Origin Materials (ORGN) Competitors

TOMI Environmental Solutions has a net margin of -75.34% compared to Origin Materials' net margin of -1,319.62%. Origin Materials' return on equity of -97.45% beat TOMI Environmental Solutions' return on equity.

TOMI Environmental Solutions has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Origin Materials. TOMI Environmental Solutions is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Origin Materials, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, TOMI Environmental Solutions had 13 more articles in the media than Origin Materials. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for TOMI Environmental Solutions and 1 mentions for Origin Materials. Origin Materials' average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat TOMI Environmental Solutions' score of 0.49 indicating that Origin Materials is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

4.8% of TOMI Environmental Solutions shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 29.9% of Origin Materials shares are owned by institutional investors. 23.5% of TOMI Environmental Solutions shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.9% of Origin Materials shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

TOMI Environmental Solutions has a beta of 1.77, indicating that its stock price is 77% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Origin Materials has a beta of 1.26, indicating that its stock price is 26% more volatile than the broader market.

Origin Materials has a beta of 1.26, meaning that its share price is 26% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Senestech has a beta of 0.18, meaning that its share price is 82% less volatile than the broader market.

29.9% of Origin Materials shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.2% of Senestech shares are held by institutional investors. 2.9% of Origin Materials shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of Senestech shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Senestech has a net margin of -304.22% compared to Origin Materials' net margin of -1,319.62%. Senestech's return on equity of -64.69% beat Origin Materials' return on equity.

Senestech has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Origin Materials. Senestech is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Origin Materials, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Senestech had 3 more articles in the media than Origin Materials. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Senestech and 1 mentions for Origin Materials. Origin Materials' average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat Senestech's score of 0.81 indicating that Origin Materials is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Origin Materials has a beta of 1.26, indicating that its share price is 26% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Trinseo has a beta of 1.46, indicating that its share price is 46% more volatile than the broader market.

Trinseo has a consensus target price of $1.00, suggesting a potential upside of 334.78%. Given Trinseo's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Trinseo is more favorable than Origin Materials.

Origin Materials pays an annual dividend of $0.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 26.0%. Trinseo pays an annual dividend of $0.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 17.4%. Origin Materials pays out -0.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Trinseo pays out -0.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Trinseo has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Origin Materials is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Origin Materials has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Trinseo. Origin Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trinseo, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Trinseo has a net margin of -13.15% compared to Origin Materials' net margin of -1,319.62%. Trinseo's return on equity of 0.00% beat Origin Materials' return on equity.

29.9% of Origin Materials shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.7% of Trinseo shares are held by institutional investors. 2.9% of Origin Materials shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.5% of Trinseo shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Origin Materials and Origin Materials both had 1 articles in the media. Origin Materials' average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat Trinseo's score of 0.00 indicating that Origin Materials is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Evogene has a beta of 1.39, indicating that its stock price is 39% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Origin Materials has a beta of 1.26, indicating that its stock price is 26% more volatile than the broader market.

Evogene presently has a consensus target price of $3.50, indicating a potential upside of 370.81%. Given Evogene's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Evogene is more favorable than Origin Materials.

Evogene has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Origin Materials. Evogene is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Origin Materials, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Evogene has a net margin of -214.57% compared to Origin Materials' net margin of -1,319.62%. Origin Materials' return on equity of -97.45% beat Evogene's return on equity.

10.4% of Evogene shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 29.9% of Origin Materials shares are held by institutional investors. 7.4% of Evogene shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.9% of Origin Materials shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Evogene had 2 more articles in the media than Origin Materials. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Evogene and 1 mentions for Origin Materials. Origin Materials' average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat Evogene's score of 0.47 indicating that Origin Materials is being referred to more favorably in the news media.