Go Pro

Marker Therapeutics (MRKR) Competitors

Marker Therapeutics logo
$1.15 0.00 (0.00%)
Closing price 09/11/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$1.19 +0.04 (+3.13%)
As of 07:09 AM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

MRKR vs. IBIO, CTOR, TELO, BRTX, and GANX

Should you buy Marker Therapeutics stock or one of its competitors? Marker Therapeutics's main competitors and comparable companies include iBio (IBIO), Citius Oncology (CTOR), Telomir Pharmaceuticals (TELO), Biorestorative Therapies (BRTX), and Gain Therapeutics (GANX). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "biotechnology" industry.

How does Marker Therapeutics compare to iBio?

Marker Therapeutics (NASDAQ:MRKR) and iBio (NASDAQ:IBIO) are both small-cap healthcare companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, valuation, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment and earnings.

iBio has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Marker Therapeutics' net margin of -343.03%. iBio's return on equity of -40.66% beat Marker Therapeutics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Marker Therapeutics-343.03% -56.96% -47.82%
iBio N/A -40.66%-35.78%

Marker Therapeutics presently has a consensus target price of $10.00, indicating a potential upside of 769.57%. iBio has a consensus target price of $5.00, indicating a potential upside of 314.94%. Given Marker Therapeutics' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Marker Therapeutics is more favorable than iBio.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Marker Therapeutics
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25
iBio
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
3 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.13

22.4% of Marker Therapeutics shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.9% of iBio shares are held by institutional investors. 5.7% of Marker Therapeutics shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of iBio shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Marker Therapeutics has higher revenue and earnings than iBio. iBio is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marker Therapeutics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Marker Therapeutics$3.55M5.40-$12.16M-$0.41N/A
iBio$100K774.94-$33.04M-$0.34N/A

In the previous week, iBio had 3 more articles in the media than Marker Therapeutics. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for iBio and 1 mentions for Marker Therapeutics. Marker Therapeutics' average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat iBio's score of 0.40 indicating that Marker Therapeutics is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Marker Therapeutics Very Positive
iBio Neutral

Marker Therapeutics has a beta of 1.53, suggesting that its share price is 53% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, iBio has a beta of 1.29, suggesting that its share price is 29% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

iBio beats Marker Therapeutics on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Marker Therapeutics compare to Citius Oncology?

Citius Oncology (NASDAQ:CTOR) and Marker Therapeutics (NASDAQ:MRKR) are both small-cap healthcare companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation and profitability.

Citius Oncology has a beta of 3.52, indicating that its share price is 252% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Marker Therapeutics has a beta of 1.53, indicating that its share price is 53% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Citius Oncology and Citius Oncology both had 1 articles in the media. Citius Oncology's average media sentiment score of 1.87 equaled Marker Therapeutics'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Citius Oncology Very Positive
Marker Therapeutics Very Positive

Citius Oncology currently has a consensus target price of $6.00, suggesting a potential upside of 553.95%. Marker Therapeutics has a consensus target price of $10.00, suggesting a potential upside of 769.57%. Given Marker Therapeutics' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Marker Therapeutics is more favorable than Citius Oncology.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Citius Oncology
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Marker Therapeutics
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25

Marker Therapeutics has higher revenue and earnings than Citius Oncology. Marker Therapeutics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Citius Oncology, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Citius OncologyN/AN/A-$24.76M-$0.47N/A
Marker Therapeutics$3.55M5.40-$12.16M-$0.41N/A

Citius Oncology has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Marker Therapeutics' net margin of -343.03%. Marker Therapeutics' return on equity of -56.96% beat Citius Oncology's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Citius OncologyN/A -102.98% -43.49%
Marker Therapeutics -343.03%-56.96%-47.82%

70.5% of Citius Oncology shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 22.4% of Marker Therapeutics shares are held by institutional investors. 9.8% of Citius Oncology shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.7% of Marker Therapeutics shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Citius Oncology beats Marker Therapeutics on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Marker Therapeutics compare to Telomir Pharmaceuticals?

Telomir Pharmaceuticals (NASDAQ:TELO) and Marker Therapeutics (NASDAQ:MRKR) are both small-cap healthcare companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability and media sentiment.

Telomir Pharmaceuticals has a beta of -0.25, indicating that its stock price is 125% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Marker Therapeutics has a beta of 1.53, indicating that its stock price is 53% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Telomir Pharmaceuticals had 2 more articles in the media than Marker Therapeutics. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Telomir Pharmaceuticals and 1 mentions for Marker Therapeutics. Telomir Pharmaceuticals' average media sentiment score of 1.87 equaled Marker Therapeutics'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Telomir Pharmaceuticals Very Positive
Marker Therapeutics Very Positive

Marker Therapeutics has a consensus price target of $10.00, suggesting a potential upside of 769.57%. Given Marker Therapeutics' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Marker Therapeutics is more favorable than Telomir Pharmaceuticals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Telomir Pharmaceuticals
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Marker Therapeutics
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25

Telomir Pharmaceuticals has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Marker Therapeutics. Marker Therapeutics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Telomir Pharmaceuticals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Telomir PharmaceuticalsN/AN/A-$10.41M-$0.91N/A
Marker Therapeutics$3.55M5.40-$12.16M-$0.41N/A

Telomir Pharmaceuticals has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Marker Therapeutics' net margin of -343.03%. Marker Therapeutics' return on equity of -56.96% beat Telomir Pharmaceuticals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Telomir PharmaceuticalsN/A -102.70% -90.75%
Marker Therapeutics -343.03%-56.96%-47.82%

22.4% of Marker Therapeutics shares are held by institutional investors. 16.4% of Telomir Pharmaceuticals shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 5.7% of Marker Therapeutics shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Marker Therapeutics beats Telomir Pharmaceuticals on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Marker Therapeutics compare to Biorestorative Therapies?

Biorestorative Therapies (NASDAQ:BRTX) and Marker Therapeutics (NASDAQ:MRKR) are both small-cap healthcare companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, profitability, risk and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Biorestorative Therapies had 1 more articles in the media than Marker Therapeutics. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Biorestorative Therapies and 1 mentions for Marker Therapeutics. Marker Therapeutics' average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat Biorestorative Therapies' score of 0.96 indicating that Marker Therapeutics is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Biorestorative Therapies Positive
Marker Therapeutics Very Positive

69.4% of Biorestorative Therapies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 22.4% of Marker Therapeutics shares are owned by institutional investors. 13.6% of Biorestorative Therapies shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.7% of Marker Therapeutics shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Marker Therapeutics has higher revenue and earnings than Biorestorative Therapies. Marker Therapeutics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Biorestorative Therapies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Biorestorative Therapies$360K10.24-$14.24M-$1.07N/A
Marker Therapeutics$3.55M5.40-$12.16M-$0.41N/A

Biorestorative Therapies has a beta of 0.83, suggesting that its stock price is 17% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Marker Therapeutics has a beta of 1.53, suggesting that its stock price is 53% more volatile than the broader market.

Marker Therapeutics has a consensus target price of $10.00, indicating a potential upside of 769.57%. Given Marker Therapeutics' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Marker Therapeutics is more favorable than Biorestorative Therapies.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Biorestorative Therapies
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Marker Therapeutics
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25

Marker Therapeutics has a net margin of -343.03% compared to Biorestorative Therapies' net margin of -3,088.27%. Marker Therapeutics' return on equity of -56.96% beat Biorestorative Therapies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Biorestorative Therapies-3,088.27% -508.42% -230.94%
Marker Therapeutics -343.03%-56.96%-47.82%

Summary

Marker Therapeutics beats Biorestorative Therapies on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Marker Therapeutics compare to Gain Therapeutics?

Marker Therapeutics (NASDAQ:MRKR) and Gain Therapeutics (NASDAQ:GANX) are both small-cap healthcare companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, risk, media sentiment and valuation.

Gain Therapeutics has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Marker Therapeutics' net margin of -343.03%. Marker Therapeutics' return on equity of -56.96% beat Gain Therapeutics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Marker Therapeutics-343.03% -56.96% -47.82%
Gain Therapeutics N/A -161.59%-118.36%

Marker Therapeutics currently has a consensus price target of $10.00, indicating a potential upside of 769.57%. Gain Therapeutics has a consensus price target of $7.50, indicating a potential upside of 328.57%. Given Marker Therapeutics' higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Marker Therapeutics is more favorable than Gain Therapeutics.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Marker Therapeutics
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25
Gain Therapeutics
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

22.4% of Marker Therapeutics shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.0% of Gain Therapeutics shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.7% of Marker Therapeutics shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.2% of Gain Therapeutics shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Gain Therapeutics had 2 more articles in the media than Marker Therapeutics. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Gain Therapeutics and 1 mentions for Marker Therapeutics. Marker Therapeutics' average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat Gain Therapeutics' score of 1.15 indicating that Marker Therapeutics is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Marker Therapeutics Very Positive
Gain Therapeutics Positive

Marker Therapeutics has higher revenue and earnings than Gain Therapeutics. Gain Therapeutics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marker Therapeutics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Marker Therapeutics$3.55M5.40-$12.16M-$0.41N/A
Gain Therapeutics$50K1,527.40-$20.16M-$0.50N/A

Marker Therapeutics has a beta of 1.53, suggesting that its stock price is 53% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gain Therapeutics has a beta of 0.2, suggesting that its stock price is 80% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Marker Therapeutics beats Gain Therapeutics on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Marker Therapeutics News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for MRKR and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding MRKR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

MRKR vs. The Competition

MetricMarker TherapeuticsBiotechnology IndustryHealthcare SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$19.17M$3.84B$7.15B$12.84B
Dividend YieldN/A3.66%2.57%11.71%
P/E Ratio-2.8014.25275.2825.35
Price / Sales5.401,418.81646.1490.72
Price / CashN/A43.6428.4234.96
Price / Book1.1415.2310.376.21
Net Income-$12.16M-$22.86M$3.50B$358.54M
7 Day Performance-2.54%-4.37%-3.30%-2.39%
1 Month Performance0.88%-0.66%-0.86%-3.39%
1 Year Performance20.47%40.76%23.53%8.81%

Marker Therapeutics Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
MRKR
Marker Therapeutics
3.0475 of 5 stars
$1.15
flat
$10.00
+769.6%
+20.5%$19.17M$3.55MN/A60
IBIO
iBio
2.2318 of 5 stars
$1.31
-0.4%
$5.00
+283.1%
N/A$83.93M$100KN/A100
CTOR
Citius Oncology
2.0265 of 5 stars
$0.90
+4.4%
$6.00
+568.2%
-52.0%$83.50MN/AN/AN/A
TELO
Telomir Pharmaceuticals
0.4714 of 5 stars
$1.21
+4.3%
N/A-14.0%$83.22MN/AN/A1
BRTX
Biorestorative Therapies
0.9748 of 5 stars
$2.90
-1.9%
N/A-91.3%$80.18M$360KN/A7

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:MRKR) was last updated on 9/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners