NASDAQ:CHEF

The Chefs' Warehouse Competitors

$33.90
-0.11 (-0.32 %)
(As of 04/16/2021 04:00 PM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$33.30
Now: $33.90
$34.43
50-Day Range
$28.54
MA: $31.64
$34.36
52-Week Range
$10.54
Now: $33.90
$34.48
Volume225,771 shs
Average Volume439,015 shs
Market Capitalization$1.29 billion
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta2.46

Competitors

The Chefs' Warehouse (NASDAQ:CHEF) Vs. FLO, NOMD, LANC, LESL, FIZZ, and CELH

Should you be buying CHEF stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the sector of "consumer staples" are considered alternatives and competitors to The Chefs' Warehouse, including Flowers Foods (FLO), Nomad Foods (NOMD), Lancaster Colony (LANC), Leslie's (LESL), National Beverage (FIZZ), and Celsius (CELH).

The Chefs' Warehouse (NASDAQ:CHEF) and Flowers Foods (NYSE:FLO) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and risk.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and price targets for The Chefs' Warehouse and Flowers Foods, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
The Chefs' Warehouse03402.57
Flowers Foods04002.00

The Chefs' Warehouse currently has a consensus target price of $25.4286, indicating a potential downside of 24.99%. Flowers Foods has a consensus target price of $24.00, indicating a potential downside of 0.12%. Given Flowers Foods' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Flowers Foods is more favorable than The Chefs' Warehouse.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

78.8% of The Chefs' Warehouse shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 64.5% of Flowers Foods shares are owned by institutional investors. 17.1% of The Chefs' Warehouse shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.2% of Flowers Foods shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares The Chefs' Warehouse and Flowers Foods' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
The Chefs' Warehouse-2.78%-10.71%-3.63%
Flowers Foods2.30%19.41%7.65%

Volatility & Risk

The Chefs' Warehouse has a beta of 2.46, meaning that its share price is 146% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Flowers Foods has a beta of 0.34, meaning that its share price is 66% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares The Chefs' Warehouse and Flowers Foods' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
The Chefs' Warehouse$1.59 billion0.81$24.19 million$1.0133.56
Flowers Foods$4.12 billion1.23$164.54 million$0.9625.03

Flowers Foods has higher revenue and earnings than The Chefs' Warehouse. Flowers Foods is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than The Chefs' Warehouse, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Flowers Foods beats The Chefs' Warehouse on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

The Chefs' Warehouse (NASDAQ:CHEF) and Nomad Foods (NYSE:NOMD) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and risk.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and price targets for The Chefs' Warehouse and Nomad Foods, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
The Chefs' Warehouse03402.57
Nomad Foods01902.90

The Chefs' Warehouse currently has a consensus target price of $25.4286, indicating a potential downside of 24.99%. Nomad Foods has a consensus target price of $28.80, indicating a potential downside of 1.06%. Given Nomad Foods' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Nomad Foods is more favorable than The Chefs' Warehouse.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

78.8% of The Chefs' Warehouse shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 67.8% of Nomad Foods shares are owned by institutional investors. 17.1% of The Chefs' Warehouse shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares The Chefs' Warehouse and Nomad Foods' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
The Chefs' Warehouse-2.78%-10.71%-3.63%
Nomad Foods8.56%10.37%4.38%

Volatility & Risk

The Chefs' Warehouse has a beta of 2.46, meaning that its share price is 146% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Nomad Foods has a beta of 0.71, meaning that its share price is 29% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares The Chefs' Warehouse and Nomad Foods' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
The Chefs' Warehouse$1.59 billion0.81$24.19 million$1.0133.56
Nomad Foods$2.60 billion1.93$172.48 million$1.3821.09

Nomad Foods has higher revenue and earnings than The Chefs' Warehouse. Nomad Foods is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than The Chefs' Warehouse, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Nomad Foods beats The Chefs' Warehouse on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

The Chefs' Warehouse (NASDAQ:CHEF) and Lancaster Colony (NASDAQ:LANC) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and risk.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and price targets for The Chefs' Warehouse and Lancaster Colony, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
The Chefs' Warehouse03402.57
Lancaster Colony00103.00

The Chefs' Warehouse currently has a consensus target price of $25.4286, indicating a potential downside of 24.99%. Given The Chefs' Warehouse's higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe The Chefs' Warehouse is more favorable than Lancaster Colony.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

78.8% of The Chefs' Warehouse shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 54.6% of Lancaster Colony shares are owned by institutional investors. 17.1% of The Chefs' Warehouse shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 31.7% of Lancaster Colony shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares The Chefs' Warehouse and Lancaster Colony's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
The Chefs' Warehouse-2.78%-10.71%-3.63%
Lancaster Colony9.90%16.90%13.24%

Volatility & Risk

The Chefs' Warehouse has a beta of 2.46, meaning that its share price is 146% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Lancaster Colony has a beta of 0.25, meaning that its share price is 75% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares The Chefs' Warehouse and Lancaster Colony's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
The Chefs' Warehouse$1.59 billion0.81$24.19 million$1.0133.56
Lancaster Colony$1.33 billion3.73$136.98 million$4.9336.60

Lancaster Colony has lower revenue, but higher earnings than The Chefs' Warehouse. The Chefs' Warehouse is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lancaster Colony, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Lancaster Colony beats The Chefs' Warehouse on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

The Chefs' Warehouse (NASDAQ:CHEF) and Leslie's (NASDAQ:LESL) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and risk.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares The Chefs' Warehouse and Leslie's' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
The Chefs' Warehouse$1.59 billion0.81$24.19 million$1.0133.56
Leslie's$1.11 billion4.43$78.49 million$0.4262.79

Leslie's has lower revenue, but higher earnings than The Chefs' Warehouse. The Chefs' Warehouse is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Leslie's, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and price targets for The Chefs' Warehouse and Leslie's, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
The Chefs' Warehouse03402.57
Leslie's05702.58

The Chefs' Warehouse currently has a consensus target price of $25.4286, indicating a potential downside of 24.99%. Leslie's has a consensus target price of $26.5455, indicating a potential upside of 0.67%. Given Leslie's' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Leslie's is more favorable than The Chefs' Warehouse.

Profitability

This table compares The Chefs' Warehouse and Leslie's' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
The Chefs' Warehouse-2.78%-10.71%-3.63%
Leslie'sN/AN/AN/A

Insider & Institutional Ownership

78.8% of The Chefs' Warehouse shares are owned by institutional investors. 17.1% of The Chefs' Warehouse shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Leslie's beats The Chefs' Warehouse on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

The Chefs' Warehouse (NASDAQ:CHEF) and National Beverage (NASDAQ:FIZZ) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk and valuation.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares The Chefs' Warehouse and National Beverage's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
The Chefs' Warehouse$1.59 billion0.81$24.19 million$1.0133.56
National Beverage$1.00 billion4.84$129.97 million$2.7818.66

National Beverage has lower revenue, but higher earnings than The Chefs' Warehouse. National Beverage is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than The Chefs' Warehouse, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for The Chefs' Warehouse and National Beverage, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
The Chefs' Warehouse03402.57
National Beverage31001.25

The Chefs' Warehouse presently has a consensus target price of $25.4286, indicating a potential downside of 24.99%. National Beverage has a consensus target price of $35.8333, indicating a potential downside of 30.93%. Given The Chefs' Warehouse's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe The Chefs' Warehouse is more favorable than National Beverage.

Profitability

This table compares The Chefs' Warehouse and National Beverage's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
The Chefs' Warehouse-2.78%-10.71%-3.63%
National Beverage15.34%33.20%23.86%

Risk and Volatility

The Chefs' Warehouse has a beta of 2.46, meaning that its stock price is 146% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, National Beverage has a beta of 1.39, meaning that its stock price is 39% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

78.8% of The Chefs' Warehouse shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 32.7% of National Beverage shares are held by institutional investors. 17.1% of The Chefs' Warehouse shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 75.2% of National Beverage shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

National Beverage beats The Chefs' Warehouse on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

The Chefs' Warehouse (NASDAQ:CHEF) and Celsius (NASDAQ:CELH) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk and valuation.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares The Chefs' Warehouse and Celsius' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
The Chefs' Warehouse$1.59 billion0.81$24.19 million$1.0133.56
Celsius$75.15 million58.68$9.97 million($0.02)-3,037.75

The Chefs' Warehouse has higher revenue and earnings than Celsius. Celsius is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than The Chefs' Warehouse, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for The Chefs' Warehouse and Celsius, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
The Chefs' Warehouse03402.57
Celsius02302.60

The Chefs' Warehouse presently has a consensus target price of $25.4286, indicating a potential downside of 24.99%. Celsius has a consensus target price of $39.00, indicating a potential downside of 35.81%. Given The Chefs' Warehouse's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe The Chefs' Warehouse is more favorable than Celsius.

Profitability

This table compares The Chefs' Warehouse and Celsius' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
The Chefs' Warehouse-2.78%-10.71%-3.63%
Celsius4.77%8.28%5.96%

Risk and Volatility

The Chefs' Warehouse has a beta of 2.46, meaning that its stock price is 146% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Celsius has a beta of 2.17, meaning that its stock price is 117% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

78.8% of The Chefs' Warehouse shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 54.0% of Celsius shares are held by institutional investors. 17.1% of The Chefs' Warehouse shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 37.6% of Celsius shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.


The Chefs' Warehouse Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Flowers Foods logo
FLO
Flowers Foods
1.3$24.03-0.6%$5.09 billion$4.12 billion52.24News Coverage
Nomad Foods logo
NOMD
Nomad Foods
1.5$29.11-0.3%$5.01 billion$2.60 billion24.26
Lancaster Colony logo
LANC
Lancaster Colony
2.0$180.46-0.1%$4.97 billion$1.33 billion37.29
Leslie's logo
LESL
Leslie's
1.3$26.37-1.2%$4.93 billion$1.11 billion62.79
National Beverage logo
FIZZ
National Beverage
1.3$51.88-2.0%$4.84 billion$1.00 billion15.08Unusual Options Activity
Celsius logo
CELH
Celsius
1.5$60.76-2.2%$4.41 billion$75.15 million868.05Analyst Downgrade
The Hain Celestial Group logo
HAIN
The Hain Celestial Group
1.5$42.72-0.3%$4.27 billion$2.05 billion164.31Analyst Downgrade
News Coverage
51job logo
JOBS
51job
1.3$62.98-0.2%$4.25 billion$574.57 million29.71Increase in Short Interest
News Coverage
Hillenbrand logo
HI
Hillenbrand
2.0$50.09-0.8%$3.76 billion$2.52 billion-61.84Analyst Downgrade
Grocery Outlet logo
GO
Grocery Outlet
1.2$38.95-0.6%$3.71 billion$2.56 billion41.00
Sanderson Farms logo
SAFM
Sanderson Farms
1.7$163.76-1.8%$3.66 billion$3.56 billion129.97Decrease in Short Interest
Compañía Cervecerías Unidas logo
CCU
Compañía Cervecerías Unidas
1.3$19.19-0.2%$3.55 billion$2.41 billion28.22Dividend Announcement
Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
WD-40 logo
WDFC
WD-40
1.6$257.52-0.0%$3.53 billion$423.35 million58.53Analyst Downgrade
Analyst Revision
Utz Brands logo
UTZ
Utz Brands
1.5$25.65-0.4%$3.51 billionN/A0.00Analyst Upgrade
BRF logo
BRFS
BRF
1.3$4.26-2.1%$3.46 billion$8.13 billion13.74Increase in Short Interest
News Coverage
Energizer logo
ENR
Energizer
2.4$49.67-0.4%$3.40 billion$2.74 billion-31.44Analyst Report
News Coverage
The Simply Good Foods logo
SMPL
The Simply Good Foods
1.6$33.42-1.0%$3.20 billion$816.64 million53.05Analyst Upgrade
JW.B
John Wiley & Sons
0.6$56.71-0.0%$3.18 billion$1.83 billion-82.19
J & J Snack Foods logo
JJSF
J & J Snack Foods
1.6$158.94-0.7%$3.02 billion$1.02 billion167.31
Coca-Cola Consolidated logo
COKE
Coca-Cola Consolidated
0.7$306.80-1.3%$2.88 billion$4.83 billion30.17Dividend Announcement
TreeHouse Foods logo
THS
TreeHouse Foods
1.2$51.20-0.3%$2.86 billion$4.29 billion-512.00
Medifast logo
MED
Medifast
2.2$237.09-0.9%$2.79 billion$713.67 million29.67Decrease in Short Interest
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
Nu Skin Enterprises logo
NUS
Nu Skin Enterprises
2.1$52.99-0.1%$2.69 billion$2.42 billion17.84Analyst Revision
News Coverage
Purple Innovation logo
PRPL
Purple Innovation
1.9$35.54-6.2%$2.37 billion$428.36 million-114.64Gap Up
Inter Parfums logo
IPAR
Inter Parfums
1.6$71.86-0.0%$2.27 billion$713.51 million71.86
Tootsie Roll Industries logo
TR
Tootsie Roll Industries
0.9$33.13-1.4%$2.25 billion$523.62 million37.92News Coverage
Vector Group logo
VGR
Vector Group
1.3$14.49-0.0%$2.23 billion$1.90 billion32.93News Coverage
Industrias Bachoco logo
IBA
Industrias Bachoco
1.6$44.41-0.1%$2.22 billion$3.26 billion16.45Analyst Upgrade
News Coverage
Edgewell Personal Care logo
EPC
Edgewell Personal Care
1.8$38.74-0.1%$2.10 billion$1.95 billion31.24
United Natural Foods logo
UNFI
United Natural Foods
1.4$35.98-1.7%$2.03 billion$26.51 billion18.94
B&G Foods logo
BGS
B&G Foods
1.6$30.07-0.6%$1.95 billion$1.66 billion14.89
Hostess Brands logo
TWNK
Hostess Brands
1.3$14.79-0.2%$1.93 billion$907.67 million29.57
Schweitzer-Mauduit International logo
SWM
Schweitzer-Mauduit International
1.4$49.74-0.3%$1.56 billion$1.02 billion17.64Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
SunOpta logo
STKL
SunOpta
1.5$14.76-0.1%$1.53 billion$1.19 billion-113.54Analyst Report
News Coverage
Gap Down
e.l.f. Beauty logo
ELF
e.l.f. Beauty
1.3$29.90-2.7%$1.53 billion$282.85 million157.38Analyst Report
Insider Selling
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
Tattooed Chef logo
TTCF
Tattooed Chef
0.9$18.71-3.0%$1.52 billionN/A0.00Insider Buying
Increase in Short Interest
News Coverage
Gap Up
Franchise Group logo
FRG
Franchise Group
2.8$37.37-1.4%$1.50 billion$132.55 million0.00
UVV
Universal
1.2$58.29-0.8%$1.43 billion$1.91 billion25.79
Meredith logo
MDP
Meredith
1.3$31.28-0.8%$1.43 billion$2.85 billion-3.40
Calavo Growers logo
CVGW
Calavo Growers
1.7$80.01-2.0%$1.42 billion$1.06 billion-102.58
Mission Produce logo
AVO
Mission Produce
1.3$19.91-0.3%$1.40 billionN/A0.00Increase in Short Interest
Fresh Del Monte Produce logo
FDP
Fresh Del Monte Produce
1.1$29.30-1.1%$1.39 billion$4.49 billion61.04News Coverage
Tupperware Brands logo
TUP
Tupperware Brands
1.5$27.48-1.8%$1.36 billion$1.80 billion85.88
Matthews International logo
MATW
Matthews International
2.3$42.16-1.2%$1.34 billion$1.50 billion-15.06Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
Gap Down
Arko logo
ARKO
Arko
1.9$9.95-0.4%$1.24 billionN/A0.00Increase in Short Interest
Scholastic logo
SCHL
Scholastic
1.8$32.15-0.7%$1.10 billion$1.49 billion-18.16
MGP Ingredients logo
MGPI
MGP Ingredients
1.7$63.81-1.3%$1.08 billion$362.74 million26.15News Coverage
John B. Sanfilippo & Son logo
JBSS
John B. Sanfilippo & Son
1.3$92.65-1.3%$1.06 billion$880.09 million19.75News Coverage
Adecoagro logo
AGRO
Adecoagro
1.0$9.03-1.2%$1.06 billion$887.14 million-28.22Analyst Upgrade
Vital Farms logo
VITL
Vital Farms
1.0$24.82-1.3%$982.57 millionN/A0.00
This page was last updated on 4/17/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security. Learn more.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.