Go Pro

United Natural Foods (UNFI) Competitors

United Natural Foods logo
$48.56 -0.54 (-1.11%)
Closing price 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$48.13 -0.43 (-0.88%)
As of 07:34 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

UNFI vs. CHEF, MED, ANDE, SYY, and SJM

Should you buy United Natural Foods stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares United Natural Foods with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with United Natural Foods include Chefs' Warehouse (CHEF), Medifast (MED), Andersons (ANDE), Sysco (SYY), and J. M. Smucker (SJM).

How does United Natural Foods compare to Chefs' Warehouse?

Chefs' Warehouse (NASDAQ:CHEF) and United Natural Foods (NYSE:UNFI) are both mid-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk and dividends.

In the previous week, Chefs' Warehouse had 8 more articles in the media than United Natural Foods. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Chefs' Warehouse and 4 mentions for United Natural Foods. United Natural Foods' average media sentiment score of 0.62 beat Chefs' Warehouse's score of 0.59 indicating that United Natural Foods is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Chefs' Warehouse
5 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
United Natural Foods
2 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Chefs' Warehouse has higher earnings, but lower revenue than United Natural Foods. United Natural Foods is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chefs' Warehouse, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Chefs' Warehouse$4.15B0.94$72.36M$1.8053.10
United Natural Foods$31.78B0.09-$118M-$0.66N/A

Chefs' Warehouse has a net margin of 1.87% compared to United Natural Foods' net margin of -0.12%. Chefs' Warehouse's return on equity of 15.54% beat United Natural Foods' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Chefs' Warehouse1.87% 15.54% 4.65%
United Natural Foods -0.12%7.42%1.57%

Chefs' Warehouse currently has a consensus price target of $91.86, indicating a potential downside of 3.90%. United Natural Foods has a consensus price target of $46.38, indicating a potential downside of 4.49%. Given Chefs' Warehouse's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Chefs' Warehouse is more favorable than United Natural Foods.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Chefs' Warehouse
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
United Natural Foods
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40

Chefs' Warehouse has a beta of 1.39, indicating that its stock price is 39% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, United Natural Foods has a beta of 0.83, indicating that its stock price is 17% less volatile than the broader market.

91.6% of Chefs' Warehouse shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.6% of United Natural Foods shares are held by institutional investors. 11.1% of Chefs' Warehouse shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.4% of United Natural Foods shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Chefs' Warehouse beats United Natural Foods on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does United Natural Foods compare to Medifast?

Medifast (NYSE:MED) and United Natural Foods (NYSE:UNFI) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, valuation, risk and institutional ownership.

Medifast has higher earnings, but lower revenue than United Natural Foods. United Natural Foods is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Medifast, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Medifast$385.79M0.30-$18.67M-$1.83N/A
United Natural Foods$31.78B0.09-$118M-$0.66N/A

95.5% of Medifast shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.6% of United Natural Foods shares are held by institutional investors. 3.7% of Medifast shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.4% of United Natural Foods shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Medifast has a beta of 0.65, indicating that its stock price is 35% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, United Natural Foods has a beta of 0.83, indicating that its stock price is 17% less volatile than the broader market.

Medifast presently has a consensus target price of $12.00, suggesting a potential upside of 15.16%. United Natural Foods has a consensus target price of $46.38, suggesting a potential downside of 4.49%. Given Medifast's higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Medifast is more favorable than United Natural Foods.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Medifast
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
United Natural Foods
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40

United Natural Foods has a net margin of -0.12% compared to Medifast's net margin of -5.78%. United Natural Foods' return on equity of 7.42% beat Medifast's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Medifast-5.78% -4.80% -3.83%
United Natural Foods -0.12%7.42%1.57%

In the previous week, Medifast had 2 more articles in the media than United Natural Foods. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Medifast and 4 mentions for United Natural Foods. Medifast's average media sentiment score of 1.01 beat United Natural Foods' score of 0.62 indicating that Medifast is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Medifast
1 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
United Natural Foods
2 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Medifast and United Natural Foods tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does United Natural Foods compare to Andersons?

Andersons (NASDAQ:ANDE) and United Natural Foods (NYSE:UNFI) are both mid-cap food distributors companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, profitability, dividends, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

87.1% of Andersons shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.6% of United Natural Foods shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.3% of Andersons shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.4% of United Natural Foods shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Andersons has a net margin of 1.17% compared to United Natural Foods' net margin of -0.12%. Andersons' return on equity of 10.68% beat United Natural Foods' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Andersons1.17% 10.68% 4.04%
United Natural Foods -0.12%7.42%1.57%

Andersons has a beta of 0.65, indicating that its stock price is 35% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, United Natural Foods has a beta of 0.83, indicating that its stock price is 17% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Andersons and Andersons both had 4 articles in the media. Andersons' average media sentiment score of 1.17 beat United Natural Foods' score of 0.62 indicating that Andersons is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Andersons
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
United Natural Foods
2 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Andersons currently has a consensus target price of $85.00, suggesting a potential upside of 9.56%. United Natural Foods has a consensus target price of $46.38, suggesting a potential downside of 4.49%. Given Andersons' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Andersons is more favorable than United Natural Foods.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Andersons
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
United Natural Foods
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40

Andersons has higher earnings, but lower revenue than United Natural Foods. United Natural Foods is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Andersons, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Andersons$11.01B0.24$95.71M$3.7620.63
United Natural Foods$31.78B0.09-$118M-$0.66N/A

Summary

Andersons beats United Natural Foods on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does United Natural Foods compare to Sysco?

United Natural Foods (NYSE:UNFI) and Sysco (NYSE:SYY) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and risk.

Sysco has higher revenue and earnings than United Natural Foods. United Natural Foods is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sysco, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
United Natural Foods$31.78B0.09-$118M-$0.66N/A
Sysco$81.37B0.47$1.83B$3.6122.38

Sysco has a net margin of 2.08% compared to United Natural Foods' net margin of -0.12%. Sysco's return on equity of 103.57% beat United Natural Foods' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
United Natural Foods-0.12% 7.42% 1.57%
Sysco 2.08%103.57%8.06%

United Natural Foods has a beta of 0.83, meaning that its share price is 17% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sysco has a beta of 0.64, meaning that its share price is 36% less volatile than the broader market.

United Natural Foods currently has a consensus price target of $46.38, suggesting a potential downside of 4.49%. Sysco has a consensus price target of $88.00, suggesting a potential upside of 8.92%. Given Sysco's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Sysco is more favorable than United Natural Foods.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
United Natural Foods
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40
Sysco
1 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.44

In the previous week, Sysco had 16 more articles in the media than United Natural Foods. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for Sysco and 4 mentions for United Natural Foods. Sysco's average media sentiment score of 0.95 beat United Natural Foods' score of 0.62 indicating that Sysco is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
United Natural Foods
2 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Sysco
11 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
7 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

87.6% of United Natural Foods shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.4% of Sysco shares are held by institutional investors. 2.4% of United Natural Foods shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Sysco shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Sysco beats United Natural Foods on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does United Natural Foods compare to J. M. Smucker?

J. M. Smucker (NYSE:SJM) and United Natural Foods (NYSE:UNFI) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends and valuation.

In the previous week, J. M. Smucker had 5 more articles in the media than United Natural Foods. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for J. M. Smucker and 4 mentions for United Natural Foods. J. M. Smucker's average media sentiment score of 1.18 beat United Natural Foods' score of 0.62 indicating that J. M. Smucker is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
J. M. Smucker
5 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
United Natural Foods
2 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

J. M. Smucker has a beta of 0.26, meaning that its stock price is 74% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, United Natural Foods has a beta of 0.83, meaning that its stock price is 17% less volatile than the broader market.

United Natural Foods has higher revenue and earnings than J. M. Smucker. J. M. Smucker is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than United Natural Foods, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
J. M. Smucker$9.05B1.33-$138.70M-$1.30N/A
United Natural Foods$31.78B0.09-$118M-$0.66N/A

81.7% of J. M. Smucker shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.6% of United Natural Foods shares are held by institutional investors. 2.8% of J. M. Smucker shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.4% of United Natural Foods shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

J. M. Smucker presently has a consensus target price of $121.13, suggesting a potential upside of 7.49%. United Natural Foods has a consensus target price of $46.38, suggesting a potential downside of 4.49%. Given J. M. Smucker's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe J. M. Smucker is more favorable than United Natural Foods.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
J. M. Smucker
1 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.42
United Natural Foods
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40

United Natural Foods has a net margin of -0.12% compared to J. M. Smucker's net margin of -1.53%. J. M. Smucker's return on equity of 17.18% beat United Natural Foods' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
J. M. Smucker-1.53% 17.18% 5.76%
United Natural Foods -0.12%7.42%1.57%

Summary

J. M. Smucker beats United Natural Foods on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get United Natural Foods News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for UNFI and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding UNFI and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

UNFI vs. The Competition

MetricUnited Natural FoodsFOOD IndustryStaples SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$2.97B$7.91B$16.77B$23.43B
Dividend YieldN/A3.72%3.30%4.16%
P/E Ratio-73.5714.4522.6927.93
Price / Sales0.091.2244.3321.11
Price / Cash8.159.9313.3818.81
Price / Book1.892.795.884.74
Net Income-$118M$149.81M$659.81M$1.07B
7 Day Performance-0.89%-1.20%1.11%-0.25%
1 Month Performance-5.61%-0.57%0.03%0.69%
1 Year Performance78.13%23.10%-2.66%16.39%

United Natural Foods Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
UNFI
United Natural Foods
2.8454 of 5 stars
$48.56
-1.1%
$46.38
-4.5%
+79.9%$2.97B$31.78BN/A25,600
CHEF
Chefs' Warehouse
2.0575 of 5 stars
$97.16
-0.6%
$91.86
-5.5%
+49.8%$3.96B$4.15B53.985,156
MED
Medifast
3.8749 of 5 stars
$10.62
-0.1%
$12.00
+13.0%
-22.7%$118.11M$385.79MN/A870
ANDE
Andersons
3.6897 of 5 stars
$76.88
+2.2%
$85.00
+10.6%
+119.1%$2.62B$11.01B20.452,137
SYY
Sysco
4.9097 of 5 stars
$82.33
+2.0%
$88.38
+7.4%
+4.1%$39.37B$81.37B22.8175,000

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:UNFI) was last updated on 7/20/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners