New York Times (NYT) Competitors

95.4% of New York Times shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 67.0% of News shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.9% of New York Times shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 13.6% of News shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

News has higher revenue and earnings than New York Times. New York Times is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than News, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

New York Times currently has a consensus price target of $82.89, suggesting a potential upside of 28.70%. News has a consensus price target of $38.50, suggesting a potential upside of 35.25%. Given News' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe News is more favorable than New York Times.

New York Times has a net margin of 13.19% compared to News' net margin of 6.35%. New York Times' return on equity of 22.64% beat News' return on equity.

New York Times has a beta of 0.95, meaning that its share price is 5% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, News has a beta of 0.88, meaning that its share price is 12% less volatile than the broader market.

New York Times pays an annual dividend of $0.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. News pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. New York Times pays out 38.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. News pays out 19.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. New York Times has raised its dividend for 7 consecutive years. New York Times is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, New York Times had 102 more articles in the media than News. MarketBeat recorded 118 mentions for New York Times and 16 mentions for News. News' average media sentiment score of 1.09 beat New York Times' score of -0.05 indicating that News is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

People Incorporated Common Stock presently has a consensus price target of $55.62, indicating a potential upside of 36.98%. New York Times has a consensus price target of $82.89, indicating a potential upside of 28.70%. Given People Incorporated Common Stock's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe People Incorporated Common Stock is more favorable than New York Times.

People Incorporated Common Stock has a net margin of 16.05% compared to New York Times' net margin of 13.19%. New York Times' return on equity of 22.64% beat People Incorporated Common Stock's return on equity.

New York Times has higher revenue and earnings than People Incorporated Common Stock. People Incorporated Common Stock is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than New York Times, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

88.9% of People Incorporated Common Stock shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.4% of New York Times shares are owned by institutional investors. 16.1% of People Incorporated Common Stock shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.9% of New York Times shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, New York Times had 95 more articles in the media than People Incorporated Common Stock. MarketBeat recorded 118 mentions for New York Times and 23 mentions for People Incorporated Common Stock. People Incorporated Common Stock's average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat New York Times' score of -0.05 indicating that People Incorporated Common Stock is being referred to more favorably in the media.

People Incorporated Common Stock has a beta of 1.04, indicating that its share price is 4% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, New York Times has a beta of 0.95, indicating that its share price is 5% less volatile than the broader market.

John Wiley & Sons has a net margin of 13.22% compared to New York Times' net margin of 13.19%. John Wiley & Sons' return on equity of 29.01% beat New York Times' return on equity.

New York Times currently has a consensus price target of $82.89, suggesting a potential upside of 28.70%. Given New York Times' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe New York Times is more favorable than John Wiley & Sons.

New York Times has a beta of 0.95, suggesting that its share price is 5% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, John Wiley & Sons has a beta of 0.54, suggesting that its share price is 46% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, New York Times had 116 more articles in the media than John Wiley & Sons. MarketBeat recorded 118 mentions for New York Times and 2 mentions for John Wiley & Sons. John Wiley & Sons' average media sentiment score of 0.54 beat New York Times' score of -0.05 indicating that John Wiley & Sons is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

95.4% of New York Times shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.5% of John Wiley & Sons shares are held by institutional investors. 1.9% of New York Times shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 29.7% of John Wiley & Sons shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

New York Times has higher revenue and earnings than John Wiley & Sons. John Wiley & Sons is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than New York Times, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

New York Times pays an annual dividend of $0.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. John Wiley & Sons pays an annual dividend of $1.43 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. New York Times pays out 38.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. John Wiley & Sons pays out 33.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. New York Times has increased its dividend for 7 consecutive years and John Wiley & Sons has increased its dividend for 26 consecutive years. John Wiley & Sons is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

John Wiley & Sons has a beta of 0.78, meaning that its stock price is 22% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, New York Times has a beta of 0.95, meaning that its stock price is 5% less volatile than the broader market.

73.9% of John Wiley & Sons shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.4% of New York Times shares are held by institutional investors. 16.7% of John Wiley & Sons shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.9% of New York Times shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

John Wiley & Sons pays an annual dividend of $1.43 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. New York Times pays an annual dividend of $0.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. John Wiley & Sons pays out 33.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. New York Times pays out 38.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. John Wiley & Sons has raised its dividend for 26 consecutive years and New York Times has raised its dividend for 7 consecutive years. John Wiley & Sons is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

John Wiley & Sons has a net margin of 13.22% compared to New York Times' net margin of 13.19%. John Wiley & Sons' return on equity of 29.01% beat New York Times' return on equity.

In the previous week, New York Times had 115 more articles in the media than John Wiley & Sons. MarketBeat recorded 118 mentions for New York Times and 3 mentions for John Wiley & Sons. John Wiley & Sons' average media sentiment score of 1.05 beat New York Times' score of -0.05 indicating that John Wiley & Sons is being referred to more favorably in the media.

New York Times has a consensus target price of $82.89, indicating a potential upside of 28.70%. Given New York Times' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe New York Times is more favorable than John Wiley & Sons.

New York Times has higher revenue and earnings than John Wiley & Sons. John Wiley & Sons is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than New York Times, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.