Go Pro
→ The $15 Gold Fund That Pays Up to $1,152/Month (From Investors Alley) (Ad)tc pixel Free HSHP Stock Alerts

Himalaya Shipping (HSHP) Competitors

Himalaya Shipping logo
$14.78 -0.59 (-3.85%)
As of 11:44 AM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.
Compare

HSHP vs. AERO, DAC, NMM, GEL, and CMRE

Should you buy Himalaya Shipping stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Himalaya Shipping with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Himalaya Shipping include Grupo Aeromexico (AERO), Danaos (DAC), Navios Maritime Partners (NMM), Genesis Energy (GEL), and Costamare (CMRE). These companies are all part of the "transportation" industry.

How does Himalaya Shipping compare to Grupo Aeromexico?

Himalaya Shipping (NYSE:HSHP) and Grupo Aeromexico (NYSE:AERO) are both transportation companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability and risk.

Himalaya Shipping has a net margin of 20.28% compared to Grupo Aeromexico's net margin of 3.78%. Himalaya Shipping's return on equity of 18.28% beat Grupo Aeromexico's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Himalaya Shipping20.28% 18.28% 3.37%
Grupo Aeromexico 3.78%-25.10%2.26%

Grupo Aeromexico has higher revenue and earnings than Himalaya Shipping. Grupo Aeromexico is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Himalaya Shipping, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Himalaya Shipping$131.90M5.23$17.70M$0.6323.46
Grupo Aeromexico$5.36B0.40$351.86M$0.8219.09

Grupo Aeromexico has a consensus target price of $28.06, indicating a potential upside of 79.27%. Given Grupo Aeromexico's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Grupo Aeromexico is more favorable than Himalaya Shipping.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Himalaya Shipping
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Grupo Aeromexico
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.82

In the previous week, Grupo Aeromexico had 5 more articles in the media than Himalaya Shipping. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Grupo Aeromexico and 3 mentions for Himalaya Shipping. Himalaya Shipping's average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat Grupo Aeromexico's score of -0.41 indicating that Himalaya Shipping is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Himalaya Shipping
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Grupo Aeromexico
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
3 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

22.3% of Himalaya Shipping shares are held by institutional investors. 12.8% of Grupo Aeromexico shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Grupo Aeromexico beats Himalaya Shipping on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Himalaya Shipping compare to Danaos?

Danaos (NYSE:DAC) and Himalaya Shipping (NYSE:HSHP) are both transportation companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, profitability and earnings.

19.0% of Danaos shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 22.3% of Himalaya Shipping shares are owned by institutional investors. 41.0% of Danaos shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Danaos presently has a consensus price target of $105.00, indicating a potential downside of 17.74%. Given Danaos' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Danaos is more favorable than Himalaya Shipping.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Danaos
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Himalaya Shipping
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

In the previous week, Himalaya Shipping had 3 more articles in the media than Danaos. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Himalaya Shipping and 0 mentions for Danaos. Himalaya Shipping's average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat Danaos' score of 0.00 indicating that Himalaya Shipping is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Danaos Neutral
Himalaya Shipping Positive

Danaos has a beta of 0.89, suggesting that its stock price is 11% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Himalaya Shipping has a beta of 1.43, suggesting that its stock price is 43% more volatile than the broader market.

Danaos has a net margin of 49.85% compared to Himalaya Shipping's net margin of 20.28%. Himalaya Shipping's return on equity of 18.28% beat Danaos' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Danaos49.85% 13.18% 10.23%
Himalaya Shipping 20.28%18.28%3.37%

Danaos has higher revenue and earnings than Himalaya Shipping. Danaos is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Himalaya Shipping, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Danaos$1.04B2.23$494.61M$28.354.50
Himalaya Shipping$131.90M5.23$17.70M$0.6323.46

Summary

Danaos beats Himalaya Shipping on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Himalaya Shipping compare to Navios Maritime Partners?

Himalaya Shipping (NYSE:HSHP) and Navios Maritime Partners (NYSE:NMM) are both transportation companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, risk, valuation and profitability.

Navios Maritime Partners has a consensus price target of $85.00, suggesting a potential upside of 17.12%. Given Navios Maritime Partners' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Navios Maritime Partners is more favorable than Himalaya Shipping.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Himalaya Shipping
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Navios Maritime Partners
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

22.3% of Himalaya Shipping shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 62.7% of Navios Maritime Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Navios Maritime Partners has higher revenue and earnings than Himalaya Shipping. Navios Maritime Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Himalaya Shipping, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Himalaya Shipping$131.90M5.23$17.70M$0.6323.46
Navios Maritime Partners$1.34B1.55$285.33M$11.876.11

In the previous week, Navios Maritime Partners had 8 more articles in the media than Himalaya Shipping. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Navios Maritime Partners and 3 mentions for Himalaya Shipping. Navios Maritime Partners' average media sentiment score of 1.56 beat Himalaya Shipping's score of 0.63 indicating that Navios Maritime Partners is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Himalaya Shipping
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Navios Maritime Partners
4 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Himalaya Shipping has a beta of 1.43, suggesting that its stock price is 43% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Navios Maritime Partners has a beta of 1, suggesting that its stock price has a similar volatility profile to the broader market.

Navios Maritime Partners has a net margin of 25.05% compared to Himalaya Shipping's net margin of 20.28%. Himalaya Shipping's return on equity of 18.28% beat Navios Maritime Partners' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Himalaya Shipping20.28% 18.28% 3.37%
Navios Maritime Partners 25.05%10.48%5.83%

Summary

Navios Maritime Partners beats Himalaya Shipping on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Himalaya Shipping compare to Genesis Energy?

Himalaya Shipping (NYSE:HSHP) and Genesis Energy (NYSE:GEL) are both small-cap transportation companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment, valuation and earnings.

Himalaya Shipping has a net margin of 20.28% compared to Genesis Energy's net margin of 2.11%. Genesis Energy's return on equity of 23.65% beat Himalaya Shipping's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Himalaya Shipping20.28% 18.28% 3.37%
Genesis Energy 2.11%23.65%0.73%

22.3% of Himalaya Shipping shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 66.8% of Genesis Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of Genesis Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Himalaya Shipping has a beta of 1.43, meaning that its stock price is 43% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Genesis Energy has a beta of 0.62, meaning that its stock price is 38% less volatile than the broader market.

Himalaya Shipping has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Genesis Energy. Genesis Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Himalaya Shipping, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Himalaya Shipping$131.90M5.23$17.70M$0.6323.46
Genesis Energy$1.63B1.12-$440.40M-$0.19N/A

In the previous week, Himalaya Shipping and Himalaya Shipping both had 3 articles in the media. Himalaya Shipping's average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat Genesis Energy's score of 0.55 indicating that Himalaya Shipping is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Himalaya Shipping
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Genesis Energy
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Genesis Energy has a consensus target price of $19.00, suggesting a potential upside of 27.30%. Given Genesis Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Genesis Energy is more favorable than Himalaya Shipping.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Himalaya Shipping
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Genesis Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

Summary

Himalaya Shipping beats Genesis Energy on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Himalaya Shipping compare to Costamare?

Costamare (NYSE:CMRE) and Himalaya Shipping (NYSE:HSHP) are both small-cap transportation companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, risk and analyst recommendations.

Costamare has a net margin of 39.93% compared to Himalaya Shipping's net margin of 20.28%. Himalaya Shipping's return on equity of 18.28% beat Costamare's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Costamare39.93% 16.42% 9.07%
Himalaya Shipping 20.28%18.28%3.37%

Costamare has higher revenue and earnings than Himalaya Shipping. Costamare is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Himalaya Shipping, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Costamare$877.90M2.04$364.58M$2.685.55
Himalaya Shipping$131.90M5.23$17.70M$0.6323.46

Costamare has a beta of 1.06, indicating that its share price is 6% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Himalaya Shipping has a beta of 1.43, indicating that its share price is 43% more volatile than the broader market.

Costamare currently has a consensus price target of $12.00, suggesting a potential downside of 19.38%. Given Costamare's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Costamare is more favorable than Himalaya Shipping.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Costamare
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Himalaya Shipping
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

58.1% of Costamare shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 22.3% of Himalaya Shipping shares are held by institutional investors. 23.2% of Costamare shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Costamare had 3 more articles in the media than Himalaya Shipping. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Costamare and 3 mentions for Himalaya Shipping. Himalaya Shipping's average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat Costamare's score of 0.00 indicating that Himalaya Shipping is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Costamare
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Himalaya Shipping
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Costamare beats Himalaya Shipping on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Himalaya Shipping News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for HSHP and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding HSHP and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

HSHP vs. The Competition

Export
MetricHimalaya ShippingTRANS IndustryTransportation SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$689.63M$3.20B$8.94B$23.46B
Dividend YieldN/A5.74%973.98%4.19%
P/E Ratio23.4714.1625.0430.98
Price / Sales5.233.965.5419.79
Price / Cash14.676.448.5033.10
Price / Book4.261.182.214.77
Net Income$17.70M$291.51M$532.32M$1.07B
7 Day Performance-3.06%-1.50%-1.05%0.31%
1 Month Performance3.41%-3.39%-1.84%1.98%
1 Year Performance113.34%33.06%24.75%16.76%

Himalaya Shipping Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
HSHP
Himalaya Shipping
1.0108 of 5 stars		$14.78
-3.9%		N/A+129.1%$689.63M$131.90M23.472
AERO
Grupo Aeromexico
4.6176 of 5 stars		$16.61
-2.8%		$28.06
+68.9%		N/A$2.33B$5.36BN/A17,364
DAC
Danaos
2.1829 of 5 stars		$127.18
+1.8%		$105.00
-17.4%		+47.6%$2.27B$1.04B4.494,116
NMM
Navios Maritime Partners
4.4385 of 5 stars		$75.70
+0.7%		$85.00
+12.3%		+88.8%$2.16B$1.34B6.38186
GEL
Genesis Energy
3.9014 of 5 stars		$14.94
-0.1%		$19.00
+27.2%		-12.9%$1.83B$1.63BN/A1,061

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:HSHP) was last updated on 7/17/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Trump's gold order: the announcement they won't put on the front page
On August 15, 1971, Nixon interrupted prime-time television and ended the gold standard in 15 minutes - no deb...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
Iran's New Leader Just Said Something That Should Terrify Every American
Iran's Supreme Leader has declared the Strait of Hormuz closed as leverage against the U.S. - and with 40% of ...
American Alternative | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
The $15 Gold Fund That Pays Up to $1,152/Month
Gold is hitting record highs, but most investors are leaving income on the table. A $15 fund is quietly paying...
Investors Alley | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump Takes Emergency Action - Plus Elon Musk's New Venture
Elon Musk has quietly launched a new venture - one that has nothing to do with rockets, EVs, or Neuralink. Tru...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
DOJ Admits It In Court—Your Cash Can Be Seized Without Warning
The Department of Justice recently argued in court that cash may not be legally your property - raising concer...
Priority Gold | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your $29.97 book is free today
Why Some Traders Skip Stocks Entirely You don't need a big account to trade options. In fact, options ca...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
SPCX Warning - and Worst News for Stocks in 50 Years
Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley are now predicting what could be the worst news for the U.S. stock market in ...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel