Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund Competitors

DNP Select Income Fund (NYSE:DNP) and Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund (NASDAQ:QQQX) are both finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, profitability, earnings, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares DNP Select Income Fund and Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for DNP Select Income Fund and Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund, as reported by MarketBeat.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

5.7% of DNP Select Income Fund shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 19.7% of Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of DNP Select Income Fund shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares DNP Select Income Fund and Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Dividends

DNP Select Income Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.78 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.6%. Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund pays an annual dividend of $1.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.7%. DNP Select Income Fund has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. DNP Select Income Fund is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Volatility and Risk

DNP Select Income Fund has a beta of 0.52, meaning that its share price is 48% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund has a beta of 1.14, meaning that its share price is 14% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

DNP Select Income Fund beats Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund on 3 of the 5 factors compared between the two stocks.

Nuveen Municipal Value Fund (NYSE:NUV) and Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund (NASDAQ:QQQX) are both finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, profitability, earnings, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares Nuveen Municipal Value Fund and Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Dividends

Nuveen Municipal Value Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.37 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund pays an annual dividend of $1.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.7%. Nuveen Municipal Value Fund has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Nuveen Municipal Value Fund and Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Volatility and Risk

Nuveen Municipal Value Fund has a beta of 0.17, meaning that its share price is 83% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund has a beta of 1.14, meaning that its share price is 14% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Nuveen Municipal Value Fund and Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund, as reported by MarketBeat.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

12.7% of Nuveen Municipal Value Fund shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 19.7% of Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Nuveen Municipal Value Fund shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund beats Nuveen Municipal Value Fund on 3 of the 5 factors compared between the two stocks.

Adams Diversified Equity Fund (NYSE:ADX) and Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund (NASDAQ:QQQX) are both finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, profitability, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares Adams Diversified Equity Fund and Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Dividends

Adams Diversified Equity Fund pays an annual dividend of $1.03 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.3%. Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund pays an annual dividend of $1.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.7%. Adams Diversified Equity Fund has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Adams Diversified Equity Fund and Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Risk & Volatility

Adams Diversified Equity Fund has a beta of 1.06, suggesting that its stock price is 6% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund has a beta of 1.14, suggesting that its stock price is 14% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for Adams Diversified Equity Fund and Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

14.9% of Adams Diversified Equity Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 19.7% of Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Adams Diversified Equity Fund shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund beats Adams Diversified Equity Fund on 3 of the 5 factors compared between the two stocks.

PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fund (NYSE:PTY) and Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund (NASDAQ:QQQX) are both finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, profitability, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fund and Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

6.9% of PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 19.7% of Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fund and Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fund and Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Dividends

PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fund pays an annual dividend of $1.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.3%. Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund pays an annual dividend of $1.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.7%. PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fund has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fund is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Risk & Volatility

PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fund has a beta of 0.76, suggesting that its stock price is 24% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund has a beta of 1.14, suggesting that its stock price is 14% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund (NASDAQ:QQQX) and Goldman Sachs BDC (NYSE:GSBD) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation and analyst recommendations.

Profitability

This table compares Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund and Goldman Sachs BDC's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

19.7% of Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.8% of Goldman Sachs BDC shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Goldman Sachs BDC shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund and Goldman Sachs BDC's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Goldman Sachs BDC has higher revenue and earnings than Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and price targets for Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund and Goldman Sachs BDC, as provided by MarketBeat.

Goldman Sachs BDC has a consensus price target of $15.9167, indicating a potential downside of 17.74%. Given Goldman Sachs BDC's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Goldman Sachs BDC is more favorable than Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund.

Dividends

Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund pays an annual dividend of $1.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.7%. Goldman Sachs BDC pays an annual dividend of $1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.3%. Goldman Sachs BDC pays out 90.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Goldman Sachs BDC has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Goldman Sachs BDC is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Risk & Volatility

Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund has a beta of 1.14, indicating that its share price is 14% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Goldman Sachs BDC has a beta of 1.42, indicating that its share price is 42% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Goldman Sachs BDC beats Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund on 10 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund (NASDAQ:QQQX) and Hercules Capital (NYSE:HTGC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation and analyst recommendations.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and price targets for Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund and Hercules Capital, as provided by MarketBeat.

Hercules Capital has a consensus price target of $13.8438, indicating a potential downside of 18.57%. Given Hercules Capital's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Hercules Capital is more favorable than Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund.

Profitability

This table compares Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund and Hercules Capital's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Dividends

Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund pays an annual dividend of $1.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.7%. Hercules Capital pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.5%. Hercules Capital pays out 90.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Hercules Capital has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Hercules Capital is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund and Hercules Capital's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Hercules Capital has higher revenue and earnings than Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

19.7% of Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.9% of Hercules Capital shares are held by institutional investors. 3.3% of Hercules Capital shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Risk & Volatility

Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund has a beta of 1.14, indicating that its share price is 14% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Hercules Capital has a beta of 1.57, indicating that its share price is 57% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Hercules Capital beats Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund on 11 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.