Microvision (MVIS) Competitors

$0.62 0.00 (0.00%)

Closing price 05/22/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$0.62 0.00 (-0.18%)

As of 05/22/2026 07:58 PM Eastern

MVIS vs. LPTH, CLFD, KE, LAES, and ALMU

Should you buy Microvision stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Microvision with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Microvision include LightPath Technologies (LPTH), Clearfield (CLFD), Kimball Electronics (KE), SEALSQ (LAES), and Aeluma (ALMU). These companies are all part of the "electronic equipment" industry.

How does Microvision compare to LightPath Technologies?

LightPath Technologies (NASDAQ:LPTH) and Microvision (NASDAQ:MVIS) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, dividends, earnings and media sentiment.

56.3% of LightPath Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 30.9% of Microvision shares are owned by institutional investors. 24.8% of LightPath Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Microvision shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

LightPath Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than Microvision. LightPath Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Microvision, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
LightPath Technologies	$37.20M	28.61	-$14.87M	-$0.50	N/A
Microvision	$1.21M	168.38	-$94.98M	-$0.31	N/A

In the previous week, Microvision had 1 more articles in the media than LightPath Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Microvision and 2 mentions for LightPath Technologies. LightPath Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.33 beat Microvision's score of -0.32 indicating that LightPath Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
LightPath Technologies	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Microvision	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

LightPath Technologies has a beta of 1.26, indicating that its stock price is 26% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Microvision has a beta of 1.21, indicating that its stock price is 21% more volatile than the broader market.

LightPath Technologies currently has a consensus price target of $14.13, suggesting a potential downside of 16.67%. Microvision has a consensus price target of $2.50, suggesting a potential upside of 301.22%. Given Microvision's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Microvision is more favorable than LightPath Technologies.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
LightPath Technologies	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67
Microvision	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

LightPath Technologies has a net margin of -37.38% compared to Microvision's net margin of -5,887.77%. LightPath Technologies' return on equity of -15.55% beat Microvision's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
LightPath Technologies	-37.38%	-15.55%	-6.87%
Microvision	-5,887.77%	-139.20%	-72.51%

Summary

LightPath Technologies beats Microvision on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Microvision compare to Clearfield?

Microvision (NASDAQ:MVIS) and Clearfield (NASDAQ:CLFD) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, earnings, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, valuation and analyst recommendations.

Microvision has a beta of 1.21, meaning that its share price is 21% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Clearfield has a beta of 1.9, meaning that its share price is 90% more volatile than the broader market.

Clearfield has a net margin of -5.41% compared to Microvision's net margin of -5,887.77%. Clearfield's return on equity of 1.03% beat Microvision's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Microvision	-5,887.77%	-139.20%	-72.51%
Clearfield	-5.41%	1.03%	0.90%

30.9% of Microvision shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.7% of Clearfield shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Microvision shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 17.8% of Clearfield shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Clearfield has higher revenue and earnings than Microvision. Clearfield is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Microvision, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Microvision	$1.21M	168.38	-$94.98M	-$0.31	N/A
Clearfield	$150.13M	3.96	-$8.05M	-$0.62	N/A

Microvision currently has a consensus target price of $2.50, indicating a potential upside of 301.22%. Clearfield has a consensus target price of $43.75, indicating a potential upside of 0.05%. Given Microvision's higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Microvision is more favorable than Clearfield.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Microvision	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Clearfield	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.57

In the previous week, Microvision and Microvision both had 3 articles in the media. Clearfield's average media sentiment score of 0.36 beat Microvision's score of -0.32 indicating that Clearfield is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Microvision	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Clearfield	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

Clearfield beats Microvision on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Microvision compare to Kimball Electronics?

Microvision (NASDAQ:MVIS) and Kimball Electronics (NASDAQ:KE) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Kimball Electronics has a net margin of 1.81% compared to Microvision's net margin of -5,887.77%. Kimball Electronics' return on equity of 6.22% beat Microvision's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Microvision	-5,887.77%	-139.20%	-72.51%
Kimball Electronics	1.81%	6.22%	3.30%

Microvision has a beta of 1.21, meaning that its share price is 21% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kimball Electronics has a beta of 1.25, meaning that its share price is 25% more volatile than the broader market.

30.9% of Microvision shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.0% of Kimball Electronics shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Microvision shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.8% of Kimball Electronics shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Microvision had 1 more articles in the media than Kimball Electronics. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Microvision and 2 mentions for Kimball Electronics. Kimball Electronics' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Microvision's score of -0.32 indicating that Kimball Electronics is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Microvision	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Kimball Electronics	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Microvision presently has a consensus price target of $2.50, indicating a potential upside of 301.22%. Kimball Electronics has a consensus price target of $32.00, indicating a potential upside of 30.08%. Given Microvision's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Microvision is more favorable than Kimball Electronics.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Microvision	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Kimball Electronics	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25

Kimball Electronics has higher revenue and earnings than Microvision. Microvision is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kimball Electronics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Microvision	$1.21M	168.38	-$94.98M	-$0.31	N/A
Kimball Electronics	$1.49B	0.40	$16.98M	$1.04	23.65

Summary

Kimball Electronics beats Microvision on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Microvision compare to SEALSQ?

Microvision (NASDAQ:MVIS) and SEALSQ (NASDAQ:LAES) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment, dividends, earnings and risk.

Microvision presently has a consensus price target of $2.50, suggesting a potential upside of 301.22%. SEALSQ has a consensus price target of $6.00, suggesting a potential upside of 77.51%. Given Microvision's higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Microvision is more favorable than SEALSQ.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Microvision	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
SEALSQ	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

SEALSQ has higher revenue and earnings than Microvision.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Microvision	$1.21M	168.38	-$94.98M	-$0.31	N/A
SEALSQ	$18.25M	35.75	-$34.19M	N/A	N/A

In the previous week, SEALSQ had 4 more articles in the media than Microvision. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for SEALSQ and 3 mentions for Microvision. SEALSQ's average media sentiment score of 0.39 beat Microvision's score of -0.32 indicating that SEALSQ is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Microvision	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
SEALSQ	1 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

30.9% of Microvision shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.3% of SEALSQ shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Microvision shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Microvision has a beta of 1.21, indicating that its share price is 21% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, SEALSQ has a beta of -8.33, indicating that its share price is 933% less volatile than the broader market.

SEALSQ has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Microvision's net margin of -5,887.77%. SEALSQ's return on equity of 0.00% beat Microvision's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Microvision	-5,887.77%	-139.20%	-72.51%
SEALSQ	N/A	N/A	N/A

Summary

SEALSQ beats Microvision on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Microvision compare to Aeluma?

Aeluma (NASDAQ:ALMU) and Microvision (NASDAQ:MVIS) are both small-cap electronic equipment companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment, risk, valuation, dividends and earnings.

Aeluma has a beta of 4.49, suggesting that its stock price is 349% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Microvision has a beta of 1.21, suggesting that its stock price is 21% more volatile than the broader market.

Aeluma currently has a consensus price target of $25.33, suggesting a potential upside of 11.90%. Microvision has a consensus price target of $2.50, suggesting a potential upside of 301.22%. Given Microvision's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Microvision is more favorable than Aeluma.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Aeluma	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80
Microvision	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Aeluma has a net margin of -115.57% compared to Microvision's net margin of -5,887.77%. Aeluma's return on equity of -12.03% beat Microvision's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Aeluma	-115.57%	-12.03%	-11.42%
Microvision	-5,887.77%	-139.20%	-72.51%

30.9% of Microvision shares are held by institutional investors. 14.7% of Aeluma shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Microvision shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Aeluma has higher revenue and earnings than Microvision. Aeluma is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Microvision, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Aeluma	$4.66M	88.96	-$3.02M	-$0.35	N/A
Microvision	$1.21M	168.38	-$94.98M	-$0.31	N/A

In the previous week, Aeluma had 3 more articles in the media than Microvision. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Aeluma and 3 mentions for Microvision. Aeluma's average media sentiment score of 0.23 beat Microvision's score of -0.32 indicating that Aeluma is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Aeluma	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Microvision	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

Aeluma beats Microvision on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Microvision News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding MVIS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

MVIS vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Microvision	LASERS Industry	Computer Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$203.74M	$929.06M	$39.37B	$12.34B
Dividend Yield	N/A	N/A	3.20%	5.28%
P/E Ratio	-2.01	43.12	170.34	25.65
Price / Sales	168.38	154.51	628.44	86.28
Price / Cash	N/A	44.42	48.72	56.67
Price / Book	5.19	23.03	10.53	7.14
Net Income	-$94.98M	-$16.97M	$1.07B	$335.98M
7 Day Performance	10.32%	3.30%	3.77%	4.15%
1 Month Performance	-4.48%	-4.51%	6.27%	2.54%
1 Year Performance	-41.77%	2.64%	169.73%	35.05%

Microvision Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
MVIS Microvision	1.3082 of 5 stars	$0.62 flat	$2.50 +301.2%	-41.8%	$203.74M	$1.21M	N/A	350	Analyst Upgrade Gap Down
LPTH LightPath Technologies	1.7519 of 5 stars	$12.44 +8.0%	$14.13 +13.5%	+615.2%	$723.33M	$37.20M	N/A	330	Analyst Upgrade Gap Down High Trading Volume
CLFD Clearfield	1.4323 of 5 stars	$43.25 -0.6%	$43.75 +1.2%	+14.2%	$591.14M	$150.13M	N/A	1,130
KE Kimball Electronics	2.6666 of 5 stars	$24.94 +1.7%	$32.00 +28.3%	+40.6%	$589.92M	$1.49B	23.98	5,700	Positive News
LAES SEALSQ	2.394 of 5 stars	$2.79 -2.8%	$6.00 +115.1%	-2.9%	$553.98M	$18.25M	N/A	61	Gap Down

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:MVIS) was last updated on 5/26/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Microvision (MVIS) Competitors

MVIS vs. LPTH, CLFD, KE, LAES, and ALMU

How does Microvision compare to LightPath Technologies?

Summary

How does Microvision compare to Clearfield?

Summary

How does Microvision compare to Kimball Electronics?

Summary

How does Microvision compare to SEALSQ?

Summary

How does Microvision compare to Aeluma?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

MVIS vs. The Competition

Microvision Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Microvision (MVIS) Competitors

MVIS vs. LPTH, CLFD, KE, LAES, and ALMU

How does Microvision compare to LightPath Technologies?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of LPTH or MVIS?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, LPTH or MVIS?

Does the media prefer LPTH or MVIS?

Which has more volatility and risk, LPTH or MVIS?

Do analysts prefer LPTH or MVIS?

Is LPTH or MVIS more profitable?

Summary

How does Microvision compare to Clearfield?

Which has more volatility & risk, MVIS or CLFD?

Is MVIS or CLFD more profitable?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in MVIS or CLFD?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, MVIS or CLFD?

Do analysts recommend MVIS or CLFD?

Does the media refer more to MVIS or CLFD?

Summary

How does Microvision compare to Kimball Electronics?

Is MVIS or KE more profitable?

Which has more risk and volatility, MVIS or KE?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in MVIS or KE?

Does the media refer more to MVIS or KE?

Do analysts recommend MVIS or KE?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, MVIS or KE?

Summary

How does Microvision compare to SEALSQ?

Do analysts rate MVIS or LAES?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, MVIS or LAES?

Does the media favor MVIS or LAES?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of MVIS or LAES?

Which has more risk and volatility, MVIS or LAES?

Is MVIS or LAES more profitable?

Summary

How does Microvision compare to Aeluma?

Which has more volatility & risk, ALMU or MVIS?

Do analysts rate ALMU or MVIS?

Is ALMU or MVIS more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of ALMU or MVIS?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, ALMU or MVIS?

Does the media refer more to ALMU or MVIS?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

MVIS vs. The Competition

Microvision Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools