The New York Times Competitors

Corteva (NYSE:CTVA) and The New York Times (NYSE:NYT) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, valuation, profitability and institutional ownership.

Volatility & Risk

Corteva has a beta of 0.82, suggesting that its share price is 18% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, The New York Times has a beta of 0.82, suggesting that its share price is 18% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Corteva and The New York Times' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

The New York Times has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Corteva. Corteva is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than The New York Times, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

Corteva pays an annual dividend of $0.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. The New York Times pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Corteva pays out 36.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. The New York Times pays out 26.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. The New York Times has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Corteva and The New York Times, as reported by MarketBeat.

Corteva currently has a consensus price target of $36.1667, suggesting a potential downside of 14.01%. The New York Times has a consensus price target of $45.00, suggesting a potential downside of 9.75%. Given The New York Times' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe The New York Times is more favorable than Corteva.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

77.2% of Corteva shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.4% of The New York Times shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Corteva shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.6% of The New York Times shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Corteva and The New York Times' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

The New York Times beats Corteva on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

The Hershey (NYSE:HSY) and The New York Times (NYSE:NYT) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, valuation, profitability and institutional ownership.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares The Hershey and The New York Times' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

The Hershey has higher revenue and earnings than The New York Times. The Hershey is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than The New York Times, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility & Risk

The Hershey has a beta of 0.31, suggesting that its share price is 69% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, The New York Times has a beta of 0.82, suggesting that its share price is 18% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for The Hershey and The New York Times, as reported by MarketBeat.

The Hershey currently has a consensus price target of $152.5333, suggesting a potential upside of 2.92%. The New York Times has a consensus price target of $45.00, suggesting a potential downside of 9.75%. Given The Hershey's higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe The Hershey is more favorable than The New York Times.

Profitability

This table compares The Hershey and The New York Times' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

52.1% of The Hershey shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.4% of The New York Times shares are owned by institutional investors. 29.4% of The Hershey shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.6% of The New York Times shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Dividends

The Hershey pays an annual dividend of $3.22 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. The New York Times pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. The Hershey pays out 55.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. The New York Times pays out 26.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. The Hershey has increased its dividend for 8 consecutive years and The New York Times has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. The Hershey is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

The Hershey beats The New York Times on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

The New York Times (NYSE:NYT) and Archer-Daniels-Midland (NYSE:ADM) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership and earnings.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares The New York Times and Archer-Daniels-Midland's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Archer-Daniels-Midland has higher revenue and earnings than The New York Times. Archer-Daniels-Midland is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than The New York Times, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk & Volatility

The New York Times has a beta of 0.82, indicating that its stock price is 18% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Archer-Daniels-Midland has a beta of 0.85, indicating that its stock price is 15% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and target prices for The New York Times and Archer-Daniels-Midland, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

The New York Times currently has a consensus target price of $45.00, suggesting a potential downside of 9.75%. Archer-Daniels-Midland has a consensus target price of $53.0909, suggesting a potential upside of 0.51%. Given Archer-Daniels-Midland's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Archer-Daniels-Midland is more favorable than The New York Times.

Profitability

This table compares The New York Times and Archer-Daniels-Midland's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

93.4% of The New York Times shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.9% of Archer-Daniels-Midland shares are held by institutional investors. 2.6% of The New York Times shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Archer-Daniels-Midland shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Dividends

The New York Times pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Archer-Daniels-Midland pays an annual dividend of $1.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. The New York Times pays out 26.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Archer-Daniels-Midland pays out 44.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. The New York Times has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Archer-Daniels-Midland has raised its dividend for 45 consecutive years. Archer-Daniels-Midland is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Archer-Daniels-Midland beats The New York Times on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

The New York Times (NYSE:NYT) and Fomento Económico Mexicano (NYSE:FMX) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership and earnings.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares The New York Times and Fomento Económico Mexicano's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Fomento Económico Mexicano has higher revenue and earnings than The New York Times. Fomento Económico Mexicano is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than The New York Times, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk & Volatility

The New York Times has a beta of 0.82, indicating that its stock price is 18% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Fomento Económico Mexicano has a beta of 0.97, indicating that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and target prices for The New York Times and Fomento Económico Mexicano, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

The New York Times currently has a consensus target price of $45.00, suggesting a potential downside of 9.75%. Fomento Económico Mexicano has a consensus target price of $75.50, suggesting a potential upside of 2.39%. Given Fomento Económico Mexicano's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Fomento Económico Mexicano is more favorable than The New York Times.

Profitability

This table compares The New York Times and Fomento Económico Mexicano's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

93.4% of The New York Times shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 19.1% of Fomento Económico Mexicano shares are held by institutional investors. 2.6% of The New York Times shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Dividends

The New York Times pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Fomento Económico Mexicano pays an annual dividend of $1.49 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. The New York Times pays out 26.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Fomento Económico Mexicano pays out 48.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. The New York Times has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

Summary

The New York Times beats Fomento Económico Mexicano on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

The New York Times (NYSE:NYT) and The Clorox (NYSE:CLX) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership and earnings.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares The New York Times and The Clorox's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

The Clorox has higher revenue and earnings than The New York Times. The Clorox is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than The New York Times, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk & Volatility

The New York Times has a beta of 0.82, indicating that its stock price is 18% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, The Clorox has a beta of 0.21, indicating that its stock price is 79% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and target prices for The New York Times and The Clorox, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

The New York Times currently has a consensus target price of $45.00, suggesting a potential downside of 9.75%. The Clorox has a consensus target price of $217.8125, suggesting a potential upside of 7.64%. Given The Clorox's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe The Clorox is more favorable than The New York Times.

Profitability

This table compares The New York Times and The Clorox's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

93.4% of The New York Times shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 81.7% of The Clorox shares are held by institutional investors. 2.6% of The New York Times shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of The Clorox shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Dividends

The New York Times pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. The Clorox pays an annual dividend of $4.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. The New York Times pays out 26.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. The Clorox pays out 60.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. The New York Times has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years and The Clorox has raised its dividend for 45 consecutive years. The Clorox is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

The Clorox beats The New York Times on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

The New York Times (NYSE:NYT) and Hormel Foods (NYSE:HRL) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership and earnings.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares The New York Times and Hormel Foods' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Hormel Foods has higher revenue and earnings than The New York Times. Hormel Foods is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than The New York Times, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk & Volatility

The New York Times has a beta of 0.82, indicating that its stock price is 18% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Hormel Foods has a beta of -0.06, indicating that its stock price is 106% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and target prices for The New York Times and Hormel Foods, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

The New York Times currently has a consensus target price of $45.00, suggesting a potential downside of 9.75%. Hormel Foods has a consensus target price of $45.8571, suggesting a potential upside of 0.98%. Given Hormel Foods' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Hormel Foods is more favorable than The New York Times.

Profitability

This table compares The New York Times and Hormel Foods' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

93.4% of The New York Times shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 42.8% of Hormel Foods shares are held by institutional investors. 2.6% of The New York Times shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Hormel Foods shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Dividends

The New York Times pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Hormel Foods pays an annual dividend of $0.98 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. The New York Times pays out 26.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hormel Foods pays out 59.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. The New York Times has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Hormel Foods has raised its dividend for 53 consecutive years. Hormel Foods is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Hormel Foods beats The New York Times on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.