Free Trial
Memorial Day Savings! Save $100 on MarketBeat All Access
Claim Your Discount
Claim MarketBeat All Access Sale Promotion

Profound Medical (PROF) Competitors

Profound Medical logo
$6.73 -0.16 (-2.32%)
Closing price 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$6.74 +0.01 (+0.22%)
As of 04:04 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

PROF vs. BLFS, TNDM, INMD, DRTS, and BVS

Should you buy Profound Medical stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Profound Medical with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Profound Medical include BioLife Solutions (BLFS), Tandem Diabetes Care (TNDM), InMode (INMD), Alpha Tau Medical (DRTS), and Bioventus (BVS). These companies are all part of the "medical equipment" industry.

How does Profound Medical compare to BioLife Solutions?

BioLife Solutions (NASDAQ:BLFS) and Profound Medical (NASDAQ:PROF) are both small-cap medical companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, risk, dividends and earnings.

93.2% of BioLife Solutions shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 47.9% of Profound Medical shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.2% of BioLife Solutions shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Profound Medical shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

BioLife Solutions has higher revenue and earnings than Profound Medical. BioLife Solutions is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Profound Medical, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
BioLife Solutions$96.21M11.71-$4.59M-$0.08N/A
Profound Medical$16.10M15.19-$42.57M-$1.24N/A

BioLife Solutions presently has a consensus target price of $32.00, indicating a potential upside of 38.83%. Profound Medical has a consensus target price of $12.00, indicating a potential upside of 78.31%. Given Profound Medical's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Profound Medical is more favorable than BioLife Solutions.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
BioLife Solutions
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40
Profound Medical
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

In the previous week, BioLife Solutions and BioLife Solutions both had 2 articles in the media. Profound Medical's average media sentiment score of 0.60 beat BioLife Solutions' score of -0.18 indicating that Profound Medical is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
BioLife Solutions
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Profound Medical
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

BioLife Solutions has a beta of 1.97, meaning that its share price is 97% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Profound Medical has a beta of 0.73, meaning that its share price is 27% less volatile than the broader market.

BioLife Solutions has a net margin of -2.80% compared to Profound Medical's net margin of -206.76%. BioLife Solutions' return on equity of 1.81% beat Profound Medical's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
BioLife Solutions-2.80% 1.81% 1.65%
Profound Medical -206.76%-78.88%-64.06%

Summary

BioLife Solutions beats Profound Medical on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Profound Medical compare to Tandem Diabetes Care?

Tandem Diabetes Care (NASDAQ:TNDM) and Profound Medical (NASDAQ:PROF) are both small-cap medical companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation and dividends.

Tandem Diabetes Care has a beta of 1.64, indicating that its stock price is 64% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Profound Medical has a beta of 0.73, indicating that its stock price is 27% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Tandem Diabetes Care had 5 more articles in the media than Profound Medical. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Tandem Diabetes Care and 2 mentions for Profound Medical. Profound Medical's average media sentiment score of 0.60 beat Tandem Diabetes Care's score of 0.31 indicating that Profound Medical is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Tandem Diabetes Care
4 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Profound Medical
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

47.9% of Profound Medical shares are held by institutional investors. 2.1% of Tandem Diabetes Care shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Profound Medical shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profound Medical has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Tandem Diabetes Care. Tandem Diabetes Care is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Profound Medical, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tandem Diabetes Care$1.01B0.94-$204.71M-$1.40N/A
Profound Medical$16.10M15.19-$42.57M-$1.24N/A

Tandem Diabetes Care has a net margin of -9.20% compared to Profound Medical's net margin of -206.76%. Tandem Diabetes Care's return on equity of -53.88% beat Profound Medical's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tandem Diabetes Care-9.20% -53.88% -7.88%
Profound Medical -206.76%-78.88%-64.06%

Tandem Diabetes Care currently has a consensus target price of $29.63, suggesting a potential upside of 113.79%. Profound Medical has a consensus target price of $12.00, suggesting a potential upside of 78.31%. Given Tandem Diabetes Care's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Tandem Diabetes Care is more favorable than Profound Medical.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Tandem Diabetes Care
1 Sell rating(s)
10 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.52
Profound Medical
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Summary

Tandem Diabetes Care beats Profound Medical on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Profound Medical compare to InMode?

InMode (NASDAQ:INMD) and Profound Medical (NASDAQ:PROF) are both small-cap medical companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, profitability and earnings.

InMode has a beta of 1.97, meaning that its stock price is 97% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Profound Medical has a beta of 0.73, meaning that its stock price is 27% less volatile than the broader market.

InMode has higher revenue and earnings than Profound Medical. Profound Medical is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than InMode, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
InMode$370.49M2.39$93.83M$1.3610.28
Profound Medical$16.10M15.19-$42.57M-$1.24N/A

68.0% of InMode shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 47.9% of Profound Medical shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.9% of InMode shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Profound Medical shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

InMode has a net margin of 23.27% compared to Profound Medical's net margin of -206.76%. InMode's return on equity of 13.47% beat Profound Medical's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
InMode23.27% 13.47% 11.95%
Profound Medical -206.76%-78.88%-64.06%

InMode presently has a consensus target price of $16.00, indicating a potential upside of 14.41%. Profound Medical has a consensus target price of $12.00, indicating a potential upside of 78.31%. Given Profound Medical's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Profound Medical is more favorable than InMode.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
InMode
1 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Profound Medical
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

In the previous week, Profound Medical had 1 more articles in the media than InMode. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Profound Medical and 1 mentions for InMode. Profound Medical's average media sentiment score of 0.60 beat InMode's score of 0.00 indicating that Profound Medical is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
InMode
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Profound Medical
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

InMode beats Profound Medical on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Profound Medical compare to Alpha Tau Medical?

Alpha Tau Medical (NASDAQ:DRTS) and Profound Medical (NASDAQ:PROF) are both small-cap medical companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment, dividends and earnings.

Profound Medical has higher revenue and earnings than Alpha Tau Medical. Alpha Tau Medical is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Profound Medical, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Alpha Tau MedicalN/AN/A-$42.63M-$0.53N/A
Profound Medical$16.10M15.19-$42.57M-$1.24N/A

Alpha Tau Medical currently has a consensus target price of $11.50, indicating a potential upside of 7.68%. Profound Medical has a consensus target price of $12.00, indicating a potential upside of 78.31%. Given Profound Medical's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Profound Medical is more favorable than Alpha Tau Medical.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Alpha Tau Medical
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Profound Medical
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

2.7% of Alpha Tau Medical shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 47.9% of Profound Medical shares are owned by institutional investors. 39.5% of Alpha Tau Medical shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Profound Medical shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Alpha Tau Medical had 8 more articles in the media than Profound Medical. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Alpha Tau Medical and 2 mentions for Profound Medical. Profound Medical's average media sentiment score of 0.60 beat Alpha Tau Medical's score of -0.06 indicating that Profound Medical is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Alpha Tau Medical
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Profound Medical
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Alpha Tau Medical has a beta of 1.11, meaning that its stock price is 11% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Profound Medical has a beta of 0.73, meaning that its stock price is 27% less volatile than the broader market.

Alpha Tau Medical has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Profound Medical's net margin of -206.76%. Alpha Tau Medical's return on equity of -70.71% beat Profound Medical's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Alpha Tau MedicalN/A -70.71% -53.10%
Profound Medical -206.76%-78.88%-64.06%

Summary

Alpha Tau Medical beats Profound Medical on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Profound Medical compare to Bioventus?

Profound Medical (NASDAQ:PROF) and Bioventus (NASDAQ:BVS) are both small-cap medical equipment companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, risk, dividends, profitability and institutional ownership.

Bioventus has higher revenue and earnings than Profound Medical. Profound Medical is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Bioventus, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Profound Medical$16.10M15.19-$42.57M-$1.24N/A
Bioventus$568.09M1.57$22.73M$0.4126.00

Profound Medical currently has a consensus price target of $12.00, suggesting a potential upside of 78.31%. Bioventus has a consensus price target of $14.00, suggesting a potential upside of 31.33%. Given Profound Medical's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Profound Medical is more favorable than Bioventus.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Profound Medical
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Bioventus
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Bioventus has a net margin of 4.94% compared to Profound Medical's net margin of -206.76%. Bioventus' return on equity of 29.97% beat Profound Medical's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Profound Medical-206.76% -78.88% -64.06%
Bioventus 4.94%29.97%9.52%

47.9% of Profound Medical shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 62.9% of Bioventus shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.5% of Profound Medical shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 33.0% of Bioventus shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profound Medical has a beta of 0.73, meaning that its share price is 27% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Bioventus has a beta of 0.72, meaning that its share price is 28% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Profound Medical had 1 more articles in the media than Bioventus. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Profound Medical and 1 mentions for Bioventus. Profound Medical's average media sentiment score of 0.60 beat Bioventus' score of -1.00 indicating that Profound Medical is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Profound Medical
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Bioventus
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Negative

Summary

Bioventus beats Profound Medical on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Profound Medical News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PROF and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PROF and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PROF vs. The Competition

MetricProfound MedicalMED IndustryMedical SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$250.37M$2.99B$6.25B$12.23B
Dividend YieldN/A1.96%2.80%5.27%
P/E Ratio-5.4317.0420.7925.04
Price / Sales15.19251.21531.2172.17
Price / CashN/A57.1543.0954.25
Price / Book4.104.399.816.83
Net Income-$42.57M$74.99M$3.55B$335.69M
7 Day Performance-5.74%-4.89%-2.07%-2.03%
1 Month Performance1.20%-8.30%-3.90%-1.90%
1 Year Performance34.87%28.66%29.39%27.36%

Profound Medical Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PROF
Profound Medical
1.5504 of 5 stars
$6.73
-2.3%
$12.00
+78.3%
+46.3%$250.37M$16.10MN/A150
BLFS
BioLife Solutions
2.6168 of 5 stars
$21.23
-2.3%
$32.00
+50.7%
-5.5%$1.04B$96.21MN/A440
TNDM
Tandem Diabetes Care
2.5303 of 5 stars
$14.69
-0.5%
$29.89
+103.5%
-41.4%$1.01B$1.01BN/A2,500
INMD
InMode
1.3919 of 5 stars
$13.83
+0.4%
$16.00
+15.7%
-3.9%$876.27M$370.49M10.17480
DRTS
Alpha Tau Medical
1.8207 of 5 stars
$9.88
-4.4%
$9.67
-2.2%
+259.5%$869.54MN/AN/A80

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:PROF) was last updated on 5/19/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners