Do analysts prefer VS or PWCM?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Versus Systems 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 LM Funding America 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Do analysts prefer PWCM or ENTO?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score LM Funding America 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Entero Therapeutics 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Do analysts recommend AMST or PWCM?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Amesite 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 LM Funding America 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Is AMST or PWCM more profitable?

LM Funding America has a net margin of -413.92% compared to Amesite's net margin of -873.02%. LM Funding America's return on equity of -132.69% beat Amesite's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Amesite -873.02% -154.31% -129.67% LM Funding America -413.92% -132.69% -78.02%

Do analysts prefer PWCM or AUUD?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score LM Funding America 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Auddia 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Is PWCM or AUUD more profitable?

Auddia has a net margin of 0.00% compared to LM Funding America's net margin of -413.92%. LM Funding America's return on equity of -132.69% beat Auddia's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets LM Funding America -413.92% -132.69% -78.02% Auddia N/A -175.41% -153.38%

LM Funding America (PWCM) Competitors

$1.17 -0.15 (-11.36%)

As of 04:00 PM Eastern

Compare

PWCM vs. VS, ENTO, AMST, IPST, and AUUD

Should you buy LM Funding America stock or one of its competitors? LM Funding America's main competitors and comparable companies include Versus Systems (VS), Entero Therapeutics (ENTO), Amesite (AMST), Heritage Distilling (IPST), and Auddia (AUUD). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "application software" industry.

How does LM Funding America compare to Versus Systems?

Versus Systems (NASDAQ:VS) and LM Funding America (NASDAQ:PWCM) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, dividends, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

Versus Systems has a beta of 1.35, indicating that its stock price is 35% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, LM Funding America has a beta of 2.43, indicating that its stock price is 143% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Versus Systems had 2 more articles in the media than LM Funding America. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Versus Systems and 0 mentions for LM Funding America. Versus Systems' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled LM Funding America'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Versus Systems	Neutral
LM Funding America	Neutral

60.7% of Versus Systems shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 22.7% of LM Funding America shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Versus Systems shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 15.0% of LM Funding America shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Versus Systems	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
LM Funding America	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

Versus Systems has higher earnings, but lower revenue than LM Funding America. Versus Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than LM Funding America, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Versus Systems	$2.18M	3.77	-$1.79M	-$0.35	N/A
LM Funding America	$8.85M	0.12	-$26.92M	-$60.51	N/A

Versus Systems has a net margin of 0.00% compared to LM Funding America's net margin of -413.92%. Versus Systems' return on equity of -70.36% beat LM Funding America's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Versus Systems	N/A	-70.36%	-61.70%
LM Funding America	-413.92%	-132.69%	-78.02%

Summary

Versus Systems beats LM Funding America on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does LM Funding America compare to Entero Therapeutics?

LM Funding America (NASDAQ:PWCM) and Entero Therapeutics (NASDAQ:ENTO) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, risk and analyst recommendations.

Entero Therapeutics has a net margin of 0.00% compared to LM Funding America's net margin of -413.92%. LM Funding America's return on equity of -132.69% beat Entero Therapeutics' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
LM Funding America	-413.92%	-132.69%	-78.02%
Entero Therapeutics	N/A	-461.02%	-14.72%

22.7% of LM Funding America shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.3% of Entero Therapeutics shares are held by institutional investors. 15.0% of LM Funding America shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Entero Therapeutics shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
LM Funding America	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Entero Therapeutics	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

In the previous week, LM Funding America's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Entero Therapeutics'average media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
LM Funding America	Neutral
Entero Therapeutics	Neutral

Entero Therapeutics has lower revenue, but higher earnings than LM Funding America. Entero Therapeutics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than LM Funding America, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
LM Funding America	$8.85M	0.12	-$26.92M	-$60.51	N/A
Entero Therapeutics	N/A	N/A	-$18.06M	-$1.69	N/A

LM Funding America has a beta of 2.43, meaning that its stock price is 143% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Entero Therapeutics has a beta of 1.19, meaning that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

LM Funding America beats Entero Therapeutics on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does LM Funding America compare to Amesite?

Amesite (NASDAQ:AMST) and LM Funding America (NASDAQ:PWCM) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability and earnings.

LM Funding America has a net margin of -413.92% compared to Amesite's net margin of -873.02%. LM Funding America's return on equity of -132.69% beat Amesite's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Amesite	-873.02%	-154.31%	-129.67%
LM Funding America	-413.92%	-132.69%	-78.02%

Amesite has a beta of 0.98, meaning that its stock price is 2% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, LM Funding America has a beta of 2.43, meaning that its stock price is 143% more volatile than the broader market.

3.6% of Amesite shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 22.7% of LM Funding America shares are held by institutional investors. 36.5% of Amesite shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 15.0% of LM Funding America shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Amesite has higher earnings, but lower revenue than LM Funding America. Amesite is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than LM Funding America, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Amesite	$110K	66.69	-$3.62M	-$0.63	N/A
LM Funding America	$8.85M	0.12	-$26.92M	-$60.51	N/A

In the previous week, Amesite had 2 more articles in the media than LM Funding America. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Amesite and 0 mentions for LM Funding America. Amesite's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled LM Funding America'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Amesite	Neutral
LM Funding America	Neutral

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Amesite	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
LM Funding America	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

Summary

LM Funding America beats Amesite on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does LM Funding America compare to Heritage Distilling?

Heritage Distilling (NASDAQ:IPST) and LM Funding America (NASDAQ:PWCM) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, profitability, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation and institutional ownership.

Heritage Distilling currently has a consensus price target of $164.00, indicating a potential upside of 2,007.97%. Given Heritage Distilling's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Heritage Distilling is more favorable than LM Funding America.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Heritage Distilling	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
LM Funding America	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

In the previous week, Heritage Distilling had 8 more articles in the media than LM Funding America. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Heritage Distilling and 0 mentions for LM Funding America. Heritage Distilling's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled LM Funding America'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Heritage Distilling	Neutral
LM Funding America	Neutral

LM Funding America has a net margin of -413.92% compared to Heritage Distilling's net margin of -1,875.66%. LM Funding America's return on equity of -132.69% beat Heritage Distilling's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Heritage Distilling	-1,875.66%	-242.58%	-201.22%
LM Funding America	-413.92%	-132.69%	-78.02%

22.7% of LM Funding America shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.7% of Heritage Distilling shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 15.0% of LM Funding America shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

LM Funding America has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Heritage Distilling. Heritage Distilling is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than LM Funding America, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Heritage Distilling	$10.12M	0.55	-$137.71M	-$311.78	N/A
LM Funding America	$8.85M	0.12	-$26.92M	-$60.51	N/A

Heritage Distilling has a beta of 4.94, suggesting that its stock price is 394% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, LM Funding America has a beta of 2.43, suggesting that its stock price is 143% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

LM Funding America beats Heritage Distilling on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does LM Funding America compare to Auddia?

LM Funding America (NASDAQ:PWCM) and Auddia (NASDAQ:AUUD) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment and earnings.

Auddia has a net margin of 0.00% compared to LM Funding America's net margin of -413.92%. LM Funding America's return on equity of -132.69% beat Auddia's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
LM Funding America	-413.92%	-132.69%	-78.02%
Auddia	N/A	-175.41%	-153.38%

Auddia has lower revenue, but higher earnings than LM Funding America. Auddia is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than LM Funding America, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
LM Funding America	$8.85M	0.12	-$26.92M	-$60.51	N/A
Auddia	N/A	N/A	-$7.69M	-$18.04	N/A

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
LM Funding America	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Auddia	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

22.7% of LM Funding America shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.0% of LM Funding America shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of Auddia shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Auddia had 4 more articles in the media than LM Funding America. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Auddia and 0 mentions for LM Funding America. Auddia's average media sentiment score of 0.71 beat LM Funding America's score of 0.00 indicating that Auddia is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
LM Funding America	Neutral
Auddia	Positive

LM Funding America has a beta of 2.43, suggesting that its stock price is 143% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Auddia has a beta of 0.5, suggesting that its stock price is 50% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

LM Funding America beats Auddia on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get LM Funding America News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PWCM and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

PWCM vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	LM Funding America	Software Industry	Technology Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$1.23M	$15.58B	$28.90B	$12.72B
Dividend Yield	N/A	3.42%	2.75%	11.02%
P/E Ratio	-0.02	121.72	68.03	20.75
Price / Sales	0.12	1,293.57	593.88	96.73
Price / Cash	N/A	47.09	48.39	53.12
Price / Book	0.07	7.37	9.35	6.25
Net Income	-$26.92M	$434.52M	$676.63M	$347.86M
7 Day Performance	-57.75%	2.97%	0.36%	1.57%
1 Month Performance	-57.75%	6.96%	4.41%	5.24%
1 Year Performance	-96.51%	5.58%	188.64%	17.87%

LM Funding America Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
PWCM LM Funding America	0.6287 of 5 stars	$1.17 -11.4%	N/A	-91.9%	$1.23M	$8.85M	N/A	8	Analyst Downgrade Gap Down
VS Versus Systems	0.4585 of 5 stars	$1.33 -3.6%	N/A	-32.1%	$6.52M	$2.18M	N/A	8	Positive News Short Interest Decrease Gap Down
ENTO Entero Therapeutics	N/A	$3.89 -1.5%	N/A	+75.0%	$6.18M	N/A	N/A	9
AMST Amesite	0.549 of 5 stars	$0.94 -0.5%	N/A	-56.9%	$6.16M	$110K	N/A	20	Short Interest Decrease Gap Down
IPST Heritage Distilling	1.7196 of 5 stars	$8.45 -46.4%	$164.00 +1,840.8%	-95.5%	$6.08M	$10.12M	N/A	N/A	Gap Up

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:PWCM) was last updated on 8/25/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

LM Funding America (PWCM) Competitors

PWCM vs. VS, ENTO, AMST, IPST, and AUUD

How does LM Funding America compare to Versus Systems?

Summary

How does LM Funding America compare to Entero Therapeutics?

Summary

How does LM Funding America compare to Amesite?

Summary

How does LM Funding America compare to Heritage Distilling?

Summary

How does LM Funding America compare to Auddia?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

PWCM vs. The Competition

LM Funding America Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

LM Funding America (PWCM) Competitors

PWCM vs. VS, ENTO, AMST, IPST, and AUUD

How does LM Funding America compare to Versus Systems?

Which has more volatility & risk, VS or PWCM?

Does the media refer more to VS or PWCM?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in VS or PWCM?

Do analysts prefer VS or PWCM?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, VS or PWCM?

Is VS or PWCM more profitable?

Summary

How does LM Funding America compare to Entero Therapeutics?

Is PWCM or ENTO more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in PWCM or ENTO?

Do analysts prefer PWCM or ENTO?

Does the media favor PWCM or ENTO?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, PWCM or ENTO?

Which has more volatility and risk, PWCM or ENTO?

Summary

How does LM Funding America compare to Amesite?

Is AMST or PWCM more profitable?

Which has more risk & volatility, AMST or PWCM?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in AMST or PWCM?

Which has better earnings and valuation, AMST or PWCM?

Does the media favor AMST or PWCM?

Do analysts recommend AMST or PWCM?

Summary

How does LM Funding America compare to Heritage Distilling?

Do analysts rate IPST or PWCM?

Does the media refer more to IPST or PWCM?

Is IPST or PWCM more profitable?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in IPST or PWCM?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, IPST or PWCM?

Which has more volatility and risk, IPST or PWCM?

Summary

How does LM Funding America compare to Auddia?

Is PWCM or AUUD more profitable?

Which has better valuation and earnings, PWCM or AUUD?

Do analysts prefer PWCM or AUUD?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of PWCM or AUUD?

Does the media prefer PWCM or AUUD?

Which has more volatility and risk, PWCM or AUUD?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

PWCM vs. The Competition

LM Funding America Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools