New York Times (NYT) Competitors

New York Times has a net margin of 13.19% compared to News' net margin of 6.35%. New York Times' return on equity of 22.64% beat News' return on equity.

News currently has a consensus price target of $38.50, suggesting a potential upside of 29.28%. New York Times has a consensus price target of $84.20, suggesting a potential upside of 20.16%. Given News' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe News is more favorable than New York Times.

News has higher revenue and earnings than New York Times. News is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than New York Times, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

67.0% of News shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.4% of New York Times shares are owned by institutional investors. 13.6% of News shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.9% of New York Times shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

News has a beta of 0.91, indicating that its stock price is 9% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, New York Times has a beta of 0.92, indicating that its stock price is 8% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, New York Times had 188 more articles in the media than News. MarketBeat recorded 196 mentions for New York Times and 8 mentions for News. News' average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat New York Times' score of -0.08 indicating that News is being referred to more favorably in the media.

News pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. New York Times pays an annual dividend of $0.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. News pays out 19.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. New York Times pays out 38.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. New York Times has increased its dividend for 7 consecutive years. New York Times is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, New York Times had 189 more articles in the media than People Incorporated Common Stock. MarketBeat recorded 196 mentions for New York Times and 7 mentions for People Incorporated Common Stock. People Incorporated Common Stock's average media sentiment score of 0.23 beat New York Times' score of -0.08 indicating that People Incorporated Common Stock is being referred to more favorably in the media.

New York Times has higher revenue and earnings than People Incorporated Common Stock. People Incorporated Common Stock is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than New York Times, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

People Incorporated Common Stock has a beta of 1.03, suggesting that its stock price is 3% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, New York Times has a beta of 0.92, suggesting that its stock price is 8% less volatile than the broader market.

88.9% of People Incorporated Common Stock shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.4% of New York Times shares are held by institutional investors. 16.1% of People Incorporated Common Stock shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.9% of New York Times shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

People Incorporated Common Stock currently has a consensus price target of $56.08, suggesting a potential upside of 54.95%. New York Times has a consensus price target of $84.20, suggesting a potential upside of 20.16%. Given People Incorporated Common Stock's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe People Incorporated Common Stock is more favorable than New York Times.

People Incorporated Common Stock has a net margin of 16.05% compared to New York Times' net margin of 13.19%. New York Times' return on equity of 22.64% beat People Incorporated Common Stock's return on equity.

John Wiley & Sons has a beta of 0.55, meaning that its share price is 45% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, New York Times has a beta of 0.92, meaning that its share price is 8% less volatile than the broader market.

0.5% of John Wiley & Sons shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.4% of New York Times shares are owned by institutional investors. 29.7% of John Wiley & Sons shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.9% of New York Times shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

New York Times has higher revenue and earnings than John Wiley & Sons. John Wiley & Sons is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than New York Times, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, New York Times had 195 more articles in the media than John Wiley & Sons. MarketBeat recorded 196 mentions for New York Times and 1 mentions for John Wiley & Sons. John Wiley & Sons' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat New York Times' score of -0.08 indicating that John Wiley & Sons is being referred to more favorably in the media.

John Wiley & Sons pays an annual dividend of $1.43 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. New York Times pays an annual dividend of $0.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. John Wiley & Sons pays out 37.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. New York Times pays out 38.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. John Wiley & Sons has increased its dividend for 26 consecutive years and New York Times has increased its dividend for 7 consecutive years. John Wiley & Sons is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

New York Times has a net margin of 13.19% compared to John Wiley & Sons' net margin of 11.90%. John Wiley & Sons' return on equity of 27.99% beat New York Times' return on equity.

New York Times has a consensus target price of $84.20, indicating a potential upside of 20.16%. Given New York Times' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe New York Times is more favorable than John Wiley & Sons.

95.4% of New York Times shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 73.9% of John Wiley & Sons shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.9% of New York Times shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 17.6% of John Wiley & Sons shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

New York Times has higher revenue and earnings than John Wiley & Sons. John Wiley & Sons is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than New York Times, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

New York Times has a beta of 0.92, meaning that its share price is 8% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, John Wiley & Sons has a beta of 0.78, meaning that its share price is 22% less volatile than the broader market.

New York Times has a net margin of 13.19% compared to John Wiley & Sons' net margin of 11.90%. John Wiley & Sons' return on equity of 27.99% beat New York Times' return on equity.

New York Times presently has a consensus target price of $84.20, suggesting a potential upside of 20.16%. Given New York Times' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe New York Times is more favorable than John Wiley & Sons.

In the previous week, New York Times had 196 more articles in the media than John Wiley & Sons. MarketBeat recorded 196 mentions for New York Times and 0 mentions for John Wiley & Sons. John Wiley & Sons' average media sentiment score of 0.26 beat New York Times' score of -0.08 indicating that John Wiley & Sons is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

New York Times pays an annual dividend of $0.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. John Wiley & Sons pays an annual dividend of $1.43 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. New York Times pays out 38.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. John Wiley & Sons pays out 37.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. New York Times has increased its dividend for 7 consecutive years and John Wiley & Sons has increased its dividend for 26 consecutive years. John Wiley & Sons is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.