Go Pro

PAMT (PAMT) Competitors

PAMT logo
$11.47 -0.58 (-4.81%)
As of 08/21/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

PAMT vs. HTLD, CVLG, ULH, PAL, and SFWL

Should you buy PAMT stock or one of its competitors? PAMT's main competitors and comparable companies include Heartland Express (HTLD), Covenant Logistics Group (CVLG), Universal Logistics (ULH), Proficient Auto Logistics (PAL), and Shengfeng Development (SFWL). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "cargo ground transportation" industry.

How does PAMT compare to Heartland Express?

PAMT (NASDAQ:PAMT) and Heartland Express (NASDAQ:HTLD) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment and earnings.

Heartland Express has a net margin of -2.98% compared to PAMT's net margin of -7.07%. Heartland Express' return on equity of -0.92% beat PAMT's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
PAMT-7.07% -13.82% -4.32%
Heartland Express -2.98%-0.92%-0.58%

Heartland Express has a consensus price target of $13.00, suggesting a potential upside of 1.25%. Given Heartland Express' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Heartland Express is more favorable than PAMT.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
PAMT
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Heartland Express
3 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

PAMT has a beta of 1.03, suggesting that its stock price is 3% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Heartland Express has a beta of 1.33, suggesting that its stock price is 33% more volatile than the broader market.

Heartland Express has higher revenue and earnings than PAMT. Heartland Express is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PAMT, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
PAMT$598.06M0.40-$52.61M-$2.03N/A
Heartland Express$805.71M1.23-$52.45M-$0.28N/A

In the previous week, PAMT and PAMT both had 1 articles in the media. Heartland Express' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat PAMT's score of -0.59 indicating that Heartland Express is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
PAMT
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Negative
Heartland Express
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

22.1% of PAMT shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 53.5% of Heartland Express shares are owned by institutional investors. 77.2% of PAMT shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 41.6% of Heartland Express shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Heartland Express beats PAMT on 14 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PAMT compare to Covenant Logistics Group?

PAMT (NASDAQ:PAMT) and Covenant Logistics Group (NYSE:CVLG) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and profitability.

22.1% of PAMT shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.7% of Covenant Logistics Group shares are held by institutional investors. 77.2% of PAMT shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 36.7% of Covenant Logistics Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Covenant Logistics Group has a net margin of 0.31% compared to PAMT's net margin of -7.07%. Covenant Logistics Group's return on equity of 9.14% beat PAMT's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
PAMT-7.07% -13.82% -4.32%
Covenant Logistics Group 0.31%9.14%3.68%

PAMT has a beta of 1.03, meaning that its stock price is 3% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Covenant Logistics Group has a beta of 1.32, meaning that its stock price is 32% more volatile than the broader market.

Covenant Logistics Group has a consensus price target of $51.80, suggesting a potential upside of 47.16%. Given Covenant Logistics Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Covenant Logistics Group is more favorable than PAMT.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
PAMT
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Covenant Logistics Group
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Covenant Logistics Group has higher revenue and earnings than PAMT. PAMT is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Covenant Logistics Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
PAMT$598.06M0.40-$52.61M-$2.03N/A
Covenant Logistics Group$1.16B0.77$7.24M$0.11320.00

In the previous week, Covenant Logistics Group had 3 more articles in the media than PAMT. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Covenant Logistics Group and 1 mentions for PAMT. Covenant Logistics Group's average media sentiment score of 0.52 beat PAMT's score of -0.59 indicating that Covenant Logistics Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
PAMT
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Negative
Covenant Logistics Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Covenant Logistics Group beats PAMT on 15 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PAMT compare to Universal Logistics?

PAMT (NASDAQ:PAMT) and Universal Logistics (NASDAQ:ULH) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, institutional ownership, profitability and dividends.

In the previous week, PAMT had 1 more articles in the media than Universal Logistics. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for PAMT and 0 mentions for Universal Logistics. Universal Logistics' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat PAMT's score of -0.59 indicating that Universal Logistics is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
PAMT Negative
Universal Logistics Neutral

PAMT has a beta of 1.03, meaning that its share price is 3% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Universal Logistics has a beta of 0.69, meaning that its share price is 31% less volatile than the broader market.

22.1% of PAMT shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 25.5% of Universal Logistics shares are held by institutional investors. 77.2% of PAMT shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 73.5% of Universal Logistics shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Universal Logistics has a consensus target price of $15.00, indicating a potential downside of 21.63%. Given Universal Logistics' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Universal Logistics is more favorable than PAMT.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
PAMT
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Universal Logistics
2 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.33

PAMT has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Universal Logistics. Universal Logistics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PAMT, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
PAMT$598.06M0.40-$52.61M-$2.03N/A
Universal Logistics$1.56B0.32-$99.87M-$1.84N/A

Universal Logistics has a net margin of -3.16% compared to PAMT's net margin of -7.07%. Universal Logistics' return on equity of 1.99% beat PAMT's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
PAMT-7.07% -13.82% -4.32%
Universal Logistics -3.16%1.99%0.62%

Summary

Universal Logistics beats PAMT on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PAMT compare to Proficient Auto Logistics?

Proficient Auto Logistics (NASDAQ:PAL) and PAMT (NASDAQ:PAMT) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, media sentiment, dividends, profitability, institutional ownership and valuation.

PAMT has a net margin of -7.07% compared to Proficient Auto Logistics' net margin of -9.24%. Proficient Auto Logistics' return on equity of -0.49% beat PAMT's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Proficient Auto Logistics-9.24% -0.49% -0.33%
PAMT -7.07%-13.82%-4.32%

In the previous week, Proficient Auto Logistics had 1 more articles in the media than PAMT. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Proficient Auto Logistics and 1 mentions for PAMT. Proficient Auto Logistics' average media sentiment score of 1.71 beat PAMT's score of -0.59 indicating that Proficient Auto Logistics is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Proficient Auto Logistics
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
PAMT
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Negative

Proficient Auto Logistics currently has a consensus price target of $12.00, indicating a potential upside of 125.14%. Given Proficient Auto Logistics' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Proficient Auto Logistics is more favorable than PAMT.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Proficient Auto Logistics
2 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
PAMT
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Proficient Auto Logistics has a beta of 1.25, meaning that its share price is 25% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PAMT has a beta of 1.03, meaning that its share price is 3% more volatile than the broader market.

Proficient Auto Logistics has higher earnings, but lower revenue than PAMT. PAMT is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Proficient Auto Logistics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Proficient Auto Logistics$430.42M0.35-$36.02M-$1.41N/A
PAMT$598.06M0.40-$52.61M-$2.03N/A

22.1% of PAMT shares are held by institutional investors. 14.2% of Proficient Auto Logistics shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 77.2% of PAMT shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Proficient Auto Logistics beats PAMT on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PAMT compare to Shengfeng Development?

Shengfeng Development (NASDAQ:SFWL) and PAMT (NASDAQ:PAMT) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, risk and analyst recommendations.

Shengfeng Development has a net margin of 0.00% compared to PAMT's net margin of -7.07%. Shengfeng Development's return on equity of 0.00% beat PAMT's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Shengfeng DevelopmentN/A N/A N/A
PAMT -7.07%-13.82%-4.32%

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Shengfeng Development
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
PAMT
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

In the previous week, Shengfeng Development and Shengfeng Development both had 1 articles in the media. Shengfeng Development's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat PAMT's score of -0.59 indicating that Shengfeng Development is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Shengfeng Development
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
PAMT
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Negative

Shengfeng Development has a beta of -1.89, indicating that its stock price is 289% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PAMT has a beta of 1.03, indicating that its stock price is 3% more volatile than the broader market.

1.1% of Shengfeng Development shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 22.1% of PAMT shares are held by institutional investors. 77.2% of PAMT shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Shengfeng Development has higher earnings, but lower revenue than PAMT.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Shengfeng Development$572.48M0.12$11.93MN/AN/A
PAMT$598.06M0.40-$52.61M-$2.03N/A

Summary

Shengfeng Development and PAMT tied by winning 5 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get PAMT News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PAMT and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PAMT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PAMT vs. The Competition

MetricPAMTGround Transportation IndustryIndustrials SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$240.21M$21.97B$10.65B$12.84B
Dividend YieldN/A2.04%97.12%11.08%
P/E RatioN/A43.1526.6924.24
Price / Sales0.402.51331.5299.48
Price / Cash4.7542.8424.4753.99
Price / Book1.143.054.496.20
Net Income-$52.61M$972.50M$612.35M$348.59M
7 Day Performance-10.11%-0.81%-1.41%0.08%
1 Month Performance-27.41%-0.30%2.54%3.88%
1 Year Performance-10.67%11.84%12.36%16.98%

PAMT Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PAMT
PAMT
0.5531 of 5 stars
$11.47
-4.8%
N/A-10.7%$240.21M$598.06MN/A2,365
HTLD
Heartland Express
1.7501 of 5 stars
$12.79
+1.0%
$13.00
+1.6%
+46.6%$989.09M$805.71MN/A4,560
CVLG
Covenant Logistics Group
4.696 of 5 stars
$34.86
+0.5%
$52.25
+49.9%
+40.6%$885.69M$1.16B316.944,700
ULH
Universal Logistics
2.0323 of 5 stars
$19.29
-1.9%
$15.00
-22.2%
-29.5%$508.68M$1.56BN/A10,525
PAL
Proficient Auto Logistics
3.7228 of 5 stars
$5.50
+0.4%
$12.00
+118.2%
-35.9%$152.74M$430.42MN/A601

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:PAMT) was last updated on 8/23/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners