Free Trial
Your $100 Credit Expires Tomorrow! Get MarketBeat All Access
  • 0Days
  • 0Hours
  • 0Minutes
  • 0Seconds
Don't Miss Out
Claim MarketBeat All Access Sale Promotion

Thomson Reuters (TRI) Competitors

Thomson Reuters logo
$85.86 +0.30 (+0.35%)
Closing price 05/22/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$85.85 -0.01 (-0.01%)
As of 05/22/2026 07:39 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

TRI vs. NWS, PSO, MH, WLYB, and WLY

Should you buy Thomson Reuters stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Thomson Reuters with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Thomson Reuters include News (NWS), Pearson (PSO), McGraw Hill (MH), John Wiley & Sons (WLYB), and John Wiley & Sons (WLY). These companies are all part of the "printing and publishing" industry.

How does Thomson Reuters compare to News?

News (NASDAQ:NWS) and Thomson Reuters (NASDAQ:TRI) are both large-cap printing and publishing companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends and risk.

In the previous week, News and News both had 6 articles in the media. News' average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat Thomson Reuters' score of -0.16 indicating that News is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
News
4 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Thomson Reuters
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

News pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Thomson Reuters pays an annual dividend of $2.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. News pays out 10.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Thomson Reuters pays out 76.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Thomson Reuters has lower revenue, but higher earnings than News. News is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Thomson Reuters, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
News$8.45B1.92$1.18B$2.0114.77
Thomson Reuters$7.48B5.01$1.50B$3.4424.96

14.6% of News shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.3% of Thomson Reuters shares are held by institutional investors. 11.1% of News shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Thomson Reuters has a net margin of 19.93% compared to News' net margin of 12.92%. Thomson Reuters' return on equity of 14.99% beat News' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
News12.92% 6.12% 3.70%
Thomson Reuters 19.93%14.99%10.06%

News has a beta of 0.89, suggesting that its stock price is 11% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Thomson Reuters has a beta of 0.8, suggesting that its stock price is 20% less volatile than the broader market.

Thomson Reuters has a consensus price target of $144.84, suggesting a potential upside of 68.70%. Given Thomson Reuters' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Thomson Reuters is more favorable than News.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
News
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Thomson Reuters
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.65

Summary

Thomson Reuters beats News on 13 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Thomson Reuters compare to Pearson?

Pearson (NYSE:PSO) and Thomson Reuters (NASDAQ:TRI) are both printing and publishing companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings and valuation.

Pearson pays an annual dividend of $0.47 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. Thomson Reuters pays an annual dividend of $2.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. Thomson Reuters pays out 76.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Thomson Reuters has a net margin of 19.93% compared to Pearson's net margin of 0.00%. Thomson Reuters' return on equity of 14.99% beat Pearson's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
PearsonN/A N/A N/A
Thomson Reuters 19.93%14.99%10.06%

2.1% of Pearson shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.3% of Thomson Reuters shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Pearson shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Thomson Reuters had 5 more articles in the media than Pearson. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Thomson Reuters and 1 mentions for Pearson. Pearson's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Thomson Reuters' score of -0.16 indicating that Pearson is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Pearson
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Thomson Reuters
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Pearson has a beta of 0.39, suggesting that its stock price is 61% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Thomson Reuters has a beta of 0.8, suggesting that its stock price is 20% less volatile than the broader market.

Thomson Reuters has a consensus target price of $144.84, indicating a potential upside of 68.70%. Given Thomson Reuters' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Thomson Reuters is more favorable than Pearson.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Pearson
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Thomson Reuters
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.65

Thomson Reuters has higher revenue and earnings than Pearson.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pearson$4.72B1.95$441.77MN/AN/A
Thomson Reuters$7.48B5.01$1.50B$3.4424.96

Summary

Thomson Reuters beats Pearson on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Thomson Reuters compare to McGraw Hill?

Thomson Reuters (NASDAQ:TRI) and McGraw Hill (NYSE:MH) are both manufacturing companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, valuation, risk and analyst recommendations.

Thomson Reuters has higher revenue and earnings than McGraw Hill. McGraw Hill is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Thomson Reuters, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Thomson Reuters$7.48B5.01$1.50B$3.4424.96
McGraw HillN/AN/AN/A$1.687.18

17.3% of Thomson Reuters shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Thomson Reuters presently has a consensus target price of $144.84, indicating a potential upside of 68.70%. McGraw Hill has a consensus target price of $20.38, indicating a potential upside of 68.89%. Given McGraw Hill's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe McGraw Hill is more favorable than Thomson Reuters.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Thomson Reuters
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.65
McGraw Hill
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.87

Thomson Reuters has a net margin of 19.93% compared to McGraw Hill's net margin of 0.00%. Thomson Reuters' return on equity of 14.99% beat McGraw Hill's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Thomson Reuters19.93% 14.99% 10.06%
McGraw Hill N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, Thomson Reuters had 4 more articles in the media than McGraw Hill. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Thomson Reuters and 2 mentions for McGraw Hill. McGraw Hill's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Thomson Reuters' score of -0.16 indicating that McGraw Hill is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Thomson Reuters
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
McGraw Hill
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Thomson Reuters beats McGraw Hill on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Thomson Reuters compare to John Wiley & Sons?

Thomson Reuters (NASDAQ:TRI) and John Wiley & Sons (NYSE:WLYB) are both printing and publishing companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings and profitability.

Thomson Reuters has a beta of 0.8, meaning that its stock price is 20% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, John Wiley & Sons has a beta of 0.57, meaning that its stock price is 43% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Thomson Reuters had 5 more articles in the media than John Wiley & Sons. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Thomson Reuters and 1 mentions for John Wiley & Sons. John Wiley & Sons' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Thomson Reuters' score of -0.16 indicating that John Wiley & Sons is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Thomson Reuters
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
John Wiley & Sons
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Thomson Reuters currently has a consensus target price of $144.84, suggesting a potential upside of 68.70%. Given Thomson Reuters' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Thomson Reuters is more favorable than John Wiley & Sons.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Thomson Reuters
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.65
John Wiley & Sons
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

17.3% of Thomson Reuters shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.5% of John Wiley & Sons shares are held by institutional investors. 29.7% of John Wiley & Sons shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Thomson Reuters has a net margin of 19.93% compared to John Wiley & Sons' net margin of 9.24%. John Wiley & Sons' return on equity of 28.38% beat Thomson Reuters' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Thomson Reuters19.93% 14.99% 10.06%
John Wiley & Sons 9.24%28.38%8.24%

Thomson Reuters has higher revenue and earnings than John Wiley & Sons. John Wiley & Sons is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Thomson Reuters, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Thomson Reuters$7.48B5.01$1.50B$3.4424.96
John Wiley & Sons$1.67B1.27$84.16M$2.8714.36

Thomson Reuters pays an annual dividend of $2.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. John Wiley & Sons pays an annual dividend of $1.42 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Thomson Reuters pays out 76.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. John Wiley & Sons pays out 49.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. John Wiley & Sons has raised its dividend for 26 consecutive years. John Wiley & Sons is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Thomson Reuters beats John Wiley & Sons on 14 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Thomson Reuters compare to John Wiley & Sons?

Thomson Reuters (NASDAQ:TRI) and John Wiley & Sons (NYSE:WLY) are both printing and publishing companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends and valuation.

Thomson Reuters has a net margin of 19.93% compared to John Wiley & Sons' net margin of 9.24%. John Wiley & Sons' return on equity of 28.38% beat Thomson Reuters' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Thomson Reuters19.93% 14.99% 10.06%
John Wiley & Sons 9.24%28.38%8.24%

Thomson Reuters presently has a consensus target price of $144.84, indicating a potential upside of 68.70%. Given Thomson Reuters' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Thomson Reuters is more favorable than John Wiley & Sons.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Thomson Reuters
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.65
John Wiley & Sons
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Thomson Reuters has higher revenue and earnings than John Wiley & Sons. John Wiley & Sons is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Thomson Reuters, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Thomson Reuters$7.48B5.01$1.50B$3.4424.96
John Wiley & Sons$1.67B1.30$84.16M$2.8714.76

Thomson Reuters has a beta of 0.8, suggesting that its stock price is 20% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, John Wiley & Sons has a beta of 0.8, suggesting that its stock price is 20% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Thomson Reuters had 5 more articles in the media than John Wiley & Sons. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Thomson Reuters and 1 mentions for John Wiley & Sons. John Wiley & Sons' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Thomson Reuters' score of -0.16 indicating that John Wiley & Sons is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Thomson Reuters
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
John Wiley & Sons
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Thomson Reuters pays an annual dividend of $2.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. John Wiley & Sons pays an annual dividend of $1.42 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Thomson Reuters pays out 76.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. John Wiley & Sons pays out 49.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. John Wiley & Sons has increased its dividend for 26 consecutive years. John Wiley & Sons is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

17.3% of Thomson Reuters shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 73.9% of John Wiley & Sons shares are owned by institutional investors. 16.7% of John Wiley & Sons shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Thomson Reuters beats John Wiley & Sons on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Thomson Reuters News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for TRI and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding TRI and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

TRI vs. The Competition

MetricThomson ReutersMisc. Publishing IndustryManufacturing SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$37.45B$19.88B$4.23B$12.33B
Dividend Yield3.05%3.05%5.93%5.28%
P/E Ratio24.9816.0821.9625.67
Price / Sales5.015.01174.9882.70
Price / Cash13.9713.9755.6856.73
Price / Book3.173.1734.847.14
Net Income$1.50B$1.50B$112.32M$335.80M
7 Day Performance3.78%4.87%1.84%3.02%
1 Month Performance-5.70%-6.40%3.77%2.48%
1 Year PerformanceN/AN/A15.72%35.08%

Thomson Reuters Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
TRI
Thomson Reuters
4.2916 of 5 stars
$85.86
+0.4%
$144.84
+68.7%
N/A$37.45B$7.48B21.1327,100
NWS
News
2.5607 of 5 stars
$29.74
-1.1%
N/A-8.6%$16.28B$8.45B14.8025,500
PSO
Pearson
0.9904 of 5 stars
$14.59
-0.7%
N/A-8.6%$8.82B$4.72BN/A16,665
MH
McGraw Hill
3.8027 of 5 stars
$11.39
+2.7%
$20.38
+79.0%
N/A$2.18B$2.11B6.784,200
WLYB
John Wiley & Sons
1.7216 of 5 stars
$41.45
flat
N/A+1.0%$2.13B$1.68B14.449,500

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:TRI) was last updated on 5/24/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners