Flowers Foods (FLO) Competitors

Flowers Foods has higher revenue and earnings than Helen of Troy. Helen of Troy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Flowers Foods, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

75.5% of Flowers Foods shares are held by institutional investors. 7.2% of Flowers Foods shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Helen of Troy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Flowers Foods has a beta of 0.4, suggesting that its share price is 60% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Helen of Troy has a beta of 1.31, suggesting that its share price is 31% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Helen of Troy had 20 more articles in the media than Flowers Foods. MarketBeat recorded 25 mentions for Helen of Troy and 5 mentions for Flowers Foods. Flowers Foods' average media sentiment score of 1.41 beat Helen of Troy's score of 0.07 indicating that Flowers Foods is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Flowers Foods presently has a consensus target price of $9.60, indicating a potential upside of 36.85%. Helen of Troy has a consensus target price of $26.50, indicating a potential downside of 4.09%. Given Flowers Foods' higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Flowers Foods is more favorable than Helen of Troy.

Flowers Foods has a net margin of 1.38% compared to Helen of Troy's net margin of -22.70%. Flowers Foods' return on equity of 15.98% beat Helen of Troy's return on equity.

Interparfums has a net margin of 11.32% compared to Flowers Foods' net margin of 1.38%. Flowers Foods' return on equity of 15.98% beat Interparfums' return on equity.

75.5% of Flowers Foods shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 55.6% of Interparfums shares are held by institutional investors. 7.2% of Flowers Foods shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 43.7% of Interparfums shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Flowers Foods has a beta of 0.4, indicating that its share price is 60% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Interparfums has a beta of 1.11, indicating that its share price is 11% more volatile than the broader market.

Flowers Foods currently has a consensus price target of $9.60, indicating a potential upside of 36.85%. Interparfums has a consensus price target of $116.17, indicating a potential downside of 6.73%. Given Flowers Foods' higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Flowers Foods is more favorable than Interparfums.

Flowers Foods pays an annual dividend of $0.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.1%. Interparfums pays an annual dividend of $3.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Flowers Foods pays out 142.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Interparfums pays out 60.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Flowers Foods has increased its dividend for 24 consecutive years and Interparfums has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Flowers Foods is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Interparfums has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Flowers Foods. Flowers Foods is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Interparfums, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Interparfums had 16 more articles in the media than Flowers Foods. MarketBeat recorded 21 mentions for Interparfums and 5 mentions for Flowers Foods. Flowers Foods' average media sentiment score of 1.41 beat Interparfums' score of 0.44 indicating that Flowers Foods is being referred to more favorably in the media.

In the previous week, Kraft Heinz had 19 more articles in the media than Flowers Foods. MarketBeat recorded 24 mentions for Kraft Heinz and 5 mentions for Flowers Foods. Flowers Foods' average media sentiment score of 1.41 beat Kraft Heinz's score of 1.03 indicating that Flowers Foods is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Flowers Foods pays an annual dividend of $0.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.1%. Kraft Heinz pays an annual dividend of $1.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.2%. Flowers Foods pays out 142.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Kraft Heinz pays out -32.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Flowers Foods has raised its dividend for 24 consecutive years. Flowers Foods is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Flowers Foods has a net margin of 1.38% compared to Kraft Heinz's net margin of -23.05%. Flowers Foods' return on equity of 15.98% beat Kraft Heinz's return on equity.

Flowers Foods has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Kraft Heinz. Kraft Heinz is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Flowers Foods, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Flowers Foods currently has a consensus target price of $9.60, indicating a potential upside of 36.85%. Kraft Heinz has a consensus target price of $23.19, indicating a potential downside of 10.30%. Given Flowers Foods' higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Flowers Foods is more favorable than Kraft Heinz.

75.5% of Flowers Foods shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 78.2% of Kraft Heinz shares are held by institutional investors. 7.2% of Flowers Foods shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Kraft Heinz shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Flowers Foods has a beta of 0.4, indicating that its stock price is 60% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kraft Heinz has a beta of 0.08, indicating that its stock price is 92% less volatile than the broader market.

Flowers Foods pays an annual dividend of $0.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.1%. MGP Ingredients pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Flowers Foods pays out 142.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. MGP Ingredients pays out -4.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Flowers Foods has increased its dividend for 24 consecutive years. Flowers Foods is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

75.5% of Flowers Foods shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.1% of MGP Ingredients shares are owned by institutional investors. 7.2% of Flowers Foods shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 31.7% of MGP Ingredients shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, MGP Ingredients had 13 more articles in the media than Flowers Foods. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for MGP Ingredients and 5 mentions for Flowers Foods. Flowers Foods' average media sentiment score of 1.41 beat MGP Ingredients' score of 0.49 indicating that Flowers Foods is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Flowers Foods presently has a consensus price target of $9.60, suggesting a potential upside of 36.85%. MGP Ingredients has a consensus price target of $27.25, suggesting a potential upside of 53.95%. Given MGP Ingredients' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe MGP Ingredients is more favorable than Flowers Foods.

Flowers Foods has a net margin of 1.38% compared to MGP Ingredients' net margin of -48.08%. Flowers Foods' return on equity of 15.98% beat MGP Ingredients' return on equity.

Flowers Foods has a beta of 0.4, indicating that its share price is 60% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, MGP Ingredients has a beta of 0.47, indicating that its share price is 53% less volatile than the broader market.

Flowers Foods has higher revenue and earnings than MGP Ingredients. MGP Ingredients is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Flowers Foods, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.