NASDAQ:SCHL

Scholastic Competitors

$31.99
+0.74 (+2.37 %)
(As of 04/14/2021 03:59 PM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$31.41
Now: $31.99
$32.06
50-Day Range
$28.44
MA: $30.12
$31.48
52-Week Range
$18.80
Now: $31.99
$34.35
Volume10,473 shs
Average Volume179,196 shs
Market Capitalization$1.10 billion
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend Yield1.96%
Beta1

Competitors

Scholastic (NASDAQ:SCHL) Vs. JOBS, CELH, HI, GO, SAFM, and UTZ

Should you be buying SCHL stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the sector of "consumer staples" are considered alternatives and competitors to Scholastic, including 51job (JOBS), Celsius (CELH), Hillenbrand (HI), Grocery Outlet (GO), Sanderson Farms (SAFM), and Utz Brands (UTZ).

Scholastic (NASDAQ:SCHL) and 51job (NASDAQ:JOBS) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, valuation and dividends.

Volatility and Risk

Scholastic has a beta of 1, suggesting that its share price has a similar volatility profile to the S&P 500.Comparatively, 51job has a beta of 0.77, suggesting that its share price is 23% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

70.6% of Scholastic shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 44.4% of 51job shares are owned by institutional investors. 22.3% of Scholastic shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Scholastic and 51job's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Scholastic$1.49 billion0.74$-43,800,000.00($0.08)-399.88
51job$574.57 million7.31$76.46 million$1.1554.17

51job has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Scholastic. Scholastic is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than 51job, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Scholastic and 51job, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Scholastic01002.00
51job0000N/A

Scholastic presently has a consensus target price of $24.00, suggesting a potential downside of 24.98%. Given Scholastic's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Scholastic is more favorable than 51job.

Profitability

This table compares Scholastic and 51job's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Scholastic-4.77%-0.96%-0.55%
51job27.33%8.72%6.78%

Summary

51job beats Scholastic on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Scholastic (NASDAQ:SCHL) and Celsius (NASDAQ:CELH) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, valuation and dividends.

Volatility and Risk

Scholastic has a beta of 1, suggesting that its share price has a similar volatility profile to the S&P 500.Comparatively, Celsius has a beta of 2.17, suggesting that its share price is 117% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

70.6% of Scholastic shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 54.0% of Celsius shares are owned by institutional investors. 22.3% of Scholastic shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 37.6% of Celsius shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Scholastic and Celsius' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Scholastic$1.49 billion0.74$-43,800,000.00($0.08)-399.88
Celsius$75.15 million55.78$9.97 million($0.02)-2,887.50

Celsius has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Scholastic. Celsius is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Scholastic, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Scholastic and Celsius, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Scholastic01002.00
Celsius02302.60

Scholastic presently has a consensus target price of $24.00, suggesting a potential downside of 24.98%. Celsius has a consensus target price of $39.00, suggesting a potential downside of 32.47%. Given Scholastic's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Scholastic is more favorable than Celsius.

Profitability

This table compares Scholastic and Celsius' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Scholastic-4.77%-0.96%-0.55%
Celsius4.77%8.28%5.96%

Summary

Celsius beats Scholastic on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Scholastic (NASDAQ:SCHL) and Hillenbrand (NYSE:HI) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, valuation and dividends.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Scholastic and Hillenbrand's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Scholastic$1.49 billion0.74$-43,800,000.00($0.08)-399.88
Hillenbrand$2.52 billion1.49$-60,100,000.00$3.1915.71

Scholastic has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Hillenbrand. Scholastic is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hillenbrand, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

Scholastic pays an annual dividend of $0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Hillenbrand pays an annual dividend of $0.86 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Scholastic pays out -750.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hillenbrand pays out 27.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Scholastic has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Hillenbrand has increased its dividend for 13 consecutive years. Scholastic is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Volatility and Risk

Scholastic has a beta of 1, suggesting that its share price has a similar volatility profile to the S&P 500.Comparatively, Hillenbrand has a beta of 1.54, suggesting that its share price is 54% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

70.6% of Scholastic shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.9% of Hillenbrand shares are owned by institutional investors. 22.3% of Scholastic shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.0% of Hillenbrand shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Scholastic and Hillenbrand's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Scholastic-4.77%-0.96%-0.55%
Hillenbrand-2.39%18.61%4.82%

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Scholastic and Hillenbrand, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Scholastic01002.00
Hillenbrand00203.00

Scholastic presently has a consensus target price of $24.00, suggesting a potential downside of 24.98%. Hillenbrand has a consensus target price of $53.00, suggesting a potential upside of 5.85%. Given Hillenbrand's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Hillenbrand is more favorable than Scholastic.

Summary

Hillenbrand beats Scholastic on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Grocery Outlet (NASDAQ:GO) and Scholastic (NASDAQ:SCHL) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, risk, profitability, earnings and institutional ownership.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Grocery Outlet and Scholastic's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Grocery Outlet$2.56 billion1.44$15.42 million$0.7948.87
Scholastic$1.49 billion0.74$-43,800,000.00($0.08)-399.88

Grocery Outlet has higher revenue and earnings than Scholastic. Scholastic is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Grocery Outlet, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility & Risk

Grocery Outlet has a beta of -0.39, meaning that its share price is 139% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Scholastic has a beta of 1, meaning that its share price has a similar volatility profile to the S&P 500.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

96.0% of Grocery Outlet shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 70.6% of Scholastic shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.5% of Grocery Outlet shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 22.3% of Scholastic shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Grocery Outlet and Scholastic's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Grocery Outlet3.09%17.92%6.32%
Scholastic-4.77%-0.96%-0.55%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for Grocery Outlet and Scholastic, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Grocery Outlet02902.82
Scholastic01002.00

Grocery Outlet presently has a consensus target price of $46.10, suggesting a potential upside of 19.40%. Scholastic has a consensus target price of $24.00, suggesting a potential downside of 24.98%. Given Grocery Outlet's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Grocery Outlet is more favorable than Scholastic.

Summary

Grocery Outlet beats Scholastic on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Sanderson Farms (NASDAQ:SAFM) and Scholastic (NASDAQ:SCHL) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, risk, profitability, earnings and institutional ownership.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for Sanderson Farms and Scholastic, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Sanderson Farms05202.29
Scholastic01002.00

Sanderson Farms presently has a consensus target price of $151.5714, suggesting a potential downside of 6.60%. Scholastic has a consensus target price of $24.00, suggesting a potential downside of 24.98%. Given Sanderson Farms' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Sanderson Farms is more favorable than Scholastic.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Sanderson Farms and Scholastic's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sanderson Farms$3.56 billion1.02$28.27 million($0.41)-395.83
Scholastic$1.49 billion0.74$-43,800,000.00($0.08)-399.88

Sanderson Farms has higher revenue and earnings than Scholastic. Scholastic is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sanderson Farms, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility and Risk

Sanderson Farms has a beta of 0.57, indicating that its stock price is 43% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Scholastic has a beta of 1, indicating that its stock price has a similar volatility profile to the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

85.8% of Sanderson Farms shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 70.6% of Scholastic shares are held by institutional investors. 5.4% of Sanderson Farms shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 22.3% of Scholastic shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Sanderson Farms and Scholastic's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Sanderson Farms0.79%-0.66%-0.48%
Scholastic-4.77%-0.96%-0.55%

Dividends

Sanderson Farms pays an annual dividend of $1.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Scholastic pays an annual dividend of $0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Sanderson Farms pays out -429.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Scholastic pays out -750.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Sanderson Farms has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Scholastic has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Scholastic is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Sanderson Farms beats Scholastic on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Scholastic (NASDAQ:SCHL) and Utz Brands (NYSE:UTZ) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership and earnings.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Scholastic and Utz Brands, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Scholastic01002.00
Utz Brands04602.60

Scholastic currently has a consensus price target of $24.00, suggesting a potential downside of 24.98%. Utz Brands has a consensus price target of $25.95, suggesting a potential upside of 0.62%. Given Utz Brands' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Utz Brands is more favorable than Scholastic.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Scholastic and Utz Brands' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Scholastic$1.49 billion0.74$-43,800,000.00($0.08)-399.88
Utz BrandsN/AN/A$7.97 millionN/AN/A

Utz Brands has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Scholastic.

Risk & Volatility

Scholastic has a beta of 1, meaning that its share price has a similar volatility profile to the S&P 500.Comparatively, Utz Brands has a beta of 0.62, meaning that its share price is 38% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

70.6% of Scholastic shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 34.6% of Utz Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. 22.3% of Scholastic shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Scholastic and Utz Brands' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Scholastic-4.77%-0.96%-0.55%
Utz BrandsN/A-2.13%-1.69%

Dividends

Scholastic pays an annual dividend of $0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Utz Brands pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Scholastic pays out -750.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Scholastic has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Utz Brands has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Summary

Scholastic beats Utz Brands on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.


Scholastic Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
51job logo
JOBS
51job
1.3$62.29+1.4%$4.26 billion$574.57 million29.38Increase in Short Interest
Celsius logo
CELH
Celsius
1.5$57.75+2.0%$4.11 billion$75.15 million825.12Analyst Downgrade
Hillenbrand logo
HI
Hillenbrand
2.0$50.10+0.1%$3.76 billion$2.52 billion-61.85Analyst Downgrade
Grocery Outlet logo
GO
Grocery Outlet
1.2$38.61+1.0%$3.64 billion$2.56 billion40.64Insider Selling
Sanderson Farms logo
SAFM
Sanderson Farms
1.7$162.29+1.2%$3.58 billion$3.56 billion128.80Decrease in Short Interest
Utz Brands logo
UTZ
Utz Brands
1.5$25.79+1.0%$3.56 billionN/A0.00Dividend Announcement
Analyst Upgrade
WD-40 logo
WDFC
WD-40
1.6$255.40+0.6%$3.52 billion$423.35 million58.05Earnings Announcement
Analyst Downgrade
Analyst Revision
BRF logo
BRFS
BRF
1.3$4.30+0.2%$3.50 billion$8.13 billion13.87Increase in Short Interest
Compañía Cervecerías Unidas logo
CCU
Compañía Cervecerías Unidas
1.3$19.17+2.7%$3.45 billion$2.41 billion28.19Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
Energizer logo
ENR
Energizer
2.4$48.56+0.2%$3.31 billion$2.74 billion-30.73
JW.B
John Wiley & Sons
0.6$56.06+0.9%$3.14 billion$1.83 billion-81.25Gap Down
The Simply Good Foods logo
SMPL
The Simply Good Foods
1.6$32.57+0.1%$3.12 billion$816.64 million51.70Analyst Upgrade
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
J & J Snack Foods logo
JJSF
J & J Snack Foods
1.6$157.31+0.3%$2.99 billion$1.02 billion165.59
TreeHouse Foods logo
THS
TreeHouse Foods
1.2$51.22+0.5%$2.88 billion$4.29 billion-512.20
Coca-Cola Consolidated logo
COKE
Coca-Cola Consolidated
0.7$300.89+0.9%$2.80 billion$4.83 billion29.59Dividend Announcement
Medifast logo
MED
Medifast
2.2$237.06+1.3%$2.76 billion$713.67 million29.67Decrease in Short Interest
Analyst Revision
Nu Skin Enterprises logo
NUS
Nu Skin Enterprises
2.1$53.01+1.2%$2.66 billion$2.42 billion17.85
Purple Innovation logo
PRPL
Purple Innovation
1.9$33.54+1.1%$2.26 billion$428.36 million-108.19Analyst Revision
Inter Parfums logo
IPAR
Inter Parfums
1.6$71.17+0.3%$2.24 billion$713.51 million71.17
Vector Group logo
VGR
Vector Group
1.3$14.38+1.0%$2.20 billion$1.90 billion32.68News Coverage
Industrias Bachoco logo
IBA
Industrias Bachoco
1.7$43.51+0.6%$2.19 billion$3.26 billion16.11
Tootsie Roll Industries logo
TR
Tootsie Roll Industries
0.9$31.58+1.6%$2.18 billion$523.62 million36.15
United Natural Foods logo
UNFI
United Natural Foods
1.4$35.28+5.8%$2.10 billion$26.51 billion18.57Analyst Revision
News Coverage
Edgewell Personal Care logo
EPC
Edgewell Personal Care
1.8$38.39+0.4%$2.08 billion$1.95 billion30.96
B&G Foods logo
BGS
B&G Foods
1.6$29.74+0.2%$1.92 billion$1.66 billion14.72
Hostess Brands logo
TWNK
Hostess Brands
1.3$14.56+0.5%$1.91 billion$907.67 million29.12Unusual Options Activity
SunOpta logo
STKL
SunOpta
1.5$15.52+1.0%$1.60 billion$1.19 billion-119.38Analyst Report
News Coverage
Schweitzer-Mauduit International logo
SWM
Schweitzer-Mauduit International
1.4$49.68+1.1%$1.54 billion$1.02 billion17.62Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
Tattooed Chef logo
TTCF
Tattooed Chef
0.9$18.35+2.8%$1.54 billionN/A0.00Increase in Short Interest
Franchise Group logo
FRG
Franchise Group
2.8$36.87+2.1%$1.45 billion$132.55 million0.00News Coverage
e.l.f. Beauty logo
ELF
e.l.f. Beauty
1.3$29.07+2.9%$1.45 billion$282.85 million153.01Analyst Report
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
UVV
Universal
1.2$57.74+1.0%$1.40 billion$1.91 billion25.55
Mission Produce logo
AVO
Mission Produce
1.3$19.84+1.6%$1.38 billionN/A0.00Increase in Short Interest
Calavo Growers logo
CVGW
Calavo Growers
1.7$78.54+1.0%$1.38 billion$1.06 billion-100.69News Coverage
Tupperware Brands logo
TUP
Tupperware Brands
1.5$27.47+0.1%$1.36 billion$1.80 billion85.85
Fresh Del Monte Produce logo
FDP
Fresh Del Monte Produce
1.1$28.91+1.9%$1.34 billion$4.49 billion60.23
Meredith logo
MDP
Meredith
1.3$30.56+4.6%$1.33 billion$2.85 billion-3.32
Matthews International logo
MATW
Matthews International
2.3$42.02+2.3%$1.30 billion$1.50 billion-15.01Decrease in Short Interest
Arko logo
ARKO
Arko
1.7$10.19+2.3%$1.30 billionN/A0.00Increase in Short Interest
The Chefs' Warehouse logo
CHEF
The Chefs' Warehouse
1.2$32.78+0.1%$1.24 billion$1.59 billion-32.78Analyst Upgrade
MGP Ingredients logo
MGPI
MGP Ingredients
1.8$65.06+1.7%$1.08 billion$362.74 million26.66
John B. Sanfilippo & Son logo
JBSS
John B. Sanfilippo & Son
1.3$91.61+0.5%$1.05 billion$880.09 million19.53
Adecoagro logo
AGRO
Adecoagro
1.1$8.67+6.0%$954.25 million$887.14 million-27.09High Trading Volume
Turning Point Brands logo
TPB
Turning Point Brands
1.8$49.66+0.7%$953.76 million$361.99 million121.12News Coverage
Village Farms International logo
VFF
Village Farms International
1.9$11.51+3.9%$951.97 million$144.57 million-230.15
Vital Farms logo
VITL
Vital Farms
1.0$24.08+2.2%$932.30 millionN/A0.00
Mohawk Group logo
MWK
Mohawk Group
1.8$26.37+4.1%$809.15 million$114.45 million-11.52Analyst Upgrade
Carriage Services logo
CSV
Carriage Services
2.2$36.10+2.3%$634.86 million$274.11 million62.24
Revlon logo
REV
Revlon
0.9$11.45+1.3%$594.38 million$2.42 billion-1.70Unusual Options Activity
Whole Earth Brands logo
FREE
Whole Earth Brands
1.8$14.21+2.1%$534.52 millionN/A0.00Analyst Upgrade
News Coverage
This page was last updated on 4/14/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security. Learn more.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.