Go Pro

Chefs' Warehouse (CHEF) Competitors

Chefs' Warehouse logo
$110.61 +1.77 (+1.63%)
As of 08/21/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

CHEF vs. VITL, UTZ, PFGC, UNFI, and ANDE

Should you buy Chefs' Warehouse stock or one of its competitors? Chefs' Warehouse's main competitors and comparable companies include Vital Farms (VITL), Utz Brands (UTZ), Performance Food Group (PFGC), United Natural Foods (UNFI), and Andersons (ANDE). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "consumer staples" sector.

How does Chefs' Warehouse compare to Vital Farms?

Chefs' Warehouse (NASDAQ:CHEF) and Vital Farms (NASDAQ:VITL) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, earnings and valuation.

Chefs' Warehouse currently has a consensus price target of $107.43, suggesting a potential downside of 2.88%. Vital Farms has a consensus price target of $17.18, suggesting a potential upside of 62.55%. Given Vital Farms' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Vital Farms is more favorable than Chefs' Warehouse.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Chefs' Warehouse
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.88
Vital Farms
1 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.29

Chefs' Warehouse has a beta of 1.39, meaning that its share price is 39% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Vital Farms has a beta of 1.07, meaning that its share price is 7% more volatile than the broader market.

Chefs' Warehouse has a net margin of 2.09% compared to Vital Farms' net margin of 0.02%. Chefs' Warehouse's return on equity of 16.95% beat Vital Farms' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Chefs' Warehouse2.09% 16.95% 5.19%
Vital Farms 0.02%3.46%2.25%

In the previous week, Chefs' Warehouse had 13 more articles in the media than Vital Farms. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for Chefs' Warehouse and 5 mentions for Vital Farms. Vital Farms' average media sentiment score of 0.95 beat Chefs' Warehouse's score of 0.83 indicating that Vital Farms is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Chefs' Warehouse
12 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Vital Farms
4 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Chefs' Warehouse has higher revenue and earnings than Vital Farms. Vital Farms is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chefs' Warehouse, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Chefs' Warehouse$4.15B1.09$72.36M$2.1052.67
Vital Farms$759.44M0.60$66.28M-$0.04N/A

91.6% of Chefs' Warehouse shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.6% of Vital Farms shares are owned by institutional investors. 11.1% of Chefs' Warehouse shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.9% of Vital Farms shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Chefs' Warehouse beats Vital Farms on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chefs' Warehouse compare to Utz Brands?

Chefs' Warehouse (NASDAQ:CHEF) and Utz Brands (NYSE:UTZ) are both mid-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings and media sentiment.

Chefs' Warehouse presently has a consensus target price of $107.43, suggesting a potential downside of 2.88%. Utz Brands has a consensus target price of $13.39, suggesting a potential downside of 5.26%. Given Chefs' Warehouse's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Chefs' Warehouse is more favorable than Utz Brands.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Chefs' Warehouse
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.88
Utz Brands
1 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Chefs' Warehouse has a beta of 1.39, meaning that its stock price is 39% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Utz Brands has a beta of 0.74, meaning that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the broader market.

Chefs' Warehouse has a net margin of 2.09% compared to Utz Brands' net margin of -2.00%. Chefs' Warehouse's return on equity of 16.95% beat Utz Brands' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Chefs' Warehouse2.09% 16.95% 5.19%
Utz Brands -2.00%8.97%4.32%

In the previous week, Chefs' Warehouse had 9 more articles in the media than Utz Brands. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for Chefs' Warehouse and 9 mentions for Utz Brands. Chefs' Warehouse's average media sentiment score of 0.83 beat Utz Brands' score of 0.32 indicating that Chefs' Warehouse is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Chefs' Warehouse
12 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Utz Brands
2 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

91.6% of Chefs' Warehouse shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.0% of Utz Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. 11.1% of Chefs' Warehouse shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 12.7% of Utz Brands shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Chefs' Warehouse has higher revenue and earnings than Utz Brands. Utz Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chefs' Warehouse, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Chefs' Warehouse$4.15B1.09$72.36M$2.1052.67
Utz Brands$1.44B1.41$800K-$0.33N/A

Summary

Chefs' Warehouse beats Utz Brands on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chefs' Warehouse compare to Performance Food Group?

Chefs' Warehouse (NASDAQ:CHEF) and Performance Food Group (NYSE:PFGC) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, profitability, risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings and dividends.

Chefs' Warehouse has a net margin of 2.09% compared to Performance Food Group's net margin of 0.53%. Chefs' Warehouse's return on equity of 16.95% beat Performance Food Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Chefs' Warehouse2.09% 16.95% 5.19%
Performance Food Group 0.53%15.15%3.87%

Chefs' Warehouse currently has a consensus price target of $107.43, suggesting a potential downside of 2.88%. Performance Food Group has a consensus price target of $126.90, suggesting a potential upside of 20.87%. Given Performance Food Group's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Performance Food Group is more favorable than Chefs' Warehouse.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Chefs' Warehouse
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.88
Performance Food Group
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.85

In the previous week, Chefs' Warehouse had 3 more articles in the media than Performance Food Group. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for Chefs' Warehouse and 15 mentions for Performance Food Group. Chefs' Warehouse's average media sentiment score of 0.83 beat Performance Food Group's score of 0.51 indicating that Chefs' Warehouse is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Chefs' Warehouse
12 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Performance Food Group
9 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Chefs' Warehouse has a beta of 1.39, indicating that its stock price is 39% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Performance Food Group has a beta of 0.91, indicating that its stock price is 9% less volatile than the broader market.

91.6% of Chefs' Warehouse shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.9% of Performance Food Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 11.1% of Chefs' Warehouse shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 4.5% of Performance Food Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Performance Food Group has higher revenue and earnings than Chefs' Warehouse. Performance Food Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chefs' Warehouse, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Chefs' Warehouse$4.15B1.09$72.36M$2.1052.67
Performance Food Group$67.84B0.24$359.30M$2.2945.85

Summary

Chefs' Warehouse beats Performance Food Group on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chefs' Warehouse compare to United Natural Foods?

Chefs' Warehouse (NASDAQ:CHEF) and United Natural Foods (NYSE:UNFI) are both mid-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability and dividends.

91.6% of Chefs' Warehouse shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.6% of United Natural Foods shares are held by institutional investors. 11.1% of Chefs' Warehouse shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.4% of United Natural Foods shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Chefs' Warehouse has higher earnings, but lower revenue than United Natural Foods. United Natural Foods is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chefs' Warehouse, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Chefs' Warehouse$4.15B1.09$72.36M$2.1052.67
United Natural Foods$31.78B0.09-$118M-$0.66N/A

Chefs' Warehouse has a beta of 1.39, indicating that its share price is 39% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, United Natural Foods has a beta of 0.84, indicating that its share price is 16% less volatile than the broader market.

Chefs' Warehouse presently has a consensus price target of $107.43, suggesting a potential downside of 2.88%. United Natural Foods has a consensus price target of $47.86, suggesting a potential downside of 0.59%. Given United Natural Foods' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe United Natural Foods is more favorable than Chefs' Warehouse.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Chefs' Warehouse
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.88
United Natural Foods
1 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.11

Chefs' Warehouse has a net margin of 2.09% compared to United Natural Foods' net margin of -0.12%. Chefs' Warehouse's return on equity of 16.95% beat United Natural Foods' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Chefs' Warehouse2.09% 16.95% 5.19%
United Natural Foods -0.12%7.42%1.57%

In the previous week, Chefs' Warehouse had 12 more articles in the media than United Natural Foods. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for Chefs' Warehouse and 6 mentions for United Natural Foods. United Natural Foods' average media sentiment score of 1.20 beat Chefs' Warehouse's score of 0.83 indicating that United Natural Foods is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Chefs' Warehouse
12 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
United Natural Foods
3 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Chefs' Warehouse beats United Natural Foods on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chefs' Warehouse compare to Andersons?

Chefs' Warehouse (NASDAQ:CHEF) and Andersons (NASDAQ:ANDE) are both mid-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, earnings, valuation, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Chefs' Warehouse currently has a consensus price target of $107.43, indicating a potential downside of 2.88%. Andersons has a consensus price target of $95.00, indicating a potential upside of 39.58%. Given Andersons' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Andersons is more favorable than Chefs' Warehouse.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Chefs' Warehouse
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.88
Andersons
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.20

Chefs' Warehouse has a beta of 1.39, suggesting that its stock price is 39% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Andersons has a beta of 0.66, suggesting that its stock price is 34% less volatile than the broader market.

Andersons has higher revenue and earnings than Chefs' Warehouse. Andersons is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chefs' Warehouse, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Chefs' Warehouse$4.15B1.09$72.36M$2.1052.67
Andersons$11.01B0.21$95.71M$5.1813.14

Chefs' Warehouse has a net margin of 2.09% compared to Andersons' net margin of 1.62%. Chefs' Warehouse's return on equity of 16.95% beat Andersons' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Chefs' Warehouse2.09% 16.95% 5.19%
Andersons 1.62%16.23%5.84%

In the previous week, Chefs' Warehouse had 10 more articles in the media than Andersons. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for Chefs' Warehouse and 8 mentions for Andersons. Andersons' average media sentiment score of 1.06 beat Chefs' Warehouse's score of 0.83 indicating that Andersons is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Chefs' Warehouse
12 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Andersons
5 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

91.6% of Chefs' Warehouse shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.1% of Andersons shares are owned by institutional investors. 11.1% of Chefs' Warehouse shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 4.3% of Andersons shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Chefs' Warehouse beats Andersons on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Chefs' Warehouse News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CHEF and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CHEF and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CHEF vs. The Competition

MetricChefs' WarehouseConsumer Staples Distribution & Retail IndustryConsumer Staples SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$4.51B$26.67B$15.97B$12.85B
Dividend YieldN/A3.52%3.20%11.08%
P/E Ratio52.6715.8313.5824.25
Price / Sales1.098.21262,949.30101.53
Price / Cash28.0042.6757.5753.99
Price / Book6.963.944.516.20
Net Income$72.36M$884.06M$834.02M$348.59M
7 Day Performance1.40%-1.72%0.26%0.08%
1 Month Performance17.07%1.07%2.22%3.88%
1 Year Performance72.61%-5.65%13.47%16.98%

Chefs' Warehouse Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CHEF
Chefs' Warehouse
2.4218 of 5 stars
$110.61
+1.6%
$107.43
-2.9%
+72.6%$4.51B$4.15B52.675,156
VITL
Vital Farms
2.7781 of 5 stars
$10.90
-6.0%
$17.18
+57.6%
-79.3%$467.94M$759.44MN/A290
UTZ
Utz Brands
2.3846 of 5 stars
$14.17
+0.0%
$13.39
-5.5%
+6.0%$2.04B$1.44BN/A3,300
PFGC
Performance Food Group
4.2063 of 5 stars
$107.07
+2.5%
$126.90
+18.5%
+3.1%$16.82B$67.84B46.7643,000
UNFI
United Natural Foods
2.9833 of 5 stars
$48.38
-0.4%
$47.86
-1.1%
+75.7%$2.93B$31.21BN/A25,600

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:CHEF) was last updated on 8/23/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners