Tri-Continental Competitors

Tri-Continental (NYSE:TY) and DNP Select Income Fund (NYSE:DNP) are both finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Dividends

Tri-Continental pays an annual dividend of $1.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.8%. DNP Select Income Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.78 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.8%. DNP Select Income Fund has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. DNP Select Income Fund is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

8.8% of Tri-Continental shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.7% of DNP Select Income Fund shares are held by institutional investors. 8.7% of Tri-Continental shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of DNP Select Income Fund shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for Tri-Continental and DNP Select Income Fund, as provided by MarketBeat.

Profitability

This table compares Tri-Continental and DNP Select Income Fund's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Tri-Continental and DNP Select Income Fund's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Risk and Volatility

Tri-Continental has a beta of 1.04, suggesting that its share price is 4% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, DNP Select Income Fund has a beta of 0.52, suggesting that its share price is 48% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Tri-Continental beats DNP Select Income Fund on 3 of the 5 factors compared between the two stocks.

Nuveen Municipal Value Fund (NYSE:NUV) and Tri-Continental (NYSE:TY) are both finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, risk and analyst recommendations.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

12.7% of Nuveen Municipal Value Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.8% of Tri-Continental shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Nuveen Municipal Value Fund shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 8.7% of Tri-Continental shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for Nuveen Municipal Value Fund and Tri-Continental, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Nuveen Municipal Value Fund and Tri-Continental's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Profitability

This table compares Nuveen Municipal Value Fund and Tri-Continental's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Dividends

Nuveen Municipal Value Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.37 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. Tri-Continental pays an annual dividend of $1.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.8%. Nuveen Municipal Value Fund has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Volatility and Risk

Nuveen Municipal Value Fund has a beta of 0.17, indicating that its stock price is 83% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Tri-Continental has a beta of 1.04, indicating that its stock price is 4% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Tri-Continental beats Nuveen Municipal Value Fund on 3 of the 5 factors compared between the two stocks.

Adams Diversified Equity Fund (NYSE:ADX) and Tri-Continental (NYSE:TY) are both finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

14.9% of Adams Diversified Equity Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.8% of Tri-Continental shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Adams Diversified Equity Fund shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.7% of Tri-Continental shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for Adams Diversified Equity Fund and Tri-Continental, as provided by MarketBeat.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Adams Diversified Equity Fund and Tri-Continental's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Profitability

This table compares Adams Diversified Equity Fund and Tri-Continental's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Dividends

Adams Diversified Equity Fund pays an annual dividend of $1.03 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.4%. Tri-Continental pays an annual dividend of $1.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.8%. Adams Diversified Equity Fund has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Adams Diversified Equity Fund is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Volatility & Risk

Adams Diversified Equity Fund has a beta of 1.06, suggesting that its share price is 6% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Tri-Continental has a beta of 1.04, suggesting that its share price is 4% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Adams Diversified Equity Fund beats Tri-Continental on 4 of the 5 factors compared between the two stocks.

Goldman Sachs BDC (NYSE:GSBD) and Tri-Continental (NYSE:TY) are both finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Goldman Sachs BDC and Tri-Continental's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Goldman Sachs BDC has higher revenue and earnings than Tri-Continental.

Dividends

Goldman Sachs BDC pays an annual dividend of $1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.9%. Tri-Continental pays an annual dividend of $1.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.8%. Goldman Sachs BDC pays out 90.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Goldman Sachs BDC has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Goldman Sachs BDC is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Profitability

This table compares Goldman Sachs BDC and Tri-Continental's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for Goldman Sachs BDC and Tri-Continental, as provided by MarketBeat.

Goldman Sachs BDC presently has a consensus target price of $15.9167, suggesting a potential downside of 21.71%. Given Goldman Sachs BDC's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Goldman Sachs BDC is more favorable than Tri-Continental.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

13.8% of Goldman Sachs BDC shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.8% of Tri-Continental shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Goldman Sachs BDC shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.7% of Tri-Continental shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility & Risk

Goldman Sachs BDC has a beta of 1.42, suggesting that its share price is 42% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Tri-Continental has a beta of 1.04, suggesting that its share price is 4% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Goldman Sachs BDC beats Tri-Continental on 10 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Tri-Continental (NYSE:TY) and PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fund (NYSE:PTY) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Tri-Continental and PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fund's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Dividends

Tri-Continental pays an annual dividend of $1.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.8%. PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fund pays an annual dividend of $1.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.4%. PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fund has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fund is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Profitability

This table compares Tri-Continental and PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fund's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Tri-Continental and PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fund, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

8.8% of Tri-Continental shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.9% of PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.7% of Tri-Continental shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk & Volatility

Tri-Continental has a beta of 1.04, suggesting that its stock price is 4% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fund has a beta of 0.76, suggesting that its stock price is 24% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Tri-Continental beats PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fund on 3 of the 5 factors compared between the two stocks.

Tri-Continental (NYSE:TY) and Hercules Capital (NYSE:HTGC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Tri-Continental and Hercules Capital's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Hercules Capital has higher revenue and earnings than Tri-Continental.

Dividends

Tri-Continental pays an annual dividend of $1.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.8%. Hercules Capital pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.5%. Hercules Capital pays out 90.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Hercules Capital has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Hercules Capital is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Profitability

This table compares Tri-Continental and Hercules Capital's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Tri-Continental and Hercules Capital, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Hercules Capital has a consensus price target of $13.8438, suggesting a potential downside of 18.42%. Given Hercules Capital's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Hercules Capital is more favorable than Tri-Continental.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

8.8% of Tri-Continental shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.9% of Hercules Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.7% of Tri-Continental shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.3% of Hercules Capital shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk & Volatility

Tri-Continental has a beta of 1.04, suggesting that its stock price is 4% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Hercules Capital has a beta of 1.57, suggesting that its stock price is 57% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Hercules Capital beats Tri-Continental on 10 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.