32 million shs
Average Volume1.44 million shs
Market Capitalization$3.85 billion
P/E Ratio757.82
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta2.17

Competitors

Celsius (NASDAQ:CELH) Vs. CPB, SJM, SAM, LW, NTCO, and DAR

Should you be buying CELH stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the sector of "consumer staples" are considered alternatives and competitors to Celsius, including Campbell Soup (CPB), The J. M. Smucker (SJM), The Boston Beer (SAM), Lamb Weston (LW), Natura &Co (NTCO), and Darling Ingredients (DAR).

Campbell Soup (NYSE:CPB) and Celsius (NASDAQ:CELH) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk and dividends.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Campbell Soup and Celsius' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Campbell Soup$8.69 billion1.60$1.63 billion$2.9515.53
Celsius$75.15 million51.18$9.97 million($0.02)-2,652.00

Campbell Soup has higher revenue and earnings than Celsius. Celsius is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Campbell Soup, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for Campbell Soup and Celsius, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Campbell Soup49301.94
Celsius02202.50

Campbell Soup presently has a consensus price target of $50.9333, indicating a potential upside of 11.21%. Celsius has a consensus price target of $36.25, indicating a potential downside of 31.66%. Given Campbell Soup's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Campbell Soup is more favorable than Celsius.

Profitability

This table compares Campbell Soup and Celsius' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Campbell Soup20.02%37.44%7.94%
Celsius4.77%8.28%5.96%

Volatility and Risk

Campbell Soup has a beta of 0.51, indicating that its stock price is 49% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Celsius has a beta of 2.17, indicating that its stock price is 117% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

51.5% of Campbell Soup shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 54.0% of Celsius shares are held by institutional investors. 35.6% of Campbell Soup shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 37.6% of Celsius shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Campbell Soup beats Celsius on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Celsius (NASDAQ:CELH) and The J. M. Smucker (NYSE:SJM) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Celsius and The J. M. Smucker's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Celsius$75.15 million51.18$9.97 million($0.02)-2,652.00
The J. M. Smucker$7.80 billion1.63$779.50 million$8.7613.27

The J. M. Smucker has higher revenue and earnings than Celsius. Celsius is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than The J. M. Smucker, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Celsius and The J. M. Smucker, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Celsius02202.50
The J. M. Smucker29001.82

Celsius currently has a consensus target price of $36.25, indicating a potential downside of 31.66%. The J. M. Smucker has a consensus target price of $116.00, indicating a potential downside of 0.19%. Given The J. M. Smucker's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe The J. M. Smucker is more favorable than Celsius.

Profitability

This table compares Celsius and The J. M. Smucker's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Celsius4.77%8.28%5.96%
The J. M. Smucker10.92%13.31%6.55%

Risk and Volatility

Celsius has a beta of 2.17, suggesting that its stock price is 117% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, The J. M. Smucker has a beta of 0.26, suggesting that its stock price is 74% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

54.0% of Celsius shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 81.5% of The J. M. Smucker shares are held by institutional investors. 37.6% of Celsius shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.6% of The J. M. Smucker shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

The J. M. Smucker beats Celsius on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Celsius (NASDAQ:CELH) and The Boston Beer (NYSE:SAM) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Celsius and The Boston Beer's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Celsius$75.15 million51.18$9.97 million($0.02)-2,652.00
The Boston Beer$1.25 billion10.12$110.04 million$9.17112.41

The Boston Beer has higher revenue and earnings than Celsius. Celsius is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than The Boston Beer, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Celsius and The Boston Beer, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Celsius02202.50
The Boston Beer14702.50

Celsius currently has a consensus target price of $36.25, indicating a potential downside of 31.66%. The Boston Beer has a consensus target price of $1,048.50, indicating a potential upside of 1.72%. Given The Boston Beer's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe The Boston Beer is more favorable than Celsius.

Profitability

This table compares Celsius and The Boston Beer's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Celsius4.77%8.28%5.96%
The Boston Beer10.77%20.36%13.84%

Risk and Volatility

Celsius has a beta of 2.17, suggesting that its stock price is 117% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, The Boston Beer has a beta of 0.76, suggesting that its stock price is 24% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

54.0% of Celsius shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 68.8% of The Boston Beer shares are held by institutional investors. 37.6% of Celsius shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 29.1% of The Boston Beer shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

The Boston Beer beats Celsius on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Celsius (NASDAQ:CELH) and Lamb Weston (NYSE:LW) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Celsius and Lamb Weston's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Celsius$75.15 million51.18$9.97 million($0.02)-2,652.00
Lamb Weston$3.79 billion3.19$365.90 million$2.5033.10

Lamb Weston has higher revenue and earnings than Celsius. Celsius is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lamb Weston, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Celsius and Lamb Weston, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Celsius02202.50
Lamb Weston03202.40

Celsius currently has a consensus target price of $36.25, indicating a potential downside of 31.66%. Lamb Weston has a consensus target price of $65.20, indicating a potential downside of 21.22%. Given Lamb Weston's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Lamb Weston is more favorable than Celsius.

Profitability

This table compares Celsius and Lamb Weston's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Celsius4.77%8.28%5.96%
Lamb Weston8.33%95.26%7.20%

Risk and Volatility

Celsius has a beta of 2.17, suggesting that its stock price is 117% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Lamb Weston has a beta of 0.78, suggesting that its stock price is 22% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

54.0% of Celsius shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.4% of Lamb Weston shares are held by institutional investors. 37.6% of Celsius shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Lamb Weston shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Lamb Weston beats Celsius on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Celsius (NASDAQ:CELH) and Natura &Co (NYSE:NTCO) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Celsius and Natura &Co's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Celsius$75.15 million51.18$9.97 million($0.02)-2,652.00
Natura &Co$3.66 billion3.11$39.40 million$0.09184.00

Natura &Co has higher revenue and earnings than Celsius. Celsius is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Natura &Co, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Celsius and Natura &Co, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Celsius02202.50
Natura &Co10001.00

Celsius currently has a consensus target price of $36.25, indicating a potential downside of 31.66%. Given Celsius' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Celsius is more favorable than Natura &Co.

Profitability

This table compares Celsius and Natura &Co's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Celsius4.77%8.28%5.96%
Natura &CoN/AN/AN/A

Institutional and Insider Ownership

54.0% of Celsius shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.8% of Natura &Co shares are held by institutional investors. 37.6% of Celsius shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Celsius beats Natura &Co on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Celsius (NASDAQ:CELH) and Darling Ingredients (NYSE:DAR) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Celsius and Darling Ingredients' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Celsius$75.15 million51.18$9.97 million($0.02)-2,652.00
Darling Ingredients$3.36 billion3.28$312.60 million$1.3450.69

Darling Ingredients has higher revenue and earnings than Celsius. Celsius is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Darling Ingredients, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Celsius and Darling Ingredients, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Celsius02202.50
Darling Ingredients021002.83

Celsius currently has a consensus target price of $36.25, indicating a potential downside of 31.66%. Darling Ingredients has a consensus target price of $64.6364, indicating a potential downside of 4.85%. Given Darling Ingredients' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Darling Ingredients is more favorable than Celsius.

Profitability

This table compares Celsius and Darling Ingredients' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Celsius4.77%8.28%5.96%
Darling Ingredients14.50%15.13%7.62%

Risk and Volatility

Celsius has a beta of 2.17, suggesting that its stock price is 117% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Darling Ingredients has a beta of 1.33, suggesting that its stock price is 33% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

54.0% of Celsius shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.7% of Darling Ingredients shares are held by institutional investors. 37.6% of Celsius shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.0% of Darling Ingredients shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Darling Ingredients beats Celsius on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.


Celsius Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Campbell Soup logo
CPB
Campbell Soup
1.9$45.80-0.0%$13.87 billion$8.69 billion7.87Upcoming Earnings
Dividend Announcement
The J. M. Smucker logo
SJM
The J. M. Smucker
2.1$116.22-1.9%$12.74 billion$7.80 billion15.05Unusual Options Activity
The Boston Beer logo
SAM
The Boston Beer
1.5$1,030.81-0.8%$12.64 billion$1.25 billion73.63
Lamb Weston logo
LW
Lamb Weston
1.9$82.76-0.4%$12.11 billion$3.79 billion40.97
NTCO
Natura &Co
0.1$16.56-0.9%$11.39 billion$3.66 billion184.00Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
Gap Down
Darling Ingredients logo
DAR
Darling Ingredients
1.8$67.93-2.6%$11.02 billion$3.36 billion23.03Earnings Announcement
Analyst Report
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
Aramark logo
ARMK
Aramark
1.4$40.63-0.0%$10.32 billion$12.83 billion-22.20
Newell Brands logo
NWL
Newell Brands
1.4$23.96-1.7%$10.17 billion$9.71 billion-92.15Decrease in Short Interest
Molson Coors Beverage logo
TAP
Molson Coors Beverage
1.3$45.39-1.0%$9.84 billion$13.01 billion16.87Increase in Short Interest
Coca-Cola FEMSA logo
KOF
Coca-Cola FEMSA
1.8$45.43-2.3%$9.54 billion$10.11 billion21.95Analyst Upgrade
High Trading Volume
Decrease in Short Interest
Beyond Meat logo
BYND
Beyond Meat
1.1$136.42-2.3%$8.59 billion$297.90 million-303.16Analyst Upgrade
The New York Times logo
NYT
The New York Times
1.8$50.46-3.3%$8.44 billion$1.81 billion53.12
Albertsons Companies logo
ACI
Albertsons Companies
2.1$17.93-1.2%$8.35 billion$62.46 billion0.00Analyst Downgrade
US Foods logo
USFD
US Foods
1.5$37.37-2.7%$8.26 billion$25.94 billion-59.32
Service Co. International logo
SCI
Service Co. International
1.9$46.19-1.8%$7.83 billion$3.23 billion18.11
Post logo
POST
Post
1.5$100.88-2.2%$6.49 billion$5.70 billion-3,361.55Insider Selling
Freshpet logo
FRPT
Freshpet
1.7$140.07-5.2%$6.04 billion$245.86 million1,273.48Analyst Report
Coty logo
COTY
Coty
1.3$7.82-4.2%$6.00 billion$4.72 billion-6.74Increase in Short Interest
Ingredion logo
INGR
Ingredion
2.1$89.11-1.7%$5.98 billion$6.21 billion17.61
Pilgrim's Pride logo
PPC
Pilgrim's Pride
1.7$23.75-0.9%$5.78 billion$11.41 billion31.25Analyst Upgrade
Helen of Troy logo
HELE
Helen of Troy
1.5$220.52-1.2%$5.38 billion$1.71 billion24.48Analyst Downgrade
Ollie's Bargain Outlet logo
OLLI
Ollie's Bargain Outlet
1.2$82.16-4.3%$5.37 billion$1.41 billion23.75News Coverage
Lancaster Colony logo
LANC
Lancaster Colony
2.0$175.24-0.6%$4.83 billion$1.33 billion36.21
Flowers Foods logo
FLO
Flowers Foods
1.3$22.40-0.9%$4.74 billion$4.12 billion48.70
National Beverage logo
FIZZ
National Beverage
1.3$48.88-1.0%$4.56 billion$1.00 billion14.21Decrease in Short Interest
51job logo
JOBS
51job
1.7$65.67-2.0%$4.43 billion$574.57 million30.98
WD-40 logo
WDFC
WD-40
1.6$311.95-0.4%$4.27 billion$423.35 million70.90
Nomad Foods logo
NOMD
Nomad Foods
1.8$24.70-2.3%$4.25 billion$2.60 billion20.58
The Hain Celestial Group logo
HAIN
The Hain Celestial Group
1.5$41.94-0.1%$4.19 billion$2.05 billion161.31
Leslie's logo
LESL
Leslie's
1.7$20.93-6.4%$3.91 billion$1.11 billion49.83
Sanderson Farms logo
SAFM
Sanderson Farms
1.9$159.87-0.8%$3.57 billion$3.56 billion126.88Analyst Report
Insider Selling
Hillenbrand logo
HI
Hillenbrand
2.2$47.40-2.1%$3.56 billion$2.52 billion-58.52Analyst Revision
Grocery Outlet logo
GO
Grocery Outlet
1.4$35.45-0.5%$3.34 billion$2.56 billion37.32Earnings Announcement
Analyst Report
Unusual Options Activity
Analyst Revision
BRF logo
BRFS
BRF
1.5$4.04-3.7%$3.28 billion$8.13 billion13.03Analyst Upgrade
Decrease in Short Interest
Gap Down
Compañía Cervecerías Unidas logo
CCU
Compañía Cervecerías Unidas
1.4$17.74-2.3%$3.28 billion$2.41 billion26.09
J & J Snack Foods logo
JJSF
J & J Snack Foods
1.6$155.23-2.2%$2.95 billion$1.02 billion163.40News Coverage
Energizer logo
ENR
Energizer
2.8$42.84-1.1%$2.93 billion$2.74 billion-27.11Insider Buying
TreeHouse Foods logo
THS
TreeHouse Foods
1.2$51.62-2.8%$2.89 billion$4.29 billion-516.20
JW.B
John Wiley & Sons
0.6$51.06-4.7%$2.86 billion$1.83 billion-74.00Gap Up
Medifast logo
MED
Medifast
2.3$239.76-6.1%$2.82 billion$713.67 million30.01Analyst Report
Analyst Revision
Utz Brands logo
UTZ
Utz Brands
1.6$23.23-4.7%$2.80 billionN/A0.00
The Simply Good Foods logo
SMPL
The Simply Good Foods
1.8$28.94-0.1%$2.77 billion$816.64 million45.94
Nu Skin Enterprises logo
NUS
Nu Skin Enterprises
2.3$49.68-1.9%$2.53 billion$2.42 billion16.73
Coca-Cola Consolidated logo
COKE
Coca-Cola Consolidated
0.9$257.54-1.0%$2.41 billion$4.83 billion25.32
Inter Parfums logo
IPAR
Inter Parfums
1.4$69.99-3.9%$2.21 billion$713.51 million69.99Earnings Announcement
Dividend Cut
Analyst Report
Decrease in Short Interest
Analyst Revision
Tootsie Roll Industries logo
TR
Tootsie Roll Industries
0.9$32.11-1.3%$2.13 billion$523.62 million36.76Decrease in Short Interest
Vector Group logo
VGR
Vector Group
1.6$13.41-3.8%$2.06 billion$1.90 billion30.48Dividend Announcement
Analyst Upgrade
News Coverage
Industrias Bachoco logo
IBA
Industrias Bachoco
1.4$39.30-2.6%$1.97 billion$3.26 billion14.56Decrease in Short Interest
Hostess Brands logo
TWNK
Hostess Brands
1.4$14.59-0.5%$1.91 billion$907.67 million29.18
B&G Foods logo
BGS
B&G Foods
1.7$28.20-0.0%$1.81 billion$1.66 billion13.96Earnings Announcement
Dividend Announcement
Analyst Report
Decrease in Short Interest
Analyst Revision
This page was last updated on 3/5/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff

Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of analysts' upgrades, downgrades and new coverage with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.