Flowers Foods (FLO) Competitors

Flowers Foods logo
$7.57 +0.22 (+2.99%)
Closing price 03:58 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$7.58 +0.01 (+0.20%)
As of 06:35 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

FLO vs. CELH, HELE, IPAR, KHC, and MGPI

Should you buy Flowers Foods stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Flowers Foods with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Flowers Foods include Celsius (CELH), Helen of Troy (HELE), Interparfums (IPAR), Kraft Heinz (KHC), and MGP Ingredients (MGPI).

How does Flowers Foods compare to Celsius?

Celsius (NASDAQ:CELH) and Flowers Foods (NYSE:FLO) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends, profitability, valuation, earnings, risk and institutional ownership.

Celsius has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Flowers Foods. Flowers Foods is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Celsius, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Celsius$2.97B2.42$108M$0.4365.49
Flowers Foods$5.26B0.31$83.82M$0.3521.63

Celsius presently has a consensus price target of $63.15, indicating a potential upside of 124.25%. Flowers Foods has a consensus price target of $9.60, indicating a potential upside of 26.82%. Given Celsius' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Celsius is more favorable than Flowers Foods.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Celsius
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
21 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.84
Flowers Foods
2 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.71

In the previous week, Celsius had 11 more articles in the media than Flowers Foods. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Celsius and 2 mentions for Flowers Foods. Flowers Foods' average media sentiment score of 1.50 beat Celsius' score of 0.85 indicating that Flowers Foods is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Celsius
7 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Flowers Foods
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Celsius has a beta of 0.93, indicating that its share price is 7% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Flowers Foods has a beta of 0.4, indicating that its share price is 60% less volatile than the broader market.

Celsius has a net margin of 5.85% compared to Flowers Foods' net margin of 1.38%. Celsius' return on equity of 37.95% beat Flowers Foods' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Celsius5.85% 37.95% 9.62%
Flowers Foods 1.38%15.98%5.11%

61.0% of Celsius shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 75.5% of Flowers Foods shares are held by institutional investors. 2.3% of Celsius shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 7.2% of Flowers Foods shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Celsius beats Flowers Foods on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Flowers Foods compare to Helen of Troy?

Helen of Troy (NASDAQ:HELE) and Flowers Foods (NYSE:FLO) are both small-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings and valuation.

75.5% of Flowers Foods shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Helen of Troy shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 7.2% of Flowers Foods shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Flowers Foods has higher revenue and earnings than Helen of Troy. Helen of Troy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Flowers Foods, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Helen of Troy$1.79B0.34-$898.98M-$39.15N/A
Flowers Foods$5.26B0.31$83.82M$0.3521.63

In the previous week, Helen of Troy had 15 more articles in the media than Flowers Foods. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Helen of Troy and 2 mentions for Flowers Foods. Flowers Foods' average media sentiment score of 1.50 beat Helen of Troy's score of 0.14 indicating that Flowers Foods is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Helen of Troy
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
15 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Flowers Foods
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Flowers Foods has a net margin of 1.38% compared to Helen of Troy's net margin of -50.33%. Flowers Foods' return on equity of 15.98% beat Helen of Troy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Helen of Troy-50.33% 7.00% 2.80%
Flowers Foods 1.38%15.98%5.11%

Helen of Troy presently has a consensus price target of $24.00, indicating a potential downside of 7.62%. Flowers Foods has a consensus price target of $9.60, indicating a potential upside of 26.82%. Given Flowers Foods' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Flowers Foods is more favorable than Helen of Troy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Helen of Troy
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.60
Flowers Foods
2 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.71

Helen of Troy has a beta of 1.34, meaning that its stock price is 34% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Flowers Foods has a beta of 0.4, meaning that its stock price is 60% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Flowers Foods beats Helen of Troy on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Flowers Foods compare to Interparfums?

Interparfums (NASDAQ:IPAR) and Flowers Foods (NYSE:FLO) are related companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, earnings, dividends, valuation, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Interparfums has a beta of 1.16, suggesting that its stock price is 16% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Flowers Foods has a beta of 0.4, suggesting that its stock price is 60% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Flowers Foods had 2 more articles in the media than Interparfums. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Flowers Foods and 0 mentions for Interparfums. Flowers Foods' average media sentiment score of 1.50 beat Interparfums' score of 0.00 indicating that Flowers Foods is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Interparfums Neutral
Flowers Foods Very Positive

Interparfums has a net margin of 11.32% compared to Flowers Foods' net margin of 1.38%. Flowers Foods' return on equity of 15.98% beat Interparfums' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Interparfums11.32% 15.47% 10.82%
Flowers Foods 1.38%15.98%5.11%

55.6% of Interparfums shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 75.5% of Flowers Foods shares are owned by institutional investors. 43.7% of Interparfums shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 7.2% of Flowers Foods shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Interparfums presently has a consensus target price of $106.00, indicating a potential upside of 6.62%. Flowers Foods has a consensus target price of $9.60, indicating a potential upside of 26.82%. Given Flowers Foods' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Flowers Foods is more favorable than Interparfums.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Interparfums
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75
Flowers Foods
2 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.71

Interparfums has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Flowers Foods. Interparfums is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Flowers Foods, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Interparfums$1.49B2.14$168.39M$5.2718.87
Flowers Foods$5.26B0.31$83.82M$0.3521.63

Interparfums pays an annual dividend of $3.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. Flowers Foods pays an annual dividend of $0.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.6%. Interparfums pays out 60.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Flowers Foods pays out 142.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Interparfums has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Flowers Foods has raised its dividend for 24 consecutive years. Flowers Foods is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Interparfums beats Flowers Foods on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Flowers Foods compare to Kraft Heinz?

Kraft Heinz (NASDAQ:KHC) and Flowers Foods (NYSE:FLO) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings and dividends.

Flowers Foods has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Kraft Heinz. Kraft Heinz is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Flowers Foods, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Kraft Heinz$24.99B1.07-$5.85B-$4.86N/A
Flowers Foods$5.26B0.31$83.82M$0.3521.63

Flowers Foods has a net margin of 1.38% compared to Kraft Heinz's net margin of -23.05%. Flowers Foods' return on equity of 15.98% beat Kraft Heinz's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Kraft Heinz-23.05% 7.26% 3.70%
Flowers Foods 1.38%15.98%5.11%

Kraft Heinz pays an annual dividend of $1.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.1%. Flowers Foods pays an annual dividend of $0.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.6%. Kraft Heinz pays out -32.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Flowers Foods pays out 142.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Flowers Foods has raised its dividend for 24 consecutive years. Kraft Heinz is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Kraft Heinz presently has a consensus target price of $22.69, indicating a potential upside of 0.97%. Flowers Foods has a consensus target price of $9.60, indicating a potential upside of 26.82%. Given Flowers Foods' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Flowers Foods is more favorable than Kraft Heinz.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Kraft Heinz
5 Sell rating(s)
14 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.85
Flowers Foods
2 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.71

78.2% of Kraft Heinz shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 75.5% of Flowers Foods shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Kraft Heinz shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 7.2% of Flowers Foods shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Kraft Heinz has a beta of 0.08, suggesting that its stock price is 92% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Flowers Foods has a beta of 0.4, suggesting that its stock price is 60% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Kraft Heinz had 23 more articles in the media than Flowers Foods. MarketBeat recorded 25 mentions for Kraft Heinz and 2 mentions for Flowers Foods. Flowers Foods' average media sentiment score of 1.50 beat Kraft Heinz's score of 0.70 indicating that Flowers Foods is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Kraft Heinz
13 Very Positive mention(s)
6 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Flowers Foods
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Summary

Flowers Foods beats Kraft Heinz on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Flowers Foods compare to MGP Ingredients?

Flowers Foods (NYSE:FLO) and MGP Ingredients (NASDAQ:MGPI) are both small-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, risk, institutional ownership and earnings.

75.5% of Flowers Foods shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.1% of MGP Ingredients shares are held by institutional investors. 7.2% of Flowers Foods shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 31.7% of MGP Ingredients shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Flowers Foods pays an annual dividend of $0.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.6%. MGP Ingredients pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Flowers Foods pays out 142.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. MGP Ingredients pays out -4.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Flowers Foods has raised its dividend for 24 consecutive years. Flowers Foods is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Flowers Foods had 2 more articles in the media than MGP Ingredients. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Flowers Foods and 0 mentions for MGP Ingredients. Flowers Foods' average media sentiment score of 1.50 beat MGP Ingredients' score of 0.00 indicating that Flowers Foods is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Flowers Foods Very Positive
MGP Ingredients Neutral

Flowers Foods presently has a consensus target price of $9.60, suggesting a potential upside of 26.82%. MGP Ingredients has a consensus target price of $27.75, suggesting a potential upside of 64.20%. Given MGP Ingredients' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe MGP Ingredients is more favorable than Flowers Foods.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Flowers Foods
2 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.71
MGP Ingredients
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

Flowers Foods has a beta of 0.4, suggesting that its share price is 60% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, MGP Ingredients has a beta of 0.46, suggesting that its share price is 54% less volatile than the broader market.

Flowers Foods has a net margin of 1.38% compared to MGP Ingredients' net margin of -45.70%. Flowers Foods' return on equity of 15.98% beat MGP Ingredients' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Flowers Foods1.38% 15.98% 5.11%
MGP Ingredients -45.70%7.48%4.44%

Flowers Foods has higher revenue and earnings than MGP Ingredients. MGP Ingredients is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Flowers Foods, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Flowers Foods$5.26B0.31$83.82M$0.3521.63
MGP Ingredients$521.15M0.69-$107.81M-$11.14N/A

Summary

Flowers Foods beats MGP Ingredients on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Flowers Foods News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FLO and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FLO and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

FLO vs. The Competition

MetricFlowers FoodsFOOD IndustryStaples SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$1.60B$7.58B$16.14B$23.13B
Dividend Yield6.43%4.11%3.50%4.06%
P/E Ratio21.6316.0925.5831.08
Price / Sales0.311.2447.0520.72
Price / Cash4.129.7613.2218.65
Price / Book1.232.805.794.65
Net Income$83.82M$241.67M$678.29M$1.07B
7 Day Performance-0.41%-0.70%-0.88%-1.04%
1 Month Performance-4.98%-1.39%0.93%0.18%
1 Year Performance-53.30%-13.49%-12.32%24.25%

Flowers Foods Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
FLO
Flowers Foods
4.819 of 5 stars
$7.57
+3.0%
$9.60
+26.8%
-53.6%$1.60B$5.26B21.6310,300
CELH
Celsius
4.6837 of 5 stars
$28.74
-1.5%
$63.50
+120.9%
-32.9%$7.46B$2.52B66.841,497
HELE
Helen of Troy
1.6892 of 5 stars
$28.79
-3.6%
$24.00
-16.6%
-2.7%$694.47M$1.79BN/A1,854
IPAR
Interparfums
3.4605 of 5 stars
$99.42
-2.3%
$106.00
+6.6%
-26.1%$3.26B$1.49B18.87530
KHC
Kraft Heinz
2.1974 of 5 stars
$23.99
-1.6%
$22.69
-5.4%
-14.6%$28.92B$24.94BN/A35,000

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:FLO) was last updated on 6/23/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners