Cal-Maine Foods (CALM) Competitors

79.7% of McCormick & Company, Incorporated shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.7% of Cal-Maine Foods shares are held by institutional investors. 10.6% of McCormick & Company, Incorporated shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.9% of Cal-Maine Foods shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

McCormick & Company, Incorporated has higher revenue and earnings than Cal-Maine Foods. McCormick & Company, Incorporated is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cal-Maine Foods, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

McCormick & Company, Incorporated has a net margin of 21.91% compared to Cal-Maine Foods' net margin of 10.88%. McCormick & Company, Incorporated's return on equity of 12.78% beat Cal-Maine Foods' return on equity.

McCormick & Company, Incorporated presently has a consensus target price of $60.50, suggesting a potential upside of 18.55%. Cal-Maine Foods has a consensus target price of $94.71, suggesting a potential upside of 7.90%. Given McCormick & Company, Incorporated's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe McCormick & Company, Incorporated is more favorable than Cal-Maine Foods.

McCormick & Company, Incorporated pays an annual dividend of $1.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. Cal-Maine Foods pays an annual dividend of $1.42 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. McCormick & Company, Incorporated pays out 31.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cal-Maine Foods pays out 21.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. McCormick & Company, Incorporated has increased its dividend for 38 consecutive years and Cal-Maine Foods has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. McCormick & Company, Incorporated is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

McCormick & Company, Incorporated has a beta of 0.63, meaning that its share price is 37% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cal-Maine Foods has a beta of 0.25, meaning that its share price is 75% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, McCormick & Company, Incorporated had 5 more articles in the media than Cal-Maine Foods. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for McCormick & Company, Incorporated and 5 mentions for Cal-Maine Foods. Cal-Maine Foods' average media sentiment score of 1.67 beat McCormick & Company, Incorporated's score of 1.24 indicating that Cal-Maine Foods is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

J. M. Smucker has a beta of 0.26, suggesting that its stock price is 74% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cal-Maine Foods has a beta of 0.25, suggesting that its stock price is 75% less volatile than the broader market.

J. M. Smucker pays an annual dividend of $4.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. Cal-Maine Foods pays an annual dividend of $1.42 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. J. M. Smucker pays out -344.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cal-Maine Foods pays out 21.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. J. M. Smucker has raised its dividend for 27 consecutive years and Cal-Maine Foods has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. J. M. Smucker is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, J. M. Smucker had 3 more articles in the media than Cal-Maine Foods. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for J. M. Smucker and 5 mentions for Cal-Maine Foods. Cal-Maine Foods' average media sentiment score of 1.67 beat J. M. Smucker's score of 1.30 indicating that Cal-Maine Foods is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Cal-Maine Foods has lower revenue, but higher earnings than J. M. Smucker. J. M. Smucker is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cal-Maine Foods, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

J. M. Smucker presently has a consensus target price of $121.67, suggesting a potential upside of 1.76%. Cal-Maine Foods has a consensus target price of $94.71, suggesting a potential upside of 7.90%. Given Cal-Maine Foods' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Cal-Maine Foods is more favorable than J. M. Smucker.

81.7% of J. M. Smucker shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.7% of Cal-Maine Foods shares are held by institutional investors. 2.8% of J. M. Smucker shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.9% of Cal-Maine Foods shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Cal-Maine Foods has a net margin of 10.88% compared to J. M. Smucker's net margin of -1.53%. J. M. Smucker's return on equity of 17.18% beat Cal-Maine Foods' return on equity.

Cal-Maine Foods has a net margin of 10.88% compared to Smithfield Foods' net margin of 6.48%. Smithfield Foods' return on equity of 15.54% beat Cal-Maine Foods' return on equity.

In the previous week, Smithfield Foods had 8 more articles in the media than Cal-Maine Foods. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Smithfield Foods and 5 mentions for Cal-Maine Foods. Cal-Maine Foods' average media sentiment score of 1.67 beat Smithfield Foods' score of 1.24 indicating that Cal-Maine Foods is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Cal-Maine Foods presently has a consensus price target of $94.71, indicating a potential upside of 7.90%. Smithfield Foods has a consensus price target of $30.88, indicating a potential upside of 18.57%. Given Smithfield Foods' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Smithfield Foods is more favorable than Cal-Maine Foods.

Cal-Maine Foods pays an annual dividend of $1.42 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Smithfield Foods pays an annual dividend of $1.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.8%. Cal-Maine Foods pays out 21.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Smithfield Foods pays out 48.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Cal-Maine Foods has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Cal-Maine Foods has a beta of 0.25, indicating that its stock price is 75% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Smithfield Foods has a beta of -0.44, indicating that its stock price is 144% less volatile than the broader market.

Smithfield Foods has higher revenue and earnings than Cal-Maine Foods. Smithfield Foods is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cal-Maine Foods, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

84.7% of Cal-Maine Foods shares are held by institutional investors. 3.9% of Cal-Maine Foods shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.8% of Smithfield Foods shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Cal-Maine Foods has a net margin of 10.88% compared to Conagra Brands' net margin of -16.99%. Cal-Maine Foods' return on equity of 11.79% beat Conagra Brands' return on equity.

In the previous week, Conagra Brands had 25 more articles in the media than Cal-Maine Foods. MarketBeat recorded 30 mentions for Conagra Brands and 5 mentions for Cal-Maine Foods. Cal-Maine Foods' average media sentiment score of 1.67 beat Conagra Brands' score of 0.11 indicating that Cal-Maine Foods is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Conagra Brands presently has a consensus price target of $14.07, suggesting a potential downside of 3.16%. Cal-Maine Foods has a consensus price target of $94.71, suggesting a potential upside of 7.90%. Given Cal-Maine Foods' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Cal-Maine Foods is more favorable than Conagra Brands.

Conagra Brands pays an annual dividend of $0.70 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.8%. Cal-Maine Foods pays an annual dividend of $1.42 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Conagra Brands pays out -17.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cal-Maine Foods pays out 21.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Conagra Brands has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years and Cal-Maine Foods has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Conagra Brands is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

83.8% of Conagra Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.7% of Cal-Maine Foods shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Conagra Brands shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.9% of Cal-Maine Foods shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Cal-Maine Foods has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Conagra Brands. Conagra Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cal-Maine Foods, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Conagra Brands has a beta of -0.03, indicating that its stock price is 103% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cal-Maine Foods has a beta of 0.25, indicating that its stock price is 75% less volatile than the broader market.