Free Trial

United Natural Foods (UNFI) Competitors

United Natural Foods logo
$50.56 -1.10 (-2.14%)
Closing price 05/15/2026 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$48.66 -1.89 (-3.74%)
As of 05/15/2026 07:59 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

UNFI vs. CHEF, MED, ANDE, SYY, and SJM

Should you buy United Natural Foods stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares United Natural Foods with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with United Natural Foods include Chefs' Warehouse (CHEF), Medifast (MED), Andersons (ANDE), Sysco (SYY), and J. M. Smucker (SJM).

How does United Natural Foods compare to Chefs' Warehouse?

United Natural Foods (NYSE:UNFI) and Chefs' Warehouse (NASDAQ:CHEF) are both mid-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings and media sentiment.

Chefs' Warehouse has a net margin of 1.87% compared to United Natural Foods' net margin of -0.25%. Chefs' Warehouse's return on equity of 15.54% beat United Natural Foods' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
United Natural Foods-0.25% 6.05% 1.27%
Chefs' Warehouse 1.87%15.54%4.65%

United Natural Foods presently has a consensus price target of $43.63, suggesting a potential downside of 13.71%. Chefs' Warehouse has a consensus price target of $80.83, suggesting a potential upside of 0.61%. Given Chefs' Warehouse's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Chefs' Warehouse is more favorable than United Natural Foods.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
United Natural Foods
1 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.20
Chefs' Warehouse
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.86

Chefs' Warehouse has lower revenue, but higher earnings than United Natural Foods. United Natural Foods is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chefs' Warehouse, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
United Natural Foods$31.54B0.10-$118M-$1.30N/A
Chefs' Warehouse$4.26B0.77$72.36M$1.8044.63

87.6% of United Natural Foods shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.6% of Chefs' Warehouse shares are held by institutional investors. 2.4% of United Natural Foods shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 11.1% of Chefs' Warehouse shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

United Natural Foods has a beta of 0.82, suggesting that its stock price is 18% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chefs' Warehouse has a beta of 1.47, suggesting that its stock price is 47% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Chefs' Warehouse had 1 more articles in the media than United Natural Foods. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Chefs' Warehouse and 6 mentions for United Natural Foods. Chefs' Warehouse's average media sentiment score of 0.98 beat United Natural Foods' score of 0.85 indicating that Chefs' Warehouse is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
United Natural Foods
2 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Chefs' Warehouse
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Chefs' Warehouse beats United Natural Foods on 16 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does United Natural Foods compare to Medifast?

United Natural Foods (NYSE:UNFI) and Medifast (NYSE:MED) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation and earnings.

Medifast has lower revenue, but higher earnings than United Natural Foods. United Natural Foods is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Medifast, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
United Natural Foods$31.54B0.10-$118M-$1.30N/A
Medifast$385.79M0.36-$18.67M-$1.83N/A

United Natural Foods has a beta of 0.82, indicating that its share price is 18% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Medifast has a beta of 0.55, indicating that its share price is 45% less volatile than the broader market.

87.6% of United Natural Foods shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.5% of Medifast shares are held by institutional investors. 2.4% of United Natural Foods shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.7% of Medifast shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Medifast had 1 more articles in the media than United Natural Foods. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Medifast and 6 mentions for United Natural Foods. United Natural Foods' average media sentiment score of 0.85 beat Medifast's score of 0.74 indicating that United Natural Foods is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
United Natural Foods
2 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Medifast
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

United Natural Foods presently has a consensus price target of $43.63, indicating a potential downside of 13.71%. Medifast has a consensus price target of $12.00, indicating a potential downside of 4.34%. Given Medifast's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Medifast is more favorable than United Natural Foods.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
United Natural Foods
1 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.20
Medifast
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50

United Natural Foods has a net margin of -0.25% compared to Medifast's net margin of -5.78%. United Natural Foods' return on equity of 6.05% beat Medifast's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
United Natural Foods-0.25% 6.05% 1.27%
Medifast -5.78%-4.80%-3.83%

Summary

United Natural Foods beats Medifast on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does United Natural Foods compare to Andersons?

United Natural Foods (NYSE:UNFI) and Andersons (NASDAQ:ANDE) are both mid-cap food distributors companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, media sentiment, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability and risk.

United Natural Foods has a beta of 0.82, meaning that its share price is 18% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Andersons has a beta of 0.69, meaning that its share price is 31% less volatile than the broader market.

Andersons has a net margin of 1.17% compared to United Natural Foods' net margin of -0.25%. Andersons' return on equity of 10.68% beat United Natural Foods' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
United Natural Foods-0.25% 6.05% 1.27%
Andersons 1.17%10.68%4.04%

In the previous week, United Natural Foods had 2 more articles in the media than Andersons. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for United Natural Foods and 4 mentions for Andersons. Andersons' average media sentiment score of 1.27 beat United Natural Foods' score of 0.85 indicating that Andersons is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
United Natural Foods
2 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Andersons
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

87.6% of United Natural Foods shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.1% of Andersons shares are held by institutional investors. 2.4% of United Natural Foods shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.3% of Andersons shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Andersons has lower revenue, but higher earnings than United Natural Foods. United Natural Foods is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Andersons, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
United Natural Foods$31.54B0.10-$118M-$1.30N/A
Andersons$11.01B0.22$95.71M$3.7619.01

United Natural Foods presently has a consensus price target of $43.63, suggesting a potential downside of 13.71%. Andersons has a consensus price target of $82.50, suggesting a potential upside of 15.45%. Given Andersons' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Andersons is more favorable than United Natural Foods.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
United Natural Foods
1 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.20
Andersons
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

Summary

Andersons beats United Natural Foods on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does United Natural Foods compare to Sysco?

United Natural Foods (NYSE:UNFI) and Sysco (NYSE:SYY) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, risk, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership and earnings.

United Natural Foods has a beta of 0.82, suggesting that its stock price is 18% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sysco has a beta of 0.66, suggesting that its stock price is 34% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Sysco had 4 more articles in the media than United Natural Foods. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Sysco and 6 mentions for United Natural Foods. Sysco's average media sentiment score of 0.86 beat United Natural Foods' score of 0.85 indicating that Sysco is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
United Natural Foods
2 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Sysco
5 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

87.6% of United Natural Foods shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.4% of Sysco shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.4% of United Natural Foods shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Sysco shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Sysco has higher revenue and earnings than United Natural Foods. United Natural Foods is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sysco, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
United Natural Foods$31.54B0.10-$118M-$1.30N/A
Sysco$81.37B0.43$1.83B$3.6120.09

Sysco has a net margin of 2.08% compared to United Natural Foods' net margin of -0.25%. Sysco's return on equity of 103.57% beat United Natural Foods' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
United Natural Foods-0.25% 6.05% 1.27%
Sysco 2.08%103.57%8.06%

United Natural Foods currently has a consensus target price of $43.63, indicating a potential downside of 13.71%. Sysco has a consensus target price of $88.15, indicating a potential upside of 21.54%. Given Sysco's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Sysco is more favorable than United Natural Foods.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
United Natural Foods
1 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.20
Sysco
0 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.56

Summary

Sysco beats United Natural Foods on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does United Natural Foods compare to J. M. Smucker?

J. M. Smucker (NYSE:SJM) and United Natural Foods (NYSE:UNFI) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment and earnings.

J. M. Smucker has a beta of 0.25, suggesting that its share price is 75% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, United Natural Foods has a beta of 0.82, suggesting that its share price is 18% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, J. M. Smucker had 3 more articles in the media than United Natural Foods. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for J. M. Smucker and 6 mentions for United Natural Foods. J. M. Smucker's average media sentiment score of 0.88 beat United Natural Foods' score of 0.85 indicating that J. M. Smucker is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
J. M. Smucker
4 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
United Natural Foods
2 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

United Natural Foods has a net margin of -0.25% compared to J. M. Smucker's net margin of -14.07%. J. M. Smucker's return on equity of 15.94% beat United Natural Foods' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
J. M. Smucker-14.07% 15.94% 5.37%
United Natural Foods -0.25%6.05%1.27%

J. M. Smucker presently has a consensus target price of $116.59, indicating a potential upside of 16.05%. United Natural Foods has a consensus target price of $43.63, indicating a potential downside of 13.71%. Given J. M. Smucker's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe J. M. Smucker is more favorable than United Natural Foods.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
J. M. Smucker
1 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.48
United Natural Foods
1 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.20

81.7% of J. M. Smucker shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.6% of United Natural Foods shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.2% of J. M. Smucker shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.4% of United Natural Foods shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

United Natural Foods has higher revenue and earnings than J. M. Smucker. United Natural Foods is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than J. M. Smucker, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
J. M. Smucker$8.73B1.23-$1.23B-$11.79N/A
United Natural Foods$31.54B0.10-$118M-$1.30N/A

Summary

J. M. Smucker beats United Natural Foods on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get United Natural Foods News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for UNFI and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding UNFI and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

UNFI vs. The Competition

MetricUnited Natural FoodsFOOD IndustryStaples SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$3.07B$7.36B$15.97B$22.74B
Dividend YieldN/A4.32%3.55%4.12%
P/E Ratio-38.8915.5526.3029.73
Price / Sales0.101.1547.6023.27
Price / Cash8.399.7916.2724.79
Price / Book1.972.525.234.60
Net Income-$118M$224.26M$674.08M$1.06B
7 Day Performance-3.21%-1.76%-2.08%-2.27%
1 Month Performance3.29%-5.00%-3.71%-1.66%
1 Year Performance62.46%-14.14%-13.66%21.94%

United Natural Foods Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
UNFI
United Natural Foods
1.7294 of 5 stars
$50.56
-2.1%
$43.63
-13.7%
+62.5%$3.07B$31.54BN/A25,600
CHEF
Chefs' Warehouse
2.8728 of 5 stars
$79.83
-0.4%
$80.83
+1.3%
+23.4%$3.26B$4.15B44.355,156
MED
Medifast
1.7274 of 5 stars
$12.71
+0.1%
$12.00
-5.5%
-10.4%$140.16M$346.10MN/A870
ANDE
Andersons
3.9951 of 5 stars
$70.37
+3.1%
$73.33
+4.2%
+98.1%$2.41B$10.98B18.792,137
SYY
Sysco
4.8218 of 5 stars
$72.36
-1.3%
$88.15
+21.8%
+0.3%$34.60B$83.57B20.0475,000

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:UNFI) was last updated on 5/17/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners