Go Pro

Profound Medical (PROF) Competitors

Profound Medical logo
$7.34 -0.07 (-0.94%)
As of 04:00 PM Eastern

PROF vs. STAA, IRMD, DRTS, BVS, and PRCT

Should you buy Profound Medical stock or one of its competitors? Profound Medical's main competitors and comparable companies include STAAR Surgical (STAA), iRadimed (IRMD), Alpha Tau Medical (DRTS), Bioventus (BVS), and PROCEPT BioRobotics (PRCT). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "healthcare equipment" industry.

How does Profound Medical compare to STAAR Surgical?

STAAR Surgical (NASDAQ:STAA) and Profound Medical (NASDAQ:PROF) are both small-cap healthcare companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership and valuation.

In the previous week, STAAR Surgical had 10 more articles in the media than Profound Medical. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for STAAR Surgical and 4 mentions for Profound Medical. Profound Medical's average media sentiment score of 0.65 beat STAAR Surgical's score of 0.47 indicating that Profound Medical is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
STAAR Surgical
4 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
7 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Profound Medical
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

STAAR Surgical presently has a consensus target price of $26.94, indicating a potential upside of 7.26%. Profound Medical has a consensus target price of $11.50, indicating a potential upside of 56.68%. Given Profound Medical's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Profound Medical is more favorable than STAAR Surgical.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
STAAR Surgical
3 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.15
Profound Medical
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

Profound Medical has lower revenue, but higher earnings than STAAR Surgical. STAAR Surgical is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Profound Medical, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
STAAR Surgical$239.44M5.22-$80.45M-$0.43N/A
Profound Medical$16.10M16.57-$42.57M-$0.46N/A

STAAR Surgical has a net margin of -7.24% compared to Profound Medical's net margin of -66.62%. STAAR Surgical's return on equity of 3.31% beat Profound Medical's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
STAAR Surgical-7.24% 3.31% 2.55%
Profound Medical -66.62%-24.47%-19.90%

STAAR Surgical has a beta of 1.26, suggesting that its share price is 26% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Profound Medical has a beta of 0.73, suggesting that its share price is 27% less volatile than the broader market.

96.7% of STAAR Surgical shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 47.9% of Profound Medical shares are held by institutional investors. 39.9% of STAAR Surgical shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Profound Medical shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

STAAR Surgical beats Profound Medical on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Profound Medical compare to iRadimed?

iRadimed (NASDAQ:IRMD) and Profound Medical (NASDAQ:PROF) are both small-cap healthcare companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment and valuation.

iRadimed has a net margin of 26.70% compared to Profound Medical's net margin of -66.62%. iRadimed's return on equity of 23.45% beat Profound Medical's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
iRadimed26.70% 23.45% 20.36%
Profound Medical -66.62%-24.47%-19.90%

iRadimed presently has a consensus price target of $120.00, suggesting a potential upside of 32.93%. Profound Medical has a consensus price target of $11.50, suggesting a potential upside of 56.68%. Given Profound Medical's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Profound Medical is more favorable than iRadimed.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
iRadimed
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.80
Profound Medical
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

In the previous week, iRadimed had 3 more articles in the media than Profound Medical. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for iRadimed and 4 mentions for Profound Medical. Profound Medical's average media sentiment score of 0.65 beat iRadimed's score of 0.19 indicating that Profound Medical is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
iRadimed
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Profound Medical
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

iRadimed has higher revenue and earnings than Profound Medical. Profound Medical is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than iRadimed, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
iRadimed$83.81M13.78$22.48M$1.7950.43
Profound Medical$16.10M16.57-$42.57M-$0.46N/A

92.3% of iRadimed shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 47.9% of Profound Medical shares are owned by institutional investors. 34.6% of iRadimed shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Profound Medical shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

iRadimed has a beta of 0.9, suggesting that its share price is 10% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Profound Medical has a beta of 0.73, suggesting that its share price is 27% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

iRadimed beats Profound Medical on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Profound Medical compare to Alpha Tau Medical?

Profound Medical (NASDAQ:PROF) and Alpha Tau Medical (NASDAQ:DRTS) are both small-cap healthcare companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, risk, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Alpha Tau Medical has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Profound Medical's net margin of -66.62%. Profound Medical's return on equity of -24.47% beat Alpha Tau Medical's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Profound Medical-66.62% -24.47% -19.90%
Alpha Tau Medical N/A -73.23%-52.90%

Profound Medical presently has a consensus target price of $11.50, suggesting a potential upside of 56.68%. Alpha Tau Medical has a consensus target price of $12.60, suggesting a potential downside of 7.35%. Given Profound Medical's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Profound Medical is more favorable than Alpha Tau Medical.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Profound Medical
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
Alpha Tau Medical
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

47.9% of Profound Medical shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.7% of Alpha Tau Medical shares are held by institutional investors. 1.5% of Profound Medical shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 39.5% of Alpha Tau Medical shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Alpha Tau Medical had 5 more articles in the media than Profound Medical. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Alpha Tau Medical and 4 mentions for Profound Medical. Profound Medical's average media sentiment score of 0.65 beat Alpha Tau Medical's score of 0.60 indicating that Profound Medical is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Profound Medical
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Alpha Tau Medical
2 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Profound Medical has higher revenue and earnings than Alpha Tau Medical. Alpha Tau Medical is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Profound Medical, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Profound Medical$16.10M16.57-$42.57M-$0.46N/A
Alpha Tau MedicalN/AN/A-$42.63M-$0.67N/A

Profound Medical has a beta of 0.73, indicating that its stock price is 27% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Alpha Tau Medical has a beta of 1.17, indicating that its stock price is 17% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Profound Medical beats Alpha Tau Medical on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Profound Medical compare to Bioventus?

Bioventus (NASDAQ:BVS) and Profound Medical (NASDAQ:PROF) are both small-cap healthcare companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, risk, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Bioventus presently has a consensus price target of $16.25, suggesting a potential upside of 16.40%. Profound Medical has a consensus price target of $11.50, suggesting a potential upside of 56.68%. Given Profound Medical's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Profound Medical is more favorable than Bioventus.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Bioventus
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Profound Medical
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

Bioventus has a net margin of 9.36% compared to Profound Medical's net margin of -66.62%. Bioventus' return on equity of 28.08% beat Profound Medical's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Bioventus9.36% 28.08% 9.82%
Profound Medical -66.62%-24.47%-19.90%

Bioventus has a beta of 0.63, suggesting that its stock price is 37% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Profound Medical has a beta of 0.73, suggesting that its stock price is 27% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Bioventus had 13 more articles in the media than Profound Medical. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Bioventus and 4 mentions for Profound Medical. Bioventus' average media sentiment score of 0.65 beat Profound Medical's score of 0.65 indicating that Bioventus is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Bioventus
5 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
8 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Profound Medical
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

62.9% of Bioventus shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 47.9% of Profound Medical shares are held by institutional investors. 33.5% of Bioventus shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Profound Medical shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Bioventus has higher revenue and earnings than Profound Medical. Profound Medical is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Bioventus, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Bioventus$568.09M2.05$22.73M$0.7718.13
Profound Medical$16.10M16.57-$42.57M-$0.46N/A

Summary

Bioventus beats Profound Medical on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Profound Medical compare to PROCEPT BioRobotics?

Profound Medical (NASDAQ:PROF) and PROCEPT BioRobotics (NASDAQ:PRCT) are both small-cap healthcare companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings and media sentiment.

In the previous week, PROCEPT BioRobotics had 49 more articles in the media than Profound Medical. MarketBeat recorded 53 mentions for PROCEPT BioRobotics and 4 mentions for Profound Medical. Profound Medical's average media sentiment score of 0.65 beat PROCEPT BioRobotics' score of 0.02 indicating that Profound Medical is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Profound Medical
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
PROCEPT BioRobotics
5 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
41 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

47.9% of Profound Medical shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.5% of PROCEPT BioRobotics shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.5% of Profound Medical shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.0% of PROCEPT BioRobotics shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profound Medical has higher earnings, but lower revenue than PROCEPT BioRobotics. Profound Medical is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PROCEPT BioRobotics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Profound Medical$16.10M16.57-$42.57M-$0.46N/A
PROCEPT BioRobotics$308.05M4.01-$95.57M-$1.94N/A

Profound Medical has a beta of 0.73, meaning that its stock price is 27% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PROCEPT BioRobotics has a beta of 0.89, meaning that its stock price is 11% less volatile than the broader market.

Profound Medical presently has a consensus target price of $11.50, suggesting a potential upside of 56.68%. PROCEPT BioRobotics has a consensus target price of $28.00, suggesting a potential upside of 28.97%. Given Profound Medical's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Profound Medical is more favorable than PROCEPT BioRobotics.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Profound Medical
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
PROCEPT BioRobotics
2 Sell rating(s)
10 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.19

PROCEPT BioRobotics has a net margin of -32.53% compared to Profound Medical's net margin of -66.62%. Profound Medical's return on equity of -24.47% beat PROCEPT BioRobotics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Profound Medical-66.62% -24.47% -19.90%
PROCEPT BioRobotics -32.53%-30.62%-22.10%

Summary

Profound Medical and PROCEPT BioRobotics tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Profound Medical News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PROF and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PROF and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PROF vs. The Competition

MetricProfound MedicalHealthcare Equipment & Supplies IndustryHealthcare SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$266.74M$5.79B$7.06B$12.95B
Dividend YieldN/A1.78%2.58%10.20%
P/E Ratio-15.9624.71269.7524.74
Price / Sales16.5767.44652.34108.60
Price / CashN/A33.5528.8937.44
Price / Book4.016.2111.276.42
Net Income-$42.57M$147.87M$3.45B$347.12M
7 Day Performance-10.92%3.40%3.56%2.48%
1 Month Performance4.26%1.66%-0.58%-1.04%
1 Year Performance32.49%6.26%77.52%23.22%

Profound Medical Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PROF
Profound Medical
2.9419 of 5 stars
$7.34
-0.9%
$11.50
+56.7%
+33.8%$266.74M$16.10MN/A150
STAA
STAAR Surgical
2.7462 of 5 stars
$24.12
-0.9%
$26.94
+11.7%
-11.2%$1.20B$239.44MN/A1,211
IRMD
iRadimed
2.5947 of 5 stars
$93.13
+1.7%
$120.00
+28.9%
+32.3%$1.19B$83.81M52.03110
DRTS
Alpha Tau Medical
1.6274 of 5 stars
$13.08
+9.7%
$12.60
-3.7%
+287.6%$1.18BN/AN/A80
BVS
Bioventus
4.318 of 5 stars
$13.42
-0.4%
$14.75
+9.9%
+104.2%$1.12B$568.09M32.731,200

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:PROF) was last updated on 8/10/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners