Go Pro

Chefs' Warehouse (CHEF) Competitors

Chefs' Warehouse logo
$116.23 +3.67 (+3.26%)
As of 01:52 PM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.

CHEF vs. VITL, UTZ, PFGC, UNFI, and ANDE

Should you buy Chefs' Warehouse stock or one of its competitors? Chefs' Warehouse's main competitors and comparable companies include Vital Farms (VITL), Utz Brands (UTZ), Performance Food Group (PFGC), United Natural Foods (UNFI), and Andersons (ANDE). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "consumer staples" sector.

How does Chefs' Warehouse compare to Vital Farms?

Vital Farms (NASDAQ:VITL) and Chefs' Warehouse (NASDAQ:CHEF) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, profitability and analyst recommendations.

98.6% of Vital Farms shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.6% of Chefs' Warehouse shares are held by institutional investors. 3.9% of Vital Farms shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 11.1% of Chefs' Warehouse shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Vital Farms presently has a consensus price target of $17.18, suggesting a potential upside of 97.61%. Chefs' Warehouse has a consensus price target of $115.67, suggesting a potential downside of 0.09%. Given Vital Farms' higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Vital Farms is more favorable than Chefs' Warehouse.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Vital Farms
1 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.29
Chefs' Warehouse
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Chefs' Warehouse has higher revenue and earnings than Vital Farms. Vital Farms is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chefs' Warehouse, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Vital Farms$759.44M0.49$66.28M-$0.04N/A
Chefs' Warehouse$4.15B1.14$72.36M$2.1055.13

Vital Farms has a beta of 1.08, suggesting that its stock price is 8% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chefs' Warehouse has a beta of 1.44, suggesting that its stock price is 44% more volatile than the broader market.

Chefs' Warehouse has a net margin of 2.09% compared to Vital Farms' net margin of 0.02%. Chefs' Warehouse's return on equity of 16.95% beat Vital Farms' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Vital Farms0.02% 3.46% 2.25%
Chefs' Warehouse 2.09%16.95%5.19%

In the previous week, Vital Farms and Vital Farms both had 3 articles in the media. Vital Farms' average media sentiment score of 0.86 beat Chefs' Warehouse's score of 0.57 indicating that Vital Farms is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Vital Farms
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Chefs' Warehouse
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Chefs' Warehouse beats Vital Farms on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chefs' Warehouse compare to Utz Brands?

Chefs' Warehouse (NASDAQ:CHEF) and Utz Brands (NYSE:UTZ) are both mid-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Chefs' Warehouse has a beta of 1.44, meaning that its share price is 44% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Utz Brands has a beta of 0.72, meaning that its share price is 28% less volatile than the broader market.

91.6% of Chefs' Warehouse shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.0% of Utz Brands shares are held by institutional investors. 11.1% of Chefs' Warehouse shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 12.7% of Utz Brands shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Chefs' Warehouse presently has a consensus target price of $115.67, indicating a potential downside of 0.09%. Utz Brands has a consensus target price of $13.39, indicating a potential downside of 6.16%. Given Chefs' Warehouse's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Chefs' Warehouse is more favorable than Utz Brands.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Chefs' Warehouse
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Utz Brands
1 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

In the previous week, Chefs' Warehouse had 2 more articles in the media than Utz Brands. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Chefs' Warehouse and 1 mentions for Utz Brands. Chefs' Warehouse's average media sentiment score of 0.57 beat Utz Brands' score of 0.42 indicating that Chefs' Warehouse is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Chefs' Warehouse
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Utz Brands
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Chefs' Warehouse has a net margin of 2.09% compared to Utz Brands' net margin of -2.00%. Chefs' Warehouse's return on equity of 16.95% beat Utz Brands' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Chefs' Warehouse2.09% 16.95% 5.19%
Utz Brands -2.00%8.97%4.32%

Chefs' Warehouse has higher revenue and earnings than Utz Brands. Utz Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chefs' Warehouse, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Chefs' Warehouse$4.15B1.14$72.36M$2.1055.13
Utz Brands$1.44B1.43$800K-$0.33N/A

Summary

Chefs' Warehouse beats Utz Brands on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chefs' Warehouse compare to Performance Food Group?

Performance Food Group (NYSE:PFGC) and Chefs' Warehouse (NASDAQ:CHEF) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk and earnings.

Performance Food Group has a beta of 0.87, indicating that its stock price is 13% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chefs' Warehouse has a beta of 1.44, indicating that its stock price is 44% more volatile than the broader market.

96.9% of Performance Food Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.6% of Chefs' Warehouse shares are held by institutional investors. 4.5% of Performance Food Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 11.1% of Chefs' Warehouse shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Performance Food Group had 4 more articles in the media than Chefs' Warehouse. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Performance Food Group and 3 mentions for Chefs' Warehouse. Chefs' Warehouse's average media sentiment score of 0.57 beat Performance Food Group's score of 0.26 indicating that Chefs' Warehouse is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Performance Food Group
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Chefs' Warehouse
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Chefs' Warehouse has a net margin of 2.09% compared to Performance Food Group's net margin of 0.53%. Chefs' Warehouse's return on equity of 16.95% beat Performance Food Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Performance Food Group0.53% 15.15% 3.87%
Chefs' Warehouse 2.09%16.95%5.19%

Performance Food Group has higher revenue and earnings than Chefs' Warehouse. Performance Food Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chefs' Warehouse, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Performance Food Group$67.84B0.22$359.30M$2.2940.81
Chefs' Warehouse$4.15B1.14$72.36M$2.1055.13

Performance Food Group presently has a consensus price target of $126.40, suggesting a potential upside of 35.26%. Chefs' Warehouse has a consensus price target of $115.67, suggesting a potential downside of 0.09%. Given Performance Food Group's higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Performance Food Group is more favorable than Chefs' Warehouse.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Performance Food Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
12 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.92
Chefs' Warehouse
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Summary

Chefs' Warehouse beats Performance Food Group on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chefs' Warehouse compare to United Natural Foods?

United Natural Foods (NYSE:UNFI) and Chefs' Warehouse (NASDAQ:CHEF) are both mid-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

87.6% of United Natural Foods shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.6% of Chefs' Warehouse shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.4% of United Natural Foods shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 11.1% of Chefs' Warehouse shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, United Natural Foods and United Natural Foods both had 3 articles in the media. United Natural Foods' average media sentiment score of 1.07 beat Chefs' Warehouse's score of 0.57 indicating that United Natural Foods is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
United Natural Foods
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Chefs' Warehouse
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

United Natural Foods currently has a consensus target price of $52.00, suggesting a potential upside of 13.92%. Chefs' Warehouse has a consensus target price of $115.67, suggesting a potential downside of 0.09%. Given United Natural Foods' higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe United Natural Foods is more favorable than Chefs' Warehouse.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
United Natural Foods
0 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.22
Chefs' Warehouse
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Chefs' Warehouse has a net margin of 2.09% compared to United Natural Foods' net margin of 0.27%. Chefs' Warehouse's return on equity of 16.95% beat United Natural Foods' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
United Natural Foods0.27% 10.51% 2.28%
Chefs' Warehouse 2.09%16.95%5.19%

United Natural Foods has higher revenue and earnings than Chefs' Warehouse. United Natural Foods is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chefs' Warehouse, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
United Natural Foods$31.15B0.09$84M$1.3434.06
Chefs' Warehouse$4.15B1.14$72.36M$2.1055.13

United Natural Foods has a beta of 0.97, suggesting that its share price is 3% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chefs' Warehouse has a beta of 1.44, suggesting that its share price is 44% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Chefs' Warehouse beats United Natural Foods on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chefs' Warehouse compare to Andersons?

Andersons (NASDAQ:ANDE) and Chefs' Warehouse (NASDAQ:CHEF) are both mid-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, dividends, earnings, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and valuation.

In the previous week, Andersons had 3 more articles in the media than Chefs' Warehouse. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Andersons and 3 mentions for Chefs' Warehouse. Chefs' Warehouse's average media sentiment score of 0.57 beat Andersons' score of 0.52 indicating that Chefs' Warehouse is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Andersons
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Chefs' Warehouse
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Chefs' Warehouse has a net margin of 2.09% compared to Andersons' net margin of 1.62%. Chefs' Warehouse's return on equity of 16.95% beat Andersons' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Andersons1.62% 16.23% 5.84%
Chefs' Warehouse 2.09%16.95%5.19%

Andersons has higher revenue and earnings than Chefs' Warehouse. Andersons is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chefs' Warehouse, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Andersons$11.01B0.21$95.71M$5.1812.82
Chefs' Warehouse$4.15B1.14$72.36M$2.1055.13

Andersons presently has a consensus price target of $95.00, suggesting a potential upside of 43.07%. Chefs' Warehouse has a consensus price target of $115.67, suggesting a potential downside of 0.09%. Given Andersons' higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Andersons is more favorable than Chefs' Warehouse.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Andersons
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Chefs' Warehouse
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

87.1% of Andersons shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.6% of Chefs' Warehouse shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.3% of Andersons shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 11.1% of Chefs' Warehouse shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Andersons has a beta of 0.65, suggesting that its stock price is 35% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chefs' Warehouse has a beta of 1.44, suggesting that its stock price is 44% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Chefs' Warehouse beats Andersons on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Chefs' Warehouse News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CHEF and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CHEF and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CHEF vs. The Competition

MetricChefs' WarehouseConsumer Staples Distribution & Retail IndustryConsumer Staples SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$4.76B$26.21B$15.20B$13.25B
Dividend YieldN/A3.31%3.32%15.88%
P/E Ratio55.5115.8713.8726.08
Price / Sales1.158.10263,620.9692.52
Price / Cash28.3942.0156.9751.25
Price / Book7.843.944.146.31
Net Income$72.36M$903.97M$839.86M$361.55M
7 Day Performance5.64%-1.26%-1.98%-1.55%
1 Month Performance2.69%-2.69%-5.26%-3.83%
1 Year Performance111.21%-5.56%7.93%2.87%

Chefs' Warehouse Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CHEF
Chefs' Warehouse
2.5234 of 5 stars
$116.23
+3.3%
$115.67
-0.5%
+106.2%$4.75B$4.15B55.475,156
VITL
Vital Farms
2.7605 of 5 stars
$9.95
-1.4%
$17.18
+72.7%
-78.1%$427.15M$759.44MN/A739
UTZ
Utz Brands
1.6538 of 5 stars
$14.25
+0.0%
$13.39
-6.0%
+16.0%$2.05B$1.44BN/A3,300
PFGC
Performance Food Group
4.1811 of 5 stars
$91.64
+1.5%
$126.40
+37.9%
-10.2%$14.44B$67.84B40.0244,000
UNFI
United Natural Foods
3.5864 of 5 stars
$45.97
-0.4%
$50.29
+9.4%
+13.4%$2.77B$31.15B34.3023,431

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:CHEF) was last updated on 10/2/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners